• GUESTS

    If You  want access  to member only forums on FM, You will need to Sign-in or  Sign-Up now .

    This box will disappear once you are signed in as a member.

  • Join In - We Share Fishing Reports & Outdoor Information Here

     
      You know what we all love...

      The same things you do!!!! Share what you love & enjoy in the outdoors as well as thank those whose posts you 'appreciate.'

      Have Fun!!!

  • 0
Sign in to follow this  
DRH1175

Humingbird vs lowrance.

Question

DRH1175

I have used Lowrance products for years and have liked them. What are the advantages of the humingbirds over the lowrance. Someone told me they are way more advanced but in what ways?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

15 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
Sandmannd

Biggest thing if you have the money is side imaging. Have a buddy who has it and it's a really sweet feature.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0
croixflats

I wonder how the side imaging works in rough water. I can see it being a good tool for bass fishing but I dont see how good it would be for walley.

I think each company has there own bennifits. I sure would not say one has better technoligy than the other it comes down to what you want the sounder/chartplotter to do for you.

For me the Garmin will satisfy my needs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0
Sandmannd

Worked fine when I was out with him in some pretty choppy water.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0
reddog

Rough water will have little or no effect on side imaging.

Not good for walleyes, but good for bass? I dont see the difference.

You are correct, both have good sounder and chart capabilities. Hbird has SI.

I'll be without SI when the pry it from my cold dead hands.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0
PerchJerker

In my opinion HB has an advantage if you want Side Imaging, and Lowrance has an advantage if you want to use LakeMaster chips or any of the mapping options other than Navionics. I think those are the only significant differences.

Both companies make a great product and they get better every year. It's hard to imagine just how much better these units could get, or what more they could do for you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0
Shack

I will say a very slight down fall to SI and Humm. is the first season you own/have it, you have learn it. I got SI last spring, used it a ton last summer and barely scratched the surface on the learning curve. The manual is the same size as most bibles wink I would never trade SI though smile

That said, I would own nothing but Humminbird for open water wink

The Nav. chip is great in the Bird, the sonar is second to none and then SI. I found my self using the sonar more than the SI last summer. The flasher feature Humm. has built into their units is great also.

Big waves might have an effect on SI, as well as turning tight will distort. Short of that, nothing bad to say from me on Humminbird. Very reliable!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0
backlash 1

Can you zoom in any closer on the hummingbirds than you can with lowrance, using the Navionics chip, or is it still the same 1/16 mi?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0
Deitz Dittrich

You can zoom in scary close on my unit.. I have the 08' Nav chip and a 997.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0
fishwater

You can zoom in scary close

The Humminbirds will tell you that you are OVERZOOMED at a certain point, you can make a break look like a flat if you want.. The birds also allow you to select different depths to be shaded a different color on the display.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0
veha44

"Can you zoom in any closer on the humminbirds than you can with lowrance, using the Navionics chip, or is it still the same 1/16 mi?"

Yes you can zoom in closer then 1/16 of a mile, but you can also do that with most new Lowrances and many of the older ones have updates now where you can do it with them too. I think only some of the handhelds do not allow you to zoom in closer then 1/16 now.

"I wonder how the side imaging works in rough water. I can see it being a good tool for bass fishing but I dont see how good it would be for walleye"

I guess you would have to define rough, up to 2-3ft not really an issue with my 690t. You do start to see the bottom get wavy the bigger the waves get, if your boat bobs more then it bottom will be wavier. The transducer sits on the back of the boat which rocks the least. Finding a rock pile tucked in next to a weed edge or seeing an extra little group of rocks hanging off the main rock pile, or where the inside turns are on a weed flat or breakline or even seeing where the biggest rocks lie will help you put more walleyes in the boat. I took mine to the Rainy and marked where all of the log piles were so we didn't snag so many jigs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0
eyebjim

SI works very well for walleye fishing. I definitely will not go back. I have had lowrance up till now and they have very good units too but the Birds are very nice and the SI is outstanding.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0
PerchJerker

"Can you zoom in any closer on the humminbirds than you can with lowrance, using the Navionics chip, or is it still the same 1/16 mi?"

Yes you can zoom in closer then 1/16 of a mile, but you can also do that with most new Lowrances and many of the older ones have updates now where you can do it with them too. I think only some of the handhelds do not allow you to zoom in closer then 1/16 now.

That is correct, the Lowrance combo units and globalmap units will zoom in with Nav just as far as they will with LakeMaster. It's just the iFinders like the H2Os and Expedition that will not zoom in very far with the Nav chips.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0
woodboat

You want to consider customer service and product reliability when your comparing the two companies. Humminbirds customer service is first rate. They are quick to respond and stand behind their products. I've even seen the Humminbird technical staff monitoring many of the fishing blogs and answering many product questions directly on-line. Lowrance on the other hand has horrible customer service and their reliability is suspect at best. Just do a search on "Lowrance" on this site to see some of the horror stories people are dealing with concerning Lowrances customer service and product support. Many of the latest Lowrance (non-HD) units have problems reading shallow water and weeds. Lowrance just recently posted a BETA software release to fix this problem. Whether it works or not has yet to be determined. Lowrance pretty much ignored and/or denied even having these problems until they were ready to release the new HD versions. In the mean time, a lot of Lowrance customers that spent a lot of money have had to deal with a lot of frustrations and sonar setting tweaks just to (maybe)make the units work in shallow water. Just to be fair, Lowrance does sell a lot more units than Humminbird does so you have to factor that into the failure rates but it shouldn't factor into the units reliability or other problems.

