• GUESTS

    If You  want access  to member only forums on FM, You will need to Sign-in or  Sign-Up now .

    This box will disappear once you are signed in as a member.

  • Join In - We Share Fishing Reports & Outdoor Information Here

     
      You know what we all love...

      The same things you do!!!! Share what you love & enjoy in the outdoors as well as thank those whose posts you 'appreciate.'

      Have Fun!!!

monstermoose78

Disbelief - mille lacs walleyes - harvest decisions

Recommended Posts

Agronomist_at_IA
12 hours ago, ozzie said:

 

yeah lets get those prime breeders out of the lake!!!  🙄  some of the stuff said on the Mille Lacs situation is just unbelievable...

 

 

LMAO 17-22 slots are because of those females being the prime breeding stock.....22-27in fish are not the prime......sure they can still reproduce, but not has effecently for the resource vs the 17-22in fish.

 

12 hours ago, ozzie said:

 

yeah lets get those prime breeders out of the lake!!!  🙄  some of the stuff said on the Mille Lacs situation is just unbelievable...

 

 

LMAO 17-22 slots are because of those females being the prime breeding stock.....22-27in fish are not the prime......sure they can still reproduce, but not has effecently for the resource vs the 17-22in fish.

 

  • l Love It 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Agronomist_at_IA
11 hours ago, gimruis said:

 

Totally true.  The younger generation is far more interested in protecting the resource and the older generation is far more interested in meat hunting.  Its definitely a generational gap thing.

 

I would disagree with this  statement. 

 

Obviously the older generation  protected and safeguarded the resources otherwise they wouldn't be here. In fact the older generation created many of the resources we have. When you have a renewable resource, a community should take full advantage and use the resouce to the FULL advantage possible. With fish that means harvesting them.

 

Now, I'm not talking rape and pillage the resouce. I'm talking responsible harvest. 

  • Thumbs Up 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
DonkeyHodey

"Obviously the older generation protected and safeguarded the resources..."

This isn't exactly obvious. 

Historically, "protected and safeguarded" means exploiting the resource to the point of elimination, crying to the state/DNR/government to externally replenish it and then complaining/crying more when it isn't done the way you'd like? (or isn't "as good" as it used to be to allow more exploitation)  Oh, and it's also helpful to find a scapegoat to deflect/blame as well--carp, "invasives", other races or "generations", etc...   It would seem that's how the Walleye has been protected and I don't think it's anything to brag about.

"...otherwise they wouldn't be here"

Just because a species can hang on despite exhaustive and devastating pressure does not mean the exploiters can claim any conservational or moral superiority...  

 

This isn't anything unique though:  Lake trout in the great lakes, cod in the North Atlantic, trout in pretty much every stream would also be nodding in agreement... (as would numerous other non-fish natural resources--turkeys (they were extinct in MN until reintroduction in the latter 1900's...), swans (also locally extinct--reintroduced), canadian geese (nearly completely extinct), prairie chickens, bison, etc...)  I can give numerous other examples if you'd like, but I'd rather go passenger pigeon watching...

(...For the record, I don't think the "younger generation" is any less greedy/selfish--But they sure think they're different/better...)

 

Agronomist:  You're sorta talking out of both sides of your mouth--"FULL advantage possible" and "responsible harvest"?  "Full advantage" is never responsible...  But maybe this time will be different, right?...

  • Thumbs Up 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ozzie

ok maybe not per say the "prime breeder" but if your lake is not possessing a number of 18"-22" fish to support your lake system, then I would think, you need a good population of 22"-26" fish to lay eggs, even though the survival rate is lower, and the bigger eyes will at times prey on young walleye if there is a low forage base.  If you have been to a stripping station it always seems the females they get eggs from are mostly over 22".  Maybe they ripen faster and that is the reason, I don't know, but that has been my observation, and I would think if the 18-22" eyes produce "Better" eggs then they would want to use them more.  The main point, I guess I wanted to make, was that Mille Lacs is such an ecological conundrum, it appears, and then to have many different hands in the bowl making decisions on it, I often laugh at all the people that think THEY have the answers, and for the most part are pulling their opinion out of their arse!  I.E. go back to the start of this thread...opinion shot down by science and yet still believes in opinion!  Just my take...

 

*(disclaimer: means nothing as it is not backed by science and the information given was my uneducated thoughts...kinda contradicting ehh )*🤔🤣

 

Get out and enjoy what we have, while we have it, and are around to use it!  Unless you are getting into politics, or are really rich and have a lot of pull with powerful people, you ain't changing much on the big ol'pond!!  (another opinion that means nothing😉

 

I am not even sure why I open these threads and then feel the need to comment?  I guess this is what keep conversation going and a reason to come back and look at the forums...

