Jump to content
  • GUESTS

    If You  want access  to member only forums on FM, You will need to Sign-in or  Sign-Up now .

    This box will disappear once you are signed in as a member.

eyechoholic

Dnr's future plan for walleye slot?

Recommended Posts

eyeguy 54

lol,  well aint dat da truth

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
delcecchi

By the way, how is that 5000 pound quota doing?  Haven't heard mention of it lately.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Stick in Mud

Good point, Del, though some will quibble with where you've started the calendar.  :) 

I got checked this weekend, and a different warden was up on the northwest end the weekend before (at least that's what I hear...I wasn't there).  I haven't seen a creel survey person sitting on shore.  I assume the wardens give input into the total harvest?  Or not, I have no idea.  There are a lot of WAG's built into the formulas that determine harvest, that's for sure. 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
leech~~
4 hours ago, delcecchi said:

All you ice fishrmen, if you kill a walleye in January or February it doesn't spawn in April 

Very good point Del! :)

I wonder if an 18" inch slot Walleye can produce the same amount of eggs as a 23"-26" inch netted Walleye? Since we will never know. Maybe we can ask some of the netters to weigh egg sacks out of each and let us know! ;)

Edited by leech~~
  • Thumbs Up 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sportland_Bait
15 hours ago, delcecchi said:

All you ice fishrmen, if you kill a walleye in January or February it doesn't spawn in April 

That is true.  I have no problems not keeping any fish until we can help the fishery get to a level where we can have options.  It is a matter of all parties working together for what is best for the fishery.  Right now, I think we can all agree that right now it is out of balance and everyone is fighting for the scraps.

  • Thumbs Up 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
jigginjim

I had thought of a couple different ideas,  A. build a walleye hatchery for Mille Lacs and surrounding area lakes.

B. Rather then Gill nets, the tribes use basket type to catch walleyes alive then strip the eggs for the hatchery. (tribes get their fish, yet spawning fish eggs can be used for a better turn around on eggs)

C. Which lake to barb-less hooks, and live bait rigs to circle hooks only. (this may cut down on gut hooked fish, and less kill of non-slot sized fish.)

Just my thoughts,   every body can come out better.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
leech~~
2 hours ago, jigginjim said:

I had thought of a couple different ideas,  A. build a walleye hatchery for Mille Lacs and surrounding area lakes.

B. Rather then Gill nets, the tribes use basket type to catch walleyes alive then strip the eggs for the hatchery. (tribes get their fish, yet spawning fish eggs can be used for a better turn around on eggs)

C. Which lake to barb-less hooks, and live bait rigs to circle hooks only. (this may cut down on gut hooked fish, and less kill of non-slot sized fish.)

Just my thoughts,   every body can come out better.

Yes, one set of fishing rules and limits for all man and no nets anymore. If one man can catch enough to feed their family with a hook and line so can everyman! ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sculpin

The Mille Lacs bands formal announcement to suspend spring gill netting came back in the first week in Aug. and was reported in St Paul paper, Mille Lacs Messenger, and perhaps others. In addition Gov. Dayton announced it at a town hall meeting in Isle at that time. The Mille Lacs bands estimated 2016 harvest would be about 3,000 lbs. this year, given the just announced 40,000 lb. harvest cap, which is the same as last year. 

The M.L. Band has not said they would NOT harvest, only that they would not gill net.  They can still go out and spear their fish, or hook and line them.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
delcecchi
1 hour ago, leech~~ said:

Yes, one set of fishing rules and limits for all man and no nets anymore. If one man can catch enough to feed their family with a hook and line so can everyman! ;)

What part of "their quota is theirs and they cam harvest it any way they please" is so hard to understand?

Slots are a mechanism for limiting rate of harvest, and don't even seem to be a good way to do so.  Alternatives would likely be better for the resource.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
leech~~
30 minutes ago, delcecchi said:

 and "they cam harvest" it any way they please" is so hard to understand?

