• GUESTS

    If You  want access  to member only forums on FM, You will need to Sign-in or  Sign-Up now .

    This box will disappear once you are signed in as a member.

  • WE CREATE LONG TERM, MEANINGFUL RELATIONSHIPS IN HERE ... PLEASE JOIN US.

    You know what we all love...

    RECEIVE THE GIFTS MEMBERS SHARE WITH YOU HERE...THEN...CREATE SOMETHING TO ENCHANT OTHERS THAT YOU WANT TO SHARE
    When you enchant people, you fill them with delight and yourself in return. Have Fun!!!

Sign in to follow this  
grizzald

I got the deer facts

Recommended Posts

grizzald

I finally received deer harvest information for zone 424 from the DNR a few days ago. I knew the numbers were gonna be down but not this bad. The harvest chart went back 13 years with 1996 being the best year with 2,257 deer taken in 424. Here's the kicker, in 2006, there was a total of 495 deer taken in 424. It's been a stedy decline since '96. Now this includes all three choices of wepons combined. Now granted we had that bad winter in '96 killing a lot of fawns in our area, but we havent had a bad winter since and numbers SHOULD be on the rise. I feel the main factor is way to much hunting pressure. One hunter does not need to take 3 three deer in a season. Thats just over doing it, especially in a area that doesnt have any deer left. What got me was in a email I received from the DNR they stated that "we no the numbers are low in 424, and we may take action in future years". Why not take action now! It's only gonna get worse from here on out until something is done.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Whoaru99

And to think 2006 was a record harvest overall. Some areas must have done REALLY well. From what I saw in zones 424 and 416, the pickings were pretty slim in the areas I could hunt.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
jlm

Griz, I highly recommend that you call and speak or email the DNR regarding your findings. There are some major DNR brass that visit this site from time to time as well, hopefully they see your post and look into this. One thing for sure, do not jump to conclusions until all the information ouot there is know. Has the number of hunters been steady since that time, has land been locked up by private owners, etc. Could be lots of explantions. I am not trying to get your goat, just trying to be objective. Sounds like you are passionate regarding your hunting area!!! Great to hear. What do you think would be beneficial as far as management goes?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
sweept

Where do you guys find the info for your area? Our group hunts 416 and we would like the info also.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Jameson

Some of my hunting is in 428. I recently was told that a farmer less than a mile from where I hunt found a coyote den last year with 24 fawn skulls/ skeletons outside of the den. Of course I missed the only darn coyote I seen this season. Do you see many coyotes in 424?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
BLACKJACK

You know I've been hearing this 'xxx fawn skulls in coyote dens' story a lot, its almost becoming one of those urban internet myth stories. I'd like to see some pictures, some proof rather than the same old retelling.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Whoaru99

I've not seen the skulls, but LOTS of scat in the areas I hunt. Saw only one coyote off stand and flushed one out on a push - hear them fairly often though. FWIW, the (few) gut piles we ended up with went largely untouched during seasons as best I could tell.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
dstrey

They usually leave the gut piles untouched for a while anyway. They dont like all the human scent around the pile.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Jameson

Sorry, I had never seen it on the web before. I usually believe things that farmers in overalls out in the field tell me. Those farmers....I thought there might be some exaggeration to it! crazy.gif

I saw 11 total deer during my 428 rifle/muzzy hunting this year. I think 3 were yearlings, 2 were bucks. With the neighbor getting another buck. I think that 3 of 12 ratio is OK. But of course would always like to see more deer! Get them yotes!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
lcornice

Quote:

Quote:

Where do you guys find the info for your area? Our group hunts 416 and we would like the info also.


This is a much better link for deer harvest information. It breaks it down in a bunch of different ways: 2005 Deer Harvest Report

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
BLACKJACK

Interesting report!!! Two numbers that I found interesting:

1) There were 59,000 All season licenses in 2005 and they shot 33,000 deer. When people start talking about deer numbers being down, they blame the All-season license "people are shooting 2 or 3 deer". The numbers don't substantiate that.

2) The 4A vrs 4B harvest numbers show that more deer are generally shot during the first, shorter season. I would have thought that it would have been the other way around, more days to hunt in the second season would equal more deer shot.

When do the 2006 numbers come out?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
lcornice

Quote:

Interesting report!!! Two numbers that I found interesting:

1) There were 59,000 All season licenses in 2005 and they shot 33,000 deer. When people start talking about deer numbers being down, they blame the All-season license "people are shooting 2 or 3 deer". The numbers don't substantiate that.

2) The 4A vrs 4B harvest numbers show that more deer are generally shot during the first, shorter season. I would have thought that it would have been the other way around, more days to hunt in the second season would equal more deer shot.

When do the 2006 numbers come out?


I think I can answer both questions;

1) All-season hunters don't shoot any more deer per person than other hunters. In both cases, about 75% of hunters shoot 1 deer, 20% shoot 2 deer, and 5% shoot 3+ deer. The issue with the all-season hunters is that in lottery areas, they can take up to 3 antlerless deer. That'll likely change this year. But, to sum it up, giving people more tags does not generally increase the deer harvest. Yes, we all know people who kill 3 deer; however, you'd be comparing an individual against the population. While an individual kills 3 deer, the population only kills 1.

2) 4A has more hunters and gets 'first crack'. With the advent of the all-season and multi-zone license and youth being able to hunt both 4A and 4B, about 80% of hunters have the ability to hunt in 4A. So, the majority of harvest occurs in 4A. Actually, if you break the harvest down by day, it looks the same as Zone 2. What I mean is 60% of the harvest happens the first weekend and 40% the rest of the season. The percentage of daily harvest looks identical between zone 2 and zone 4A/4B.

