Jump to content
  • GUESTS

    If You  want access  to member only forums on FM, You will need to Sign-in or  Sign-Up now .

    This box will disappear once you are signed in as a member.

Binoculars?


Code-Man

Recommended Posts

So I got a gift card from my dad for Scheels and I decided I was finally going to get a pair of binoculars that would be impressed with but not break the bank. I looked at a few but the salesmen pretty much suggested on pair of binoculars and they were 350+ dollars. Granted they were really nice I was hoping 150-250 dollar price range. I bow hunt about 80-85% of the time so don't need to see 1 mile but would like to get a pair that wouldn't be 20 lbs hanging around my neck.

Does anyone have some suggestions or recommendations? I do like the smaller styles and granted I know they cost a few more then the bigger ones but 350 dollars for a pair of binoculars? I would really like 150-250 dollar range and brand is not a big deal I'm just looking for something to start looking at.

Thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The first name I will throw out is Nikon, I only have one decent set of binocs BURRIS which came with my scope but they are cheaper than the level you are talking about. I have drooled over a few sets of light weight Nikons, but I don't get out chasing coyotes or deer as much as I used to or need to........

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like my Leupold Cascades. Don't recall what I paid for them though. One thing I will say is that when it comes to optics, you do get what you pay for. When I was searching for mine I was told that you won't find much quality in anything below about $300.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

save it add some money to it and get a pair of Zeiss you will not be disapointed ,every time you use em you will say its the best money i ever spent, take youre time and get the best quality you can afford!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a pair of Nikon Monarchs 10x42. I think I paid aroind 300$ for them. I've tried the Leopold that are around the same price range. I like these ones more because they had a wider feild veiw. The Monarch's has a 6 degree where the leopolds's has a 5.1 degree range. It makes a big difference when your looking at field with deer 400 yards away.

I've heard good things about Meopta. There around 500$. I heard nothing but good things about them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have some Wind River(Leupold import) Cascades 10x42 and I paid around $279 for them. That was ten years ago though. They are a very respectable set of binocs. Once you have a good set you will be surpised how often you use them..I use mine bowhunting, rifle hunting, pretty much when ever I'm outside.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have the Nikon Monarchs as well. I found a deal online for about $279. You can save a good chunk of money ordering on line, instead of buying in the store. I think in this case I saved 50 bucks. And they're not huge and bulky either. I love mine. If you lived closer to the cities I'd consider selling them to you. I'm a little short for the house payment after the holidays.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just bought a pair of Camo Nikon Monarchs 10x42 at g-mountain for $279. They are not bulky and they are pretty light.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

scheels does make a bino very similar to the nikons and leupolds discussed above. kick in the extra buck and buy a good set. you will not be dissapointed, even if they are just for bowhunting. I will not go in the woods without a good pair.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have the NIKON monarch 10x42 and in ten years NIKON has fixed them three times now no questions asked. I wear them everywhere including crawling on stalks, hanging stands you name it. I am hard on them and the optics have never failed or fogged up inside. I was given a of monarch x 10x42 to use while mine were being fixed this winter and I was happy to have mine back. The monarch x series was not worth the price difference in my opinion. I would really suggest the NIKON monarch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a pair of Cabella's 8x42 Alaskan binocs and I love them. They ran me about $500 but they are a night and day difference to the $150 binocs. I will never go back to the cheap ones again - although these will last me forever so I won't need to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was looking at getting a pair of the nikon monarchs in the 12x42. I've read that the 12x magnification will appear to be shaky if you are not using a tripod. Can anyone attest to this? Should I just go with the 10x magnification?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If money was no object, I'd buy a pair of Steiners or Zeiss.

But it is.

For compacts, I run with a Nikon ProStaff 12x25. Waterproof, very sharp and clear, about $150, and excellent for the all-around use I need. I have no issues with shakiness at 12x, but I'm used to holding a heavy camera and long lenses steady. With proper technique, the handheld 12x Nikons work well for me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really like Nikon products but I have a set of Buschnell Bino's I had picked up at that R store in Walker if I remember correctly I paid about 80.00. I mostly use these for bow hunting as they are light weight and fit well. They are 10x42 honestly I have never been much of a buschnell fan for most part they can be cheap but the set I picked up have really surprised me and are durable and still clear after a few seasons now and even took them out on a muley hunt this fall so mabey they're making better products now or I have been lucky with this pair just my 2c

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not an expert, but as I know it, the biggest difference between binoculars, is what you can see in low light conditions. The better ones draw more light.

If you're buying them at a big box store, go right at sundown, and ask them if you can take a couple outside to compare. You can give them your license or something to hold.

The store I was at let me walk out into the parking lot and look around. There's a fairly big difference that you notice in low light, that you won't notice inside a well lit store.

Most of my use outside of baseball games, is hunting/scouting deer, and I like to have them for first light, and last night conditions.

There's a place over by my house where I go watch deer feed in the evenings. I used to use the cheap Bushnell, and now my Nikon Monarch. There's really no comparison. There are times when I can't see very well with the naked eye because it's getting too dark, but can still see looking through the nikons just fine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Check out the Nitrex binoculars. I have some 8x42s that work well in low light. The only thing I don't like about them is the pull out eye cups. Would prefer twist out cups. I did a blind test on a bunch of different models at different prices and liked them for $280 then found them at Natchez for half that. They are a steal at $140.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

another vote for nikon monarchs. compared them side by side with some svaroskis in good light conditions and couldnt tell the difference. didnt get a chance in low light conditions.

I think this says it all. i thought I lost mine and was thinking i was gonna have to buy a replacement pair....and didnt even think about making a switch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 11 years later...

