Jump to content
  • GUESTS

    If You  want access  to member only forums on FM, You will need to Sign-in or  Sign-Up now .

    This box will disappear once you are signed in as a member.

Your ideal first round for the Wolves....


Coach1310

Recommended Posts

Okay so the Wolves have #4, #16 and #23 in the first round. What would you like to see?

I am kind of against giving up 2 first rounders to move up and get who I assume would be Turner. I would be for giving up one pick and a player, but not 2 picks. We still have that wonderful first rounder coming due to the Clips and it isn't lottery protected thanks to Kevin Mc"Fail"'s great deal for Marco Jarich, so I think we need as many young prospects as possible. The ideal situation would be Turner to fall to #4, but my ideal, realistic result would be:

#4. Wesley Johnson F Syracuse.... long, athletic, slasher type. Good on the glass. I'm not in love with him, but with the guys I think will be available I think he is the best fit and fills a need.

#16. Xavier Henry SG Kansas.... he has slipped in some projections due to not having great numbers last year, but Kansas was loaded so that took away from him some. He can shoot it and from DEEP.... I just think he has a TON of upside and could be a steal at #16. I have seen him going at #15 in quite a few mocks.... my next choice would be James Anderson from Ok State... probably the most polished and NBA ready pure 2 guard in the draft which helps him slide this far as many teams think he doesn't have a lot of room to improve..

#23. I really think if the PERFECT player is not available they will move this pick or even possibly move the #16 pick in hopes of picking up a similar pick next year. I would like to see them move Jefferson and this pick for a pick next year and a veteran type guy to come in and be a leader in the locker room. I think we have seen the best of big Al and this would allow Love some more PT.... I'm not in LOVE with him either, but I see no point in having both of them

Should be interesting.... maybe we will just take 3 power forwards this year smile

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd be fine with them trading all three picks to move up to #2, I don't think Philly would do it though. The Wolves have enough trouble hitting on a top 5 pick, let alone a player picked in the teens. I know some gems kind be found in the mid to late first round, but the Wolves don't have an eye for spotting talent that late. Well, they did draft Ty Lawson last year in that range, but that was directed by Denver. Looks like Lawson could be a better player than Jonny Flynn.

I would love to get Turner, but if that doesn't happen then I guess I'd be okay with Wesley Johnson. ESPN is comparing him to Shawn Marion. I wouldn't mind landing Crawford from Xavier with a later pick if they could get him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Trade them all, and get Turner, I dont care! Atleast then we have a good chance at a good starter, which we need. We dont need a bunch of 4 year bench players, we have an entire team of them now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would try and trade big Al, Rubio, and the 16th pick for the 2nd pick and E.Brand who is dead weight with a bad contract that Philly would love to get rid of. The T-losers can afford to sit on that contarct for a couple of years while there young players develope. Then they can spend the money on free agents in a few years. My dream draft would be Turner at #2 and Cousins at #5.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would payoff the Clippers pick while we have so many and be done with all of McHale's horrible trades. They can't year after year be dealing with who else do we need to payoff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the Clips have to decide they want the pick and we have to agree. If not, they get our pick next year no matter what... I'm not 100% on this, but I thought that is what I read... so if the Wolves wanted to give up #4 and the Clips said "OK" then we could give them that pick and be done with it.

Moving Big Al for something productive and cheaper would be my biggest want from the draft. If it were me, I would want NO part of taking Brand's contract back... way too much $$ in my opinion..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, Brands contract is huge and that's why you might get Philly to trade. Plus the T.losers are not going to attract anybody worth spending the money on until they get better anyway. Then in 2 or 3 years when the pups grow up they would have Brands money to spend on a player.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I say we send Rubio to the Clippers and be done with it. He doesn't want to play here anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am pretty sure the pick is top 10 protected until 2011. Atleast that is what I remember.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't believe it has any protection next year. If the draft went Wall/Turner/Favors, wonder what the Clippers would deal for the #4? Our pick next year and #8 this year? Maybe the wolves would have to package #23 in with the deal or something.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Might be worth considering if they don't love any player that will be there at #4.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't believe it has any protection next year. If the draft went Wall/Turner/Favors, wonder what the Clippers would deal for the #4? Our pick next year and #8 this year? Maybe the wolves would have to package #23 in with the deal or something.

