Jump to content
  • GUESTS

    If You  want access  to member only forums on FM, You will need to Sign-in or  Sign-Up now .

    This box will disappear once you are signed in as a member.

Wright county: annandale boat inspection program will harm local economies


Recommended Posts

Here is a link to the latest on The Wright County AIS program. 
http://www.co.wright.mn.us/CivicAlerts.aspx?AID=1057
It is dead for now. They may try to spin this in the future, so watch for other clever ways they will try to privatize the lakes. 
See the full board discussion in the video replay, the boat inspection topic starts at 1:49:50 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is a link to the latest on The Wright County AIS program. 
http://www.co.wright.mn.us/CivicAlerts.aspx?AID=1057
It is dead for now. They may try to spin this in the future, so watch for other clever ways they will try to privatize the lakes. 
See the full board discussion in the video replay, the boat inspection topic starts at 1:49:50 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

These guys talked about an educational program, but last single site inspection program was not an educational program. It was mainly designed to restrict boat access to special lakes. If they wanted a individual inspection program it could be done through adult education systems in the county.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/25/2019 at 8:12 AM, MinDak Hunter said:

I’ve been to a bunch of these meetings and according to the Wright Co. SWCD the DNR is required by law to ratify the plan once it comes together and meets the requirements in State Statutes. I haven’t looked it up myself but that’s what was told to the Commissioners. 

From my understanding of the situation, The DNR has final veto power over whatever the county does in regard to county AIS programs funded with state tax dollars. No county AIS program that fails to meet DNR approval can be implemented. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 'we have more fun' FishingMN Creators

Please contact  your state representative as the program has been added as an amendment legislatively of the senate floor 4/23 without any committee input or discussion and was pass by the senate.  It will be voted on soon by the house.  This totally works around the dnr management or input.  Follow Facebook link for more information. 

 

 https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=2382782005285036&id=1593672207529357

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 'we have more fun' FishingMN Creators

Here is the language from the bill.

FB_IMG_1556192455440.thumb.jpg.f5b0eb45e32faafcfcc08448d94fb625.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yikes:  is there an easy way to email all the reps without clicking individually on each rep?  Or are y'all just emailing the rep from your district?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 'we have more fun' FishingMN Creators

Here is a link with information for members who are on the Environment and Natural Resouce Policy committee. 

 

https://m.facebook.com/groups/1501474759942534?view=permalink&id=2183284585094878

 

They will have input that the house members will likely consider. 

  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks Borch:  this helps!

I emailed the whole committee--hopefully one of them sees the ridiculousness in this.

Basically:  

1.)  the DNR set up a pilot.  

2.)  The DNR analyzed their results and refused to enlarge the scope of the pilot

3.)  Legislature will, if passing this amendment, force the DNR expand a program that their own conclusions did NOT support expanding.  (* this is the time to insert your own clever comments about government doing stupid things contrary to evidence...)

 

Anyone that enjoys using the numerous MN lakes with public accesses NEEDS to take an active roll in this--let's overwhelm the server with emails from concerned fishers!; If we don't, I worry more and more lakes (associations) will place more and more barriers (in the "name" of AIS) to practically make the public lakes private...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am an out of state fisherman that enjoys Minnesota fishing.  I'm there several times a year and spend plenty of money there.  I understand AIS but there is no proof it is coming from boats and not waterfowl.  This is an economy killer.  If it becomes a chore to go fishing people will go elsewhere and take their money with them.  Wisconsin has great fishing too, but I love MN.  If it becomes work I'll seek Wisconsin Lakes. Keep after em guys and good luck.  You have out of state support as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All -

 

The Wright County Coalition of Lake Associations is the big supporter of this regional inspection program.  They just sent out another "canned" email for all members to send to Senator Bruce Anderson and Representative Marion O' Neill.  Hopefully this link will take you to the canned email.  Respond as you see fit.

 

http://www.congressweb.com/mlra/45/

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What a crock of s#*t.  Their purported success of catching 18 contaminated watercraft entering already infested lakes is laughable!  If you want to stop the spread of AIS inspect the boats as they LEAVE infested waters.  This is nothing more than a ploy by lake assn. members to restrict activity on “their lakes”.

