Net Nuetrality

[LMITOUT]

Maybe we should just have the IRS control the internet since they are already skilled at wiping data and suppressing the opposition at the behest of Obama and the DNC.

[Uncle Bill]

in order to preserve a free and open Internet. - obama

"If you like your Dr. you can keep your Dr." - obama

#ThestupidityoftheAmericanvoter.

[bobbymalone]

You know there isn't much to stand on when you have to try confuddle net neutrality with obamacare and IRS scandals.

Let's make it a quadrafecta and bring Benghazi and Fast & Furious into the equation.

[PurpleFloyd]

Maybe we should just have the IRS control the internet since they are already skilled at wiping data and suppressing the opposition at the behest of Obama and the DNC.

can I keep my emails if I want my emails?

[FM_Mike]

can I keep my emails if I want my emails?

Even if you can't, someone will keep them for you.

Mike

[Uncle Bill]

Let's make it a quadrafecta and bring Benghazi and Fast & Furious into the equation.

Bring em in.

Thinking people will deduce the common denominator.

[LMITOUT]

We have a winner!

[Duffman]

[fishersofmen]

Well no one can explain things quite like Al can....

Those who have voted for him must be very proud.

[swamptiger]

It sounds like he might have schooled by the guys who run the postal dept.

[bobbymalone]

Let's make it a quadrafecta and bring Benghazi and Fast & Furious into the equation.

[LMITOUT]

">

[Duffman]

[LMITOUT]

Shhhhh! Dangit anyway, you gave up the secret already. That wasn't even a good fight.

BTW, If you couldn't tell by my response above I could smell your stinkbait a mile away.

Try a little harder next time, would ya?

[Big Dave2]

Is it broke or isn't it?

[delcecchi]

The common denominator is everything democrat or Obama you're against, even things I'm still pretty sure you don't even understand enough to formulate an opinion on.

So you defend the Admistration's actions on Benghazi, and Fast & Furious? I didn't think there was anyone left in the country that still believed the official stories about videos, spontaneous demonstrations, and whatever the excuse for all those guns walking across the border was.

Surely you jest.

[aanderud]

I'm guessing bobby doesn't "defend" those actions as much as he chooses to ignore them altogether. "Nothing to see here". Seems like that's the way Progressives work with this president. There's no accountability whatsoever. Same with the lying about Gruber's 'stupid voter' Obamacare stuff. Anything that goes wrong is either ignored (Gruber, Benghazi, etc) or blamed on GWB, even 6+ years later. If these same type of things happened under a Republican administration, the press and the progressives would be ALL OVER it.

[PurpleFloyd]

That is the way the two parties you guys are beholden to operate. The left ignores benghazi ,the aca lies etc while the right was ignorant of Valerie Plame,wmd, the Katrina fiasco and every screw up from Bush. Prior to that there was the blue dress,what the word is is, read my lips etc.but hey,as long as your side is winning then there are no problems.

[bobbymalone]

So you defend the Admistration's actions on Benghazi, and Fast & Furious? I didn't think there was anyone left in the country that still believed the official stories about videos, spontaneous demonstrations, and whatever the excuse for all those guns walking across the border was.

[FM_Mike]

I thought we were talking about net neutrality.

Yes, I ignore benghazi when it comes to net neutrality. Net neutrality has been floating around longer than Benghazi. It also has jack squat to do with it.

[bobbymalone]

That's funny, because it was you brought them up in the first place?

Dude you are dense. Let's just go back to Net Neutrality is bad because Obamacare is bad.

[Uncle Bill]

That's funny, because it was you brought them up in the first place?

Mike

Can't pass it through congress.

(failed 5 different times)

Even the FCC refuses to act on this turd.

[delcecchi]

Can't ignore it. Bobby was the one that injected Benghazi etc into the discussion.

As for me, I think in principle that net neutrality is probably a good idea if that means that the carriers don't discriminate due to source or content. I would however support the ability of the carriers to charge for disproportionate use of the network, where someone was putting way more data into the backbone than they were accepting from the backbone.

