Jump to content
  • GUESTS

    If You  want access  to member only forums on FM, You will need to Sign-in or  Sign-Up now .

    This box will disappear once you are signed in as a member.

Barotrauma and crappies


Kettle

Recommended Posts

https://www.outdoornews.com/2023/02/08/a-case-study-on-minnesota-crappies-looks-at-barotrauma-in-the-popular-fish/

 

Interesting study on barotrauma and crappies. Obviously a relatively small sample study but results were pretty eye opening to me. 

I for one am guilty of this but will definitely change my practice. I have already stopped walleye fishing deeper than 30'. Was a bit bummed to see that fizzing didn't work. I am not opposed to deep fishing like the article states, those times should be limited to strictly harvest. Everybody's thoughs?

  • Thumbs Up 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Kettle said:

https://www.outdoornews.com/2023/02/08/a-case-study-on-minnesota-crappies-looks-at-barotrauma-in-the-popular-fish/

 

Interesting study on barotrauma and crappies. Obviously a relatively small sample study but results were pretty eye opening to me. 

I for one am guilty of this but will definitely change my practice. I have already stopped walleye fishing deeper than 30'. Was a bit bummed to see that fizzing didn't work. I am not opposed to deep fishing like the article states, those times should be limited to strictly harvest. Everybody's thoughs?

I don't like to fish deeper than 30' as well. If I do, I plan to harvest anything I catch. Here on Osakis we have a 15' minimum for walleyes and for this reason I refuse to fish deeper than 30' for them. It pains me to hear about guys fishing in the 40' and 50' holes for them knowing that they can't legally keep anything smaller than 15" so there is likely some mortality as a result. Can't be good for the fishery.

 

On the other hand, I have never noticed or heard about there being a lot of dead walleyes on the shores after ice out in the spring. Does this mean that fish are not being pulled from those depths and released for being too small or is mortality not as big a problem as thought or are the fish just sinking and decomposing before spring thaw? 

 

Whenever I've fished on LOTW through resorts, we have usually been set up at depths in excess of 30' and quite often when bringing up sauger and walleye from those depths their air sac is in their mouth. It forces us to keep many of the small ones. Fortunately, they taste just as good. 

Edited by BobT
  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn't read the article,yet anyway. So are they fish being pulled up from 30-40 feet?? 

 

Over new years I was fishing crapped in 46 feet of water but the fish I caught were suspended at 25 ft???

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Panfish and crappies take an absolute beating in the winter here, might be nice to give some of them a break if barotrauma is causing increased mortality.  LOTW is notorious for this problem in the winter with dinky saugers.

 

About the only time I fish that deep is when I'm on the mud flats of Mille Lacs using a lindy rig or spinner in open water.  The tops of the flats are in the 25 foot range, and the deep edge off of them is deeper, but the lake itself is relatively shallow for such a large body of water, so I don't know if barotrauma is an issue out there.

 

I have heard of tournament bass anglers causing barotrauma to smallmouth on the Great Lakes when they target them in deep water during midsummer.

  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The first time I basin (34-35 ft) trolled on Mille Lacs I caught a 22" walleye with bugged out eyes and I couldn't get it to go back down. When I took an ichthyology course in college (early 80s) it said barotrauma occurred with a quick depth change of 10 meters. I think it could be less than that.

I don't fizz fish anymore. I take a depth bomb attached to a rod and reel and clip it on to the pectoral fin of the fish. Drop it down close to the bottom and give it a yank to release the fish. Doing this should bring the swim bladder back close to where it was when the fish took the express elevator to the surface.

  • Thumbs Up 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
On 2/10/2023 at 9:08 AM, Kettle said:

https://www.outdoornews.com/2023/02/08/a-case-study-on-minnesota-crappies-looks-at-barotrauma-in-the-popular-fish/

 

Interesting study on barotrauma and crappies. Obviously a relatively small sample study but results were pretty eye opening to me. 

I for one am guilty of this but will definitely change my practice. I have already stopped walleye fishing deeper than 30'. Was a bit bummed to see that fizzing didn't work. I am not opposed to deep fishing like the article states, those times should be limited to strictly harvest. Everybody's thoughs?


I’ve been on board with this for years.  Heard a little bit about it then started keeping mental notes on it in my own fishing.  You see it if you know to look for it.

 

I talk about it some but people usually don’t want to hear it because it’s a fun limiter.