  • Thumbs Up 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now Bruce Anderson is pushing a omnibus bill that will give money to fund the complete program. Call your congress people. Vote NO,  Why should people in outstate Minnesota pay to keep people from enjoying our public waters.

  • I Like it 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...

Pulaski Lake is getting harder for fishing people to get on during the weekends, The locally paid crew will give you a hard time about a eel grass leave that was left on the trailer after going through the Decon site at Clearwater lake. 

 Yet the big ski boats don't get a second look as they are new and pretty. Gee nothing but water in the bulk tanks for making high wave for their spoiled rats to pretend they can surf. I am streamed about our treatment to go out fishing the walleyes and bass.  yet almost get ran over by the tri-toon rigs with the 300hp motors. 

 

Seems the game warden Ricky is scared to really do anything, the lake wright sheriff boats will steak out  west and east sylvia, don't have to put up with the rich mommys sitting in court to waste everyones time. I saw so many boating rules busted on Sunday had I been able to write tickets My wrists would still be in a ice packs. 

12 yr old kids driving personal watercraft( jetskies).  others jumping wakes of ski boats, and somepeople just being brain dead. or drunk.  The fishing can be really go early morning and later evenings.  When you find the Crappies several have been over 14 Inches.  trolling walleyes after dark has always been good. But watch out those jet skies flying across the lake after sunset, in the dark.  Slow trolling plugs is getting nice fish.  Be safe, but catch them now as the lake group are looking for ways to TRY and keep the anglers off THEIR lake.  GRRRR

 

  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Never had any trouble trying to get on pulaski,then again I usually stay away once the water warms and the crowds come out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jigginjim, I hear ya.  That sort of behavior from what I like to refer to as "recreational riff raff" seemingly never ends for most of the summer when its a nice day out.  I'm kinda surprised people are skiing/tubing/wakesurfing already though because the water is barely 60 degrees.

 

This is what I do in the summer to avoid them: go early in the morning and be outta there before noon, go when its inclement weather (rain or at least overcast, but not in a storm obviously), or stay home.  Not only that, but if you try to get out there when its raining or at least cloudy, the fishing is often better anyways.

 

In my opinion, the wake surfing boats are becoming the most intolerable.  They create massive waves that destruct and erode shorelines.  And they seem to just cruise past within casting distance of the boat like they're not causing a problem either.

  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Noticed yesterday the orange signs that indicate a herbicide/pesticide was sprayed went up at the landing on a lake near Buffalo.Wright County lakeshore owners care so much for the lakes they have them sprayed with chemicals that kill things...

  • Thumbs Up 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In my opinion, the wake surfing boats are becoming the most intolerable.  They create massive waves that destruct and erode shorelines.  And the home owners of lake Pulaski are all up in arms because many people want a no wake zone, Yet the wake surfing boater on the refuse to think about the shoreline,  the millionaires don't care about you rock wall.  I have money I'll rebuild mine (without a DNR permit). Saw that last summer, 3 home owners put sand blanket on their beach no permit, but dnr tagged 4 shoreline owners, The 4th person never asked for it.

 These people have not clue about the damage their $60,000 toys are causing.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Your Responses - Share & Have Fun :)

