• GUESTS

    If You  want access  to member only forums on FM, You will need to Sign-in or  Sign-Up now .

    This box will disappear once you are signed in as a member.

  • WE CREATE LONG TERM, MEANINGFUL RELATIONSHIPS IN HERE ... PLEASE JOIN US.

    You know what we all love...

    RECEIVE THE GIFTS MEMBERS SHARE WITH YOU HERE...THEN...CREATE SOMETHING TO ENCHANT OTHERS THAT YOU WANT TO SHARE
    When you enchant people, you fill them with delight and yourself in return. Have Fun!!!

Sign in to follow this  
fisherman-andy

Keeping bigger fish wrong?

Recommended Posts

fisherman-andy

There seems to be alot of debate about how fish is being kept, what size, kind, etc...

So I thought I bring up this long overdue issue of what to keep and not to keep.

I guess all of us can agree keeping less than your limit is good. We can also say keeping the legal size limit is good to. But what about undersize and oversize?

I believe in letting undersize fish go, and should'nt be kept in the first place due to regulation. Those smaller fish is definately going to help out in the future fishing. But what about the larger fish?

Is keeping a larger fish wrong? I think yes and no. I think a fish that is way too large should always be let go, for instance a 35+inch walleye or 50+inch muskie or an 8-10lb bass. The downside to these fish is they are way too old and in many cases unable to compete in breeding. There are people that are going to keep one, and it's not going to hurt.

Okay here comes the hard part. Fish that are in their prime.. like say a 20+inch eye, or 5lb bass can still be a very strong contender & breeder. We can easily say this is where the fish population can be hurt if too much is kept.

For example my theory is if we are keeping the 15-18inch eyes and letting the rest go could mean a very good fishery for years to come. It's not rocket science that larger fish produce stronger & bigger offspring. That means plenty of trophy fish in the 19-30inch range. Here is where my theory will sound kinda off-beat or fishy, but I think eyes over 30inches can be taken for trophy if one wants. Anything above 35inches should be released simply because it is just way too old and big.

I know not everyone will agree with me and that this is just my opinion that I am sharing with everyone. You could say different species will have different results. You also have to consider the size or type of body of water, or river.

But really letting all the big ones go isn't all that great when you really think about it. It's letting the great big ones go that make it such a desire or sport.

Anyone feel free to add comments or info...
I would like to know how this issue stands among us.


Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ozzy

For myself I keep smaller pan fish instead of larger ones, let the large ones spawn.(unless it is red lake crappies}
Walleyes any thing over 4 pounds goes back.
I only keep fish if there going to the table that night.
this year I will keep some northern to learn how to get the y bones out and see if they taste as good as everyone says.

sometimes not keeping fish does more harm than good, to many fish not enough prey.
just my 2 cents.

------------------
crazy about fishing

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Trailblazin

You state: For example my theory is if we are keeping the 15-18inch eyes and letting the rest go could mean a very good fishery for years to come. It's not rocket science that larger fish produce stronger & bigger offspring. That means plenty of trophy fish in the 19-30inch range. Here is where my theory will sound kinda off-beat or fishy, but I think eyes over 30inches can be taken for trophy if one wants. Anything above 35inches should be released simply because it is just way too old and big.

Not a bad theory. Here are Mille Lacs Regs:

May 15, 2004: Anglers may keep walleye up to 20 inches, with one trophy over 28 inches in the four fish limit. All walleye from 20 to 28 inches must be released.

July 15, 2004: Anglers may keep walleye up to 22 inches, with one trophy over 28 inches in the four fish limit. All walleye from 22 to 28 inches must be released.

This topic will be debated for many years.
I agree that you must take some fish out and you also must leave some. Use good judgement! Bring home a meal.....Better yet - let the trophies grow.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
little buddy

ozzy... why the exception for red lake crappies? just curious

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ozzy

Little buddy
The exception for red lake crappie is most of the large crappies are from the 1995 year class and I read that 75% will die from old age, and they are the best tasting fish I've ever had.

------------------
crazy about fishing

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Abyss

I also believe in catch and release, but I always keep a couple panfish for dinner. I can understand letting a trophy go, but for me and others like me who are not great fishermen by any means, catching a trophy is a once in a lifetime deal. I can understand some people keeping them, but I personally would let the trophy go (after many photos hehe) since its not really healthy to eat and I dont feel stuffing it and putting it on my mantle would do any good. In my opinion, keeping it or letting it go really wouldnt affect fishing in general since it is a rare occurance to catch a trophy.

