Jump to content
  • GUESTS

    If You  want access  to member only forums on FM, You will need to Sign-in or  Sign-Up now .

    This box will disappear once you are signed in as a member.

Recommended Posts

Congrats Casey! Thats got to be an unreal feeling sliding the net under a gosh fish like that in that tourney.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice going Casey, congratulations! I fished it with Travis Sorokie and finished "somewhere" in the middle of the pack of nearly 100 boats, weighing in five fish for 4.55 pounds. We had a couple better fish die on us and couldn't weigh those. Acually, we quit fishing a couple hours early because most of our fish looked like they wouldn't make it, being caught deep and being bounced around out there all day. Fun event though and once again, CONGRATS!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Congrats Casey and Dave! It absolutely couldn't have happened to two nicer guys or better fishermen. Just think Casey, assuming you and Dave split the winnings, 13 more wins like this one and you'll have that new boat ALMOST paid for! laugh

Good Fishing,

MarkB smile

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Congrats Casey and Dave. Always nice to see local guys cash the big checks.. grin

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We fished it for the first time, (first time fishing the lake on Friday) we weighed 6 fish for 6.11 lbs all the fish were 15"-16", we caught 12 keepers on Friday prefishing and then caught 15 fish on sat, we weighed 4 fish at 9am because ther was no way they were going to make another 6 hrs in the live well and went back out looking for a kicker and released a 22" and 20" and caught more 15"ers. It took about 7lbs to cash a check, we ended up in about 18-20th place. It was a record for most fish caught in the tourney.

Can't say enough good things about the tournament! I'm not a tournament guy but I will be back!

The fish were 26'-40' right on the transition from the rocks to the mud off of structure that topped out at 15-20 feet, we had three spots all to ourselves for fri and sat, red beeds and a red hook with a rainbow or shiner out fished everything else.

Thanks to mark b and the other guys on here for such awesome info last week, it got me started and we picked up a pattern and we had a blast!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tjo, the bite could be anywhere on the lake right now. This storm may change a few thing tho.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey John, by chance, did you fish out of a red Lund? If so, I'll explain why I ask.

Good Fishing,

MarkB smile

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Older black Lund 1890 tiller with a 90 hp merc. It has a little red on it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you guys run mono as a main line on your lindy rods or a braid with flouro leader? I noticed the line section my weight was sliding on was pretty beat up. Rocks down there don't help either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you very much for the congratuatulations!! I am taking the day off today to relax! Definately awsome putting the net under a 28.5 on tournament day!! gringrin

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Congrats again Casey, always nice seeing people ya know getting the win! Ill finally be heading up this weekend coming up, excited to fish for the first time this year. Ill be doing some trolling...passing the time before the real opener starts...Muskies crazy

Timmy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

tjo,

I was out this morning with clients and we boated 23 walleyes and kept 12 nice fish!

Largest was 22inches.

Cliff

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think most of the experts (not me) will say they use a braid and flouro leader.

Get a snag, pull hard and break the flouro, just retie the leader and you are back in business.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can go either way. I think a quality rod with a good tip is more important. I like berkley sensation on my jigging and lindy rods. I always use fluorocarbon no matter what on lindys. It's all personal preference.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I honestly feel sorry for the fishermen that have to work all week so they can come to the lake on the week-end and then get the kind of weather we had this past week-end. Actually, the fishing was quite good if you wanted to fight the wind most of the day Saturday and fish in the rain most of the day Sunday. Rain is most welcome, but during the week would be better.

And then there was today grin You absolutely couldn't ask for a more beautiful day to be on the lake. Sunshine and light variable winds made fishing conditions perfect! The week-end cold front appeared to have absolutely no effect on the appetite of the walleyes. My wife and I started out at the deep water mud and today we pulled up with another boat as the first boats out there. Eventually, the numbers swelled to over 30 boats. Everyone is still catching walleyes and the depths still range between 30' and 40', with perhaps the nod going to the 30'-35' depth. The only significant change that I could detect in the bite was that the walleyes seemed a bit more tentative in the "hit" and we had several pick it up and drop it. With that said, any lindy style rig, bouncer/leader, etc would catch all the walleyes you could possibly need.