My biggest worry is if the draft goes Wall-Turner-Johnson... I think the 2 players they covet most are Turner and Johnson and with both of them gone, I think you have to look at trading down. I'm not sure what others have to offer, but you have to think about it... it may even be a draft and swap scenairo and we are bound to get one of them right!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also, it is being rumored that the Wolves are considering trading their #16 for the Grizzlies #25 and #28. Sure, more picks are nice, but dropping all the way to #25 takes away the chance to draft a shooting guard the likes of Henry, George, Anderson etc.... My guess would be that they would make this deal in hopes of packaging one of their late first round picks with Al, to move into the mid first...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I actually prefer Paul George to Johnson. I'd love to see James Anderson with our second pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I still think they will try to move into the top 2, they have more then enough picks this year, they have plenty of mediocre talent on the team now, they need a star, and someone liked, that will bring people to the games, they wont get that with a mid 1st round pick. At this point, the teams main focus, I think would be to draw people to the games. Some one that is exciting to watch, and can make the plays now. Wall/Turner!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just heard on the news that the its HIGHLY unlikely that the T-Wolves will make a move for a higher pick in the draft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

but..., since when do GM's tell what they plan on doing to the media?

True. Who knows what this GM is going to do, he definitely isn't scared to make some moves!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK...I'll chime in on this since I am a NBA rube and have been following the draft closer than about anyone not named Chad Ford. Going into the draft, the Timberwolves have a point guard playing in Spain who could still be the next star, a point guard named Jonny Flynn who is basically Troy Hudson 2, and really at this point can't be seen as anything more than a good backup. SG is a mess. SF-Corey Brewer actually played OK last year, can hit the open 3 and play great defense. PF- well your best 2 players both play this position. Jefferson's defense is so horrible, he couldn't beat me in a game of one on one if I started with the ball. He is a bad passer as well, which makes double teaming him effective. He is a decent rebounder, and probably the best back to the basket scorer in the NBA. Kevin Love is also a bad defender, although not quiet as horrible as Jefferson. He is an outstanding passer, and can hit outside shots and spread the floor more. He is one of the best rebounders in the league already as well, and is still very young. C- Um...

So..my theory is to move Jefferson, get whatever you can for him. I would move him and one of the later first round picks to get a SG/SF, or a C who can play D and rebound. My ideal situation would be this: Draft Cousins with the number 4 pick. Sign Rudy Gay or John Salmons as your SG. Then in one year you would have PG Rubio with Flynn as backup. SG Salmons/Gay or whoever you traded Big Al for. SF Salmons/Gay/player from Jefferson trade. PF Love C Cousins. Bring home the Vanilla Gorilla, Joel Prizbilla. He can rebound and play good D, and isn't a horrible offensive player as well.

As far as the players in this draft go, I think there are only a few that really are going to make a splash. Obviously John Wall is going to be a great player. I also think Turner should be really good too, although be might never be a Lebron/Kobe superstar, I think he could be a Joe Johnson like Allstar anyways. I think Cousins is hands down the next player to take, and in all reality probably the best player in this draft. The numbers don't lie, the kid is a beast. The question is whether or not he is too big of a headcase. I usually don't like this type of player with attitude issues, but the upside is way too high here not to take a chance. He is a 20-10 guy who players great defense too, and is NBA ready now.

Favors is the upside pick here. Looking at his numbers, he can't shoot, for a super athelete, his defensive number like steals and blocks weren't that high. He could grow up to be the next Dwight Howard, or Kwame Brown. He is 6'10, so I'm not sure he has the size to be an NBA center. I like his upside, but don't think he is as sure of a bet as others. Also, what are the Wolves gonna do with another guy who is a PF?

Wesley Johnson. I think he is way overrated. He is not as great of a shooter as people are giving him credit for. He isn't a great ball handler or that quick off the dribble and isn't going to be able to create his own shot easily. He is also almost 23 already, which makes him older than about half the Wolves roster. I think he will end up being a good player/starter in the NBA, but I am not on board with those thinking he is a future all-star.

