Jump to content
  • GUESTS

    If You  want access  to member only forums on FM, You will need to Sign-in or  Sign-Up now .

    This box will disappear once you are signed in as a member.

Outdoor Minnesota Deer Photo's


picksbigwagon

Recommended Posts

umichjessy, you must a have a nice spot there in SE MN. If my memory doesn't fail me, I'm fairly certain you've posted a kill pic in that very spot in years past.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good memory. I have been lucky enough to take 3 decent bucks in the last six years from the family farm. 2 of them were taken in the same spot.

2007 - 10 point mainframe with a sticker off the browtine

full-20340-27782-buck.jpg

2009 - 10 point with both G2s split

full-20340-27783-2009front.jpg

2012 - 10 point with both G2s split

full-20340-27784-fullbody.jpg

full-20340-27785-closeup2.jpg

I actually think the buck I shot in 2012 is either the dad or brother of the buck I shot in 2009. The 2009 buck was probably only 3 years old. The buck I shot this year was around is at least 6 years old. They have remarkable similar antlers including the split G2s. This years buck just had more mass but less tine length. I think he was on the decline.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Absolute bulls! I am currently experiencing deep and seething jealousy. Please forgive me. The landscape in those pics has soothed my spirit. I'm better now. smile

Congrats dude! Really great bucks!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Haha. That buck isnt on the decline, hate to break it to ya. Probably a 4.5, MAYBE 5.5 year old deer. He had a couple good years left to grow. Unless you're somewhere wih no decent food sources. Not trying to detract from your deer, its a great buck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Haha. That buck isnt on the decline, hate to break it to ya. Probably a 4.5, MAYBE 5.5 year old deer. He had a couple good years left to grow. Unless you're somewhere wih no decent food sources. Not trying to detract from your deer, its a great buck.
Wow, you can tell that from just two pictures? Impressive. The shooter must have clouded judgement from seeing/touching/handling it in person.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Haha. That buck isnt on the decline, hate to break it to ya. Probably a 4.5, MAYBE 5.5 year old deer. He had a couple good years left to grow. Unless you're somewhere wih no decent food sources. Not trying to detract from your deer, its a great buck.

I know that deer can look remarkably similar, so I am not positive, but I almost sure that I have been seeing this deer for the last 4 years and I would have been proud to shoot him 3 years ago. He was just a small bodied deer. I drug him out of the woods with one hand without breaking a sweat. You very well could be right though. Maybe this is a different deer. I am not challenging your opinion, I am just curious. What do you see that makes you think he is still growing? I have never been great a judging deer past 3 years old. Truth is, I probably haven't seen many beside those that live here in the cities.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its pretty amazing how much deer can change from year to year. Also, some areas have characteristics that will make all the bucks look very similar (which is what you have going on there by the looks of it) I personally look at the bases on this deer and see, more than likely, a 4.5 year old deer. You are in a good area by the looks of it. My thought is he would have peaked close to 200". I picked up sheds from a deer several years ago (well one side) and it was literally bigger than a beer can and just a club. About 10" with several stickers off it. Usually when a deer is on the decline you see A)tons more mass, b)JUNK. Seems to be the trend anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A good friend of mine from Grand Rapids, who's personally taken numerous old, trophy deer, sees similar characteristics as the animals age.

Often, he sees main beams widening further out, with less and less curl back in. Tines that are progressively shortening, and appear shorter, and I guess stunted? More solid mass at the bases, and more sticker junk at the bases as well. Overall, the racks just look older, and less healthy...for lack of a better way to say it?

I think too that older deer just simply "look" older. Much more gray, or even black. Not much for rich brown hair left. Kinda gnarly and grizzled like an old bachelor farmer. I think they used to say, "Long in the tooth"? Although I don't think that phrase had anything to do with describing teeth. smile

The second deer pic above, the one with the Golden Retriever looking on, that deer kinda looks to be a little "long in the tooth". They sure all look like great trophy deer though. Now I'm feeling the envy well back up again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think umichjesse really cares how old they are anyway but had to critcize him by "mis-aging" the nice deer he shot. He is not the Lakosky's where they pass up 5 1/2-6 1/2 year old bucks. A nice rack like that will make me shoot it anyway.

Nice bucks, pretty landscape as well...love these hills and woods and looks like there is good food sources!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Shot this one back on 11-23. Scored 140", not the biggest out there but he was an old buck that had few teeth left.

2012buck986.jpg

2012buck970.jpg

2012buck1006.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gloomis. Are pic one, and pic two of the same deer?

