Jump to content
  • GUESTS

    If You  want access  to member only forums on FM, You will need to Sign-in or  Sign-Up now .

    This box will disappear once you are signed in as a member.

Recommended Posts

I'm planning a fishing trip to Vermilion this summer. It's been many years since I've been up there.

I have the Navionics + app on my mobile devices and have been marking spots that look interesting.  One of the spots I marked was a nice hump surrounded by deep water. There was a big difference between the Navionics Nautical Chart view and the Sonar Chart view. It literally disappeared on the Nautical view but showed on the Sonar View. I then ran the map "update all" and from the Sonar view now it was gone from both views with my marker out in the middle of nowhere.

So I started to look around for other areas that showed a big difference between the two views. (Many areas however do look very similar on both views) I've attached a couple of screen grabs of a spot that has a huge difference. This is on the north side of Pine Island near Matson Island.

The first is the Nautical Chart view, The second is the Sonar Chart View.

I always thought that the Sonar Chart would be the most accurate, they look more detailed, plus according to Navionics the Sonar Chart is "constantly being updated by Sonar Logs contributed by million of boaters."

I'm not really sure if I can trust either?

To anyone who knows this part of the lake, are there really the holes and humps in this area?  One view shows a 52' hole where the other has 15 FOW.

 

navionics.jpg

sonar.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know that part of the lake fairly well. The Sonar chart is definitely better but I'm still surprised at how inaccurate it is. There are humps etc but they don't have them in the right places.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sonar chart is going to be more detailed (obviously). As far as accuracy it’s pretty spot on the most I’ve found navionics to be off is a foot or two usually on steep breaks or humps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow, I just replicated what you show, and I can confirm the same results.  I did not expect that much of a difference.  Crazy.

  • Yayyyy 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I also replicated the differences on my Navionics.  I don't know what to trust now.  I was in 48 FOW on Burntside last weekend and my Navionics said I was in 74 FOW, and I wasn't on a sharp break.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

JL, I’ve fished burtside multiple times and have noticed that it seems to be off all over the lake. That’s the only place I’ve noticed it though.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The sonar chart that shows 52 feet is totally wrong!

Probably more like 15' to 20' depth.

The Navionics  is probably closest to correct.

Cliff

  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not seeing that when I switch it to sonarchart. I don't have navionics + app though just regular old navionics. For what it's worth I've always been on the navionics setting when I use the phone app on the lake and it's mostly spot on. Actually didn't realize sonarchart existed until now

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, KirtH said:

If you see any issues with mapping follow this link they are very good at fixing issues. 

http://navionics.force.com/PlugPlay?cancel=http%3A%2F%2Fnavionics.force.com%2Fkb&l=en

I actually did follow up on that same  Navionics mapping discrepancy report earlier today. I sent them the same images that I posted here.

More or less just curious to see what the response would be.

It is interesting to see that community sonar readings can be used to improve mapping software but it looks as though it's not quite perfected yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have had the app for several years.  The first thing I noticed on the old app, was a series of trenches in North Niles Bay.  I skeptically went out there first thing to check it out and found nothing.  A few years later, their update corrected the issue. Found many other inaccuracies since then.   I would give the app low marks for accuracy but good marks for functionality.  It is a serviceable for scouting, navigating and marking your spots.  I do use it on ice.   I heard that Garmin did a full lake survey last year.  I am looking forward to their product.   It should be good.  

  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Garmin acquired Navionics last October.  That could mean some improvements in the future.

If you have the plus version of the app you can get the updates. Every few days I hit update all.

It just about always has an update to download. If Garmin just completed a survey of Vermilion maybe Navionics will become more accurate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have the LakeMaster chip on my Garmin GPS.  It doesn't have increments finer than 5 feet but does seem to be accurate.  Anybody else have an opinion on the LakeMaster maps?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My brother has one in his lowrwnce handheld. He’s had that for 10+ years. It seems fine. I do notice navionics is more detailed somtimes but others it’s the opposite. It does it’s job well.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, JerkinLips said:

I have the LakeMaster chip on my Garmin GPS.  It doesn't have increments finer than 5 feet but does seem to be accurate.  Anybody else have an opinion on the LakeMaster maps?