So naturally the Wolves will end up with Johnson, and trade Jefferson for some parts that don't work. I love MN sports..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

jparruci, I was with you until you lost all your credibility with bringing in Joel P, The Wolves definitely don't need another Herman Munster to play center. The worst run franchise in professional sports will continue to dissapoint and will make another mess of the draft unless, like you said, package a player or two with a draft pick and get somebody who can shoot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was only saying to bring him in as a backup center. He is still a big body who can rebound and defend well. He was producing for Portland before he was injured. I don't like him as a starter, but I think he is just fine as a backup.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good to see someone else seems to be following the draft.... I too like Cousins, but he doesn't want to be here and we really don't have a proven vet here to keep him in line, so that worries me a lot! I really doubt we take him, but I can't complain if we do, especially if it goes Wall, Turner, Johnson. I understand your take on Johnson, but I see him as one of the "safest" picks in the draft IF you don't expect him to be a superstar. Great athlete, mature, skilled, can shoot it and seems to be WAY above average in the intelligence department. He won't be the next Kobe or LeBron, but a 12 year NBA veteran that many teams would love to have because he knows how to play the game and will adapt his role accordingly.

I heard a couple of rumors about the Wolves moving Big Al and the #16 to get another pick in the 8-12 range. I would LOVE to see this, especially if they land Paul George or Xavier Henry. They both have quite a bit of potential and George has BIG upside... although in MN upside never really seems to materialize. I also hope they move that late first round pick for a pick next year as we will lose our pick to the Clips thanks to the Marko deal... should be interesting tonight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice posts jparucci and Coach. I wasn't terribly impressed with the Wolves' drafting. I think Johnson will be decent, but it would have been nice to get a real star at #4. It would have been nice to see Cousins here, but like Coach1310 says, there are probably situations where certain players fail or succeed, and I would guess Minnesota would be a poor fit for DeMarcus. That statement could be made about a lot of players with potential, and its impossible to prove, so call it my gut feeling.

We essentially draft Luke Babbitt and trade him for Martell Webster. And we draft another undersized power forward in Trevor Booker, to be traded for Lazar Hayward and a Serbian small forward. Might as well stash away half of Europe while we wait on Rubio.

I'm not gonna stay up for the second round. *Yawn* Maybe its better to have a boring draft than watch the Wolves trade away or let another good player slip between their fingers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't even begin to explain how dissappointed I am in the Wolves at the moment. Johnson is a SOLID pick and I think without so many swings and misses in the past, Cousins would have been the guy and I think he will be a really good player in the league, but who knows... I was pretty bummed to see George and Henry off the board at 16, but I thought, well Anderson would be a good fit--polished guy who can shoot and high basketball IQ or Babbit because the guy can score and is a tough as nails competitive type... then we trade him and Gomes for Webster??? Not quite sure what we gained?? Yeah we got rid of the Gomes contract, but Webster is still owed over 10 million and a career avg of 9pts per game?? I think Babbit would have been a great fit for the Wolves.... you know what happens when we draft a guy and trade him?? Then we take Booker, trade him to the Wiz so we can take ANOTHER undersized forward and then some guy from Serbia?????

So instead of my ideal first round we got....

Wes Johnson... solid, nothing to get excited about

Webster...... if he couldn't be good in Portland, he won't be here...

Hayward....... Ryan Gomes clone, but unproven

some Serbian... and odds point to the fact he will never make it over anyway..

AND

we get rid of Ryan Gomes

AND

we still don't have a decent shooting guard

AND

Big Al and his contract are still on the Wolves roster.... yipee...gotta run, want to be first in line for twolves season tickets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

im happy with the wes johnson pick then after that the night was a lose, i really dont think they know what to do anymore

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm definitely not saying they know what they're talking about, but Sludge & Lake on KFAN loved the trade when it was announced. They claim Webster can really shoot and will be our starting SG. They also claim his PPG were more a result of having being behind Brandon Roy and having to defer Roy, Aldridge & Co when he was on the court.

I have no idea. I've heard Webster's name, but that's about it.

