Jump to content
  • GUESTS

    If You  want access  to member only forums on FM, You will need to Sign-in or  Sign-Up now .

    This box will disappear once you are signed in as a member.

Walleye bag limit change


Recommended Posts

walleye101

Are Minnesota anglers aware of legislation currently in progress to lower the statewide bag limit from six to four?  I sure don't hear much discussion about it. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Wanderer

The only thing I read on it was there wasn’t a lot of push back from the public due to such a low percentage of people actually catching the 6 fish limit on a routine basis.

Four seemed to be adequate for most.

 

I fish walleyes but it’s not my main target species so I’m not the greatest at it.  The regulation change would rarely affect me.  Really probably never, except there might be a few more in the lake to catch. 

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • l Love It 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
whateverisbiting

I prefer a slot approach seems to be a better balance for the meat eaters and the CPRs.  Also you can bet the meat eaters will just bring their fish to the freezer and go out and get more.  I see people taking limits every day. With the slot there is better compliance.

  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
walleye101

What would be the intended purpose of implementing a statewide slot limit? 

Link to post
Share on other sites
whateverisbiting

I was not suggesting we do that or don't do that state wide.  What I am saying is if there are any restrictions either on a single lake or statewide then my opinion is a slot does more to protect a population.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 'we have more fun' FishingMN Builders
monstermoose78

I say lower the limit to 2 walleyes and first two you catch then you are done!

  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Wanderer

They put slot limits on lakes they actually pay attention to and that get heavy fishing pressure.  Slots aren’t a one size fits all “solution” if you will.  Each lake has different needs.

 

8 hours ago, whateverisbiting said:

I prefer a slot approach seems to be a better balance for the meat eaters and the CPRs.  Also you can bet the meat eaters will just bring their fish to the freezer and go out and get more.  I see people taking limits every day. With the slot there is better compliance.

 

Yah, those folks make me scratch my head. Keep taking until there isn’t any to take anymore.  So a lower daily limit means a lower possession limit.  Maybe harder to make the extras disappear or fewer to send home with every licensed angler that visits.

Link to post
Share on other sites
whateverisbiting

They just implemented slots for northers with 3 zones across the state a few years ago, which is a good case study.

 

The lake I fish is in the region with 22-26" slot but they INCREASED the limit from 3 to 10 with 2 over the slot allowed.  The lake had a few larger northers but most were in the 20-26 inch range.  I LOVE the slot; fish are clearly shifting larger with many more between 26-30".  Larger fish means more eggs which means more fish.  It works.  Plus compliance is higher because you can get caught on the water with an illegal fish.  You don't get caught with over limit in your freezer. 

 

Hasn't helped the perch population at all they are thick but too small to be worth keeping been that way forever.  Hope that will change.  Eyes are super fat though!

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 'we have more fun' FishingMN Builders
monstermoose78
50 minutes ago, whateverisbiting said:

They just implemented slots for northers with 3 zones across the state a few years ago, which is a good case study.

 

The lake I fish is in the region with 22-26" slot but they INCREASED the limit from 3 to 10 with 2 over the slot allowed.  The lake had a few larger northers but most were in the 20-26 inch range.  I LOVE the slot; fish are clearly shifting larger with many more between 26-30".  Larger fish means more eggs which means more fish.  It works.  Plus compliance is higher because you can get caught on the water with an illegal fish.  You don't get caught with over limit in your freezer. 

 

Hasn't helped the perch population at all they are thick but too small to be worth keeping been that way forever.  Hope that will change.  Eyes are super fat though!

Except on Mille Lacs lake the jumbo perch are almost gone

Link to post
Share on other sites
whateverisbiting

Probably because people can't keep eyes so they are taking home perch.  It's a clear pattern for area lakes that a lake has a hot bite with good year class it gets hammered for a couple years then they move on to the next bite after depleting the fish.  For 3 years I watched 50 boats cruising outside the cabin at night.   Last year no one one the lake they depleted the eyes. A slot would eliminate this problem.  No matter to me I switched to bass and northern. 

Edited by whateverisbiting
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 'we have more fun' FishingMN Builders
monstermoose78
1 hour ago, whateverisbiting said:

Probably because people can't keep eyes so they are taking home perch.  It's a clear pattern for area lakes that a lake has a hot bite with good year class it gets hammered for a couple years then they move on to the next bite after depleting the fish.  For 3 years I watched 50 boats cruising outside the cabin at night.   Last year no one one the lake they depleted the eyes. A slot would eliminate this problem.  No matter to me I switched to bass and northern. 

No the perch being eaten by eyes they say

Link to post
Share on other sites
walleye101

Interesting that folks are suggesting slot limits or even lower bag limits as solutions to a problem that has not been identified.  DNR fisheries "supports" this bill, but did not initiate it because they would be required to show need and reasonableness for the change. Showing need seems like a pretty reasonable requirement rather than arbitrarily reducing harvest opportunity.