  • Thumbs Up 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Rick G said:

For this very reason I refuse to fish for deep fish!!!  I don't much like to go over 20ish feet deep, and even those sometimes show some of the symptoms of barotrauma.  I don't care how slow they are reeled up, those deep caught fish will most certainly die at some point, regardless if they " swam away just fine" .  

👍 i agree Rick...........if i fish deeper my intent is to keep those fish........... and Yes Rick.........i do fish!!!!!!!!🤗

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 9 months later...

Caught some crappies on the north end of Osakis on Nov 15th. Pulled from 25-27 feet. All laid on their side in the live well. All kept but one.

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Similar Content

  • Your Responses - Share & Have Fun :)

    • gimruis
      I hunt in the rifle zone so I don't have a need to use a shotgun to hunt deer, but I would be looking at this if there was ever a need to.   There could be state legislation introduced next summer that eliminates the shotgun zone completely.  It has bipartisan support.  Wisconsin removed theirs years ago and MN is usually later to follow.  They've tried to pass it more than once and it came up just short both times.  Probably just a matter of time.
    • Wanderer
      Oh, h e l l no! 
    • leech~~
      Screw that, here's whatch need!  😆   Power-Shok Rifled Slug 10 Gauge 766 Grain Grain Weight: 766 Shotshell Length: 3-1/2in / 89mm Muzzle Velocity: 1280
    • Wanderer
      20 ga has become a real popular deer round in the last 5 or so years.  The rifled barrels are zinging those sabot slugs with rifle like accuracy out to 100 yards easily.  Some go so far as dialing in for a 200 yard shot but really, by 150 they’re falling off pretty low.   I have a single shot Ultraslug in 20 ga that shoots really well at 100 yards.  Most everyone I know that has bought a slug gun lately has gotten the Savage 220 in 20ga.  Problem can be finding the shells you want.
    • leech~~
      My son always bugs me about getting a nice light over-under 20ga for grouse hunting.  I say Heck no, I'm getting a 3 1/2" 10ga so I can put as much lead in the air that I can!!     So, I'm keeping my 12ga.  
    • 11-87
      That’s almost exactly what I was thinking.  Have slug barrels for both   One for turkey and one for deer.      I have a 20ga mosseberg as well. (Combo came with the scope but never used.   I always liked the 12 better
    • leech~~
      Wanderer is right on the money and covered it well.  I was wondering too if you had a slug barrel for one of your guns?  If so you could make that your slug gun with a scope, and the other your turkey gun with the Red dot.  As you can afford it. 
    • Wanderer
      Kinda depends on if you want magnification or quick target acquisition.   More magnification options and better accuracy with a scope.  You get what you pay for too so get comfortable with a budget for one.  Tasco and Bushnell work but I find they lose their zero easier, have low contrast and don’t gather light well in low light conditions.  That said, I’m still using one I haven’t replaced yet.  Vortex has been the hot brand for the past several years for bang for the buck.  Good products.  Nothing beats Swarovski though.  Huge dough for those.  Burris is another decent option.   There are some specific models for shotgun/slug hunting in the economy brands and bullet drop compensation (BDC) reticles.  Based on experience I’d recommend not falling for that marketing ploy.   Red dots are usually lower magnification and easier to get on target.  Reasonably accurate but don’t do well with definition, like searching the brush for your target.  I put a HAWKE red dot on a .22 for squirrels and it’s been good.  For turkey, that’s probably the route I’d go.     If your slug shots are normally not too far and too brushy, I’d think a red dot could work there too if you’re only buying 1 scope.  You’ll be better off dimming the reticle to the lowest setting you can easily use to not over shine the target and get a finer aim point.   If you don’t have a slug barrel, you might appreciate one of those.  I had a browning with a smoothbore slug barrel that shot Brenneke 2-3/4 inch well.  The 11-87 would well fitted with a cantelever rifled barrel. 
    • 11-87
      Looking for recommendations on scope or red dot    I basically hunt turkey and whitetail, live in southern MN. So it’s all deer/ shotgun    looking to add a scope/ red dot as my eyes don’t work like they used to to with the open sights.    my gun options are 11/87 12. Browning BPS 12    not looking for the most expensive or the cheapest    pros and cons of one over the other
    • SkunkedAgain
      That's good news. I haven't seen any ice in Black Bay yet, but it looks like the small bays should start to freeze up this weekend. Hopefully we make some ice next week.   Below is the forecast for Cook. We should have temps mostly below zero . The bottom section below shows that it should not be windy, and no snow is predicted. All good signs for making ice.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.