Check out the Carson 3D Series High Definition Waterproof Binoculars with ED Glass. Its the best hunting binoculars

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Your Responses - Share & Have Fun :)

    • Kettle
      Walked today and yesterday, flushed 9, shot at two and got two. Hopefully next year I'll have a dog to hunt with. Still warm up here, skim of ice on ponds. Weather has been nice. Hopefully walk a bit more the next few weeks. Been pretty cautious walking for birds to not interfere with deer hunters. There sure are not the deer hunters there used to be 
    • LakeofthewoodsMN
      On the South Shore...  The focus for many this week is the ongoing deer hunting season which is a big tradition in these parts, even for avid walleye anglers.  There were some that either already harvested their deer or are more into catching fall walleyes than hunting.     Those that are fishing are taking advantage of the unseasonably warm weather and excellent walleye and sauger bite that is happening across the lake.  Cold weather is in the forecast in the upcoming days and weeks so that is also getting many excited. The best depths on the south end of LOW are 22-28 feet of water.     Vertical jigging with frozen emerald shiners is catching most of the walleyes, saugers and jumbo perch.  Depending upon where on the lake you are fishing, some slots and big trophies are in the mix as well, but most reports are talking about good numbers of eaters.    Jumbo perch are coming in good numbers this fall which will serve ice anglers well.  Watch out for an occasional pike or even lake sturgeon mixed in with the walleyes.      There are good numbers of walleyes and saugers across the south shore which is setting up nicely for early ice.   On the Rainy River...  There continues to be good numbers of shiners in the river, and consequently, there are good walleyes in the river as well.     Walleyes along with saugers, pike and some sturgeon are coming in up and down the river.  Most walleyes are being caught in 10-25 feet of water in various stretches of the river.   Jigging with live or frozen emerald shiners is the key. Some anglers are also still slow trolling crankbaits upstream to cover more ground and find fish. Both methods are producing solid results. Sturgeon fishing remains strong.  The catch-and-release sturgeon fishing is open into the spring when it changes to the "keep season" on April 24th. Up at the NW Angle...  As temps are getting colder, most are in the woods hunting and not fall fishing, however, for those who bundle up, fishing continues to be excellent.     A nice mixed bag with walleyes, saugers, perch, pike and crappies being caught. Very good muskie fishing with the colder water temps and shorter days.  Some big fish and some good numbers are being caught amongst the islands.  Both casting and trolling is getting it done.  
    • gimruis
      I hunt in the rifle zone so I don't have a need to use a shotgun to hunt deer, but I would be looking at this if there was ever a need to.   There could be state legislation introduced next summer that eliminates the shotgun zone completely.  It has bipartisan support.  Wisconsin removed theirs years ago and MN is usually later to follow.  They've tried to pass it more than once and it came up just short both times.  Probably just a matter of time.
    • Wanderer
      Oh, h e l l no! 
    • leech~~
      Screw that, here's whatch need!  😆   Power-Shok Rifled Slug 10 Gauge 766 Grain Grain Weight: 766 Shotshell Length: 3-1/2in / 89mm Muzzle Velocity: 1280
    • Wanderer
      20 ga has become a real popular deer round in the last 5 or so years.  The rifled barrels are zinging those sabot slugs with rifle like accuracy out to 100 yards easily.  Some go so far as dialing in for a 200 yard shot but really, by 150 they’re falling off pretty low.   I have a single shot Ultraslug in 20 ga that shoots really well at 100 yards.  Most everyone I know that has bought a slug gun lately has gotten the Savage 220 in 20ga.  Problem can be finding the shells you want.
    • leech~~
      My son always bugs me about getting a nice light over-under 20ga for grouse hunting.  I say Heck no, I'm getting a 3 1/2" 10ga so I can put as much lead in the air that I can!!     So, I'm keeping my 12ga.  
    • 11-87
      That’s almost exactly what I was thinking.  Have slug barrels for both   One for turkey and one for deer.      I have a 20ga mosseberg as well. (Combo came with the scope but never used.   I always liked the 12 better
    • leech~~
      Wanderer is right on the money and covered it well.  I was wondering too if you had a slug barrel for one of your guns?  If so you could make that your slug gun with a scope, and the other your turkey gun with the Red dot.  As you can afford it. 
    • Wanderer
      Kinda depends on if you want magnification or quick target acquisition.   More magnification options and better accuracy with a scope.  You get what you pay for too so get comfortable with a budget for one.  Tasco and Bushnell work but I find they lose their zero easier, have low contrast and don’t gather light well in low light conditions.  That said, I’m still using one I haven’t replaced yet.  Vortex has been the hot brand for the past several years for bang for the buck.  Good products.  Nothing beats Swarovski though.  Huge dough for those.  Burris is another decent option.   There are some specific models for shotgun/slug hunting in the economy brands and bullet drop compensation (BDC) reticles.  Based on experience I’d recommend not falling for that marketing ploy.   Red dots are usually lower magnification and easier to get on target.  Reasonably accurate but don’t do well with definition, like searching the brush for your target.  I put a HAWKE red dot on a .22 for squirrels and it’s been good.  For turkey, that’s probably the route I’d go.     If your slug shots are normally not too far and too brushy, I’d think a red dot could work there too if you’re only buying 1 scope.  You’ll be better off dimming the reticle to the lowest setting you can easily use to not over shine the target and get a finer aim point.   If you don’t have a slug barrel, you might appreciate one of those.  I had a browning with a smoothbore slug barrel that shot Brenneke 2-3/4 inch well.  The 11-87 would well fitted with a cantelever rifled barrel. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.