  • Thumbs Up 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
whateverisbiting

Actually I already addressed this but will state it more directly.  Having a slot state wide ensures we maintain a stable population of fish in each lake that cannot be removed.  It takes a long time for a lake to recover a species once it gets overfished and this is not just the big lakes and it is happening all over the place.  Upper Red Lake is good case study (I can cite case studies of smaller lakes as well but won't to protect those lakes).  Though to be honest I loved the HUGE crappies that was a unique opportunity and I was quite disappointed when they turned it back into another me too walleye lake so I have not been back since.  So, to what I said earlier, I see the value of it but there are trade-offs and I don't necessarily agree or disagree to it.  Once you remove one species another will take over and personally I am not that picky so I adapt.  If I were focused on walleye I would have a different view.

Link to post
Share on other sites
walleye101

Minnesota's best walleye fisheries are anything but stable populations. These populations are constantly cycling with new robust year classes recruiting to the fishery every few years. Harvest of excess spawning stock actually stimulates frequent strong recruitment. The closest thing we have to stable walleye populations are lakes dominated by old fish with low to moderate recruitment replacing natural mortality from the aging population. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
whateverisbiting

I fully agree that lakes go through cycles but that negates nothing I said.  MNs best walleye fisheries are that way because they have a slot.  Rainy, Winnie, Leach, Mille Lacs, and Red were destroyed and the slots brought them back.  Lake of the woods a slot was put in before it got depleted and that fishery is awesome so easy to catch a limit there and a great mix of small fish and jumbos...just a matter of time for other lakes.  Can you be more specific what lakes you are referring to that have just large fish and no slot?  If it is not one of the well known lakes be careful if you name it here its fished out in 3 years if it does not have a slot guaranteed.

Link to post
Share on other sites
walleye101

At the risk of sending this thread further off the rails, let's talk "slots".

There is nothing majic about a protected slot limit (PSL). It can be a useful tool if your spawning stock NEEDS some protection, or if there is demand for growing larger fish.  All of the lakes you mention have had a PSL in the past, and some still do.  The most used PSL originally, protected all fish from 17-26 inches, because that protection covered almost all the mature females in a population (and lots of mature males). The thought at the time was that if some spawners are good, more is better, or at least can't hurt.  Wrong!

Almost all those lakes have since adjusted those PSLs, or eliminated them. Red closed the fishery during restoration, then used the PSL while spawning stock still NEEDED some protection. Upper Red has since abandoned the PSL all together for much less restrictive, one over 17", or 20" regulations. Both allow considerable harvest of spawners. The other lakes mentioned have all experienced some stockpiling of excess spawning stock and suppression of new year classes, causing managers to make multiple adjustments to allow more harvest and free up productivity.

Lake of the Woods, which you didn't mention started out with a 19.5-28" PSL to be more compatible with Ontario's regulation (50cm). That worked out well because it allowed considerable harvest under the PSL, reducing spawner density before they grew into the PSL.  Finally there's Mille Lacs which has continued with very restrictive harvest regulations, currently with a closed summer season, no PSL, but insted a two inch harvest slot limit.  Lot's of large fish, an abundance of spawning stock, but recruitment of new young fish has been dismal. 

Now can we get back to discussing why a statewide bag limit reduction applied across all Minnesota walleye lakes, natural or stocked, makes no sense? 

 

 

 

  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Similar Content

    • smalljaw
      By smalljaw
      After more than a year, thankfully we have been allowed to return to our Rainy Lake home.  Hopefully the travel bans will not be repeated.  Fall fishing is as good as it gets.  Walleye and bass are making their fall transition and are schooled up.  Find the right spot and let the party begin!  Thanks to Muskies for feeding my addiction while I was stuck in the U.S.  If you can get to Ontario, come now!



    • MinneapolisTransplant
      By MinneapolisTransplant
      Living in SW Minneapolis, and have gotten back into fishing after many years away (guess COVID was good for something). I mostly fish in Bde Maka Ska (formerly Calhoun) and other urban lakes because I can get to 'em and get out on the water under pure human power (not opposed to electrics or real boats, just can't afford 'em). Most times out I'll get bass or northerns... but no dang walleye, despite all the fry that DNR pours in there. In fact, I've been living in Minnesota for 3 years now, and from the BWCA to the southern lakes, I have never gotten a walleye to bite, be it leech, jig, dropshot, or crankbait. Which tells me I need to quit trying on my own and get on the water with somebody who knows what they're doing.
       
      I'm pretty flexible about timing; can even do some weekdays if we plan in advance. Would love to meet others who fish my local lakes, but at this point, I'll happily travel to learn the mysteries of the 'eyes. If you're looking for another partner or just like to spin yarns, I'll listen and bring along some brews and gas money for your troubles.
       
