• GUESTS

    If You  want access  to member only forums on FM, You will need to Sign-in or  Sign-Up now .

    This box will disappear once you are signed in as a member.

  • Join In - We Share Fishing Reports & Outdoor Information Here

     
      You know what we all love...

      The same things you do!!!! Share what you love & enjoy in the outdoors as well as thank those whose posts you 'appreciate.'

      Have Fun!!!

Sign in to follow this  
Guest

An Agreement has been reached

Recommended Posts

bigeyes

Well it is not great, but I am ok with it. Guess things will really depend on how the bite is next year. Another year like this one could mean really tight restrictions or no fishing on the back end of this 5 year deal. I wonder if the tribe is banking on that?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beckman

This works for me. I just wonder if this really will be a 5 year plan. Remember the last agreement was supposed to be long term and it barely lasted a year.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I Like Worms

I don't really see a change. How is this a good deal? So the min. size increased from 16" to 17" with no bottom, but really, who is going to keep a eye less then 14 inches? Still can't keep anything between 17-28. I just don't see how this is such a better deal. someone please explain if I am totally wrong here.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
tjhunter

I caught a lot of walleyes that were just under the 14" mark last year. Not that I wanted to get a limit every time out, but it got a little frustrating throwing back a fish that was just a 16th of an inch short. Not too mention that as long as the public sees this as a positive move, it'll bring more people up there and help out the local economy.

tjhunter

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beckman

This same slot has been in place on Rainy, Winne, and various Canadian lakes for a while now. It has proven results for these waters, granted not all lakes are the same, but it seems like the right kind of plan to me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ds

All I know is that next spring when they survey me at the landing, I didn't catch a **** thing out of the slot. That 10% mortality they hit you with is a bunch of BS

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
kwkfsh

There has been alot of talk here that the tribe has been trying set quotas in order to hurt the resorts so they can buy them out. I do not know whether or not this is true and not trying to pass judgement. What everyone needs to remember is that they are now a business and a big one at that. If you want to get their attention it will have to be done with dollars, either putting into the till or taking out. Well taking out is alot cheaper than putting in! I have an idea that may or may not work but is sure worth a try. The casinos at millelacs and hinckley are always having concerts, these are not put on out of the goodness of their heart. They are done to generate revenue as in cold hard cash. The casinos know that each person who attends will spend a certain amount of money and they have this figured out to the penney. My guess is that they generate in the $200 per seat range. (Tickets, meals, drinks, and gambling) Now it would be very tough to keep 500 or 1000 people away from a concert. But if all the members of this site were to send a E-mail to a performer saying if they play that venue they and all of the friends and family would stop paying to see or hear them perform. That performer would back out of that concert date faster than you would beleive. If this could be done just a couple of times I believe that you would have the tribes full and undivided attention. Also word would get around entertainment industry real fast that a booking at a Millelacs band casino generates thousands of peices of ex-fan mail. And no entertainer would want to deal with that. As everyone knows a lack of money can have a powerful effect on ones state of mind!!! Believe me if one concert were to be canceled and hundreds of tickets refunded it would get their attention fast, just think of the pain in the *** it would be to do all those refunds and field all the calls from angry customers. Gives me a warm fuzzy just thinking about it. grin.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest

I agree in principle kwkfsh! I don't mind the regs and think the DNR is doing an acceptable job managing the lake given the situation. I do not think the band should be able to harvest ANYTHING unless they use birch-barks to do it or they can follow the same regs we all follow. Hey Mille Lacs Band the time IS coming when you won't be able to have your cake and eat it too!!! The time is long overdue for us to write government offices and DEMAND a change! If the tribe wants walleye then they can afford to buy them with the casino revenue.

Man, I feel better now with that off my chest!

[This message has been edited by chiro (edited 12-04-2002).]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest

Good idea KWFKSH. I'm sure your idea would work! You're a clown!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
kwkfsh

But you did mean clown? Hey I resemble that remark!!! grin.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
bigeyes

ds, if the article is correct it lists 260,000 pounds attributed to mortality, and list 4,000,000 pounds caught, that means mortality rates were about 6.5% and that sir I belive to be pretty accurate. I think most people would agree that this is reasonable. I do not like the fact that we only got to keep 86.6% of our harvest was wasted though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
avrg.joe

ds, I'm with you. The DNR asks me what I have caught, I'm telling them "just whats in the boat, thats it".

