Jump to content
  • GUESTS

    If You  want access  to member only forums on FM, You will need to Sign-in or  Sign-Up now .

    This box will disappear once you are signed in as a member.

One of the absolute best trail cam pics I have ever seen


Mark Christianson

Recommended Posts

I got this from a coworker.

Here is the story that was with the email:

Here's a pretty cool picture from one of my customers. He went to change the disc in his camera he has set up by his deer stand. He had a buck decoy set up nearby to lure them in, but the decoy was about 50yds from where he left it, and was wedged in under a pine tree.

So, he changed the disc, and looked at the pictures. He was there at 12:30 this past Monday, and the camera got this shot 25 minutes earlier!

copyofcdy0031medium5gw.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

man does he look pissed! sweet picture.... i bet your buddy wishes he had been there to "protect" his decoy!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thats why you invest in a cuddyback trail cam! There worth every penny of the $400 That picture is priceless!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice Buck...Isthis the only trail pic of this buck? Would like to see more? Has he seen it since?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am trying to dig for more info on this thing.

Its a co-workers, uncles customer.... Catch that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK-

Hate to be a naysayer here but I don't buy it.

1st- How does a trail camera work? Number one is motion. That one is no problem with me. The camera detected motion of a deer and took a photo.

2nd- Time delay between photos? Here's where I'm sketchy because of my unfamiliartiy with digital trail cameras. How quickly would you time a digital to take photos? Every 5 seconds, 10 seconds, 30 seconds, 50 seconds, 1 minute, etc...

Maybe I'm right, but I'm probably wrong. I want to see the before and after photos of this "sequence" of photos or else it is BS. There is no way that buck could have "snuck in" on the decoy, attacked it, and then had the photo taken at that exact moment of disgust. If photoshopped, I commend the author.

Please prove me wrong because that is an awesome shot! I can believe alot of things but I can also believe that camera snapped a shot as that deer was coming into view and than waited another minute to shoot another shot, thus missing the shot we see here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can see your skepticism.

I am not 100% sure about it either.

But owning several cameras this is VERY possible.

Digitals are slower to react. Period.

If that buck was staged out to the side of the pic or even straight out aways, once he makes his move to attack, he aint gonna tip-toe in and then attack. He is gonna come full steam. By the time digitals get the motion sensed so it can power up the camera, a couple seconds can pass easily. Then it takes several seconds for the camera to take the second shot. This deer would be way out of the frame for a second pic if he was running.

I think its real. He has the aggresive look. Ears back, snot stream coming out of his nose(yes, I had to shrink the photo size to post it), and his body position is clearly on the move.

I agree, its an awesome pic and if it is fake, crap. But if its real, WOW!

If its fake, I still give it a WOW!

Here is a perfect example of "How did this deer get in such perfect position to get a photo?" I have no flippin clue, but I gaurantee you I didnt photoshop this one. And its the only pic I got of this deer during this event.

dsc0032medium8bl.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another thing to note is the stakes on the decoy.

They are definitely bent and even blurred from what looks to be the motion of the decoy moving upwards.

If it is photoshopped, the bent stakes are a good call for the editing.

Looking at this pic, that would be the most fabulous full body mount EVER including the decoy. If I take out my entertainment center, this would look pretty awesome there. grin.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

BLB-

I do value your judgement as you are definitely at the top of the heap here as far as trail camera photos go.

Thats why I DO believe the photo is real. (and simply an awesome one at that!!)

On the otherhand, I do know what I can do with Photoshop if I REALLY feel like it and know that a photo like this could be duplicated with alot of effort. Being that it was sent to you via e-mail from a friend (Hate to say it but we all know how e-mail works), I become a wee bit leary of it.

With that said, I'd love to see it proved one way or the other. I also agree with the other points you just mentioned as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If its fake, I will go and punch my co-worker in the neck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One thing I noticed was the cuddeback logo on the bottom right screen of the picture... does it show on every picture or is it taken off from the cuddeback website?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would hate for it to come to that man. grin.gif

Quackaddict9- I agree as well and was one of my first thoughts. Do all CuddeBack cameras produce an image like this one. Whether it is photo #1 or photo #99.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

BLB,

I just hope your co-worker isn't elderly......."today in the news an elderly parapalegic was punched in the neck for now apparent reason"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LMFAO

Hey Quack

I wondered about that too, and I went to the Cudde website and didnt find this particular pic.

They have pics from users posted there that also have that emblem. So I figured it must be some logo that goes on the pics. Some of the posted pics didnt have it either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow I want to buy one of them decoys just see that in real life. grin.gif Then shoot the S.O.B that brakes my decoy. ha ha ha ha ha ha ha grin.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All I can add to this is that I've had a doe archery target completely destroyed by a buck. I didn't see it, but the head was at least 30 feet away and the body was pushed along the ground about 20 feet. Horn marks indicate he spent quite some time at it. There were clear bite marks too. Guess she didn't perform for him? Still no way to treat a lady.

Craig

Link to comment
Share on other sites

well, I found this picture on the cuddeback website.. not sure if your co-worker got this picture, or put it up on the site? confused.gif still a great picture though!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yepper.

I just got word from my neighbor that he got this pic via email a week before I got it.

I will be punching my co-worker in the neck for sending an internet favorite. Flippin jerk!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I cant believe poeple thought that was a real photo. grin.gif Its an obviouse fake, and a bad one at that. It is pretty funny though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm gonna send it to all my customers and give the story that its mine. laugh.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I showed my kids the picture last week and they thought it was great. Then we were in Grand Rapids for Thanksgiving and they told me they saw the same exact picture on a news broadcast from a station out of Duluth I believe.

