Jump to content
  • GUESTS

    If You  want access  to member only forums on FM, You will need to Sign-in or  Sign-Up now .

    This box will disappear once you are signed in as a member.

Recommended Posts

Posted

Landr, I believe its sac's landing, its the one with the donation box on it for ppl using his road. Hopefully it has been cold enough to freeze that thing up because it was NO FUN going through even with my 4wd!

Posted

maybe everybody should be on the same page with slot litmits, too many different opinions, all i know is that every year walleye numbers are going down in over fished lakes, toooo many people keeping every walleye they catch

There are always going to be guys that are meat hogs and feel the need to keep every walleye/crappie/sunfish they catch. More often than not, the same guys will kick a bass or northern in the weeds because they are "slimy and taste like mud", or the same guys that will shoot a small buck and use a doe tag on it.

I used to be of the mentality of throwing smaller (13-15") walleyes back and keeping 16-20" walleyes. But after conversations with some fisheries/biologist friends and doing a little reading, I feel that a slot, whether it be voluntary or imposed is a better management tool than a minimum length requirement. One only has to look at Lac Qui Parle over the past few years to see what minimum length regulations did to the fishery. You could catch 13" walleyes all day long but finding a 16" fish seemed impossible day after day.

On the other hand, look at lake emily. Any time there is a great walleye bite going on, the lake gets raped. buckets of walleyes taken home day after day. Rumors of double dipping and overlimits start circulating. 5 lb females are filleted up for supper. yet year after year the walleyes are there. Some lakes just naturally handle the pressure better than others. But why pressure them in the first place????

Regardless of theory of management one feels is better, its still important to not abuse the resource.

Posted

Crappiesniffer,

Nice to see a moderator, or frequent contributor, acknowledges that although SH is catching on, is also concerned, and shares his concern that more is needed. Some do it when it's convenient (fish are really biting or just might have the "right" number of "right" fish), and I guess that's progress right there.

Posted

carpshooter i dont know if i agree with the size limit leading to the demise of lac qui parles walleyes. I think it has more to do with the explosion of silver bass and sheephead leading to less forage for walleye and the bass eating young walleye.It also could have alot to do with low water levels or the large fluctuation of water levels in the spring. Size limit may be a contributing factor though. Each lake is unique so a slot that works for one lake may not work for other lakes. So if there is alot of smaller fish take a couple small ones for a meal and if there is good variety of sizes keep a few medium sized fish and let the bigger and smaller ones go.

Posted

Thanks goose89 for the kind words, but I mean what I wrote. I have seen to many anglers take fish home that should be released. Do not get me wrong here, everyone has the right to fish and take what the resourse has give us. But be respectful too. We should hook up and fish sometimes; it would be fun!

Sniffer

Posted

No matter what people say about emily, it does not get near the fishing pressure that waska does no matter when the bite is on or not. I remember when I was a kid and Emily would have hundreds of boats on it on opener, but that was the exception. Minnewaska gets hit like that day in and day out during all times of year. Yes it is a bigger lake but not so much bigger that it can handle that pressure. If you consider partial winter kills, the difference in stocking, and the amount of pressure, the only real difference between Minnewaska and Emily is that Minnewaska is a tourist location where people keep whatever they catch, Emily is more of a fishing destination where people actually release fish and come back time and time again. I bet 75% of the people that fish waska dont even know how to find the access on emily:P.

Posted

On a side note, I am glad that people mostly leave Emily alone. Their were already enough boats out there this fall to screw up the duck hunting!!!!!:) There aren't any fish in that lake anyway so stick to waska folks;).

Posted

carpshooter i dont know if i agree with the size limit leading to the demise of lac qui parles walleyes. I think it has more to do with the explosion of silver bass and sheephead leading to less forage for walleye and the bass eating young walleye.It also could have alot to do with low water levels or the large fluctuation of water levels in the spring. Size limit may be a contributing factor though. Each lake is unique so a slot that works for one lake may not work for other lakes. So if there is alot of smaller fish take a couple small ones for a meal and if there is good variety of sizes keep a few medium sized fish and let the bigger and smaller ones go.