Taking your limits all the time will hurt the fishing in the future, but really nothing can be done to the people who do that since its perfectly legal. All we can do is help educate everybody about the problem of doing it and maybe lobby to have tighter regs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
mnwild

I was going to ask a similar question about what size fish are ok to keep. I catch alot of Northern's all in the 16"-20" range maybe a few lbs 2 or 3, would you consider this a small fish to keep. Panfish and Bass I have a general idea of what is small, the Northerns are what I have in question.
Any info is appreciated

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
pikemania

In my opinion the 2-3lbs pike is the perfect size to keep. If you know how to take the y bone out it is a great fish to eat and you are keeping the population of pike in the lake strong by releasing the breeding stock. Most lakes I have been to in Canada the slot limit on pike is 25-36 inches with one over 36. So the 5lb to 12lb (approximately) pike are beeing allowed to spawn and keep anglers from Minnesota coming back year after year.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Juan Grande

I actually caught the biggest bass of my life yesterday morning (almost 6lbs) and I threw it back. I didn't even consider keeping it. I took a few pictures and released it.

My uncle was with and couldn't believe I put it back. He was keeping every bass he caught including several nice fish over 3 lbs. I tried to convince him that those 3 pounders are important spawners and that the smaller fish taste better. To him, bigger fish=bigger fillets.

I guess it's just a matter of personal preference.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
pjfweb

I used to always think... bigger fish = bigger fillets... which of course is completely true. Personally I don't keep the fish I catch that often, but when I do.. it's going to be based completely on taste and almost always, bigger fish = nastier taste... especially when it comes to bass.

For instance, I caught three bass Saturday morning, I kept two (first two fish I kept this year) and they were both 12"... the 3 pounder went back in the lake.

~Patrick

[This message has been edited by pjfweb (edited 06-07-2004).]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beef46

I disagree that taking your limit is a bad thing. The DNR is constantly doing surveys and limits are set based on these surveys. If taking your limit was a "bad thing", the limits would be reduced. That being said what about the size within those limits? Let's talk walleyes. Every lake is different. Personally, I only like to keep walleyes from 15-18 inches. Let the smaller ones grow, let the bigger ones make more babies.

Everyone has their opinion on this and this is just my .02 cents.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Roosterslayer05

andy- you say release the fish between 19-30 inches. Thats good for some lakes but other lakes its fine and wont hurt the population like Mille Lacs, LOW, Superior, Michigan, Erie ect.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  



  • Your Responses - Share & Have Fun :)

    • gimruis
      If the water is that clear and you can see 17-20 feet down, the fish will be very spooky.  And if the sun is out, they will be looking for relief from the sun in the form of shade.  Night time might actually be a better option.
    • gimruis
      Not terrible.  But they can be merciless, I will tell you.
    • Mike89
      below the darn is a park there too if I remember right, Plus Garden City has a park by the river too I think..
    • Rick
      Good fishing in the Blue Earth river too. Also, a short drive to Rapidan can be productive.
    • Wanderer
      Welcome to the site @eg_gophers2124 I have never even seen the lake but these screen shots might help. Navionics Judging by the Lake Finder report, it’s a super clear lake; 17-20 foot clarity but with plenty of weeds. A couple shots of the weed report. Starting from scratch, I would head to the southwest area.  The southern basin has better looking structure too. You might do well simply working edges of the emergent weeds with spinnerbaits in low light and weedless frogs or spoons up in the weeds when it gets to be mid day.  Crawler under a slip bobber on the weed edges could do well also. It’s purely guessing on my part.  Hopefully someone with experience on the lake will chime in. Good luck!
    • Mike89
      walked that creek to the river many years!!!  again home area!!!!  
    • Rick
      Bring your spinning rod and fish for walleyes or white bass at the confluence. Wherever the river is pounding the shoreline fish the current breaks for big flatties. Heavy fiberglass rod with a sturdy baitcaster and 50 lb power pro line will be effective. Fish the head of snags for channels. Setup just like a Lindy rig for them with 1 oz to 5 oz no roll sinker and a big live bait like a 7" bullhead or even larger sucker for flatties. Use cut strips of bait off a large sucker or something similar for channels. Frogs can be good too. Have fun.
    • ifishwalleye
      Thank you Vermilliongold. This took care of the problem. 
    • eg_gophers2124
      Yes it is open. It is $7.00 this year. It is a nice access and I use it every time instead of one of the public accesses. It is on Hwy 24 & county rd 39. It is a little old lady that owns it and collects the money. There is a bucket and notepad to write your plate number on if she isn't home.
    • eg_gophers2124
      We have rented a cabin on Sylvan Lake between Pillager and Brainerd for the family this weekend. My 13 year old really would like to find some bass and pike. I have never fished the lake and don't fish for bass or pike often, does anyone have a fishing report and tips of what depth/lures to use? We do have a boat to get around the lake.  TIA