Jump to content
  • GUESTS

    If You  want access  to member only forums on FM, You will need to Sign-in or  Sign-Up now .

    This box will disappear once you are signed in as a member.

Senators Seek Moratorium on Wolf Hunting in Minn.


bd477

Recommended Posts

Quote:
A high-profile group of Minnesota senators is backing a five-year moratorium on sport hunting and trapping of wolves in Minnesota.

The chief sponsor is Majority Whip Chris Eaton, D-Brooklyn Center. The cosponsors include Minority Leader David Hann, R-Eden Prairie, and Senate President Sandra Pappas, D-St. Paul.

Minnesota wolves were taken off the endangered list last year, and hunting and trapping resumed last fall.

Maureen Hackett, founder of Howling for Wolves, says they're trying to restore a five-year moratorium that used to be in state law for when wolves came off the list. Lawmakers canceled it when they authorized the hunt last year, citing years of delays caused by court battles over lifting the federal protections.

No hearing has been scheduled, and no companion bill has been introduced in the House.

http://kstp.com/news/stories/S2939174.shtml?cat=1

Looks like the outta state activist pressure is getting to them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

UPDATED...

An influential group of Minnesota senators is backing a five-year moratorium on sport hunting and trapping of wolves in Minnesota.

The chief sponsor is Majority Whip Chris Eaton, D-Brooklyn Center. The co-sponsors include Minority Leader David Hann, R-Eden Prairie, Senate President Sandra Pappas, D-St. Paul, and Sens. David Senjem, R-Rochester, and Terri Bonoff, D-Minnetonka, according to a news release Thursday from Howling for Wolves.

Minnesota wolves were taken off the endangered list last year, and hunting and trapping resumed last fall.

Maureen Hackett, founder of Howling for Wolves, said they're trying to restore a five-year moratorium that used to be in state law for when wolves came off the list. Lawmakers lifted the moratorium when they authorized the hunt last year, citing years of delays caused by court battles over lifting the federal protections.

Hunters and trappers killed 413 wolves during the recently ended season. Hackett points out that state figures show farmers and property owners legally killed another 298 for predator control last year. The figures don't include poaching, road kills or deaths from disease.

No hearing date has been scheduled, and no companion bill has been introduced in the House.

The Department of Natural Resources says Minnesota's wolf population is stable at around 3,000 and can withstand the hunting, trapping and predator control that the state allows under its wolf management plan.

http://kstp.com/news/stories/S2939174.shtml?cat=1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is funny everytime you read one of these articles, it says "wolves killed" rather then taken, or hunted. But "Killed" like if they are humans.

When you read a deer hunting article, does it read 100,000 deers killed this year?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

notice where they are a from ? where there are no wolves ! talk to the people who live in wolf country...dragging your pets out of the yard .small chidren around wolves with no fear .worry about your cities and not up north .there are way more wolves then they think.try to balance the budget first then worry about wolves!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Harvest" conveys utilization and is the popular term amongst wildlife professionals and resources managers. "Kill" is the buzzword the antis like to use. Since there is a purpose behind a wolf hunting season, I don't see it as killing. I can't believe a few Senators, without a dog in the fight pardon the pun, are rooting around in something they know nothing about. But that's politics for you. A bunch of (mostly lawyers) people that think they know everything about everything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

notice where they are a from ? where there are no wolves ! talk to the people who live in wolf country...dragging your pets out of the yard .small chidren around wolves with no fear .worry about your cities and not up north .there are way more wolves then they think.try to balance the budget first then worry about wolves!

That was the first thing I noticed. Remember, the big city liberals always know what is best for outstate Minnesota.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 'we have more fun' FishingMN Builders

Why don't these "feel good" people ever go with the advise of the DNR? That's what we pay the DNR to do! whistle

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is a combination of D's and R's in that list. Its not only liberals involved in this bill. Unfortunately, the two R's are both heads of their groups. Hahn is considered one of the most conservative R's in the state.