About 11 o'clock I suggested to my wife that we try a rock reef or two away from the crowd. The fishing was spectacular! I have a mark in 19' on a reef that tops out at 14' surrounded by 30'-40' of water. I knew I was in the right spot because it took my wife <5 minutes to get the first snag. The walleyes were scattered from 25'-29' for about 200 yards along the deep edge of the reef. I marked quite a lot of fish and it was refreshing being able to see them compared to the mud where they are, most of the time, harder to see(for me anyway). We actually caught more walleyes there than on the mud and, today, the average was bigger. Most of the mud walleyes today were 15"-15.5" while the walleyes we caught adjacent to the rocks were beautiful 16"-17.5" The first walleye my wife caught there was smallish but that was the only one. In addition I got a 18" smallmouth in 25' of water that had me going for a bit. When it didn't give me the tell-tale thump when it ran I was certain I didn't have my first big walleye of the season cry

The reason for todays post is that several people that I talk to are having issues with mud questions: are they only on deep mud?, how do you tell if it's mud?, how long will they be on the mud? Well, a blanket answer today would be: if you feel more comfortable fishing more "typical" walleye structure away from the big crowds of boats, then, by all means, give it a try because they were certainly there for us today.

Personally, I'll keep fishing both places until they all go to the rocks.

Good Fishing,

MarkB smile

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the updates Mark. How can you tell if you are on top of the mud versus rocks?

Thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Visually, you can see the difference on your sonar. Mud shows up somewhat granular and dull colored:

full-32496-20759-002.jpg

Rock will show up as a solid dark band and, of course, large boulders,etc. will protrude up from the bottom.

full-32496-20760-001.jpg

Now, this is precisely the reason I like using bouncers. With a bouncer, a fast tip, and braid, I can "feel" the bottom blindfolded and know what it is.

Hope this helps.

Good Fishing,

MarkB smile

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote:
The walleyes were scattered from 25'-29' for about 200 yards along the deep edge of the reef.

bingo!

also, the way we could tell is when you use an old fashion bottom bouncer, you can tink it down the rocks and the when you hit the mud you can feel the soft bottom, do that on a few drifts and pay attention to how deep the transition is and then use your gps and trolling motor to keep you there and follow the structure.. that mixed with my new Humminbird 798 on the same screen that Mark showed is an easy way to find the transition.

Our biggest fish were actually on the rocks and they must have been huge because we were snagging all the time in that spot compared to our other spots.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Our biggest fish were actually on the rocks and they must have been huge because we were snagging all the time in that spot compared to our other spots.

The fish were huge or the rocks were huge? I presume it was the rocks that were huge, but that's not what you wrote. Grammar police in action.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are some big fish there also.. I have a giant corrugated plastic check

To prove it grin

Capt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lol I didn't know I had to use proper grammar on here... I was on the Tower end where that is allowed, i guess you get called out on the cook side.

I meant the rocks but there was no doubt they were holding bigger fish.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yep, folks is very picky about proper language usage on the Cook end. smile

Nah, it just struck me funny is all. Like the old grouch marx thing about "One morning I shot an elephant in my pajamas. How he got in my pajamas I don't know"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mark,

The graphs are very helpful identifying rocks versus mud. Much appreciated! Does anyone have the full auto Glass standings? Can't find on the web.

Also, does anyone else get logged out of the forums regularly after checking "remember me"? not a big deal, but I must contiuously enter my ID and password.

Thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They compiled the results yesterday and they are being uploaded today on their website. 27 teams out of 91 didn't weigh a fish, I thought it was less than that but that is still pretty good, I think they said there were 350 or so walleyes weighed, 3 over 26" and that doesn't count the ones that people culled and I heard a few guys say that they just took theirs home for the frying pan instead of weighing them. (going off of memory so may be a bit sketchy)

That is very impressive!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Got into the slab crappies on opener...here are a fewfull-885-20832-540012_4035141123782_1439

Nice crappies! Great photo!

Cliff

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2012 City Auto Glass Walleye Classic results:

