• RECEIVE THE GIFTS MEMBERS SHARE WITH YOU HERE...THEN...CREATE SOMETHING TO ENCHANT OTHERS THAT YOU WANT TO SHARE

    You know what we all love...

    When you enchant people, you fill them with delight and yourself in return. Have Fun!!!

  • 0
Sign in to follow this  
Guest

Eagle/Lowrance difference?

Question

Guest

I am looking at the new Bass Pro Shop catalog and am wondering what's the differnce between the x71 and x91. Is it just the 160x160 pixels vs. 240x240 pixels?

Also, is the Eagle Fishmark the same unit? The Fishmark 160 is $219.99
The Lowrance X71 is $289.00

The Fishmark 240 is $319.99
The Lowrance X91 is $449.00

There must be some difference besides the name.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

7 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
Seabass77

Look at the power. The x 91 is 3,000 peak to peak, the x71 is 1500 Peak to peak. The eagle 240 is the same as the x71 but with a 240 x 240 screen.

Buy a garmin 240. $279.99 at galyans. 3200 watts power peak to peak, 240x240 pixels.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0
Guest

My catalog says that the X71 is 1200 watts. It also says the FishMark 160 and 240 are both 1200 watts.
I am a novice and don't know what the watts really mean, but I assume the more the better. So the garmin 240 must be a much better deal. Thanks Seabass.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0
Seabass77

Busted – I just pulled those numbers on power from memory. But I think you saw what I was getting at. Power – Pixels – then customer service. There have been conversations on this site that suggest Lowrance has better customer service that Garmin but I haven’t noticed anything negative with my conversations with them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0
rmh2o

the big difference between eagle and lowrance is power rating wich is something to consider if you fish deep water.the lowrance also has gold connections inside to eliminate corrosion in salt water applications.the thing to look for in a locator is pixels, the more pixels the better bottom seperation and better picture like a TV more lines better picture.buy the most pixels you can afford.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0
Guest

Pixals are your definition, the number is for the amount of lines contained in an inch of screen. Watts is the amount of power your unit sends out in the form of a sonar signal. The more power, the stronger and faster the signal is.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0
smallies24

Remember now, when you're looking at the "new" x71 and x91, you're really looking at the x65 and x85 respectively. The guts of these new locators are virtually identical to the older models. All lowrance did is put a new shell onto their old models. I believe the pixels and the power for these "new" units are identical to the old models.

Granted, they are still both good units, but you aren't quite getting what you pay for. After all, the x65 ran for $270 and the x85 ran for $400. I would go with the Garmin 240. More power and the same pixel count as the x91, but less expensive. The Garmins are great from a quality stand point as well. Good luck with your purchase, I hope this sheds some new light on the subject.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0
Valv

I have a Garmin 160 which is lesser than 240 and I am really impressed with the finder.
I like also the capability of having a side of the screen with a Flasher bar, thing that only now current expensive finders have. Flasher might not as fast as a Vex or Zercom, but helps a lot.

Val

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  



  • Your Responses - Share & Have Fun :)

    • ZachD
      Its that time of year again pick up your heart guard and your flea and tick.  
    • Smoker2
      Where are you located?
    • eyeguy 54
      Time to get the yak ready. Might need to paddle a couple spots on the sippi soon. 
    • mrpike1973
      Nice Crappie!
    • Rick G
      Eyeguy and I made it out one last time yesterday. Access points are getting pretty bad in our area. Was finding roughly 2ft of  very chunky ice in the places we drilled holes. With the warm weather and bright sunahine we had, I'm guessing we lost a few inches through the day Fishing wasn't exactly fast and furious, we did get our fish... but really had to work for the quality.  The area we ended up finding our fish was a shallow 6-10ft dark bottom flat, close to where they will move come ice out.   It soon became apparent the fish we were targeting were almost swiming with their back right against the bottom of the ice, infact my two best crappies hit while my bait was only inches below my hole.  Baits we found better success with were the Northland slugbug and The Impulse Mayflies in bright colors. Jig size didn't seem to matter much due to the depth we were fishing. As I am typing this, my thoughts are already turning toward warmer days spent chasing smallies on the river. The boat and yak are soon to be ready, rods will be strung and so on. It was one heck of a long winter.... fished with some real good people from this site I had more good days than bad, got some monster fish locally... for these things I'm truly blesaed.... like I said,It's been a long winter....I'm glad it's over Pic is of my last big ice crappie for the season  
    • Cliff Wagenbach
      I will certainly keep you informed about the progress of the hatchery. I expect to see the nets and traps go in within the next two to three days. The run should be very strong as the fish are already moving into Pike Bay strongly. Cliff
    • Bigfatbert
      Thanks Cliff for your Pike River deteriorating ice reports and pics . I. Really want to show my wife the hatchery when the action is really happening this year , I would assume you will be right on that when this happens , is there any way that you can give a shout out on here as to just when this scenario is happening up there . With the warmer temps being quite steady now , I would think the run will be rather strong this year when things get going ..  
    • biff
    • CigarGuy
      I got the 4 smaller ones the other day. They are a little over 2" long and paid only $6.64 total to my door.  The quality seem pretty good, we shall see once I put them to some use! 
    • Bryan P
      Thanks Leech! Ya you need a life jacket in a kayak. I have mine behind my seat, but Yes I should be wearing it.