Putting the FCC in charge and treating the internet like the Railroads or the Telephone network seems like a bad idea, like killing the deer fly on your foot by hitting it with a sledge hammer. If that is what it takes to have "net neutrality" then I oppose it.

[bobbymalone]

Can't ignore it. Bobby was the one that injected Benghazi etc into the discussion.

I brought it into the discussion immediately after saying there must not be much to stand on if you have confuddle obamacare and irs scandals into why net neutrality is bad.

Uncle bill and Mike probably not, but I know you're smarter than that del.

[Duffman]

Shhhhh! Dangit anyway, you gave up the secret already. That wasn't even a good fight.

BTW, If you couldn't tell by my response above I could smell your stinkbait a mile away.

Try a little harder next time, would ya?

Just phoning it in these days like you.

I didn't even watch the vid myself.

(Ya gotta admit the Tundra was a nice touch?)

[delcecchi]

[quote name='bobbymalone

I brought it into the discussion immediately after saying there must not be much to stand on if you have confuddle obamacare and irs scandals into why net neutrality is bad.

Uncle bill and Mike probably not' date=' but I know you're smarter than that del. [/quote']

You made a mistake. The reason those things were mentioned was to explain why some of us don't trust the Obama administration to tell the truth as to what they intend. For example, see ACA and Gruber. I favor Net Neutrality by some definitions of Net Neutrality. I oppose Net Neutrality that turns the internet into a common carrier under regulation by the FCC.

Obama can call it Net Neutrality, and try to get us to buy a pig in a poke but I oppose his version on the grounds of lack of trust. Even the head of the FCC thinks it is a bad idea.

"When elephants fight it is the grass that suffers"

[Uncle Bill]

CNN's Candy Crowley asked senator franken, "What is it that's broken?"

"Nothing," he replied.

Crowley returned, "So if nothing's broken, why is the government wanting to fix it?"..

Oh, boy !

These net neuter guys really make a good argument.

[upnorth]

Can't ignore it. Bobby was the one that injected Benghazi etc into the discussion.

As for me, I think in principle that net neutrality is probably a good idea if that means that the carriers don't discriminate due to source or content. I would however support the ability of the carriers to charge for disproportionate use of the network, where someone was putting way more data into the backbone than they were accepting from the backbone.

Putting the FCC in charge and treating the internet like the Railroads or the Telephone network seems like a bad idea, like killing the deer fly on your foot by hitting it with a sledge hammer. If that is what it takes to have "net neutrality" then I oppose it.

Adding any kind of fast lanes etc to the internet nullifies net neutrality.

But I will say we have run into issues with what I work with where parts of certain networks get overwhelmed with certain types of traffic. So in some cases it would be nice if there were ways to prioritize some traffic over others. Say business traffic gets a higher place than someone streaming porn. But again that is not neutrality.

[FM_Mike]

Uncle bill and Mike probably not, but I know you're smarter than that del.

Ah, back to the "I'm smarter than everyone else" routine.

You sound like another Progressive elitist, Gruber, who also "Thinks" he's smarter than everyone else.

As I've told you in the past, despite what you think, or what someone may have told you, you're NOT as smart as you THINK you are, and your incisive need to call out others you don't agree with by trying to belittle them, only confirms how small and foolish you look when doing it.

You may want to consider a different approach. Dude.

Mike

[delcecchi]

I am not sure who I am smarter than, but I can tell when someone is micturating on my shoe and telling me it is raining.

I am still considering the arguments on both sides but I know for sure that giving the FCC dominion over the Internet is a Bad Idea. Most of you guys are probably way to young to remember the days of the ATT control of the phone network. You were not allowed to connect anything not approved by ATT and the FCC to the telephone network. Nothing. NaDa. Zip.

Look up the "Carterphone Decision"

Be afraid, be very afraid.

BTW I wouldn't believe anything the Obama administration says. Nothing. They could tell me the sun will come up in the morning and I would look when I got up.