I also find it kind of interesting that Lowrance is now copying Humminbird when it comes to unit features and capabilities. Humminbird has had dual beam sonar frequency for quit a while and Lowrance's new HD units now have it as well. Same for hot keys, higher screen resolutions, better GPS antenna reception, etc, etc. That tells me that Humminbird is ahead of Lowrance when it comes to product inovations. The new Lowrance HD appears to be nothing more that an enhanced digital oversampling of the same old analog sonar signal. While this will give you a very vivid display, the information displayed is a digital representation of what the sonar unit is interpreting. This interpretation might or might not be a true representation of what is actually going on below the water surface. It will be a very nice looking display of inccurate information. Side Imaging is a completely different technology that shows a far more accurate representation of the bottom structure.

Before I get beat up to badly on this post let me add that I currently have Lowrance units (113cHD and 520C). When it's time to replace them (soon I think) I will most likely switch over to Humminbird.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0
gunflint

I have been a Lawrance user for years. I'll probably be upgrading soon and the SI intrigues me. I am looking forward to hearing about Lowrance's HD But at this point I could go either way. I would like to add that my experience with customer service at Lowrance has been top notch and very impressive.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0
hitthebricks

I have the 997 and mainly fish walleyes and crappies and find the side imaging in deep water very easy to use and read. I can see where on the structure the fish are, the shape of the stucture, schools of Bait fish with larger fish under them, Crappie cribs on Rainy lk and see if there is fish on them. Now I just need to get them to bite. grin

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  



  • Your Responses - Share & Have Fun :)

    • Turk
      Hello. This is a post for those interested in the Bayport area.   Many anglers are waiting for the river to freeze to get after the big river crappie. Right now the Bayport pool is skim iced over. The Bayport area of the St. Croix River is the best and safest place on the river for crappie fishing. The Crappie bite can be very good, but as a whole not the most consistent. Normally the morning bite is be the best though, from a half hour after sun up till 8:30, with an ok bite from 3:00 till sun down.  Techniques that catch crappies: Crappie minnow and bobber on a #6 hook or small jig.  Space out your lines in terms of depth above bottom as these crappies suspend up to 18 feet of the bottom, though four to ten feet above bottom is more common than 18’.  Smaller crappie minnows work better than the larger ones for numbers of caught crappies; minnow heads can be productive on jigs (for anglers actively jigging) instead of a whole minnow when the bite is slow. Crappies always roam the basin; this soft fluffy bottom covers the majority of the Bayport pool, and the majority of the basin is 33 to 36 fow.  Also the shallower basin (the north part of the pool) in 26 to 30 feet can also be productive.  Without a doubt these crappie roam and a mobile angler does better.  Walleye and sauger catches remain inconsistent traditionally, and a few being taken constitutes a good day (15” minimum size for walleye), Jigging Rap’s are a best bet to tangle with river walleyes and saug dogs (glow green tiger, clown, and rainbow trout colors in sizes W3, W5, and W7) either tipped with a minnow head or plain.  White bass are a bonus and very good out of the ice-cold water the top loin is white meat and good eating. Avoid the meat.  Trucks will eventually drive on the ice, but it is a river folks!  Please be aware that there is open water on the river. Because of currents, I would not drive within a mile of the train bridge (swing bridge) near Hudson or the New Stillwater bridge.  The NSP plant also has a warm water discharge.  The Malileau Dam also flows into the Bayport pool. Learn the river in the day and stay on the beaten path until you are experienced enough. Keep Catchin’ Turk
    • Hatto018
      So the weeks betwixt point and click and smoke pole deer hunting always have my ire up to get that last Musky Missile into my hands.  Gotta scrub that slime into my glove until next year.  Going to give the Mississippi below Falls a try here in a few hours.   Might find it frozen, might find a spot to get in.   I'll bring my boat because I'm an optimist,  but I'll bet the kayak is where i end up.    Wish me luck, otherwise I have a scheme on my mind for my favorite frozen central mn musky lake.   
    • Prods
      Chill62 I live in the the Detroit lakes area and have fished a few times with little luck. Just wondering what lake you got the fish in the pictures on. 
    • DP
      Be extra careful on Typo, there are some springs.
    • monstermoose78
      Please share what ya find
    • monstermoose78
      Get them bullheads for smoking 
    • eyeguy 54
      might find out next week
    • fins_n'_feathers
      It has to be the micro sd version 
    • LakeofthewoodsMN
      On the main basin... Ice is making progress and now covers Lake of the Woods. Satellite images from 11-17-18 show the majority of the lake locked up with various pockets of open water. A very welcomed sign, but way too early to be on the main lake. Some spearing for pike taking place on Bostic Bay. Spearers are often the first on the ice. Please use resort marked trails and exercise safety precautions as ice thickness is varied. On the Rainy River... The Rainy River and Four Mile Bay is frozen over with various pockets of open water. Currently, higher than normal current. Areas of the river locked up earlier in the week. Up at the NW Angle... The NW Angle is locked with ice. Higher than normal current. As always, neck down and other areas with current are iffy. Mainly airboat traffic between islands thus far. Work through resorts and stay on staked resort ice trails when ice fishing begins. Safety first. We are getting closer!
    • crappie king 42
      Anyone know whats goin on for ice on Shakopee?