I had them for years and other than the 3 foot contours thing, I found them to be pretty good.  Now using Lake insight that was bundled with my Lowrance elite units, and it looks just like the lakemaster data.  No complaints. 

  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Both Lake Master and Navionics chips work fine on Vermilion.

Cliff

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just received this email from Navionics:

Thank you for bringing your concerns to our Cartography Department.   Navionics appreciates your input.  We anticipate an update will be made available by 30 MAR 2018. I will contact you with instructions to receive the update once it has been released. Please do not hesitate to contact us if you have any questions.

Best regards,

Jennifer Pereira
Navionics Customer Service

  • Thumbs Up 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

BTW, I do have Navionics+ but I let the app expire because I preferred the Lake Master.  But I will renew my Navionics in the hope that the Garmin influence will improve their maps.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/9/2018 at 4:18 PM, mdogdaddy said:

Just received this email from Navionics:

Thank you for bringing your concerns to our Cartography Department.   Navionics appreciates your input.  We anticipate an update will be made available by 30 MAR 2018. I will contact you with instructions to receive the update once it has been released. Please do not hesitate to contact us if you have any questions.

Best regards,

Jennifer Pereira
Navionics Customer Service

Well, in less than a week Navionics followed up on the update.  I checked the Web app since it is an auto update and the new sonar view was there. Who knows maybe they improved on the rest of the lake since it was all charted last year.

 

Sonar2.jpg

Nautical-2.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting.  I had let my Navionics+ subscription expire, so I went and checked my map for the area above, and it still has the old, incorrect sonar map.  I still get application updates that show up for the app, but obviously that does not include map updates.  And when I go to the Menu and click on updates, it immediately reminds me it is expired.  So when the app is expired, it looks like it is then a static map from the day it expired, no map updates.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My Navionics app is so old that it doesn't even have an update option. It talks about having 3G and iphone 4s. I'm on version 5.0.4 with a GeoCore version of 01.00.03.

I assume that I would need to re-purchase the app to get anything useful, but I still find this old version to be helpful.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Similar Content

  • Your Responses - Share & Have Fun :)