And what's going on with that right brow tine? Kinda cool!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Thanks guys! Yes all pics are of the same buck. He must have damaged his brow in velvet, surprised he didn't break it clean off!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Here's my 10 point bow kill from the last day of November for anyone else out there still thinking about hunting in April. full-13263-31681-photo(4).jpg

full-13263-31682-photo(3).jpg

full-13263-31683-photo.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow! That is a great looking buck Ditchpickle! Congratulations! Great photos!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

full-14944-31685-deer2012.jpg

This is the Buck I harvested last fall. The Taxidermist called last night and he is ready for pick-up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Your Responses - Share & Have Fun :)

    • Kettle
      Walked today and yesterday, flushed 9, shot at two and got two. Hopefully next year I'll have a dog to hunt with. Still warm up here, skim of ice on ponds. Weather has been nice. Hopefully walk a bit more the next few weeks. Been pretty cautious walking for birds to not interfere with deer hunters. There sure are not the deer hunters there used to be 
    • LakeofthewoodsMN
      On the South Shore...  The focus for many this week is the ongoing deer hunting season which is a big tradition in these parts, even for avid walleye anglers.  There were some that either already harvested their deer or are more into catching fall walleyes than hunting.     Those that are fishing are taking advantage of the unseasonably warm weather and excellent walleye and sauger bite that is happening across the lake.  Cold weather is in the forecast in the upcoming days and weeks so that is also getting many excited. The best depths on the south end of LOW are 22-28 feet of water.     Vertical jigging with frozen emerald shiners is catching most of the walleyes, saugers and jumbo perch.  Depending upon where on the lake you are fishing, some slots and big trophies are in the mix as well, but most reports are talking about good numbers of eaters.    Jumbo perch are coming in good numbers this fall which will serve ice anglers well.  Watch out for an occasional pike or even lake sturgeon mixed in with the walleyes.      There are good numbers of walleyes and saugers across the south shore which is setting up nicely for early ice.   On the Rainy River...  There continues to be good numbers of shiners in the river, and consequently, there are good walleyes in the river as well.     Walleyes along with saugers, pike and some sturgeon are coming in up and down the river.  Most walleyes are being caught in 10-25 feet of water in various stretches of the river.   Jigging with live or frozen emerald shiners is the key. Some anglers are also still slow trolling crankbaits upstream to cover more ground and find fish. Both methods are producing solid results. Sturgeon fishing remains strong.  The catch-and-release sturgeon fishing is open into the spring when it changes to the "keep season" on April 24th. Up at the NW Angle...  As temps are getting colder, most are in the woods hunting and not fall fishing, however, for those who bundle up, fishing continues to be excellent.     A nice mixed bag with walleyes, saugers, perch, pike and crappies being caught. Very good muskie fishing with the colder water temps and shorter days.  Some big fish and some good numbers are being caught amongst the islands.  Both casting and trolling is getting it done.  
    • gimruis
      I hunt in the rifle zone so I don't have a need to use a shotgun to hunt deer, but I would be looking at this if there was ever a need to.   There could be state legislation introduced next summer that eliminates the shotgun zone completely.  It has bipartisan support.  Wisconsin removed theirs years ago and MN is usually later to follow.  They've tried to pass it more than once and it came up just short both times.  Probably just a matter of time.
    • Wanderer
      Oh, h e l l no! 
    • leech~~
      Screw that, here's whatch need!  😆   Power-Shok Rifled Slug 10 Gauge 766 Grain Grain Weight: 766 Shotshell Length: 3-1/2in / 89mm Muzzle Velocity: 1280
    • Wanderer
      20 ga has become a real popular deer round in the last 5 or so years.  The rifled barrels are zinging those sabot slugs with rifle like accuracy out to 100 yards easily.  Some go so far as dialing in for a 200 yard shot but really, by 150 they’re falling off pretty low.   I have a single shot Ultraslug in 20 ga that shoots really well at 100 yards.  Most everyone I know that has bought a slug gun lately has gotten the Savage 220 in 20ga.  Problem can be finding the shells you want.
    • leech~~
      My son always bugs me about getting a nice light over-under 20ga for grouse hunting.  I say Heck no, I'm getting a 3 1/2" 10ga so I can put as much lead in the air that I can!!     So, I'm keeping my 12ga.  
    • 11-87
      That’s almost exactly what I was thinking.  Have slug barrels for both   One for turkey and one for deer.      I have a 20ga mosseberg as well. (Combo came with the scope but never used.   I always liked the 12 better
    • leech~~
      Wanderer is right on the money and covered it well.  I was wondering too if you had a slug barrel for one of your guns?  If so you could make that your slug gun with a scope, and the other your turkey gun with the Red dot.  As you can afford it. 
    • Wanderer
      Kinda depends on if you want magnification or quick target acquisition.   More magnification options and better accuracy with a scope.  You get what you pay for too so get comfortable with a budget for one.  Tasco and Bushnell work but I find they lose their zero easier, have low contrast and don’t gather light well in low light conditions.  That said, I’m still using one I haven’t replaced yet.  Vortex has been the hot brand for the past several years for bang for the buck.  Good products.  Nothing beats Swarovski though.  Huge dough for those.  Burris is another decent option.   There are some specific models for shotgun/slug hunting in the economy brands and bullet drop compensation (BDC) reticles.  Based on experience I’d recommend not falling for that marketing ploy.   Red dots are usually lower magnification and easier to get on target.  Reasonably accurate but don’t do well with definition, like searching the brush for your target.  I put a HAWKE red dot on a .22 for squirrels and it’s been good.  For turkey, that’s probably the route I’d go.     If your slug shots are normally not too far and too brushy, I’d think a red dot could work there too if you’re only buying 1 scope.  You’ll be better off dimming the reticle to the lowest setting you can easily use to not over shine the target and get a finer aim point.   If you don’t have a slug barrel, you might appreciate one of those.  I had a browning with a smoothbore slug barrel that shot Brenneke 2-3/4 inch well.  The 11-87 would well fitted with a cantelever rifled barrel. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.