Jump to content
  • GUESTS

    If You  want access  to member only forums on FM, You will need to Sign-in or  Sign-Up now .

    This box will disappear once you are signed in as a member.

Idea for a more competitive league


Blackhawkxp

Recommended Posts

Watching sports center over the lunch hour and this amazing idea popped into my brilliant mind. confused The league should set a maximum number of years players can be on a team. Example say players like Manning, Brady, Brees, and other top notch talent can only play on a team for 4 years and then must sign with a different team. In my opinion it would give the bottom feeders a shot at actually being competitive. It is like the impact a guy like Favre had on our team. It would put an end to the top bidder teams like the Yankees had for years in Baseball. I think it would showcase the true talents of the players and their ability to turn teams around. It would put an end to the is it Brady or Belichick conversations. Let me now what you guys think!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is a salary cap in the NFL, so there really isn't a "top bidder" situation like there is in baseball.

But I'll play along. However, instead of players having to rotate every 4 years, the coaches should rotate every 4 years. That way fans would have a chance at landing a guy like Belichick, Carrol, Harbaugh or Tomlin (oops) to come in an turn things around.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I went back and looked at the past 20 years of Superbowl winners, I think it is pretty competitive the way it is now. 13 different winners out of 20 years. You need an ownership that is willing to put a winning team together, and a capable front office to put one together. Salary caps, and free agency is what makes teams competitive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The idea kind of came to me as they were talking about the Browns. It would be cool to see if a guy like Manning could go to a historically [PoorWordUsage] team lead them to the super bowl. Basically what Favre did for us. We became a contender when he showed up. Don't really care for the guy but i have to respect him as a player and what he did for our franchise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It takes more than one guy to get a team into contender status. We had a SB ready team during that time, all that we lacked was a solid QB. Like Favre said when he showed up, "the pieces are in place".

No way could you ship Manning to the Browns as they are today and expect much more than what they are doing. Maybe he could get them an extra win or two, but he'd be killed by the lack of talent surrounding him, same as if you put him on the Vikes roster today.

You need a lot of SOLID talent to surround a few superstars on a team, as well as good coaching and coaching strategies to make a SB run.

Sorry, but your idea is preposterous.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think if you put a Hall Of Fame QB on any team that team is automatically better. Your O-line isn't as bad anymore because they know how to change protections,audible, and get rid of the ball.

Your WR's are much better because they know how to read defenses and where to put the ball so your WR's can make plays.

If a guy like Peyton Manning or Aaron Rodgers was on the Vikings this year I'd bet our record would be much better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I realize the likely hood of this is pretty ridiculous. What i think a system like this would prove is: is it the players or the coaches that actually make the team a winner. You take the Patriots for instance and they say they win because of the system. It doesn't matter the player. Just plug them into the system. When Belichick was the head coach for the Browns they sucked. You take Fox in Denver. Is Fox a good head coach or is he riding Manning's coat tails? The team sucks without Manning in my opinion. I guess i am just fed up with our mediocre play and looking for a way for the Vikes to become a winning team again. If that means mandating a time line that Aaron Rodgers can be a packer before he comes to the Vikes so be it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I say give zimmer a couple years and see what happens. The defense is already immensely better than a year ago but the offense just cannot consistently score. Injuries play a role there but our D is much better. Last drive last week looked like the same old vikes but overall they are improved.

Interesting idea but I think it sucks and we are all dumber for having heard it. Lmao. Ala billy Madison

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is Fox a good head coach or is he riding Manning's coat tails? The team sucks without Manning in my opinion.

I've always liked Fox as a coach, he was one of the guys I wanted the Vikes to go after.

Their team is pretty good even without Manning, they won the AFC WEST and went into the playoffs with Tebow lol. Obviously Manning makes them light years better though. It doesn't matter what kind of line Manning has his Jersey looks like it just came out of the wash after every game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

YAAAA... OKkkkk....

Pretty Socialist view/thought... So let me see if I follow along with your thoughts comrade... the team owners with the best scouts and GMs who draft/aquire and have great coaches who develop players would only get 4 years of use from their assets? So that some team that is a perennial dog in the league (browns, raiders, vikings) because of the poor performance of their employees (players, coaches, scouts and GMs) would benefit? The owners of these competitve teams have an investment in their product to provide a winning team so they can guarntee profits, this would be pulled from them to help some other losing team, thus bringing diminishing profits for the once competitve team... where is the reward for their risk in developing a team?... Sounds like a stellar plan!!!

Why not say every four years we should rotate our jobs and saleries so we all can get paid like a millionaire on occassion whether we earned it or not!

I know you were being tounge in cheek but sheesh! Have Viking fans fallen that hard that they now want to rely on some other teams good fortune to potentially turn them into a team worth watching? Has our mindset in a free market society gotten so polluted by liberals that we want to propose how long good players can stay with a team? I owned my own company for 17 years. We always had new/good equipment and fantastic well paid employees who performed incredibly. Maybe I should have only been able to own that equipment for 4 years and after it was paid off it could go away to another company that is struggling with poor equipment and their image... along with all of our good employees that we developed...

