• GUESTS

    If You  want access  to member only forums on FM, You will need to Sign-in or  Sign-Up now .

    This box will disappear once you are signed in as a member.

  • WE CREATE LONG TERM, MEANINGFUL RELATIONSHIPS IN HERE ... PLEASE JOIN US.

    You know what we all love...

    RECEIVE THE GIFTS MEMBERS SHARE WITH YOU HERE...THEN...CREATE SOMETHING TO ENCHANT OTHERS THAT YOU WANT TO SHARE
    When you enchant people, you fill them with delight and yourself in return. Have Fun!!!

Sign in to follow this  
PierBridge

Over/Under Win Totals......MLB

Recommended Posts

PierBridge

Here is a current Las Vegas list of over/under win totals for this season......I have a few LOCKS in-case you guys want to make some moola!....sorry Windy!

Arizona- 86.5

Atlanta- 86

Baltimore- 65

Boston- 94

Chicago C- 87.5

Chicago W- 76 Under for sure I see 69 or 70 wins tops!

Cincinnati- 76.5

Cleveland- 91

Colorado- 83 Under on the Rockies no miracles this year!

Detroit- 93.5 I'll take the under on this one also!

Florida- 68.5

Houston- 73.5

Kansas City- 73.5

LA Angels- 92

LA Dodgers- 87.5

Milwaukee- 84

Minnesota- 73.5 I like the over here for sure!

NY Mets- 92.5 I think the Mets will 100 this year

NY Yankees- 94

Oakland- 74

Philadelphia- 88

Pittsburgh- 68.5

San Diego- 85

San Francisco- 72

Seattle- 85

St. Louis- 77

Tampa Bay- 72 Under for sure on this one!

Texas- 75

Toronto- 84

Washington- 71.5

I'm looking for 2 more Locks!....what say U! grin.gif

Go Twins!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
tisosy11

I wouldn't lock that TB under in just yet...

Hit the san fran over

Cubbie Under

Hammer Twins OVER

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
mike morris

Man... I can't help but disagree with most of your picks lol.

Chicago's pitching staff looks ugly, but I think they have enough offense to win 76 games. The addition of Swisher and Orlando Cabrera will help.

Colorado is young and getting better. They will win at least 85.

Detroit... I can't help but think they'll win close to 100 games. That offense is just sick! They have a pretty good staff, but nothing spectacular.

Minnesota over 73 for sure! You're right on that one.

Tampa Bay I'd go over. They have a good looking offense, and their staff looks better with the addition of Garza. The bottom half of their rotation is still ugly, but their top 3 looks good (if healthy, in Kazmir's case).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
bassNspear

atlanta will be there, if not higher, have to have faith in the braves.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
maros91

 Originally Posted By: PierBridge
Here is a current Las Vegas list of over/under win totals for this season......I have a few LOCKS in-case you guys want to make some moola!....sorry Windy!

Arizona- 86.5 Over here for sure. Big Unit is back along with Dan HarenAtlanta- 86 Go under. Hampton is hurt again. Smoltz is old, Glavine is older.

Baltimore- 65

Boston- 94

Chicago C- 87.5 Under. I just don't see the Cubs winning that much. Zambrano and Pinella will be duking it out by the All Star break.

Chicago W- 76

Cincinnati- 76.5

Cleveland- 91

Colorado- 83

Detroit- 93.5

Florida- 68.5

Houston- 73.5

Kansas City- 73.5

LA Angels- 92 Go over. AL West is bad besides the Mariners. Angels will be in the Fall Classic this year.

LA Dodgers- 87.5

Milwaukee- 84

Minnesota- 73.5 I'll take the under. Young staff could make for long season.

NY Mets- 92.5

NY Yankees- 94 Go under. Outside of Wang and Pettite, a bunch of ?'s

Oakland- 74

Philadelphia- 88

Pittsburgh- 68.5

San Diego- 85

San Francisco- 72

Seattle- 85

St. Louis- 77

Tampa Bay- 72

Texas- 75

Toronto- 84

Washington- 71.5

I'm looking for 2 more Locks!....what say U! grin.gif

Go Twins!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
bassNspear

im sorry, but atlanta is going to be back on the map this year. I can feel it. Its time for them to get back to where they belong.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
tisosy11

don't bet on braves....not yet

Cox has lost a step...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
PierBridge

Bill..... I was thinking under on the Yankee's also....I'll add them to the betting list.

 Quote:
Man... I can't help but disagree with most of your picks lol.

If a guy faded all my pics over the years they would be rich!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Windy City Walleye Hunter

Pier,

How did I know what your comments would be!!! LOL

Of course I will take my Pale Hose on the over. But I would go with your Twinks on the over as well. I am thinking that the Tribe is ripe for a downfall and 91 seems a tad high. Sorry but I like the Kitties to run the table and agree that they could hit the century mark. I think my Pale Hose will be battling the Tribe for the wild card spot and I see the Twinks coming in a hair behind in 4th. Of course I love the under with the Cubbies, if for no other reason than...THEY ARE THE CUBS! Enough said, a century of frustration. I can see Pinella and Zam-brain-no going nuclear and melting down by July! I would say the Yanks are ripe for a beat down this year too, so bet the under with the pinstripes!