GOOD LUCK!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ds

maybe the mortality rates are close, but I think the DNR way underestimatest the population of the walleyes. Just remember this phrase (Honestly everything I caught is in the boat.)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest

I like kwkfsh's idea!
It would work and also put the band way back in the profit category! I LOVE IT! grin.gif

------------------
FISHSTUNNER

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest

I've been a life long fisherman on Mille Lacs and have seen it go through the cycles over the years, the only real difference in the fishing is the pressure and arming bad fisherman with good equipment that's why the catch rates have gone up! Now onto the indian issue, I have no problem that they want treaty rights as long as they want to abide by the entire treaty which I'm sure many of you have read. It defines what is considered legal and illegal (aka what is considered illegal for the natives, gas motors ect,) but they seem to forget about this part of the treaty. Now we sportsmen in Minnesota can talk until we are Blue in the face about how pissed we are the the Native's up there. The best way to get back at them is to NOT go to that **** casino no matter how bad you like to gamble like me. I haven't been into see the Devil since they got their initial treaty rights back. That means BOYCOTT Grand Casino Mille Lacs and Hinkley and any other business they own or have an interest in. Some of you like to talk smart in the local pubs, but then when you drive by the parking lot there's Your Truck in the Devils Pen. If you have to gamble either get a game going in your shack or head up to your favorite watering hole and do a little chartible gambling for a local youths sports team.
Hopeful the only prefishing post, hoping for drivable ice by the 20th.
keep it real
Da biggest shooter

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
huskminn

I really don't see the sense in this new agreement, unless the DNR is expecting the fishing (catching) to seriously decline over the next 5 years. If fishing remains as good as it has been for the last 3-5 years, this plan gets us no where.

Does everyone remember how many 16 1/4" fish you caught last open water season? And how hard was it to catch a slot fish? Once the 16"-17" fish are harvested, there will be few left in the 14"-17" range because they were cleaned out this last summer.

The DNR must have a lot of faith in the big perch hatch....they are banking on the fact that the walleyes will have so much to eat that fishing will be poor. If fishing is poor, then those 16"-17" fish will carry sport anglers for a year.

Long term, I think this agreement does little for sport anglers, little for the local economy and perhaps little for the walleyes. As all of these larger fish begin to die off, what will replace them?

There is continued evidence that the DNR is unwilling to promote the radical changes necessary to allow the lake to be managed biologically, not politically.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest

All the talk about fish mortality reminds me of my trip to mille lacs this summer. My group of 3 and another small group went out of a resort I will keep nameless. When fish in the 18-21 inch range were hooked deep and it was obvious they were going to die, the guide insisted on keeping them for that reason. I personally didn't think the risk was worth it so the other group kept the non-legal fish but I think the guide had a point. If there was only some way where fisherman could keep fish that were going to die anyway...but that would be way too subjective

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I Like Worms

I couldn't find it, but I know somewhere on this forum someone posted an idea of a total length limit. I really think its a good idea. Say the limit is 50", if I got 2 24 inchers, I was basically done. Or a couple 14's and a 20. Bottem line is, if you get that one 18-20 that is hooked to deep, you would beable to keep it.
critics would say you'd get guys that would catch 3 fish, go back put them in their car and go out for more. Well the same guy that would do that will do it anyway.
Wouldn't, couldn't something like a total length limit work?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beckman

To all those who insist that the slot fish had been 'cleaned out' last summer. Talk to some people who were out there this fall, alot more of those slot fish were showing up, despite a pretty tough bite. So they haven't all been caught. Remember many of the 18-25" fish were slot fish once as well and enough of those seemed to make it. I don't understand, before people were complaining about having a harvest slot over a protected slot, now we will have a protected slot and many people are still not happy. The fish are not starving anymore and people are still claiming the lake will crash. I'm convinced that no matter what is done, there always will be a very large group of Mille Lacs anglers who will be complaining about one thing or another. Like I said it seems to work for Rainy, Winnie, Lac Suel etc... why not use this slot on Mille Lacs? It's time for me to shut up and fish now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest

Southwest F Man
Ponder this.
I grew up in (and learned to fish in) a state where it was ILLEGAL to "release" a fish that was "mortally hooked". If the fish would obviously not survive, that one had to be kept and counted against your daily limit. Amazing at least one DNR in this nation had some COMMON SENSE eh?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
huskminn

Beckman,

I was one of those people who claimed the lake was going to crash due to an over-representation of large fish in the walleye population. The massive perch hatch seems to have replenished the prey fish numbers and the walleyes will eat well for a while now. Was I proven wrong? So far, it seems that I was. That's the first mistake I've made this year! wink.gif We'll see how many of those new perch reach keepable size.