Might be the other way around...walleyes could be gorging themselves on little sheephead and silvers, not to mention bullheads, and have no desire to whack a crawler or minnow. wink

Back on topic; anybody out on waska today that can post up a report on the ice/snow/slush? Going to be 7 or 8 of us up there this weekend doing our best to catch some 13" walleyes and 6" sunnies wink

Posted

Thanks goose89 for the kind words, but I mean what I wrote. I have seen to many anglers take fish home that should be released. Do not get me wrong here, everyone has the right to fish and take what the resourse has give us. But be respectful too. We should hook up and fish sometimes; it would be fun!

Sniffer

I didn't mean to say you didn't mean what you wrote. I believe you. I agree everyone has a right to fish and keep fish, but with respect and responsibility, as well. With knowledge, comes responsibility. I appreciate your reports of good fishing, without advertising yourself, or the lake(s) your fishing on.

Posted

Many believe there are more walleyes in Emmily because there is no restriction at the outlet which allows walleyes to freely return into Emily from the river. Walleyes breed and feed in rivers as one of the prefered walleye habitats. The control structure on the west end of Minnewaska prevents walleyes from returning into Waska...except this year...the DNR pulled it due to high water levels. There are good numbers of eyes being caught this winter...are walleyes moving into waska? Does having the structure out allow better movement of eyes into Waska?

Is this why Emily has so many walleyes because they are allowed to enter the lake to feed?

Thoughts?

Posted

That could be a possibility but is sure is a long way for the walleyes to swim in a little creek.

On Waska yesterday. Lots of slush off plowed roads. Many people stuck. Cross country you better have a sled.

Posted

The walleyes don't have to go far down stream to find riffles and cobble areas for spawning. There are also many bends and holes for them to hang out in. DNR put radio tracking on some walleyes a few years back and tracked 3 walleyes that went to Pelican and then back again to Minnewaska. I thought that was pretty interesting.

Walleyes will move out into streams to spawn...but if there is a control structure in the way, they can't get back into Minnewaska is some of the opinion.

Some think the walleyes are not spawning in Emily, but are returning from the creeks and rivers into Emily to feed. That's interesting too and would give some evidence why Emily can hold some many walleyes and withstand the pressure.

??

Fish On!

Posted

Yes...just a few good roads on Waska to get out. Off the roads there is slush under the snow. It is starting to freeze up but it is still tough traveling.

Crappies were really slamming last night...mostly in the 9 to 10.5 range. We have been marking a lot of fish and catching a few...but last night they really turned on. A lot of fun.

Fish On!

Posted

are the nords still active. thinkin of settin up a spear shack out there sat.

Posted

Yes...very active. Often see two or three on the camera at the same time. They are not very big however...most are 1.5 to 2 lbs. There is a large year class of this size. Occassionally a bigger one comes in.

Fish On!

Posted

What kind of snow/slush depth are you guys seeing off the "roads". Is there a consistant depth of snow that prevents travel, or is there a lot of drifts? I was going to park the truck and bring a wheeler, but maybe getting around in the lifted chevy would be easier? I guess i could always steal a buddy's plow truck too...

Posted

That could be a possibility but is sure is a long way for the walleyes to swim in a little creek.

Used to shoot carp in a drainage ditch that runs into the Chippewa...we were 11 miles upstream from the river. Its not uncommon to see pike swimming through the same ditches in early-mid april as well. Fish will go a long ways to spawn.

Posted

Thinking about coming that way on thurs. am with the big house how bad is it out from sac's landing hoping to spend a few nights

Posted

My parents own a farm with a creek going through it miles from any real lake to speak of. You see plenty of pike, suckers, carp, minnows, in it but never seen a walleye in it. I dont think you can really compare the amount of travel a pike will do to spawn versus a walleye.

