Jump to content
  • GUESTS

    If You  want access  to member only forums on FM, You will need to Sign-in or  Sign-Up now .

    This box will disappear once you are signed in as a member.

Searching for walleyes


BobT

Recommended Posts

When fishing for walleyes on open water I have a reputation for working an area to death. I'm interested in what others do. When seeking out walleyes, how much time do you spend checking out a particular area/structure before moving on?  What tactics/methods do you find successful?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I never leave fish to find fish. So if I am working structure and it doesn't have fish I am moving on.  You can easily cover a lot of ground in open water so I just move and explore until I start seeing fish.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a hard time with relying on electronics to determine there are fish present. I don't have side imaging so the amount of water I might be looking at is going to be extremely narrow. 

Case in point. This weekend I was sitting over 12' of water along a weed edge. Looking at my sonar one would be led to believe there were no fish in the area however, when I lowered my camera lens down and looked around I could see schools of crappies. I'm betting I could only see about 10' or maybe 15' of distance with the water clarity and amount of light penetration under the ice. 

One of the reasons for using out-riggers or planer boards is because it is felt that the fish will move out away from the boat as it passes over and the planer boards puts the lures in front of them. Doesn't this also suggest that not seeing fish on the sonar does not mean they are not there? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with you BobT.  And will add, when Walleye are sucked to the bottom in structure, I have yet to find electronics that show them consistently.  I just started using Jigging Raps recently, and that is my search lure now.  They seem to trigger fish to bite, sometimes can turn a school of fish on to biting that were otherwise negative.  Can cover ground pretty quick with a Jigging Rap to find those positive biting fish.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 If I pull up to a spot that I know well and see fish , yes I will work it good , and if no fish show on electronics , that's usually not a deal breaker for that spot for me , as I will definitely give it at least a once or twice over also , with trying a quick few presentations...  this especially holds true in shallow water , as the boat itself will cause fish to somewhat scatter .... I too will not leave fish to find fish , usually a change of color and/or presentation will trigger some more fish to bite ... patience is important to me , 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess it just depends on how confident you are with your electronics. I will agree it may be hard to see fish sitting in a weed line etc or to get target separation between what is a rock boulder or fish etc. With advancements in DI and SI as well as things like the new Panopix its getting much easier to differentiate now.  And sonar angles and directions are much wider so its getting easier to cover a lot of water. 

Still have to get them to bite though.

I find now days I almost have more fun just watching the map chip and looking for new structure and areas to target than I do fishing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Okay, so you pull up to a spot (point, hump, inside turn, flat, or whatever) how much time do you spend working it before you decide nothing is going to happen and move on? This is where I get my reputation. I keep thinking, they can turn on at any minute and of course it'll be right after I leave. 

I remember one day about five years ago I was fishing with some buddies on Vermillion. We were sitting the narrows in front of the boat launch at Moccasin Point. Every once in a while a sheet of ice would float through so we had to move to avoid it. At one point, since there wasn't too much happening, my fishing partner and I decided to work our way around the island in front of Moccasin Point so we come in behind the ice sheet that was floating through. Naturally, when we finally came around the other boats with us couldn't help but to tell us how the fish turned on during that half-hour while we were gone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I'll usually check 4-5 spots and if no fish anywhere I'll go back to spot #1 and start over.  Can usually find something along the way.  Small areas get about 15 min.  Long, large areas will get one pass up and one back.  Then move on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 11 months later...

I'm with you Bob - I never have enough confidence in my electronics (or advanced enough side imaging, etc) to be 100% confident there are fish so it's tough to fully embrace the "never leave fish to find fish" motto if I'm not sure there are fish. 

 

While it's not scientific, I think sometimes it's six one way a half dozen the other way when it comes to staying another 15-30 minutes at a spot vs. trying the next spot. If you're on a body of water with a handful of key spots you typically hit, it's impossible to know if you're better served to wait it out on a good spot with fish or go look elsewhere. 

 

To an extent it depends on personal preference, but generally speaking it sounds like you're thorough enough and I do think that is a smart approach as opposed to burning gas and burning time running too quickly from spot to spot rather than grinding out a bite. 

 

Not too helpful, but for what it's worth I can relate to your question / dilemma. 