 

This part! :D

  • Thumbs Up 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sculpin
1 hour ago, delcecchi said:

What part of "their quota is theirs and they cam harvest it any way they please" is so hard to understand?

Slots are a mechanism for limiting rate of harvest, and don't even seem to be a good way to do so.  Alternatives would likely be better for the resource.

What would you propose as a viable "alternative"  to slots, they seem to work in other lakes.  Perhaps the difference in the case of Mille Lacs is that there is only a slot for sport anglers. Perhaps the lake can't sustain it both ways.

  • Thumbs Up 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Weathertite

What if : Instead of using part of our licence dollars to support the liberal arts programs. We used those dollars to support the local business around Mille Lacs Lake and shut down any kind of harvest from the lake for 1 yr ? Might not be the long term solution , But it would certainly help the Fishery. Both side would be giving up the same thing and it would be fair to all. Just a thought.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
mjk
On 2/2/2016 at 3:13 PM, Bandersnatch said:

Am I mistaken, or did not the Mille Lac band say that they would not net the lake Spring 2016?

I read something that said, yes, they are not netting.  Unfortunately, that doesn't mean other bands are going to refrain from netting this year.  And I thought I read that the other bands contribute heavily towards the total.

 I thought I also read that WI bands can net the lake - is that true?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Stick in Mud
13 hours ago, Sculpin said:

What would you propose as a viable "alternative"  to slots, they seem to work in other lakes.  Perhaps the difference in the case of Mille Lacs is that there is only a slot for sport anglers. Perhaps the lake can't sustain it both ways.

I think the double-bind here is that the DNR needs (or, when this problem really got going, needed) to limit total harvest in order to prevent going over the poundage quota. Back then, when the lake was full of nothing but big walleyes that didn't have enough to eat, "we" anglers would've hit our quota very, very quickly if we had kept any big fish.  So the harvest slot of relatively smsall walleyes allowed us to keep fish without shutting down the lake/hitting the quota.  Add our harvest of small walleyes with the big walleyes eating the small ones, and now that those big walleyes are mostly gone, there are a few years of almost completely missing year classes. As far as I understand it, that's why the numbers in the lake are so low--except for the 2013 class that is now what we're all catching in relative abundance.

But the DNR was (and still is) stuck.  It lost the battle at the Supreme Court and is now stuck with the current system (or at least it doesn't appear willing to fight another battle).  It has to share harvest. It has no right to prevent Native harvesting in any matter they want. How do we divvy up the total while not going over the allotted 40,000 lbs?  That's the rub.  Slots ain't perfect, but what else can they do at this point? 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Bandersnatch
2 hours ago, Stick in Mud said:

I think the double-bind here is that the DNR needs (or, when this problem really got going, needed) to limit total harvest in order to prevent going over the poundage quota. Back then, when the lake was full of nothing but big walleyes that didn't have enough to eat, "we" anglers would've hit our quota very, very quickly if we had kept any big fish.  So the harvest slot of relatively smsall walleyes allowed us to keep fish without shutting down the lake/hitting the quota.  Add our harvest of small walleyes with the big walleyes eating the small ones, and now that those big walleyes are mostly gone, there are a few years of almost completely missing year classes. As far as I understand it, that's why the numbers in the lake are so low--except for the 2013 class that is now what we're all catching in relative abundance.

But the DNR was (and still is) stuck.  It lost the battle at the Supreme Court and is now stuck with the current system (or at least it doesn't appear willing to fight another battle).  It has to share harvest. It has no right to prevent Native harvesting in any matter they want. How do we divvy up the total while not going over the allotted 40,000 lbs?  That's the rub.  Slots ain't perfect, but what else can they do at this point? 

 

Sorry, but that is entirely off base from how I understand that the MNDNR has been managing the slot.

 

They have been targeting the same year class fish for three-four years since there are fewer and fewer of them, not many "Slot Fish" are caught.