 

Good Luck and Enjoy the season!

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Flash

Ozzie,

Well said.  This world we live on is over millions of years old.  I don't think much that I do is going to have much impact on the little blup of hopefully around 80 years I get to enjoy it.  Thus, enjoy what you have and let the rest worry about it.  Go Hunting and Fishing and enjoy it.

Flash

"Set the Hook"

 

  • Thumbs Up 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
tfin
On ‎10‎/‎22‎/‎2018 at 8:16 AM, gimruis said:

 

Ok, so all the biologists, scientists, and compiled data is wrong and you're right.  Lets rape and pillage the lake until there's absolutely nothing left.  Great idea tfin.  In fact, maybe when the walleyes are all gone we should harvest all the muskies, smallmouth bass, and pike in the lake too.  And then blame the DNR for it.  Go fly a kite

I didn't say that all the data is wrong.  I didn't say that we should fish the lake out.  I said that the lake should be managed for food not for sport.  You're advanced degree didn't help you with reading for comprehension.  

 

If you don't think it was mismanaged let me ask you two simple questions.  First question.  Was it managed?  Second question.  Did that management keep the lake population of walleye to a satisfactory level?  I will say that people may have taken too many fish but if the DNR is going to take tax money and use it to set limits than they should be accountable for doing a good job.  People don't all know the lake.  They come from all over and if the regulations say you can take 4 fish under 17 then they probably will.  If you do this for or something similar for 5 straight years., you're probably going to end up with fewer small fish and correct me if I'm wrong but wasn't that why the lake got shut down?  I'm not calling for heads to role because the lake has it's many issues.  I'm just trying to keep it from happening again.

On ‎10‎/‎24‎/‎2018 at 6:42 PM, gimruis said:

Totally true.  The younger generation is far more interested in protecting the resource and the older generation is far more interested in meat hunting.  Its definitely a generational gap thing.

Probably because they can hardly wipe their own butt much less clean a fish.  

  • Thumbs Up 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
leech~~
24 minutes ago, tfin said:

 I said that the lake should be managed for food not for sport. 

 

Well it is managed for food.  Sorta?  🙄  

d39cc6-20170927-mille-lacs-survey04.jpg

untitled.png

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
tfin

Yeah, there's nothing pretty about any of that.  The lake is what it is with the abuse it takes.  I don't blame the DNR for shutting it down, the year classes that I've seen while out on the ice have been well represented and It seems to be stronger than I've seen since 2007.   I want to see it opened back up but with different long term management.  Whether it's 1 over and 1 under limits or changing the size of harvest fish as long as they don't repeat the same long term program that got us here.  I'd be happy with 1 over 22 in the summer and 1 under 18 over 15 in the winter if that would keep the lake in good health.

 

I suppose there are differing combinations of three types of fisher people out there.  Those that want the challenge, those that want the fight, and those that want the food.  I couldn't care less about the fight.  I like the challenge of finding the fish and to be able to eat my catch once in a while.  If that means I have to freeze a fish until I catch enough to feed the family then so be it.

  • Thumbs Up 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Agronomist_at_IA
On October 25, 2018 at 9:20 AM, DonkeyHodey said:

"Obviously the older generation protected and safeguarded the resources..."

This isn't exactly obvious. 

Historically, "protected and safeguarded" means exploiting the resource to the point of elimination, crying to the state/DNR/government to externally replenish it and then complaining/crying more when it isn't done the way you'd like? (or isn't "as good" as it used to be to allow more exploitation)  Oh, and it's also helpful to find a scapegoat to deflect/blame as well--carp, "invasives", other races or "generations", etc...   It would seem that's how the Walleye has been protected and I don't think it's anything to brag about.

"...otherwise they wouldn't be here"

Just because a species can hang on despite exhaustive and devastating pressure does not mean the exploiters can claim any conservational or moral superiority...  

 

This isn't anything unique though:  Lake trout in the great lakes, cod in the North Atlantic, trout in pretty much every stream would also be nodding in agreement... (as would numerous other non-fish natural resources--turkeys (they were extinct in MN until reintroduction in the latter 1900's...), swans (also locally extinct--reintroduced), canadian geese (nearly completely extinct), prairie chickens, bison, etc...)  I can give numerous other examples if you'd like, but I'd rather go passenger pigeon watching...

(...For the record, I don't think the "younger generation" is any less greedy/selfish--But they sure think they're different/better...)

 

Agronomist:  You're sorta talking out of both sides of your mouth--"FULL advantage possible" and "responsible harvest"?  "Full advantage" is never responsible...  But maybe this time will be different, right?...