As for harvest, the total is now on the DNR website. I can't tell you when the full harvest report will be available.

2006 Total deer harvest

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
wallegator

Quote:

I think I can answer both questions;


lcornice,

I responded to a statement about antler point restrictions, I was under the impression they were being tested as a tool that could be used to control population, by replacing the harvest of yearling bucks with does. It seemed most people think the restriction is just for trophy hunters, could you clear this up?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
lcornice

Quote:

lcornice,

I responded to a statement about antler point restrictions, I was under the impression they were being tested as a tool that could be used to control population, by replacing the harvest of yearling bucks with does. It seemed most people think the restriction is just for trophy hunters, could you clear this up?


You're correct. APR's, earn-a-buck, and early antlerless seasons are being tested as population management tool with a benefit of maybe saving a few bucks. They are currently not being evaluated in Minnesota primarily on the merits of saving bucks. However, if the shift is made to antlerless harvest and proper population management is the result, the by-product is a buck gets to live longer (see my comment about hunters only shooting one deer). In areas where doe harvest is not a concern (e.g., most of zone 4), the issue of antler point restrictions gets a little tougher to institute. In those cases, you're telling hunters they can't shoot a doe (if they don't have a tag) but you're also telling them they can only shoot a certain type of buck. With short seasons in some areas (which happen to be the same areas with limited doe harvest), you may have a situation where a person has no opportunity to harvest any deer. I think the last thing anyone wants is to design a regulation that encourages people to quit hunting. So, the current research project is designed to evaluate alternative deer management strategies that 1) lower populations, 2) have broad hunter support. Saving a few bucks may be a positive byproduct of sound population management.

I'm not sure if I've answered your question or generated a bunch more smile.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
wallegator

lcorice,

Thanks for the response, that is what I thought, nice to know I am on the right track.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  

Announcements



  • Your Responses - Share & Have Fun :)

    • jhousenga
      59 crossing Daisy Bay Friday night. 67 in Big Bay this afternoon.
    • monstermoose78
      The stearms in the arrowhead are small very small I would recommend a 6 foot or short rod for most streams as you will be pitching your bait out. They are also over grown with brush wading these streams is a challenge. You will be fishing for mostly brook trout above the first posted boundary FYI it’s normally a large water fall but not always. Also the first week of June there will not be much from the lake to the first posted boundary anyways. Remember there special regs below the first posted boundary and the above the first posted boundary.  If you want to use your fly rod I would hit the small trout lakes in the area. A split shot and small chunk of crawler is my go to bait for Brookies. There are a few streams with some browns and rainbows but very few. If you are fly fishing look at Thompson lake by  devilstrack lake it’s catch and release. Mink lake, kimball lake are also good. 
    • Squirrelhawke
      Growing up in South Dakota I did quite a bit of fishing in the black hills for browns and rainbows, most of that fishing was best accomplished with a long pole and just drifting my bait down the stream if you can read the eddies and slacks in the water you should do fine.  Of course I'm assuming they bite the same up north as they do out west.  It was a kick when I went  back out there 2 years ago and on Sunday morning fished the little 6 ft wide stream running behind the campground, all the other campers were amazed that I would pull out a fish about every 20-30 ft no monsters but plenty of little beauties at 7-10 inches. If the water is clean and the fish are there you just gotta find out what they are eating at that time of year.  Hopefully this helps and if I'm wrong some of the guys with Minnesota experience will pipe up. 
    • Squirrelhawke
      I do a bit of fishing from the coon rapids dam on down to 694 and I usually bring 2 rods because I lose at least one lure to the rocks. Bear that in mind and also realize that there are nice smallies, eyes and cats in that stretch of river. I also had over 3 feet of pike eat my stink bait I had out for channel cats. If I didn't have a circle hook on it would have been a nice pic to share. Good luck and hope to hear of some good luck. 
    • delcecchi
      It would take a lot of code to make multiple windows tiling the screen work, would be my guess, and would create few additional sales so isn't worth the expenses.    Just pick up an inexpensive 5 to 7 inch unit and use it for the map.   
    • Wanderer
      You look like the Phantom Fisherman - except the toes.  Or maybe the River Detective  🕵️‍♂️ Gotta love those good runs in short times!   
    • Bryan P
      Awesome Eyeguy! That is a good run of smallies there. I like your spot, that was my favorite fishing stretch for them when I lived in St cloud. Mississippi is such a great smallie fishery. Im blessed to live right next to it too. Now lets get the current to go down some! 
    • eyeguy 54
      I LOVE SMALLIES !  LOL  I am blessed to live close to so much fun. 
    • pikeandchester
      Spent a couple hours on Elysian this afternoon.  Drove around some shallow areas on the south east end of the lake with the trolling motor and only saw carp. Water is still unusually clear for this lake, at any time of the year, and 79 degrees near shore. May be a great opportunity for a bow fisherman, even in the daylight. Tried soaking minnows in a hole on the north end with no luck.
    • Fully Kraeusened
      My choice would be Namakan, but honestly that’s mostly based on emotion. It’s where my dad and I fished the most while up there. I also think it’s prettier than Kab.  I’ve never been on Sand Point or Crane. Just my two cents. I’ll be up there one week from today. Staying on the Ash River if anyone would care to enjoy a cold one first round is on my buddy. 😁