Maybe we should just hand out a Lombardi trophy to every team, every year and never keep score in a game again too!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have Viking fans fallen that hard that they now want to rely on some other teams good fortune to potentially turn them into a team worth watching?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why not say every four years we should rotate our jobs and saleries so we all can get paid like a millionaire on occassion whether we earned it or not!

I'm on board with this!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The league should set a maximum number of years players can be on a team. Example say players like Manning, Brady, Brees, and other top notch talent can only play on a team for 4 years and then must sign with a different team. In my opinion it would give the bottom feeders a shot at actually being competitive.
The bad teams would still find a way to foul up good players. Bad owners can't help but getting in the way of their teams. After four years, many of these players would be ready for the "big" contracts and would have the potential of sinking the bad teams in terms of salary cap.

Bad teams need to find better GMs and scouting departments to build up the team cores before they start spending money heavily on high level free agents. Maybe you should talk about rotating the GMs and scouting departments? grin

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Your Responses - Share & Have Fun :)

    • mulefarm
      With the early ice out, how is the curlyleaf pondweed doing?
    • LakeofthewoodsMN
      On the south end...   The big basin, otherwise known as Big Traverse Bay, is ice free.  Zippel Bay and Four Mile Bay are ice free as well.  Everything is shaping up nicely for the MN Fishing Opener on May 11th. With the walleye / sauger season currently closed, most anglers are targeting sturgeon and pike.  Some sturgeon anglers are fishing at the mouth of the Rainy River, but most sturgeon are targeted in Four Mile Bay or the Rainy River.  Hence, pike are the targeted species on the south shore and various bays currently.   Pike fishing this time of year is a unique opportunity, as LOW is border water with Canada, the pike season is open year round. The limit is 3 pike per day with one being able to be more than 40 inches. All fish 30 - 40 inches must be released. Back bays hold pike as they go through the various stages of the spawn.  Deadbait under a bobber, spinners, spoons and shallow diving crankbaits are all viable options.   Four Mile Bay, Bostic Bay and Zippel Bay are all small water and boats of various sizes work well. On the Rainy River...  Great news this week as we learned sturgeon will not be placed on the endangered species list by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.     The organization had to make a decision by June 30 and listing sturgeon could have ended sturgeon fishing.  Thankfully, after looking at the many success stories across the nation, including LOW and the Rainy River, sturgeon fishing and successful sturgeon management continues.   A good week sturgeon fishing on the Rainy River.  Speaking to some sturgeon aficionados, fishing will actually get even better as water temps rise.     Four Mile Bay at the mouth of the Rainy River near the Wheeler's Point Boat Ramp is still producing good numbers of fish, as are various holes along the 42 miles of navigable Rainy River from the mouth to Birchdale.   The sturgeon season continues through May 15th and resumes again July 1st.   Oct 1 - April 23, Catch and Release April 24 - May 7, Harvest Season May 8 - May 15, Catch and Release May 16 - June 30, Sturgeon Fishing Closed July 1 - Sep 30, Harvest Season If you fish during the sturgeon harvest season and you want to keep a sturgeon, you must purchase a sturgeon tag for $5 prior to fishing.    One sturgeon per calendar year (45 - 50" inclusive, or over 75"). Most sturgeon anglers are either a glob of crawlers or a combo of crawlers and frozen emerald shiners on a sturgeon rig, which is an 18" leader with a 4/0 circle hook combined with a no roll sinker.  Local bait shops have all of the gear and bait. Up at the NW Angle...  A few spots with rotten ice, but as a rule, most of the Angle is showing off open water.  In these parts, most are looking ahead to the MN Fishing Opener.  Based on late ice fishing success, it should be a good one.  
    • leech~~
      Nice fish. I moved to the Sartell area last summer and just thought it was windy like this everyday up here? 🤭
    • Rick G
      Crazy windy again today.... This is has been the norm this spring. Between the wind and the cold fronts, fishing has been more challenging for me than most years.  Panfish have been moving in and out of the shallows quite a bit. One day they are up in the slop, the next they are out relating to cabbage or the newly sprouting lilly pads.  Today eye guy and I found them in 4-5 ft of water, hanging close to any tree branches that happened to be laying in the water.  Bigger fish were liking a 1/32 head and a Bobby Garland baby shad.   Highlight of the day way this healthy 15incher
    • monstermoose78
    • monstermoose78
      As I typed that here came a hen.  IMG_7032.mov   IMG_7032.mov
    • monstermoose78
      So far this morning nothing but non turkeys. 
    • monstermoose78
      Well yesterday I got a little excited and let a turkey get to close and I hit the blind!!
    • smurfy
      good......you?? living the dream..in my basement playing internet thug right now!!!!!! 🤣 working on getting the boat ready.......bought a new cheatmaster locator for the boat so working on that.   waiting for warmer weather to start my garden!!!
    • monstermoose78
      How is everyone doing? Holy moly it’s chilly this morning I stayed in bed and will hunt later today when it warms up.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.