Guests - If You want access to member only forums on FM. You will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up on Fishing Minnesota.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

  • Announcements

    • Rick

      Members Only Fluid Forum View   08/08/2017

      Fluid forum view allows members only to get right to the meat of this community; the topics. You can toggle between your preferred forum view just below to the left on the main forum entrance. You will see three icons. Try them out and see what you prefer.   Fluid view allows you, if you are a signed up member, to see the newest topic posts in either all forums (select none or all) or in just your favorite forums (select the ones you want to see when you come to Fishing Minnesota). It keeps and in real time with respect to Topic posts and lets YOU SELECT YOUR FAVORITE FORUMS. It can make things fun and easy. This is especially true for less experienced visitors raised on social media. If you, as a members want more specific topics, you can even select a single forum to view. Let us take a look at fluid view in action. We will then break it down and explain how it works in more detail.   The video shows the topic list and the forum filter box. As you can see, it is easy to change the topic list by changing the selected forums. This view replaces the traditional list of categories and forums.   Of course, members only can change the view to better suit your way of browsing.   You will notice a “grid” option. We have moved the grid forum theme setting into the main forum settings. This makes it an option for members only to choose. This screenshot also shows the removal of the forum breadcrumb in fluid view mode. Fluid view remembers your last forum selection so you don’t lose your place when you go back to the listing. The benefit of this feature is easy to see. It removes a potential barrier of entry for members only. It puts the spotlight on topics themselves, and not the hierarchical forum structure. You as a member will enjoy viewing many forums at once and switching between them without leaving the page. We hope that fluid view, the new functionality is an asset that you enjoy .
Sign in to follow this  
anchor man

Timing belt change???

Recommended Posts

anchor man

I have a 2000 Honda Accord with 73k miles. I've heard some say to replace the timing belt as a maintenance precaution before it goes out, as it'll cost many times more in engine damage than to replace and keep a "fresh" belt. Is this typically an issue with these cars around the 100k mile mark? Have a hard time forking out 600 as maintenance, but maybe it's necessary????

any thought?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
MntkaFishin

I'm not a mechanic by any means, but I will give you my personal story on timing belts. As a senior in high school, about 10 year ago, I was driving the olds mans Plymouth Laser down the freeway at about 65 mph and the timing belt went out. Let's just say everything came to a grinding halt right then and there. It was about $2500 to overhaul the entire engine, all of the pistons where completely shot. I believe the car had about 75k miles at the time. I had to wake the old man up at 11 pm, and he wasn't happy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
fivebucks

I replace them every 60,000 miles for piece of mind. Sure they can last longer but you don't want to go 1 minute too long.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ralph Wiggum

I blew one at 150,000 on my old '87 Accord although I don't know if that was the original or if it had been replaced at some point. If I rememeber correctly, it cost me < $300 to replace.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ham

This is for a 2.3 engine Replace Timing Belt, Balancer Belt, and inspect Water Pump every 105,000 miles. We normally put the idlers for timing belt and do water pump.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Scott K

100k is about the right time to do it, $600 seems steep, its about a 3.5 job and the belt isnt that costly. BUT its a wearing item and if you ride it hard it can bust st anytime, but a new one can also! I would wait!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
jltimm

It would depend upon if your engine is an interference engine or not. In other words if your engine will be junk if the timing belt goes I would replace it as soon as the manual suggests. Otherwise if it breaks and causes no damage other than getting towed to the shop, then you don't have to worry about it, unless you don't want to stall someday when it does break?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
anchor man

thanks for the input. Is there any way for the belt to be inspected, or is that where the cost comes from...labor to get at it?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ChuckN

Have 2 cars (Toyota and Mazda) that have timing belts. Every 60-70,000 miles I change the belt, water pump and if the pulleys need changing I change..

It's about $350 each vehicle.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Scott K

Its not a phisical thing you can see usually, sometimes you will see cracks, but its best to just change it at the recomended interval, and yes this is an interference engine! The recomended interval is 105k as noted before, unless you ride it hard then change it now! But for normal driving it should go beyond the recomandation of 105K.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
McGurk

I'd get a little closer to the 100,000 mile mark. $5-600 isn't too bad if it includes the belt, a water pump, a belt tensioner, and all the labor. I had this all done on my wife's Outback at the recommended 115,000 and got the parts back; the belt looked in pretty darn good shape to me. I do feel much better with her driving around with a new one, though. There's not much that can be repaired for less than $600 after the fact if it is an interference engine.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  



  • Posts

    • JIvers
      Thanks for the reply. Ya, McNally's gets pounded right away. I looked at the ice in front of Schafer's in Onalaska yesterday; there was about 3.5" of ice near the docks, and then it got thinner in a hurry. Apparently someone got wet feet there earlier in the day.  I ended up at Lawrence Lake Marina just north of Brownsville yesterday. There was probably 4" of good clear ice, much better than what I found in  La Crosse. Will post pictures later, but I got one nice largemouth on a tip up at the Marina, one 10" perch, and a couple small perch.  Today I drove around Winona, and fished the backwater pond east of Latsch Island on the west side of the road. The ice there was...not real good.  I stuck close to shore on 3" of not-real-clear ice after my spud bar saved me from a cold bath a little farther out.  I caught a few small perch there, and a bunch of small bluegills. Nothing worth keeping, and nothing on the tip-up. Was expecting the ice to be a little better than what I found, but what do you do?    
    • leech~~
      No Lake Trout in the lake?
    • leech~~
      Thanks Guys.  Starting to feel better about may be getting the sled and porty out there.
    • kelly-p
      Miss the old days too shaky, we had some fun didn't we.  I don't miss working on the lake tho.
    • kelly-p
      Westwind, Roger's and JR's that I know of. Not sure of the cost.
    • Rick G
      Roughly 11inches... there were a few brave people who drove mini vans out
    • Wanderer
      @leech~~ There was all of 10 inches where I was but I’d say it was a tick more.
    • MNoutdoors99
      Thanks for your input, I got myself setup with braid and a fluoro leader and its working great!
    • MNoutdoors99
      Hey all, I am looking to catch a decent perch in the 7" or bigger range and soon because in my class at school we get to taxidermy a fish and I would like to do a yellow perch, I have fished little Pulaski for 2 days and Buffalo for one and caught nothing on Buffalo lake and some bluegills and bass on little pulaski. Anyone got advice on spots in little Pulaski or Buffalo lake or just another lake near by Buffalo as well for perch? Thanks - jim
    • tview
      Thanks Moose  Fun meeting up with the Group today Fun Day . Good times.. i