 

Last seasons shut down was not brought on by kept Slot Fish, but by estimates of Hooking Mortality in my understanding.

 

As an aside, having the slots target the very same fish that the net sizes do, is a bit on the stupid side.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sculpin
3 hours ago, mjk said:

I read something that said, yes, they are not netting.  Unfortunately, that doesn't mean other bands are going to refrain from netting this year.  And I thought I read that the other bands contribute heavily towards the total.

 I thought I also read that WI bands can net the lake - is that true?

Correct, there are 6 other Tribes that come over from Wi. to join in the festivities. In addition, a good deal of the decision making process is dictated by the GLIFWC, Great Lakes Indian Fish and Wildlife Commission. It was in fact the GLIFWC that made the harvest recommendation for 2016. The Wi.  Bands have not yet made any commitment one way or another on Mille Lacs. They are however looking to expand their harvest to other major lakes in the treaty area, including Vermilion.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Stick in Mud

I don't even remember what the slots have been the last three or four years, to be honest.  I'm also not sure I follow your argument, but it's been a long day. If the slots have been targeting the same year class of fish for the last three/four years, and our harvest of those fish is the cause of the low numbers, then wouldn't there only be one "missing" year class?  I mean, four years ago the current 18-20'' fish were, what, a few inches long?

Good point about the hooking mortality; yes, that was a lot of the "harvest" last year, as far as I understand. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
eyechoholic
21 hours ago, Weathertite said:

What if : Instead of using part of our licence dollars to support the liberal arts programs. We used those dollars to support the local business around Mille Lacs Lake and shut down any kind of harvest from the lake for 1 yr ? Might not be the long term solution , But it would certainly help the Fishery. Both side would be giving up the same thing and it would be fair to all. Just a thought.

If they do that they need go around the whole state and bail out resorts on other lakes that are going through lean times due to bad fishing years. You can't just favor mille lacs. When times are good save some of that money for slow times it's business 101. If you can't make it through sell your resort they are worth quite a bit. No pity from me and here is why. I own a house framing business it's good right now but from 2006 to 2010 there wasn't any new houses going up and if there was you got paid half of what you were getting before. The state wasn't bailing my ass out or anyone else in the industry you either make it through or you dont.

  • Thumbs Up 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Bandersnatch
18 hours ago, Stick in Mud said:

I don't even remember what the slots have been the last three or four years, to be honest.  I'm also not sure I follow your argument, but it's been a long day. If the slots have been targeting the same year class of fish for the last three/four years, and our harvest of those fish is the cause of the low numbers, then wouldn't there only be one "missing" year class?  I mean, four years ago the current 18-20'' fish were, what, a few inches long?

Good point about the hooking mortality; yes, that was a lot of the "harvest" last year, as far as I understand. 

You can sort of read it between the lines in this one:

http://www.messagemedia.co/millelacs/outdoors/walleye-fishing-returns-on-mille-lacs/article_e624d81a-7cb2-11e5-8c57-df910697fc93.html

 

I was looking for the comments by Don Pereira, DNR Fisheries chief, made at the last meeting in Brainard, where he actually came out and admitted that they had set the slot to follow the almost nonexistent year classes in an effort to keep actual harvest down, but sorry, couldn't find that one. (and I gotta work sometime!)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
delcecchi

It now seems that the slots and resulting high numbers of big walleye led to cannibalism and poor recruitment for several years.

The DNR had several alternatives to limit harvest, and slots seemed to be the one they believed would be most acceptable to anglers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Stick in Mud

You're probably right, Bandersnatch....I just thought there were *multiple* missing year classes.  I don't doubt that the DNR has tried to limit harvest by allowing anglers to keep the fish that are largely absent in the lake.  Doing so allows fishing while making it essentially a catch-and-release fishery.  Still hurts all the businesses up there, but at least the DNR can say the lake is "open"--at least it could until last summer, when most of our "harvest" was an estimate based on hooking mortality, as you correctly pointed out. 