1. Casey Sunsdahl & David Schaeffer – 14.56 pds (*New tourney record*)

2. Steve Amundson & Brandon Mihm – 10.63

3. Tom Schlotec & Len Petroskey – 9.72

4. Tony Oehrlein & Brian Zak – 9.50

5. Buck & Todd Lescarbeau – 9.45

6. Troy Jutting & Ben Johnson – 8.30

7. Ralph Teschner & Horst Graser – 8.12

8. Zach Dagel & David LaCoe – 8.08

9. Jerry & John Waldvogel – 7.94

10. Pat Savage & John Martire – 7.88

11. Chad & Scott Hinrichs – 7.81

12. Dave & Zachary Beckmann – 7.66

13. Mike McPherson & Steve Krasaway – 7.63

14. Russ Dahl & Gary Savela – 7.25

15. Tim & Andy Woitalla – 6.92

16. Steve Rowe & Troy Weyrens – 6.73

17. Steve & Terry Anderson – 6.68

18. Jeff & Frank Niepagen – 6.53

19. Tim & Steve Tauer – 6.16

20. Lorne Jonassen & Mark Sindelir – 6.13

21. John Cochems & John Reilly – 6.11

22. Marc Snow & Brad Engman – 5.67

23. Terry Sjoberg & Kyhl Kissinger – 5.59

24. Don Neisen & Trent Zilmer – 5.36

25. Jack & Mark Bradach – 5.32

26. Brandon Ward & Josh Juaire – 5.24

27. Duane Zywicki & Jamie Loftis – 5.18

28. Paul Pollock & Joe Secola – 5.17

29. Joe Lorenz & Noah Wendorf – 5.16

30. Brad Zilmer & Matt Weimer – 5.12

31. Jeff & Tristana Tatur – 5.03

32. Brad Schuett & Keith Behn – 4.92

33. Henry & Michael Gatzke – 4.58

34. Travis Sorokie & Greg Clusiau – 4.55

35. Johnny & Mike Neisen – 4.45

36. Greg Ribich & Bob Lubovich – 4.29

37. John Cann & Ted Olson – 4.12

38. Jason Svaleson & Gunder Nelson – 4.02

39. Craig & Darin Johnson – 3.87

40. Allan Thompson & Brock Dahl – 3.37

41. Denny VanDeLinde & Larry Burton – 3.30

42. Bobby Schlieske & Scott Dougherty – 3.16

43. Jim Buranen & Darren Simonson – 3.13

44. Patrick MacMillan & Catherine Farley – 3.04

45. Tom Taber & David Haedtke – 2.97

46. Jim Patterson & Adam Ryan – 2.79

47. Mike Sanborn & John Kerr – 2.77

48. Grant Schultz & Lance Dougherty – 2.42

49. Doug Palazzari & Jim Perpich – 2.15

50. Sam & Paul Stanisich – 2.10

51. Erik Ruud & Josh Simon – 2.04

52. Matt Nelson & Mike Sehr – 1.95

53. Jason Hamre & Rich Lees – 1.87

54. Paul Duerre & Josh Kruse – 1.71

55. Joni Mogen-Pfutzenreuter & Pia Starkovich – 1.69

56. Randy Marsh & Gary Setala – 1.36

57. Chris Vogel & Bill Detienne – 1.28

58. Josh Day & Todd Sturk – 1.19

59. Jeff Jandl & Lloyd Williamson – 1.17

60. Ron & Rick Flesvig – 1.06

61. Ben Dery & Dan Brelje - .96

62. Ryan Rud & Joel Pagnac - .88

63. Mark Vermette & Mike St. Vincent - .79

64-90: 27 teams with 0.00 pds

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • The title was changed to 2020-21 Lake Vermilion Fishing Reports
  • The title was changed to 2021 Lake Vermilion Fishing Reports
  • The topic was unlocked
  • The topic was pinned

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Similar Content

  • Your Responses - Share & Have Fun :)