I have only been seriously fishing Mille Lacs for 4-5 years. Over that time, it seems that the DNR's main management concern was picking a harvest slot drawn from the year classes that have the smallest representation in the overall population. In other words, to keep harvest down, they let us keep fish from year classes that are already relatively low in population.

I see the "new" management plan as an attempt to achieve the same results as previous plans. Kind of a "We'll let them fish, but they ain't keeping much" approach. Within the constraints of the current system, that's fine. That's all they can do.

My point is that for the long-term future of the fishery and, accordingly, the Mille Lacs economy, the DNR needs to aggressively try to remove the Band from the management equation. They have not done so and are afraid to try.

Although other large walleye fisheries have a similar protected slot plan, none of them get the pressure that Mille Lacs does. None of them have another management team indiscriminately harvesting 50,000 lbs. of fish. None of them have the same level of economy relying on the fishery.

You're right.....someone will always complain. I'm not complaining that I can only keep fish under 17".....I am complaining that the DNR has once again struck another "deal" that is nothing more than a continuation of the policy that has been in effect since the court ruling.

According to the DNR, that policy gave us 260,000 lbs of crayfish food last summer. Is that acceptable?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest

From what I understand and have read, The DNR's goal in setting the slot is to have the fish that consume the majority of small baitfish removed from the lake. The smaller walleyes are the ones that eat the majority of small baitfish. Notice how the perch numbers are almost completely shot? Those big walleyes gobbled the perch up and now the goal is to bring back the baitfish by harvesting the small walleyes that consume them. This is not factual, just what i read. It makes sense though right?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  



  • Your Responses - Share & Have Fun :)