Fingers crossed. It would be nice if the Wolves were relevant again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Your Responses - Share & Have Fun :)

    • Mike89
      you make it so fun!!!!    😁
    • CigarGuy
      Quick update: Lucky 7 now has rainbows, fatheads, crappie and light pike in stock. If I remember correctly, scoop of rainbows was $8.99.  Stopped at L&M in Virginia. Rainbows $6.99, fatheads and crappie minnows (scoop) $3.99. I was billed $6.99 dozen for rainbows, but was given a healthy scoop!
    • smurfy
      🤣 you da friggin grammar police!🤔😒🤣
    • leech~~
      I have had the same old Strikemaster augers for years, take care of them and they will last a long time.   I think E-augers are nice for around home lakes or at the cabin. The thing that was a eye opener to me was being in D-Rock in New Brighton getting new blades and there were two guys that just got back from a week in Canada on a big ice fishing trip and both very pissed off at their e-augers dying! They were both buying new gas augers.  
    • LakeofthewoodsMN
      On the south end...   Things are shaping up nicely for the MN Fishing Opener which takes place Saturday, May 11th.  Recent rain has brought up the water levels, which were low.  The walleyes and saugers are in very good shape across the south shore.  Expectations are high. The goto presentation this weekend will be a jig and frozen emerald shiner or other kind of minnow.  Emerald shiners are a staple in LOW and walleyes love them.     Hook the shiner through the mouth and out the gill.  Push the minnow all the way up to the jig head and hook the minnow as far back as possible.  This will give you a better hooking percentage.     Jig sizes and colors?  This is stained water so you can get away with a big heavier jig, which is nice for those who don't fish a lot.  It enables them to have more control and feel the bottom.  A quarter ounce jig is a good size for starters.     In stained water, gold, glow white, glow red, pink, orange and chartreuse, or a combo of those colors, are great places to start.   The limit of walleyes and saugers is a combined limit of six fish, up to four of the six can be walleyes.  All walleyes between 19.5 - 28.0 inches must be released.  One fish over 28.0 inches can be kept.  The possession limit in MN is one daily limit of fish. Whether intentionally or unintentionally, there will be some good pike caught this weekend.  The pike season on LOW is open year round. The limit is 3 pike per day with one fish allowed more than 40 inches. All fish 30 - 40 inches must be released. On the Rainy River...  Sturgeon fishing on the Rainy River has been excellent.  The catch and release season is May 8 - 15.  The keep season starts up again July 1st. FYI, there will be some nice walleyes in the Rainy River for the fishing opener.  Lots of sturgeon anglers are reporting big walleyes being caught on sturgeon rigs! Up at the NW Angle...  Angle resorts are ready to roll for the opener.  As many of you know, this is the area of LOW where the islands begin.  Lots of structure.     Go to spots for walleyes, neck down areas, shoreline breaks, points and bays which will have warmer water.  In true NW Angle form, be ready for a mixed bag of fish.  In addition to walleyes and saugers, pike, jumbo perch, crappies, and even a few smallies and muskies will be caught.   Again, the goto presentation will be a jig and minnow. Slow trolling a crankbait will also produce fish if need be.    
    • Mike89
      Totally disagree Gim. I have a gas Jiffy legend auger. Never issues. Take a little time to care for it before putting it away and good to go. Sincei started using non oxygen gas, startron and seafood in never have issues with my 2 strokes.   seafood???   I'd try seafoam!!!   🤣
    • smurfy
      Totally disagree Gim. I have a gas Jiffy legend auger. Never issues. Take a little time to care for it before putting it away and good to go. Sincei started using non oxygen gas, startron and seafood in never have issues with my 2 strokes.   Guess when them damb helicopters from my maple tree arrive I'll  find out how good she blows,  doubt I'll  get a chance first with Stormy to compare!🤭   Anyone got trumps number?😄
    • gimruis
      Wow, 600 bucks for a battery powered lawn mower?  Guess I didn't realize they costed that much.   I assume most people now are using battery augers in the winter.  I remember when they first came out everyone thought they were a joke.  Things sure have changed on that front.  I hardly see anyone using a gas auger anymore.   The selling point, at least for me, would be to avoid having to do any engine maintenance.  Small 2 stroke motors are a pain in the rear to maintain, and unreliable at best.
    • Mike89
      I'll bet she's better at it!!!!  
    • leech~~
      That thing should blow better then Stormy Daniels!  🤣🤣
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.