Despite all of that, I know that David Hahn is my senator and I plan to call him and tell him my opinion on this bill as well as my opinion that they have more important things to be working on that the wolf hunt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I already wrote my senator, David Hann of Eden Prairie, a letter this morning expressing my dissatisfaction with his sponsorship/support of this bill.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just looking at where they are from, this doesn't surprise me. People in politics just keep getting more outrageous.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The location of these reps. just made me laugh!! Let the reps from Wolf country decide if they need to overstep the DNR. These types of interest groups and the reps that listen to them are the reasons our government just spins its wheels on important issues...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is a combination of D's and R's in that list. Its not only liberals involved in this bill. Unfortunately, the two R's are both heads of their groups. Hahn is considered one of the most conservative R's in the state.

Despite all of that, I know that David Hahn is my senator and I plan to call him and tell him my opinion on this bill as well as my opinion that they have more important things to be working on that the wolf hunt.

i thought i read that the R's removed thier names from the bill.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There shouldn't be an ounce of wasted time in regards to our wolf season. A bunch of deer and moose were saved as a result as well as maybe a few less depredation cases. The federal trappers became way too busy with wolves in MN. And the packs started showing up in areas I'm not sure suit them too well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is a combination of D's and R's in that list. Its not only liberals involved in this bill. Unfortunately, the two R's are both heads of their groups. Hahn is considered one of the most conservative R's in the state.

Despite all of that, I know that David Hahn is my senator and I plan to call him and tell him my opinion on this bill as well as my opinion that they have more important things to be working on that the wolf hunt.

They don't have a clue! and should stick to representing where they are elected. As you wrote they have more important things to deal with than this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

At least there was some common sense in this court hearing. next time who knows.

One sure gets tired of some of these elected officials that are more concerned about something not near them versus some common sense governemnt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

was happy to get that DNR email today but we all know this isn't the last time this will go to court

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How many times can they take it to court? Nice that govt. money continues to be spent on these frivolous suits. Here is an idea make them pay for the court costs if they lose, for some reason I bet they would not continue with them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

doubt that one bit many of the anti groups are funded very very well, look at PETA

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What are you saying, they are funded well? Trust Howling for Wolves will struggle going forward.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Buying billboards all along 94 and 494 having trucks drive around the cities with billboards on them protesting the hunt you think a bunch of poor granola eaters were pooling money to do that no those groups have deep pockets with big names making large donations

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Your Responses - Share & Have Fun :)

    • CigarGuy
      Went in to Lucky 7 to get some crappie minnows today. All they had were crappie minnows and fatheads. She said to call in advance for the opener, couldn't say for sure if they'd have rainbows, shiners, etc for opener!
    • SkunkedAgain
      I hope to see it and believe it next week! Nice looking crappie
    • CigarGuy
      Crappies are biting!  
    • Rick G
      Been out couple times this last week. Between the rain and wind there really was only one day this past week where it was actually warm out fishing.  Water temps are low mid 50s yet, not much change from last week.  Fish are still holding out off the first break on some area lakes and right up in the boat channels and back bays of others.   Been keeping it pretty simple as far as tackle used. Having the best luck with the lil hustler tubes under a small float or throwing the Bobby Garland baby shads with a 1/32 jig head.  The Bobby's have definitely been my big fish catcher this spring.
    • imhatz
      The water looks low but appears to be on the rise. We will be there  the week after opener. I have been going since 1981 and enjoying the experience. We love the variety of fish we catch and release each year. Ice went out a bit earlier than in years past. Water may be warmer and plan to target some crappies. We fish predominately in Sand Point as we camp. Good luck all and tight lines. We may consider the hike to Lake Lucille which we did 2 years ago. 
    • delcecchi
      Seeing is believing.   
    • smurfy
      thats great to hear regarding the lake levels!!!!!!
    • Kettle
      On an off light precipitation today. Hoping the weather this weekend will be nice so I can get out and crappie fish and check the weather. My yard has standing water and the driveway is a mess. Lot of lakes are near standard water levels which is good. Heard they are done stripping eggs on cut foot. Shaping up to be a good opener. Last year fished open water 60+ days and 28 different lakes. Hopefully bump both those numbers up this year
    • rundrave
      I don't think its 100% accurate, you are just relying on other average joes to report precipitation. But I think most numbers there are right in the ball park, especially when you see consistency among multiple reports in a general area.   It's probably more accurate than what the weather terrorists say on the news  which usually only reports metro areas. cocorahs is good for getting rural area reports you just might not have as many reports to go off of
    • smurfy
      i like this site!!!!!  👍 thanks rundave......its in my favorites!!!!!!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.