    • LakeofthewoodsMN
      On the South Shore...  The focus for many this week is the ongoing deer hunting season which is a big tradition in these parts, even for avid walleye anglers.  There were some that either already harvested their deer or are more into catching fall walleyes than hunting.     Those that are fishing are taking advantage of the unseasonably warm weather and excellent walleye and sauger bite that is happening across the lake.  Cold weather is in the forecast in the upcoming days and weeks so that is also getting many excited. The best depths on the south end of LOW are 22-28 feet of water.     Vertical jigging with frozen emerald shiners is catching most of the walleyes, saugers and jumbo perch.  Depending upon where on the lake you are fishing, some slots and big trophies are in the mix as well, but most reports are talking about good numbers of eaters.    Jumbo perch are coming in good numbers this fall which will serve ice anglers well.  Watch out for an occasional pike or even lake sturgeon mixed in with the walleyes.      There are good numbers of walleyes and saugers across the south shore which is setting up nicely for early ice.   On the Rainy River...  There continues to be good numbers of shiners in the river, and consequently, there are good walleyes in the river as well.     Walleyes along with saugers, pike and some sturgeon are coming in up and down the river.  Most walleyes are being caught in 10-25 feet of water in various stretches of the river.   Jigging with live or frozen emerald shiners is the key. Some anglers are also still slow trolling crankbaits upstream to cover more ground and find fish. Both methods are producing solid results. Sturgeon fishing remains strong.  The catch-and-release sturgeon fishing is open into the spring when it changes to the "keep season" on April 24th. Up at the NW Angle...  As temps are getting colder, most are in the woods hunting and not fall fishing, however, for those who bundle up, fishing continues to be excellent.     A nice mixed bag with walleyes, saugers, perch, pike and crappies being caught. Very good muskie fishing with the colder water temps and shorter days.  Some big fish and some good numbers are being caught amongst the islands.  Both casting and trolling is getting it done.  
    • gimruis
      I hunt in the rifle zone so I don't have a need to use a shotgun to hunt deer, but I would be looking at this if there was ever a need to.   There could be state legislation introduced next summer that eliminates the shotgun zone completely.  It has bipartisan support.  Wisconsin removed theirs years ago and MN is usually later to follow.  They've tried to pass it more than once and it came up just short both times.  Probably just a matter of time.
    • Wanderer
      Oh, h e l l no! 
    • leech~~
      Screw that, here's whatch need!  😆   Power-Shok Rifled Slug 10 Gauge 766 Grain Grain Weight: 766 Shotshell Length: 3-1/2in / 89mm Muzzle Velocity: 1280
    • Wanderer
      20 ga has become a real popular deer round in the last 5 or so years.  The rifled barrels are zinging those sabot slugs with rifle like accuracy out to 100 yards easily.  Some go so far as dialing in for a 200 yard shot but really, by 150 they’re falling off pretty low.   I have a single shot Ultraslug in 20 ga that shoots really well at 100 yards.  Most everyone I know that has bought a slug gun lately has gotten the Savage 220 in 20ga.  Problem can be finding the shells you want.
    • leech~~
      My son always bugs me about getting a nice light over-under 20ga for grouse hunting.  I say Heck no, I'm getting a 3 1/2" 10ga so I can put as much lead in the air that I can!!     So, I'm keeping my 12ga.  
    • 11-87
      That’s almost exactly what I was thinking.  Have slug barrels for both   One for turkey and one for deer.      I have a 20ga mosseberg as well. (Combo came with the scope but never used.   I always liked the 12 better
    • leech~~
      Wanderer is right on the money and covered it well.  I was wondering too if you had a slug barrel for one of your guns?  If so you could make that your slug gun with a scope, and the other your turkey gun with the Red dot.  As you can afford it. 
    • Wanderer
      Kinda depends on if you want magnification or quick target acquisition.   More magnification options and better accuracy with a scope.  You get what you pay for too so get comfortable with a budget for one.  Tasco and Bushnell work but I find they lose their zero easier, have low contrast and don’t gather light well in low light conditions.  That said, I’m still using one I haven’t replaced yet.  Vortex has been the hot brand for the past several years for bang for the buck.  Good products.  Nothing beats Swarovski though.  Huge dough for those.  Burris is another decent option.   There are some specific models for shotgun/slug hunting in the economy brands and bullet drop compensation (BDC) reticles.  Based on experience I’d recommend not falling for that marketing ploy.   Red dots are usually lower magnification and easier to get on target.  Reasonably accurate but don’t do well with definition, like searching the brush for your target.  I put a HAWKE red dot on a .22 for squirrels and it’s been good.  For turkey, that’s probably the route I’d go.     If your slug shots are normally not too far and too brushy, I’d think a red dot could work there too if you’re only buying 1 scope.  You’ll be better off dimming the reticle to the lowest setting you can easily use to not over shine the target and get a finer aim point.   If you don’t have a slug barrel, you might appreciate one of those.  I had a browning with a smoothbore slug barrel that shot Brenneke 2-3/4 inch well.  The 11-87 would well fitted with a cantelever rifled barrel. 
    • 11-87
      Looking for recommendations on scope or red dot    I basically hunt turkey and whitetail, live in southern MN. So it’s all deer/ shotgun    looking to add a scope/ red dot as my eyes don’t work like they used to to with the open sights.    my gun options are 11/87 12. Browning BPS 12    not looking for the most expensive or the cheapest    pros and cons of one over the other
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.