 

 

Wow people read and comprehend only what they want.

 

Using a resouce to its full advantage possible would be harvesting fish responsible, if you can understand something so simple you need someone to help you. 

 

Not ot giving the older generation credit for protecting and managing our resources is just ignorant. However, with your train of thought they must have wiped out the dinosaurs or are somehow responsible.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
gimruis

This is the land of 10,000 lakes.  If you don't like the regs, go somewhere else.  Pretty obvious on this thread who's in it to harvest fish () and who's out there just enjoying it.  Its still ranked #5 in the country for bass and #4 in the country for muskies.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
gimruis
On ‎10‎/‎27‎/‎2018 at 10:11 PM, Agronomist_at_IA said:

Using a resouce to its full advantage possible would be harvesting fish responsible, if you can understand something so simple you need someone to help you. 

 

Yes, I agree.  Sustainable harvest.  And clearly this population of walleyes cannot sustain any harvest, which obviously angers a lot of anglers and a lot of posters on this thread.  Frankly I don't think its ever going to return to the way it used to be either.  The lake has changed too much.  Which is partially why its also become a smallmouth factory.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
leech~~
1 hour ago, gimruis said:

 

 Which is partially why its also become a smallmouth factory.

 

 

You might be right. They don't Net around rock piles much because it snags nets, so the Smallmouth may be safe! 😉

  • Thumbs Up 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Flash

Even the Natives don't eat Small Mouth Bass.

"Set the Hook"

Flash

  • Thumbs Up 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
gimruis

I guess the new regs this winter allow the beer drinkers to keep one fish between 21-23 inches starting Dec 1.  🍺

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
PRO-V
1 hour ago, gimruis said:

I guess the new regs this winter allow the beer drinkers to keep one fish between 21-23 inches starting Dec 1.  🍺

What's it got to do with beer drinking?🤔

  • Thumbs Up 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Agronomist_at_IA
On October 29, 2018 at 8:41 AM, gimruis said:

 

Yes, I agree.  Sustainable harvest.  And clearly this population of walleyes cannot sustain any harvest, which obviously angers a lot of anglers and a lot of posters on this thread.  Frankly I don't think its ever going to return to the way it used to be either.  The lake has changed too much.  Which is partially why its also become a smallmouth factory.

 

 

Even if the lake is changing it should be able to sustain a very health and harvestable population of walleye. While that number may be lower then in the past it still should produce walleye. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Esox62

Unfortunately , the stories of "filling buckets, going home then going back and filling another" are still common topic with the old timers around me. Ah the good ol days they say. To say that generation was into conservation or thought about the future of the sport is a stretch of epic proportions. Not saying everyone was. But, to not see the difference in the generations seems ignorant. I'm 50 and I can't remember anyone younger than me talking about filling buckets going home then going out and doing it again. This was an enormous mistake the older generation made. 

  • Thumbs Up 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Borch

Talk to your local game warden.  It's still prevalent and it's not just the old guys.

 

What's more common is hitting a hot bite and bringing a limit home everyday until the bite dies.  You can try to blame whoever you want.  But the problem is more widespread than you're stating.

But I do agree that it's less of an issue with younger fisherman.  Part of that is education and part is so few are fishing anymore.

  • Thumbs Up 2
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Agronomist_at_IA
14 hours ago, Esox62 said:

Unfortunately , the stories of "filling buckets, going home then going back and filling another" are still common topic with the old timers around me. Ah the good ol days they say. To say that generation was into conservation or thought about the future of the sport is a stretch of epic proportions. Not saying everyone was. But, to not see the difference in the generations seems ignorant. I'm 50 and I can't remember anyone younger than me talking about filling buckets going home then going out and doing it again. This was an enormous mistake the older generation made. 

 

LMFAO...........No body younger does it........you must not have the minority problems like we do down here.......they fish by the code....pirate code.....take everything and throw nothing back. Size doesn't mater....fish type doesn't matter....it all gets cooked. 