It would've been interesting to see what anglers (and businesses) would have done back in the "good ol' days" if the DNR had attempted to change the way it limited harvest, as in allowing one big fish per angler (instead of four smaller ones) to 1) leave the little fish in the lake and 2) reduce the cannibalism of little ones by big ones.  Of course, given the good fishing, "hooking mortality," and constraints due to treaty management, I suspect the harvest total would've been hit pretty quickly, meaning a closed lake and bad political mojo.  Now that the fit's hit the shan, including more bad mojo and ruined businesses, one wonders if the guys in the DNR are saying (behind closed doors, of course) that more significant changes should've happened much, much sooner.  Who knows.  Bummer all the way around.  

I'll be up there in a few hours, though, chasing the 15'' fish and hoping for a nice one. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Bandersnatch

Have a great trip!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Weathertite
On ‎2‎/‎4‎/‎2016 at 5:48 PM, eyechoholic said:

If they do that they need go around the whole state and bail out resorts on other lakes that are going through lean times due to bad fishing years. You can't just favor mille lacs. When times are good save some of that money for slow times it's business 101. If you can't make it through sell your resort they are worth quite a bit. No pity from me and here is why. I own a house framing business it's good right now but from 2006 to 2010 there wasn't any new houses going up and if there was you got paid half of what you were getting before. The state wasn't bailing my ass out or anyone else in the industry you either make it through or you dont.

I agree with you whole heartedly as I also own a construction business , But then on the other hand we must all realize that our license dollars are used to bail out the liberal arts program here in Minnesota . If those dollars are used to bail anyone out it should be people that have something to do with the OUTDOORS !!!!!!  Not saying this is an answer but it sure could help.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
eyechoholic

I do agree with you on that 100 percent all money made from licenses so go to something related to hunting and fishing not liberal arts or anything  else it's a classic example of re distribution of wealth.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
SaintPaulPaul
On ‎2‎/‎4‎/‎2016 at 5:48 PM, eyechoholic said:

If they do that they need go around the whole state and bail out resorts on other lakes that are going through lean times due to bad fishing years. You can't just favor mille lacs. When times are good save some of that money for slow times it's business 101. If you can't make it through sell your resort they are worth quite a bit. No pity from me and here is why. I own a house framing business it's good right now but from 2006 to 2010 there wasn't any new houses going up and if there was you got paid half of what you were getting before. The state wasn't bailing my ass out or anyone else in the industry you either make it through or you dont.

Well said.  Many of us in the construction industry struggled to keep our homes during the Great Recession, some made it out intact and many people in the industry left to find a more stable livelihood. If I build only houses, and the housing market crashes, I'm going to have to find alternatives to making a living. If I depend only on walleyes to keep my resort afloat and the fishery crashes, I need to explore other potential fishing opportunities that will sustain me through difficult times.

  • Thumbs Up 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
leech~~

I have a dream today.

I have a dream that one day even the state of Mississippi Minnesota, a state sweltering with the heat of injustice, sweltering with the heat of fishing oppression, will be transformed into an oasis of Fishing freedom and justice for all.

I have a dream that my little children will one day live in a State where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the safe harvest limits they all follow.

I have a dream today.

I have a dream that one day down up in Alabama Minnesota, with its vicious racists, with its governor Goofy having his lips dripping with the words of interposition and nullification who knows what the heck he is saying, that one day right down up in Alabama Minnesota little black Red boys and black Red girls will be able to join hands with little White boys and White girls as sisters and brothers and fish all lakes the same for the good of all.

I have a dream today.

  • Thumbs Up 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
delcecchi

If that requires abrogation of the treaty rights "subject to the pleasure of the president " you better start organizing and lobbying. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
leech~~
1 hour ago, delcecchi said:

If that requires abrogation of the treaty rights "subject to the pleasure of the president " you better start organizing and lobbying. 

It's just a Dream Del!

Free at last! Free at last!