    • AlanS
      By AlanS
      Hey all,
       
      I am new here obviously, but I recently learned how many fish the DNR kill off every year with those surveys. I've never started a petition for anything before, but here's my attempt to get that to stop. https://www.change.org/KillingFishMN
       
      This is not about the big lakes. To me it is the same as trying to manage deer by digging a pit in the woods to see what falls in and dies- Wisconsin pretty much gave it up and we should as well.
       
      I know some DNR guy is going to get on here and say it is for consistent data, and that it only happens every few years on the smaller lakes. It should not happen at all. Every 10 years and the best fish in the lake might still be dead in that net, just to have a fancy survey. Heres what a survey should look like. https://dnr.wi.gov/lakes/lakepages/LakeDetail.aspx?wbic=967200
       
      If there are already petitions and groups out there trying to change this I would like to get involved,
       
      A
    • macgruber
      By macgruber
      Heading up this weekend to camp at onegume with the family- wife and two kids under 10, and the dog.  Just looking for tips on where fish might be found/best tactics this time of year.  I’ve never been to the area and would love to try for some walleye, but with kids, panfish might be the better option as patience tends to run a bit short at times.  I have a 16’ flat bottomed alumacraft, so won’t be venturing out on the big lake, just looking for a few ideas to keep the kids engaged and maybe have one small fish fry.  Thanks in advance for any help!
       
    • CigarGuy
      By CigarGuy
      The tournament yesterday looked like the walleyes were tight lipped. Almost half of the 125 boats didn't weigh a fish. Looks like I'm not the only one struggling. I don't know if I'm allowed to post the results. I'll let someone else do it, if it's ok.
    • SkunkedAgain
      By SkunkedAgain
      The Timberjay recently had a typical article about the Hatchery in operation in Pike Bay. It reminded me that they did not strip eggs last year due to Covid, and there was some discussion about how this would affect the lake's walleye population. I did a little digging last night into the annual growth of walleye in Vermilion and found that it takes somewhere in the 3-4 year range to reach eater-size range. That means that the "covid experiment" won't be real noticeable until the end of this season when walleye start reaching double-digits in length but most likely 2022 when those walleye are in the 10-14 inch range.
       
      From the Lake Vermilion Fisheries Management Plan (https://files.dnr.state.mn.us/publications/fisheries/special_reports/183.pdf
      Besides abundance, differences between walleye captured in East and West Vermilion are most evident in age and size structure. Overall, walleye in West Vermilion tend to grow faster and live longer than walleye in the east basin. For example, by age-5, walleye captured in East Vermilion average about 16 inches compared to 18 inches in West Vermilion. Walleye on Lake Vermilion can survive to age-8 or older, however older walleye (age-7+) tend to be more abundant in West Vermilion.
       
      I figure that Lake of the Woods is similar in latitude to Vermilion, so probably similar growth rates.
       
      From the Lake Of The Woods section of the DNR website: (https://www.dnr.state.mn.us/areas/fisheries/baudette/low_walleye.html#:~:text=Generally%2C walleye in Lake of,male walleye are sexually mature.
      Generally, walleye in Lake of the Woods reach 12 inches long when they are three years old. Male walleye start to mature when they are 12 inches long, 3 years old, but it is not until they are 16 inches long, 5 years old, that all male walleye are sexually mature. Male walleye longer than 24 inches are extremely rare.
       
      Female walleye grow faster than male walleye, after they are three years old. Female walleye start to mature when they are 4 years old, 15 inches long, but all of them are not sexually mature until they are 7 years old, 20 inches long. Generally, female walleye which are 25 inches long are about 10 years old, and 30 inch females are in the range of 20 years old. The oldest Lake of the Woods walleye we have aged was a 23 year old female which was 30.3 inches long.
    • walleye345
      By walleye345
      Hello I am looking for a weight system to help me catch more fish.  I am torn between Snakebite Snaps and Offshore Snap Weights.  They are 2 very different clips. Anyone know anything about either?  Was looking to grab some here soon.  


    • tbetts1000
      By tbetts1000
      What is the best chip option for Vermilion. I am getting a new Lowrance HDS and need some guidance.
    • lakesareaoutdoors
      By lakesareaoutdoors
      Fished Lake of the Woods yesterday during this tropical heat wave.. I'll tell you what, if you're planning on fishing in these temps, bring backup gear for your essentials (Heat, Auger, etc). Doing this was key for us yesterday when the buddy heater hose was acting up due to the cold. We had a fun day! Check out the video below:
       
    • whateverisbiting
      By whateverisbiting
      Just wondering when jigging for eyes in the winter, why is the standard to tip a jig with a minnow head and not the whole minnow or the minnow tail?  Would seem like a more natural presentation to tip with the tail and not the head.  Anyone experimented with this?
  • Your Responses - Share & Have Fun :)

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.