Wish we knew the origin.

ccarlson

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Your Responses - Share & Have Fun :)

    • JerkinLips
      41.6°F in Stuntz Bay Thursday morning.  Left my boat in the water to hopefully fish more before the lake freezes.  Caught four 9-11" walleyes in 2½ hours before I gave up due to the strong west wind.  Water level has not gone up more than a couple of inches at the most.  May be a good winter to jack my boathouse out of the water on the deep end.
    • Troy Smutka
      The calendar migrators from the Dakotas have been passing through central MN in trickles the past few weeks, and the recent cooler weather has some Canada ducks starting to show up. We have been harvesting mallards, pintails, gadwalls, wigeon, shovelers, greenwing teal, canvasbacks, redheads, bluebills, and ringnecks in decent numbers.
    • SkunkedAgain
      It doesn't look like the lake level has gone up at all. I was up a week ago and struggled to get my boat in and out of the public landing on the west end of Head O Lakes. I used my paddle to push the boat further out to deeper water. I could hear the hull moving over the sandy/muddy bottom near the launch.
    • JerkinLips
      Pretty tough.  Was catching about 2 walleyes per hour and the biggest was only 13".  Back up Thursday so I hope I have better success.
    • smurfy
      the kid and I always check our stands prior.......i'll go back to check the conditions of said stands before he gets there to see what we need. while i'm at it if i can i shoot at grouse with shells that appear to not have bb,s in them!!!!🙄
    • LakeofthewoodsMN
      On the South Shore...  With unseasonably warm weather, there are still some anglers hitting the water and most have been rewarded.  Limits of walleyes and saugers being caught, and the forecast looking ahead is favorable. The best bite on the south end of LOW has been in 22-28 feet of water. Water temperatures are dropping and as the temps cool further, the bite has been excellent.     Vertical jigging with frozen emerald shiners has been the program for most anglers.  Bring plenty of bait, as you’ll need to sort through some smaller fish and short biters.  Plenty of eater fish to be had, just have to do a bit of sorting.  Anglers are also reporting very good numbers of jumbo perch and occasional pike mixed in with the walleyes.     For those fishing structure, if you slide up on top of a rock pile, don't be surprised to catch a big smallmouth bass, there are plenty around.   This week’s hot colors have been gold, gold/glow white, gold/chartreuse, gold/orange, and gold/glow white/pink.     One tip, a stinger hook on your jig will catch you more fish if you start missing too many fish. On the Rainy River...  Bait dealers are reporting good numbers of shiners in the river this past week.  Interesting, each night is different.  Some areas have the small shiners called pinheads.  Other areas have the larger minnows.     The river is producing some nice walleyes in various spots from Four Mile Bay to Wheeler's Point, to Baudette all the way to Birchdale.  There are 42 miles of navigable Rainy River from the mouth to Birchdale with plenty of public boat ramps along the way.     Walleyes are being caught in various depths, but 15-25 feet of water has been good.   Jigging with live or frozen emerald shiners has been highly effective. Some anglers are also trolling crankbaits to cover more ground and find fish. Both methods are producing solid results. Sturgeon fishing has been strong.  The catch-and-release sturgeon fishing is open into the spring when it changes to the "keep season" on April 24th. Up at the NW Angle...  Fall fishing continues to be excellent. Points, neck-down areas with current, shoreline breaks, and transition zones from rock to mud are all productive locations for walleye right now.   It is traditionally a mixed bag up around the many islands in this part of the lake and this fall is no different.  In addition to walleyes, pike, jumbo perch, and crappies are in the mix.  A jig and minnow has been the most effective presentation. Good muskie fishing is the norm during the fall of the year and area reports have been good.  In addition to casting, trolling shorelines, points and neckdown areas has been effective.  Muskies are often targeting schooling tullibees this time of year. The weather forecast for the next couple of weeks is conducive for fall fishing.  If you don't deer hunt, or if you have harvested your deer, consider some bonus walleye action before the ice forms.  The bite continues to be excellent.    
    • leech~~
    • gimruis
      I'm not one to leave that to chance the day I need it.  I always check on my stands prior to the season.  Just like I always shoot my rifle before the season and I always run my outboard motor before fishing opener.  Too many things to go wrong without confirming it ahead of time.   I guess it could have been beavers but the house itself didn't appear nearly big enough along one ditch.  It was about the size of chair.  I've seen beavers houses many times before and they appear much bigger than that.
    • leech~~
      Good thing you made a check run.  That would have really suked walking into opening day.  Why do you think muskrats and not beavers?  
    • gimruis
      Well I checked on stands over the weekend.  Kind of a disaster.   All the ditches are plum full and twice as wide becauase muskrats have clogged an area.  I spent an hour unclogging it and the water is slowly moving again, but our bridges and planks were underwater.  The back portion of the land where the best stand is was inaccessible.  Hopefully that changes by Saturday.  I have a feeling the muskrats are just going to clog it back up again.   Tons of standing corn still too.  They've started on it, but being so wet now with more rain coming, whatever's there will remain there for the foreseeable future.   All the grassland is completely flattened like a pancake due to 3-4 inches of heavy wet snow.  That eliminates about 75% of the pheasant habitat in this spot.  Total buzz kill.  And this specific spot was one of my better producers last season because the grass was intact and lush through December last year.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.