Guests - If You want access to member only forums on FM. You will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up on Fishing Minnesota.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Guest

URL walleye Question

6 posts in this topic

I had a guide who I rented house over new years tell me that if I was not as concerned about getting any crappies and wanted to concentrate more on the walleyes that I would catch 5 times the walleyes on the first break (7-9 feet) as opposed to going farther out. So I got to thinking (as dangerous as that may seem)when I was up there last feb, we caught 8 walleyes about 6 miles out on a friday and tried about a 1/2 mile out the next day and caught about 60. Is that the norm or we we in the right place at the right time on that day. Having only fished the lake a handful of times, I was just wondering if anyone else has run into this, thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

hmmm the farther you go out the better chances of getting a crappie r pretty good.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well this is how I see it.

Yes you will catch more walleye closer to "walleye structure". Such as a sharper break, shore bound rockpiles, deep cuts into shallow water so on and so forth. Although on Upper Red Lake a good majority of the shallow walleye will fall into the slot and the bite can be very shortlived at dusk and dawn. Now I'm not saying this is the way it always goes but for the most part it is the trend.

Now take yourself out to deper water you will find more keeper fish, crappies, perch and the tanker pike tend to hang in the deeper parts of the lake this time of the year.

so you have to make the decision "Do I go out deep and open up my chances for all kinds of species or do I restrict to myelf to the shore line and catch-realease a bunch of walleye in short bursts?"

Many of the guides and outfitters have have spent sleeples nights trying to figure out what the best approach would be to satisfy clients. You will notice maybe one or two are in close and the rest are out in the deeper regions.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Johnny

With bringing up the wives mid feb(which took a little convincing)we just want them to catch some fish regardless of what they are. With the crappie bite getting tougher all the time, I thought walleyes may be the better target. From your experience, to get numbers of fish mid feb, are we better off in close or out farther or is it just whatever our gut feeling is at the time.

When I asked the guide I fished with over new years why he does not have any houses in close if he feels the fishing is better in close, his response was that his clients get upset with him or think he is being cheap or lazy when he only brings them a 1/4 mile out as opposed to furthur out. I would not think clients would care where they are if they are catching fish but then again, maybe you do run into that.

Thanks for your help

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Trouble is when houses are in close good reports may come in from out deep and everybody wants to go deep, then the guys out deep hear of a bite in shallow and everybody wants to go shallow, it can be a vicous cycle. crazy.gif

My thought currently (could change tommorow)is to stay deep and keep the chances for crappies/ perch/pike/walleye open. From what I see scouting in shallow on the north side is a very slow bite until the sun touches the horizion creating about an hour of fast action then it dies again until sunrise. When I check houses after this shallow water test they are still catching fish in deeper water well after dark and even some good midday bites.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sounds right to me. Then if you're in shallow for early or late walleye, you'll miss the best chance for crappie out deep.

It's funny rocky but I think you're guide is right-- a guide is better covered with slow fishing if he takes you out farther. The preception by some customers is "at least he's trying". doesn't make much sense? If fishing is good though, it doesn't matter where you are or how far out.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • Jim Uran
      I have to add that my buddy has had the Eskimo propane auger and loves it, he has a season and half using it and it hasn't given him any problems. 
    • Jim Uran
      I've had an Eskimo Shark for a few years and I love it, I'm not a fan of the aluminum handles on it, they have given me an issue or two but customer service is outstanding. Can't comment on the EVO, other than  I think they are gimmicky, but I love their six sided insulated hub. Works great for my family trips or just going out by myself. Sets up easy and there is a ton of room. 
    • papadarv
      Vexilar makes many "fish finders" what model do you have. Is it a flasher, a graph, WiFi type. Will help in knowing what your looking at when running your finder.
    • Cliff Wagenbach
      brianfisher, Welcome to Fishing Minnesota! Using a flasher in open water is way more difficult then using a regular depth finder! It takes a lot of study time to really learn to recognize what it is showing you! Basically anything marked even slightly off of the bottom is likely a fish unless there is a lot of floating weeds etc. in the water column. I suggest that you get out on the ice with your friend this winter and use his flasher through the ice. You will very quickly learn to adjust the gain settings and learn to recognize fish under a controlled depth condition! If possible have someone that is familiar with his flasher model go with you and show you how to operate it. Once you learn to read a flasher your fish catching rate will go way up! Cliff      
    • RuddyDuck
      Ice forming in the dogs water dish right now! Forcast still looks good starting Tuesday. I predict the first truck thru the ice on Buffalo will be Dec 23!