                Thank God Almighty, Walleye's are free at last! :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
delcecchi

You do realize that the same thing likely would have happened to the walleye population even without native harvest, right?  Anglers are capable of harvesting all the lake can produce, and more, so slots would still have been necessary. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
leech~~
2 hours ago, delcecchi said:

You do realize that the same thing likely would have happened to the walleye population even without native harvest, right?  Anglers are capable of harvesting all the lake can produce, and more, so slots would still have been necessary. 

Boy you are right on me Del.

I'll repost this:

Very good point Del! :)

I wonder if an 18" inch slot Walleye can produce the same amount of eggs as a 23"-26" inch netted Walleye? Since we will never know. Maybe we can ask some of the netters to weigh egg sacks out of each and let us know! ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Your Responses - Share & Have Fun :)

    • Stickjiggler
      Papadarv Your camera setup looks pretty sweet. Any chance you would do a how to build it for us?
    • Rick
      Welcome to FM @chuckziegler.   Thank you for the info.
    • CigarGuy
      I think BigV sent you a msg. The number on the sign is 218-666-6063
    • papadarv
      I fish out of a wheel house, hub or flip. Over the years I have found a camera to be an extremely fishing tool as long as water is somewhat clear. (Dont work well on Red or LOTW). My Flasher or Showdown both mark fish before they show up on camera due to cone area greater than camera view. Biggest advantage over flashsr/showdown is the "light bite" which happens often on ice. With flasher, red (fish) consumes green (bait) turning green to red indicating fish on - setting hook and miss. With camera I see fish barley lip the minnow/worm/plastic often hold a few to 15 seconds than suck bait in and instentally spit it out aka the miss. With camera you see the suck in, set the hook, fish on. Watching the many behaviours really adds to wisdom. Sometimes like last Sunday watching my grandkids playing and learning with Gills & Perch was extreanily gratifying. My camera is self built, in a suitcase totally push button wireless to drop, retrive, rotate left/hight, one button record high def.  
    • Wanderer
      😄 yeah, actual lumber would be littering.  I just meant that as a slang expression for wood, aka branches.     For what it’s worth, I think you know I’m also one who appreciates a good muskie and will gladly abide by conservation efforts for the specie.  I just don’t put any one fish higher above all others when it comes to the management of a lake.  Except maybe lake trout! 🙃
    • Chill62
      Lake travel getting better...you can thank me for buying tracks 3 weeks ago!!!  LOL  Good thing is it'll make it easier to get around bad part is the sun will start eating up the ice quickly.
    • chuckziegler
      Cell service is spotty but ATT is available several places on the lake.  You can also use the cell phone at the Sherrick's office in an emergency.  Just ask for Steve.  Call 937 244 1900 for any additional questions. Chuck Ziegler Owner
    • chuckziegler
      The resort is under new ownership and  is open from May through September. There are 4 fully equipped rental cabins, which include boats, motors, full kitchen, generator, hot showers and flush toilets.  Parties of 6 or more pay $450.00 per person per week, all inclusive. Prices have been this low since the 1990's. Great fishing for walleye, northern, small mouth, perch, whitefish, and lake trout. Limited access lake, so the fishing pressure is very low. Located on Johnson Lake with access to Little Johnson and Spring Lake. Borders Voyagers National Park, and Superior National Forest. Call 937 244 1900 for details. Chuck Ziegler , Owner
    • Rick
      As for me I would prefer they pull those trophies out of the lake. Their reproductive ability is more limited and they are soon destined to become food for the ecosystem anyway.   I also advocate for encouraging harvest of year classes that are too large, such as the 2013 year class that will soon be protected. It's not always about me me me. Sometimes it's about what is best for the fishery.
    • Eyesniper
      Does anyone have current knowledge on ice road distances? I know each resort will be different. Hearing roads are 20+ miles out from pine which would put them beyond garden. Heading up after the weekend and curious how far the roads are out. Any info helps, thanks guys. Enjoy fishing with the warm weekend!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.