Posted

radio tagged walleyes from Minnewaska were found in lake Emily, so they do make if a ways down stream

Posted

Walleyestealer...I hear that a lot about "radio tagged" walleyes making down to Emily, but I spoke with Dean Beck a couple weeks ago to get all the facts from him on that study, walleyes spawning areas, the control structure and what projects volunteers can do to improve the lake. He told me that "no" walleyes were tracked down to Emily...but that a "rumor" was that one was caught in Emily with a tag. He said they tried to track it down but never confirmed if a walleyes with a tag was caught or not. That is when he told me that they did track 3 walleyes to Pelican and that all 3 returned back to Minnewaska.

That is why the question about the control structure at the west end of Minnewaska...are walleyes being let out, but not allowed back into Waska? Should the control structure be open at more strategic times? Should some type of by-pass be built to allow walleyes to move around the control structure a lot like the salmon and trout by-passes?

Fatty56...you might be limited to a few spots but should still be fine. The spots I would send you to appear to still have good access. It was -11F at the store this morning so I would assume the slush is becoming ICE...can't see why it wouldn't. Panfish bite has been really good and lots of pike action with the occassional walleye in the panfish areas.

Fish On!

Posted

Just got off the lake setting up a renter. Roads have really firmed up...travel is rough but I didn't see any slush. There might still be some soft spots but it looked pretty good. Fish seem to be more active...a lot of sunnies swimming around and even a few crappies already. Sunnies were very agressive on the shrimp and would just smack them. He had 3 really nice sunnies in the pail already before I left and more fish coming in. A lot of bass and pike as well but they just cruzed by. I would expect the crappie bite is going to be pretty good tonight.

Fish On!

Posted

has anybody tried fishing lake Emily lately? not easy to get on lake im sure.

Posted

Landdr was the by town or out by sac's landing?

Posted

Fatty56...not sure what you were asking (typo) but he went off the DNR landing.

Fish On!

Posted

Walleyes typically do not travel great distances to spawn. They are very sluggish in cold temperatures when ice is first coming off the lake. It is more typical for Walleyes to spawn on humps or structure near steep drop offs where they use that as a staging area. They do spawn in shallower water where there are typically rocks and sunlight, but for the most part walleyes do not travel far up stream for spawning purposes.

Posted

"Dean Beck"?, i dont believe much that comes out of his mouth about walleyes in minnewaska, he says that minnewaska is not a walleye lake. tell that to all the people that have grown up fishing lake minnewaska.

Posted

Jerome Wendlandt of the Minnesota DNR office in Glenwood radio tracked walleyes in Lakes Minnewaska, Le Homme Dieu, and Mary during 1995, 1996, and 1997, to determine if suitable walleye spawning habitat was lacking or degraded, which could limit walleye natural reproduction. Results differed greatly among lakes. In Lakes Minnewaska and Le Homme Dieu, suitable and traditional spawning habitat (clean gravel, rock, and cobble) was considered limiting. Areas supposed to be, good spawning sites, based on historical surveys, angler word of mouth, or observation of classical rock-gravel habitat, did not attract spawning radio-tagged fish.

Scuba diving at these sites found that spaces between the rocks and gravel were filled with sand that contained silt and other organic material. Walleye eggs deposited on silt or organic material generally are subject to rapid fungal infections that kill the eggs. Sites where viable eggs were located were of sand substrate with a substantial covering of Chara (an underwater plant), especially in Lake Minnewaska. The numbers of viable walleye eggs found on these sites, however, were small. Greater numbers of walleye eggs were located in tributary stream spawning sites in these two lakes.

Wendlandt determined that rehabilitating or placing new spawning substrate in the lake would be expensive, dangerous, and difficult to evaluate. In addition, conditions that degraded the existing spawning habitat would rapidly degrade anything placed in the lake to supply new or to augment existing spawning sites.