  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Your Responses - Share & Have Fun :)

    • Kettle
      Walked today and yesterday, flushed 9, shot at two and got two. Hopefully next year I'll have a dog to hunt with. Still warm up here, skim of ice on ponds. Weather has been nice. Hopefully walk a bit more the next few weeks. Been pretty cautious walking for birds to not interfere with deer hunters. There sure are not the deer hunters there used to be 
    • LakeofthewoodsMN
      On the South Shore...  The focus for many this week is the ongoing deer hunting season which is a big tradition in these parts, even for avid walleye anglers.  There were some that either already harvested their deer or are more into catching fall walleyes than hunting.     Those that are fishing are taking advantage of the unseasonably warm weather and excellent walleye and sauger bite that is happening across the lake.  Cold weather is in the forecast in the upcoming days and weeks so that is also getting many excited. The best depths on the south end of LOW are 22-28 feet of water.     Vertical jigging with frozen emerald shiners is catching most of the walleyes, saugers and jumbo perch.  Depending upon where on the lake you are fishing, some slots and big trophies are in the mix as well, but most reports are talking about good numbers of eaters.    Jumbo perch are coming in good numbers this fall which will serve ice anglers well.  Watch out for an occasional pike or even lake sturgeon mixed in with the walleyes.      There are good numbers of walleyes and saugers across the south shore which is setting up nicely for early ice.   On the Rainy River...  There continues to be good numbers of shiners in the river, and consequently, there are good walleyes in the river as well.     Walleyes along with saugers, pike and some sturgeon are coming in up and down the river.  Most walleyes are being caught in 10-25 feet of water in various stretches of the river.   Jigging with live or frozen emerald shiners is the key. Some anglers are also still slow trolling crankbaits upstream to cover more ground and find fish. Both methods are producing solid results. Sturgeon fishing remains strong.  The catch-and-release sturgeon fishing is open into the spring when it changes to the "keep season" on April 24th. Up at the NW Angle...  As temps are getting colder, most are in the woods hunting and not fall fishing, however, for those who bundle up, fishing continues to be excellent.     A nice mixed bag with walleyes, saugers, perch, pike and crappies being caught. Very good muskie fishing with the colder water temps and shorter days.  Some big fish and some good numbers are being caught amongst the islands.  Both casting and trolling is getting it done.  
    • gimruis
      I hunt in the rifle zone so I don't have a need to use a shotgun to hunt deer, but I would be looking at this if there was ever a need to.   There could be state legislation introduced next summer that eliminates the shotgun zone completely.  It has bipartisan support.  Wisconsin removed theirs years ago and MN is usually later to follow.  They've tried to pass it more than once and it came up just short both times.  Probably just a matter of time.
    • Wanderer
      Oh, h e l l no! 
    • leech~~
      Screw that, here's whatch need!  😆   Power-Shok Rifled Slug 10 Gauge 766 Grain Grain Weight: 766 Shotshell Length: 3-1/2in / 89mm Muzzle Velocity: 1280
    • Wanderer
      20 ga has become a real popular deer round in the last 5 or so years.  The rifled barrels are zinging those sabot slugs with rifle like accuracy out to 100 yards easily.  Some go so far as dialing in for a 200 yard shot but really, by 150 they’re falling off pretty low.   I have a single shot Ultraslug in 20 ga that shoots really well at 100 yards.  Most everyone I know that has bought a slug gun lately has gotten the Savage 220 in 20ga.  Problem can be finding the shells you want.
    • leech~~
      My son always bugs me about getting a nice light over-under 20ga for grouse hunting.  I say Heck no, I'm getting a 3 1/2" 10ga so I can put as much lead in the air that I can!!     So, I'm keeping my 12ga.  
    • 11-87
      That’s almost exactly what I was thinking.  Have slug barrels for both   One for turkey and one for deer.      I have a 20ga mosseberg as well. (Combo came with the scope but never used.   I always liked the 12 better
    • leech~~
      Wanderer is right on the money and covered it well.  I was wondering too if you had a slug barrel for one of your guns?  If so you could make that your slug gun with a scope, and the other your turkey gun with the Red dot.  As you can afford it. 
    • Wanderer
      Kinda depends on if you want magnification or quick target acquisition.   More magnification options and better accuracy with a scope.  You get what you pay for too so get comfortable with a budget for one.  Tasco and Bushnell work but I find they lose their zero easier, have low contrast and don’t gather light well in low light conditions.  That said, I’m still using one I haven’t replaced yet.  Vortex has been the hot brand for the past several years for bang for the buck.  Good products.  Nothing beats Swarovski though.  Huge dough for those.  Burris is another decent option.   There are some specific models for shotgun/slug hunting in the economy brands and bullet drop compensation (BDC) reticles.  Based on experience I’d recommend not falling for that marketing ploy.   Red dots are usually lower magnification and easier to get on target.  Reasonably accurate but don’t do well with definition, like searching the brush for your target.  I put a HAWKE red dot on a .22 for squirrels and it’s been good.  For turkey, that’s probably the route I’d go.     If your slug shots are normally not too far and too brushy, I’d think a red dot could work there too if you’re only buying 1 scope.  You’ll be better off dimming the reticle to the lowest setting you can easily use to not over shine the target and get a finer aim point.   If you don’t have a slug barrel, you might appreciate one of those.  I had a browning with a smoothbore slug barrel that shot Brenneke 2-3/4 inch well.  The 11-87 would well fitted with a cantelever rifled barrel. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.