    • redlabguy
      I haven’t seen many posts lately which means I’m not the only one struggling to find fish. I ventured out of Frazer into Big Bay today and fished 20 fow on a shore line pulling a spinner/crawler  at 1 mph and got a limit of nice fish in a half an hour. They hit almost as soon as I got the bait to the bottom. Just me and the lab- - otherwise, we would’ve put a lot more fish in the boat. It was the third place I tried. It’s good advice to fish where you see fish on the sonar.  RLG
    • yoppdk
    • srj
      Sounds like a great time, Hoey. Keeping active with old friends is really important...……….as I have advanced well past "middle age", most of my friends I fished/hunted with have either died or quit the outdoors pursuits. Bummer. However, Thursday I head to Morson with one of my remaining partners to spend a few days at his place at Sportsmans Landing, always a good time. That part of LOW is really fun! Endless rock humps to fish, and little traffic. A couple years ago, I got my bud into jigging raps and similar lures. Big fun jig rappin the sand flats in that area. And usually, we catch a few crappies for a great meal. One observation  after many years of fishing LOW north and east of Big Traverse involves the rock humps.....anyone with thoughts on this, please weigh in. In big Traverse, the rock bite peaks in July and slowly peters out. There are still good days, but by late August, you have to run and gun to find fish on the rocks. However, in Sabaskong, Little Traverse and areas north and east of Big Traverse, the rock bite stays very strong. On Whitefish Bay, my best rock fishing was the last couple weeks of August. My thought is it is because of the pressure on  the US side and the lack thereof on the Canada side. Opinions? Good luck.
    • Borch
      I was fishing 18-25 fow.  I cruised several humps that topped out around 17-20 fow and found fish on about 1/2 of them.  I only fished spots I marked good numbers of fish on them.   By horizontal I mean either making long cast and snapping the jigging rap back sharply or trolling 1- 1.2 mph and having enough line out that there would be a little slack before my next snap of the rod at that speed/depth.  You don't feel the hit.  The fish is just there on the next snap that then turns into a hook set.   I've also fished them vertically but many times the more horizontal presentation works better.  At least for me.   I caught fish on both 7&9 sizes.  But the 7s are easier on my arm with repetitive snapping of the rod.  These fish heavy and I've fished them like this in more than 30 feet of water. Metallic perch was the best color for me this weekend followed by rainbow trout or chartreuse.   Even caught several pike and crappies doing this type of fishing.  Moonshine shiver minnows work well too.  They get the nod when there is most on the bottom.  They fish cleaner that the jigging raps. 
    • delcecchi
      when was the most recent time it started normally?   You did start mixing oil in gas when you disconnected the injection system, right?    
    • opsirc
      I have a 1984 40hp evinrude, when to start this year after it has been sitting for 5yrs. It was drawing so much juice that it melted one one the terminals off. The only thing different is I disconnected the oil injection system because it was in constant alarm. Did this after talking to the service dept at a outboard motor dealership. Everything else is the same, when i parked it would turn over with no problem, now hard turning. Anyone have idea i am out of them.   Thanks
    • Rick
      The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources has confirmed a report of a zebra mussel in East Silent Lake in Otter Tail County.  A property owner contacted the DNR after finding a one-half inch zebra mussel attached to a native mussel near a dock in about two feet of water. DNR staff conducted follow-up searches of more than 1,500 objects in East Silent Lake and found no additional zebra mussels. The lake will be added to the infested waters list, because the DNR verified the initial report. The lake will be monitored for additional zebra mussels. “It’s helpful that lake users are being vigilant and are contacting us when they suspect they’ve found a zebra mussel,” DNR invasive species specialist Mark Ranweiler said. “We ask people to keep the specimen and send us a photo, to assist with identification and confirmation.” Whether or not a lake is listed as infested, Minnesota law requires boaters and anglers to: Clean watercraft and trailers of aquatic plants and prohibited invasive species. Drain all water by removing drain plugs and keeping them out during transport. Dispose of unwanted bait in the trash. Some invasive species are small and difficult to see at the access. To remove or kill them, take one or more of the following precautions before moving to another waterbody: Spray with high-pressure water. Rinse with very hot water (120 degrees for at least two minutes or 140 degrees for at least 10 seconds). Dry for at least five days. Zebra mussels can compete with native species for food and habitat, cut the feet of swimmers, reduce the performance of boat motors, and cause expensive damage to water intake pipes. People should contact an area DNR aquatic invasive species specialist if they think they have found zebra mussels or any other invasive species. More information is available at mndnr.gov/ais. Discuss below - to view set the hook here.
    • Lohmwil
      Hey Borch, What do you mean by horizontal presentation for jigging raps?  How deep were the mid lake humps you were fishing?  I've been experimenting with jigging raps this year and have caught some on them, but not a lot.  One final question, I've been using size 7.  What were you using?  THANKS.
    • Borch
      The eyes I got from 11 - 11:45 am.  The gills and crappies from 2:30 - 4:30 pm.  We did a picnic lunch and a boat tour of the lake as it was Wanda's first time on Osakis.   The panfish bite was very good.   Enjoyed our time as well.   Was hoping to see you before I went to get Wanda and left active fish. 
    • Rick
      The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources has confirmed a report of zebra mussels in Eagle Lake in Kandiyohi County.  A property owner contacted the DNR after finding a one-half inch zebra mussel on the north side of Eagle Lake. DNR staff conducted a two-hour snorkel search and found one additional zebra mussel on a settlement plate attached to a dock. The lake will be monitored for additional zebra mussels. “It’s helpful when lake users contact the DNR if they think they’ve found a zebra mussel or any other invasive species,” said DNR invasive species specialist Eric Katzenmeyer. “We ask people to keep the specimen and send us a photo, to assist with identification and confirmation.” Whether or not a lake is listed as infested, Minnesota law requires boaters and anglers to: Clean watercraft and trailers of aquatic plants and prohibited invasive species, Drain all water by removing drain plugs and keeping them out during transport, and Dispose of unwanted bait in the trash. Some invasive species are small and difficult to see at the access. To remove or kill them, take one or more of the following precautions before moving to another waterbody: Spray with high-pressure water. Rinse with very hot water (120 degrees for at least two minutes or 140 degrees for at least 10 seconds). Dry for at least five days. Zebra mussels can compete with native species for food and habitat, cut the feet of swimmers, reduce the performance of boat motors, and cause expensive damage to water intake pipes. People should contact an area DNR aquatic invasive species specialist if they think they have found zebra mussels or any other invasive species. More information is available at mndnr.gov/ais. Discuss below - to view set the hook here.