Posted

How is the snow on waska and surrounding lakes? Would a wheeler with chains be able to drive around some or pretty much be confined to set paths?

Posted

The lake has really hardened up the past few days u should b good to go.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Similar Content

  • Your Responses - Share & Have Fun :)

    • SkunkedAgain
      Those are some nice lakers. Admittedly, I just hit BWCA lakes in the spring when they come up shallow - so I cheat!   I fished LOW two weeks ago and caught a good sized pike on an airplane jig. It swam around and collected one of my buddy's lines and then slipped the hook on the hole's edge as well. The fish that get away are always the ones to remember.
    • smurfy
      Highbanks just posted thos on book of faces.  Said there access is closed for the season. 
    • LakeofthewoodsMN
      On the South Shore...  Ice fishing remains strong on Lake of the Woods, with resorts and outfitters continuing to offer both day houses and sleeper fish houses. The bite has been good in most areas, and ice conditions are among the best in recent years.    Some ice roads now extend more than 20 miles out, with resorts and outfitters working hard keeping anglers on schools of walleyes and saugers. With nearly 40 inches of ice in many areas, auger extensions are necessary for those fishing on their own. The March forecast predicts daytime temperatures above freezing and overnight lows below freezing, helping to maintain solid ice conditions through the month.  Resort guides and outfitters are on the ice daily monitoring conditions where they travel and fish. Anglers are sorting through smaller fish but are consistently catching limits of walleyes and saugers, along with jumbo perch, eelpout, pike, tullibees, and even a few crappies. The one-two punch of jigging and deadsticking remains the most effective technique. Jigging spoons with rattles, lipless crankbaits, and jigging rap-style lures are producing well, while deadsticks with a live minnow a foot off the bottom are catching less aggressive fish. March is prime time for trophy northern pike, with tip-up fishing proving to be highly productive. It was a great week for big pike and should only get better through March and into April. On the Rainy River...  As it has been most of the winter, walleye fishing has been best in the mornings and evenings using jigs and minnows. Sturgeon fishing has been solid, with some large fish being caught. Anglers should check with resorts before heading out, as ice conditions on the river can change quickly due to current and runoff during the day. Up at the Northwest Angle...  Fishing remains very good. Resorts continue to move fish houses to keep guests on active schools of walleyes, saugers, perch, and pike. Big crappies are still being caught just over the border in Canada, and those interested should check with resorts for the latest conditions and guide services. Lake of the Woods being border water with Canada has an extended ice fishing season, with fish houses allowed on the ice through March 31st.  In addition, the walleye and sauger season is open through April 14th. Pike fishing never closes, and perch and crappie remain open year-round as well. Whether booking a day house rental, sleeper fish house, or resort stay, there is still plenty of time to plan a late-season ice fishing adventure. 
    • JerkinLips
      Van Vac can be a tough hill to travel on.  I parked in the upper parking lot in 2014 and went out fishing in a snow storm.  I think we got about 10 inches of snow that day and they didn't plow at all.  There was no way my front wheel drive caravan was going to make it up the upper hill so I spent the night in my van.  I had prepared for that possibility so I was quite comfortable in the 0ºF night (just started the van up once during the night to heat it up.  I went out fishing again the next day and when I came back they still hadn't plowed the road to the parking lot (late March).  So I towed my snowmobile trailer to the top of the hill with my snowmobile.  Then I made a circular path in the parking lot so I could build up my van speed to go up the hill.  I think it was about 15 attempts to go up the hill before I finally made it to the top.  What an experience.
    • JerkinLips