  • Thumbs Up 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Your Responses - Share & Have Fun :)

    • Rick
      The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources has confirmed zebra mussels in McCarron Lake in Ramsey County.  A person trained in invasive species detection found six zebra mussels near the public access. A DNR survey found six additional zebra mussels north and south of the public access. In both cases, the zebra mussels were attached to rocks and muskgrass in 1 to 3 feet of water. Ramsey County staff conducted a targeted search and confirmed a lakewide zebra mussel presence. Whether or not any invasive species has been confirmed in a lake or river, Minnesota law requires boaters and anglers to: Clean watercraft and trailers of aquatic plants and prohibited invasive species. Drain all water by removing drain plugs and keeping them out during transport. Dispose of unwanted bait in the trash. Some invasive species are small and difficult to see at the access. To remove or kill them, take one or more of the following precautions before moving to another waterbody: Spray with high-pressure water. Rinse with very hot water (120 degrees for at least two minutes or 140 degrees for at least 10 seconds). Dry for at least five days. People should contact an area DNR aquatic invasive species specialist if they think they have found an invasive species in a waterbody where it has not already been confirmed. More information is available at mndnr.gov/ais. Discuss below - to view set the hook here.
    • Rick
      The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources invites the public to an open house to learn about updating the master plan for the David Dill-Arrowhead State Trail in St. Louis and Koochiching counties.  The open house will be from 6-8 p.m. on Sept. 4 at the Cook Community Center, 699 3rd Ave. S.E., Cook. The main parking lot and building entrance are along Gopher Avenue. Visitors to the open house can review information, ask questions and submit comments. The David Dill-Arrowhead State Trail is about 125 miles long, stretching from an intersection with the David Dill-Taconite State Trail, just east of Tower, northwest to an intersection with the Blue Ox Trail, just south of International Falls. The current master plan was written in 1980 and revised in 1983. The trail is primarily managed for snowmobile use, but other uses such as hiking, biking, horseback riding and skiing are permitted in certain areas. Written comments may also be submitted by emailing [email protected], using the online comment form or sending via US mail to Joe Unger, DNR Parks and Trails, 500 Lafayette Road, St. Paul, MN, 55155. The DNR will accept written comments through Sept. 18. More information can be found on the David Dill-Arrowhead State Trail webpage. Discuss below - to view set the hook here.
    • Raven77
      Disappointing.  Had a mushroom/Swiss burger there last week.  Small, dry, overcooked with a small dab of what looked like mushroom shavings.  Wife had a salad with grilled chicken that was tough as shoe leather.  I was really hoping for better as our cabin is close and we enjoy eating out.
    • BobT
      Was out on Osakis yesterday evening on some midlake humps using 1/4oz jigs with leeches in the hopes I could find a few cooperative walleyes. I was getting pestered by what I thought were perch stealing my leeches. I'm a slow learner so it took too long for me to finally downsize my presentation until my dozen leeches were nearly gone. I finally downsized to 1/8oz digs and caught fish. It was 10" sunnies that were stealing my bait. Once I figured that out, I grabbed my crappy/sunny rod with a flu-flu jig and proceeded to have a pretty good time catching sunnies. I had a container of crawlers with me and just cut them up to tip the jig. Kept five for a meal but could have easily filled out.    They were near the bottom in 18' of water.
    • Surface Tension
      FishHawk and Depth Raider are your choices as Sub Troll and Canon are no longer manufactured.   If you don't have any of the above your relying what you see on your sounder and for speed your looking at the blow back or the timing of the thump from a Flasher.   Interpreting speed at the ball this way is a guessing game but it works along with varying your speed. It might not tell you a precise speed but you should be slowing and speeding up not matter what method for speed your using.  If you set your speed at 2.5 and stick there all day your probably won't boat as many fish as if you were coming in and out of 2-3 MPH all day.    Would speed and temp at the ball be useful, absolutely. Wouldn't it be nice to know that fish hit at 75' down in 45 degree water at 2.8 MPH.   Maybe you it was on a speed up or down when it hit too.    
    • trumy
      Seems just fine but I'm not big on eating out and I don't drink anymore so I'm not a frequent flyer of any establishment 
    • delcecchi
      We are?  I hadn't noticed any such activity.      So, how do you like the new reconstituted Landing?   
    • trumy
      Just curious what any posts on this page have to do with the landing? I really don't care but some of you are sure quick to point out when posts get off the intended subject 
    • delcecchi
      Good to know.  Didn't know that they had boats.
    • Wishin4Walleyes
      Went out of agate in 2 harbors on Saturday from about 8 am to 2 pm after missing the last couple weekends (family vaca). Tough bite. Had 1 short strike on the rigger at 50' with a spoon and 1 screamer hit a tail dancer long lined on a board (must've been a pretty good sized steelie as I've never seen a board disappear behind the boat like that before). Unfortunately it came unpinned. 0 for 2 in 6 hrs of fishing. Tried depths from 20 to 70, tried plugs, spoons, flies, etc. Talked to another gent at the dock and they managed 14. Really love hearing that when you come off defeated and someone out in the same area doing mostly the same things lights them up.   Looking at getting a fishhawk x2 to try and find the thermocline and get on the fish faster. Anyone have experience with the down temp/speed devices on the market and are they a must have like I've heard from some?