Windy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
First Ice-Mike

I'd take the under on the Phillies - tough division.

FI

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Jarrod32

Kind of an odd one...but I think I'd take over on San Diego at 85...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
PierBridge

I was thinking the same......then again I thought Ron Paul had chance to win also....LOL

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
tisosy11

pads could definately do something

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
IFallsRon

"And, if you want to bet them under 75, it costs you $130 to make $100. If you bet them over, it's $100 to make $110."

75 wins is pretty optimistic for this projected starting staff.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
tisosy11

This weather is getting me itchy for moving my tv into the yard!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
zamboni

Noone else noticed the Twins and Royals have same over/under. Watch out for the Royals in a couple years if they keep their youth movement intact.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
tisosy11

same for the twins!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
zamboni

When the Royals win the WS in 5 years, someones gonna want their box fan back

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
tisosy11

royals have some time yet before being good

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
zamboni

Almost finished ahead of the White Sux last year, and only 1 year removed from being World Chumps. The thing that's going to hurt the Royals is playing in the toughest division in MLB. If they were in the west, I wouldn't put anything past them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Dahitman44

Ummm ... yeah ...

Sorry 2 say but the Royals will never win the WS.

I know never say never, but once their guys are good they will leave.

Rather be a Twins fan than a Royals fan.

Royals -- ish.

Glad they had Brett.

But ... weren't we saying the same thing about the Indians?

Say it ain't so.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
zamboni

Hey Hitman- how many people were saying that about the Braves or Twins in 1990? The Royals have a great farm system, and almost won the Central in 2003 (when I lived there, btw) Never say never, guys- It can happen. I have said it before on here, their potential would be endless had they re-signed their outfield- Johnny Damon, Jermaine Dye and another guy, whats his name? Oh yeah, Carlos Beltran.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
tisosy11

Well, the white sox are a laughing stock that got lucky one year!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Jarrod32

The Royals have done a nice job reloading in the past couple of years. A couple decent young pitchers in Brian Bannister, Zach Grienke, and Kyle Davies; some good young position players in Teahen, Butler, Gordon, Shealy, and even Buck at catcher...Soria could turn into a decent closer...

If their young pitching pans out, they would need to add a couple big bats and they could be a good team. And maybe just in time in a couple years when the Indians and Tigers start to get a bit older and fade...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Scott M

Interesting to look back at this as the Twins and White Sox reached 77 today. 25 and 26 games left, respectively. Could have turned some money!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  

Announcements



  • Your Responses - Share & Have Fun :)

    • guideman
      You need to go west or perhaps north of Pine island if you don't want to go that far.   "Ace"   "It's just fishing man"  
    • Getanet
      I spoke to a buddy who was at Sag over the weekend, and my dad who was fishing a lake a bit north of Leech - none of them had much luck on walleye. I'm chalking it up to a walleye blackout across the northern part of the state. I just need an excuse for the rest of the trips I take! We're talking about coming up again in the fall. I definitely would like to come back for a longer trip, there is so much more of the lake to explore  
    • Borch
      It usually pays off finding your own fish.   Nice report.
    • Borch
      Welcome to the forum.  Lots of good options already given.  Have some fun!
    • ozzie
      The fish are out there and they go hot and cold on the bite but they are catchable!  Anytime you can get the kids out fishing is worth it in my opinion!  Take them up and wet a line is about the only way you will find out if they can catch anything or not.  The main thing to look for before going to Red is the week leading up to the date you plan on fishing is to watch the wind speed and direction.  If blowing from the west for a few days the water stirs up and gets hard to fish. 
    • ANYFISH2
      Welcome TheEyesofanAngler! A ton of good bass lakes around the area.  For numbers of 2 to 4 lb bass, the eastern Todd County lakes near Burtrum and NW Morrison county are hard to beat as well.
    • Wanderer
      Good job guys!
    • YellowFinRed
      Have only been out a couple of times now but did get a 5.5 lb walleye my first 10 minutes out in 16 feet of water. Lots of fish in the 16-20 feet range. No jumping in the boat but catching fish on the mid lake areas. I'll be darned if I'll sit under a bridge with other boats when you can catch fish out on the lake without others boaters around.
    • Gillraker
      Any reports from Buffalo?  I would imagine that they are doing OK right out in front of the marina/beach.  Anybody?
    • DonkeyHodey
      agree with gimruis.  look to the river. Your chances of catching a 3# bass or better are exponentially better on the river.  (There's a reason SC/mississippi was chosen for the Gov's opener last year--the Mississippi around here is really a world class smallmouth fishery.)  (most river rats will tell you that you can essentially catch smallies any time of year and often as by-catch while targeting other species.)  Below the SC dam is pretty much catch and release only (all 12-20 inchers must be released) but it's quite loaded with big smallies! (and lots of good shore areas on public land)  Just be prepared to lose a few lures on snags... Frankly, If you want to stick to lakes, I think you can pretty much pick a lake in a 30 mile radius...--most produce bass in good quantity, it's just years may vary in terms of sizes.  Clearwater is good.  Consider Bass lake adjacent to it.  (...it's not just a clever name.)