      Burntside Lake is a beautiful lake and very convenient to get to.  I started fishing it in 2010 when it got to difficult for me to travel into the BWCA while I lived in the twin cities.  I averaged 1 laker/day up to 2018 when my success started to decline.  That was also when I quit going out on snowmobile and just walked to fishing spots.  That probably also contributed to my decline.  My average the last 3 years has been 0.4 lakers/day.  Now that I live in northern Minnesota I think I will travel into the BWCA more for lakers.   My longest Burntside laker was the skinny 33 incher shown in the 1st picture (2020).  This fish weighed only 7#-15oz, and I think it was at the end of its life.  My biggest BWCA laker was 34 inches and weighed 13#-3oz (2nd picture from 2008).  I also caught an 11 pounder in the BWCA in 1999 (3rd picture).   My goal is to someday catch a 20 pounder.  I had one up to the bottom of the hole once that I think was over 20 pounds.  I was jigging a large airplane jig near the bottom when I thought I snagged the rocks.  When I was able to finally move the fish I knew I had a huge one.  I saw its head at the bottom of my 7-inch hole and had a hard time getting it started into the hole.  I reached for the gaff hook but the jig caught on the bottom of the hole and the fish was gone.  Ever since then, I chisel the bottom of my holes to guide the laker's head into the hole.  
    • Wanderer
      Quite a bit a matter of convenience but it was pretty good in the late 2000’s; early 2010’s for me.   It’s fully outside of the B-dub, and expansive, so plenty of places to try.  But never go out there with expectations beyond spending time on one of the most beautiful lakes the state has to offer.   You should count yourself blessed to get 1 trout iced but 5 trout days can happen.  Biggest I’ve gotten out of there is 32 inches.  Average had been 24-27.
    • mbeyer
      Is Burntside "the Laker" spot to fish in the area? Is that a matter of convenience or is Lake Trout populations far better there than any other lake??
    • Wanderer
      It’s been all of 7 years since I’ve fished Burntside.  The last time I also brought my wheelhouse up and headed out of Van Vac.  That was a scary ride down the hill at 11pm when I showed up.  The switchback access road was iced up and the weight got me sliding like I was on a luge.  I intentionally put my rig into the snowbank before I got to the 2nd turn.  It was enough to slow me down that I could make that corner.  I left the lake out of Camp Van Vac and that wasn’t easy either with the double layer of ice.   The lake ice conditions you described are too familiar to me for this time of year.  I’ve  had a wheelhouse out there twice in my years of fishing it, otherwise it’s been sled or wheeler travel only - which is a way better idea!   Reports have been so quiet from there, I’ve wondered if the fishing got tougher or if it’s just the shift in social media that’s the reason.   March trips for me have always had that great expectation but honestly, most March trips for lakers have been a bust.  I’ve been in Canada the past 3 years at this time and only 1/3 were good laker trips.  No trip this year and I’m OK with that.   All this to say, I still miss ice fishing that lake!  I was looking over some of my old spots on my mapping app and thought how nice it would’ve been to have that back in the glory days!     Good luck and thanks for posting!   *6 years, 11 mos, based on a phone pic. * 😉 
    • JerkinLips
      This may end up be a quiet topic, but I thought I would share my results (and lack there of) because of my love for late winter lake trout fishing.  Went to Burntside Lake on Thursday, February 27th for my first time there this winter, and like my last 3 trips there last year I was skunked.   It was a very windy day so I fished in a spot next to a cliff to avoid the wind.  I found 4" of hard pack snow on top of 3" of water over 20+" of ice.  I was able to avoid the water (most of the time) by sitting in my sled portable and walking around very carefully.  I had no bites in 10+ hours fishing and only 3 "follows" of my pike suckers and jig.  Was still a very enjoyable day on the ice.  I saw a few other people out fishing, and was surprised to see that somebody had plowed a huge road out from Van Vac landing and plowed spots for wheelhouses.  Currently there were 8 of them on the ice.   My success on Burntside has definitely diminished in the last few years.  Guess I need to get to "10,000 jigs" to catch another.  Or maybe I will take the tough trip into the BWCA to enjoy the wilderness.
    • smurfy
      🤣🤣 i prefer fish that has flavor......... but thats a pretty funny one right there!!!!!!!!👍
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.