    • LakeofthewoodsMN
      On the South Shore...  The focus for many this week is the ongoing deer hunting season which is a big tradition in these parts, even for avid walleye anglers.  There were some that either already harvested their deer or are more into catching fall walleyes than hunting.     Those that are fishing are taking advantage of the unseasonably warm weather and excellent walleye and sauger bite that is happening across the lake.  Cold weather is in the forecast in the upcoming days and weeks so that is also getting many excited. The best depths on the south end of LOW are 22-28 feet of water.     Vertical jigging with frozen emerald shiners is catching most of the walleyes, saugers and jumbo perch.  Depending upon where on the lake you are fishing, some slots and big trophies are in the mix as well, but most reports are talking about good numbers of eaters.    Jumbo perch are coming in good numbers this fall which will serve ice anglers well.  Watch out for an occasional pike or even lake sturgeon mixed in with the walleyes.      There are good numbers of walleyes and saugers across the south shore which is setting up nicely for early ice.   On the Rainy River...  There continues to be good numbers of shiners in the river, and consequently, there are good walleyes in the river as well.     Walleyes along with saugers, pike and some sturgeon are coming in up and down the river.  Most walleyes are being caught in 10-25 feet of water in various stretches of the river.   Jigging with live or frozen emerald shiners is the key. Some anglers are also still slow trolling crankbaits upstream to cover more ground and find fish. Both methods are producing solid results. Sturgeon fishing remains strong.  The catch-and-release sturgeon fishing is open into the spring when it changes to the "keep season" on April 24th. Up at the NW Angle...  As temps are getting colder, most are in the woods hunting and not fall fishing, however, for those who bundle up, fishing continues to be excellent.     A nice mixed bag with walleyes, saugers, perch, pike and crappies being caught. Very good muskie fishing with the colder water temps and shorter days.  Some big fish and some good numbers are being caught amongst the islands.  Both casting and trolling is getting it done.  
    • gimruis
      I hunt in the rifle zone so I don't have a need to use a shotgun to hunt deer, but I would be looking at this if there was ever a need to.   There could be state legislation introduced next summer that eliminates the shotgun zone completely.  It has bipartisan support.  Wisconsin removed theirs years ago and MN is usually later to follow.  They've tried to pass it more than once and it came up just short both times.  Probably just a matter of time.
    • Wanderer
      Oh, h e l l no! 
    • leech~~
      Screw that, here's whatch need!  😆   Power-Shok Rifled Slug 10 Gauge 766 Grain Grain Weight: 766 Shotshell Length: 3-1/2in / 89mm Muzzle Velocity: 1280
    • Wanderer
      20 ga has become a real popular deer round in the last 5 or so years.  The rifled barrels are zinging those sabot slugs with rifle like accuracy out to 100 yards easily.  Some go so far as dialing in for a 200 yard shot but really, by 150 they’re falling off pretty low.   I have a single shot Ultraslug in 20 ga that shoots really well at 100 yards.  Most everyone I know that has bought a slug gun lately has gotten the Savage 220 in 20ga.  Problem can be finding the shells you want.
    • leech~~
      My son always bugs me about getting a nice light over-under 20ga for grouse hunting.  I say Heck no, I'm getting a 3 1/2" 10ga so I can put as much lead in the air that I can!!     So, I'm keeping my 12ga.  
    • 11-87
      That’s almost exactly what I was thinking.  Have slug barrels for both   One for turkey and one for deer.      I have a 20ga mosseberg as well. (Combo came with the scope but never used.   I always liked the 12 better
    • leech~~
      Wanderer is right on the money and covered it well.  I was wondering too if you had a slug barrel for one of your guns?  If so you could make that your slug gun with a scope, and the other your turkey gun with the Red dot.  As you can afford it. 
    • Wanderer
      Kinda depends on if you want magnification or quick target acquisition.   More magnification options and better accuracy with a scope.  You get what you pay for too so get comfortable with a budget for one.  Tasco and Bushnell work but I find they lose their zero easier, have low contrast and don’t gather light well in low light conditions.  That said, I’m still using one I haven’t replaced yet.  Vortex has been the hot brand for the past several years for bang for the buck.  Good products.  Nothing beats Swarovski though.  Huge dough for those.  Burris is another decent option.   There are some specific models for shotgun/slug hunting in the economy brands and bullet drop compensation (BDC) reticles.  Based on experience I’d recommend not falling for that marketing ploy.   Red dots are usually lower magnification and easier to get on target.  Reasonably accurate but don’t do well with definition, like searching the brush for your target.  I put a HAWKE red dot on a .22 for squirrels and it’s been good.  For turkey, that’s probably the route I’d go.     If your slug shots are normally not too far and too brushy, I’d think a red dot could work there too if you’re only buying 1 scope.  You’ll be better off dimming the reticle to the lowest setting you can easily use to not over shine the target and get a finer aim point.   If you don’t have a slug barrel, you might appreciate one of those.  I had a browning with a smoothbore slug barrel that shot Brenneke 2-3/4 inch well.  The 11-87 would well fitted with a cantelever rifled barrel. 
    • 11-87
      Looking for recommendations on scope or red dot    I basically hunt turkey and whitetail, live in southern MN. So it’s all deer/ shotgun    looking to add a scope/ red dot as my eyes don’t work like they used to to with the open sights.    my gun options are 11/87 12. Browning BPS 12    not looking for the most expensive or the cheapest    pros and cons of one over the other
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.