    • LakeofthewoodsMN
      On the South Shore...  The focus for many this week is the ongoing deer hunting season which is a big tradition in these parts, even for avid walleye anglers.  There were some that either already harvested their deer or are more into catching fall walleyes than hunting.     Those that are fishing are taking advantage of the unseasonably warm weather and excellent walleye and sauger bite that is happening across the lake.  Cold weather is in the forecast in the upcoming days and weeks so that is also getting many excited. The best depths on the south end of LOW are 22-28 feet of water.     Vertical jigging with frozen emerald shiners is catching most of the walleyes, saugers and jumbo perch.  Depending upon where on the lake you are fishing, some slots and big trophies are in the mix as well, but most reports are talking about good numbers of eaters.    Jumbo perch are coming in good numbers this fall which will serve ice anglers well.  Watch out for an occasional pike or even lake sturgeon mixed in with the walleyes.      There are good numbers of walleyes and saugers across the south shore which is setting up nicely for early ice.   On the Rainy River...  There continues to be good numbers of shiners in the river, and consequently, there are good walleyes in the river as well.     Walleyes along with saugers, pike and some sturgeon are coming in up and down the river.  Most walleyes are being caught in 10-25 feet of water in various stretches of the river.   Jigging with live or frozen emerald shiners is the key. Some anglers are also still slow trolling crankbaits upstream to cover more ground and find fish. Both methods are producing solid results. Sturgeon fishing remains strong.  The catch-and-release sturgeon fishing is open into the spring when it changes to the "keep season" on April 24th. Up at the NW Angle...  As temps are getting colder, most are in the woods hunting and not fall fishing, however, for those who bundle up, fishing continues to be excellent.     A nice mixed bag with walleyes, saugers, perch, pike and crappies being caught. Very good muskie fishing with the colder water temps and shorter days.  Some big fish and some good numbers are being caught amongst the islands.  Both casting and trolling is getting it done.  
    • gimruis
      I hunt in the rifle zone so I don't have a need to use a shotgun to hunt deer, but I would be looking at this if there was ever a need to.   There could be state legislation introduced next summer that eliminates the shotgun zone completely.  It has bipartisan support.  Wisconsin removed theirs years ago and MN is usually later to follow.  They've tried to pass it more than once and it came up just short both times.  Probably just a matter of time.
    • Wanderer
      Oh, h e l l no! 
    • leech~~
      Screw that, here's whatch need!  😆   Power-Shok Rifled Slug 10 Gauge 766 Grain Grain Weight: 766 Shotshell Length: 3-1/2in / 89mm Muzzle Velocity: 1280
    • Wanderer
      20 ga has become a real popular deer round in the last 5 or so years.  The rifled barrels are zinging those sabot slugs with rifle like accuracy out to 100 yards easily.  Some go so far as dialing in for a 200 yard shot but really, by 150 they’re falling off pretty low.   I have a single shot Ultraslug in 20 ga that shoots really well at 100 yards.  Most everyone I know that has bought a slug gun lately has gotten the Savage 220 in 20ga.  Problem can be finding the shells you want.
    • leech~~
      My son always bugs me about getting a nice light over-under 20ga for grouse hunting.  I say Heck no, I'm getting a 3 1/2" 10ga so I can put as much lead in the air that I can!!     So, I'm keeping my 12ga.  
    • 11-87
      That’s almost exactly what I was thinking.  Have slug barrels for both   One for turkey and one for deer.      I have a 20ga mosseberg as well. (Combo came with the scope but never used.   I always liked the 12 better
    • leech~~
      Wanderer is right on the money and covered it well.  I was wondering too if you had a slug barrel for one of your guns?  If so you could make that your slug gun with a scope, and the other your turkey gun with the Red dot.  As you can afford it. 
    • Wanderer
      Kinda depends on if you want magnification or quick target acquisition.   More magnification options and better accuracy with a scope.  You get what you pay for too so get comfortable with a budget for one.  Tasco and Bushnell work but I find they lose their zero easier, have low contrast and don’t gather light well in low light conditions.  That said, I’m still using one I haven’t replaced yet.  Vortex has been the hot brand for the past several years for bang for the buck.  Good products.  Nothing beats Swarovski though.  Huge dough for those.  Burris is another decent option.   There are some specific models for shotgun/slug hunting in the economy brands and bullet drop compensation (BDC) reticles.  Based on experience I’d recommend not falling for that marketing ploy.   Red dots are usually lower magnification and easier to get on target.  Reasonably accurate but don’t do well with definition, like searching the brush for your target.  I put a HAWKE red dot on a .22 for squirrels and it’s been good.  For turkey, that’s probably the route I’d go.     If your slug shots are normally not too far and too brushy, I’d think a red dot could work there too if you’re only buying 1 scope.  You’ll be better off dimming the reticle to the lowest setting you can easily use to not over shine the target and get a finer aim point.   If you don’t have a slug barrel, you might appreciate one of those.  I had a browning with a smoothbore slug barrel that shot Brenneke 2-3/4 inch well.  The 11-87 would well fitted with a cantelever rifled barrel. 
    • 11-87
      Looking for recommendations on scope or red dot    I basically hunt turkey and whitetail, live in southern MN. So it’s all deer/ shotgun    looking to add a scope/ red dot as my eyes don’t work like they used to to with the open sights.    my gun options are 11/87 12. Browning BPS 12    not looking for the most expensive or the cheapest    pros and cons of one over the other
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.