Jump to content
  • GUESTS

    If You  want access  to member only forums on FM, You will need to Sign-in or  Sign-Up now .

    This box will disappear once you are signed in as a member.

Vikings 2015 Season


Rick

Recommended Posts

  • 'we have more fun' FishingMN Creators

After the 1st game where the Vikings looked absolutely tired and putrid, they came to their home opener against Detroit a little more ready to play.

I was not impressed by the offense or Bridgewater but the run game did show some improvement. I have to wonder how much of that is Detroits poor run game D?

The defense definitely came to play and they looked much better. I wonder how many teams can put the Jumbo package 3 TE sets out there against the Vikes D. If they do and they can play it like San Francisco did and they have a decent offense, which SF did not, those will be long games.

The team needs to be able to get into an offensive rhythm and until they do they are no more than a middle of the road team. Adrian Peterson, Xavier Rhodes, and Harrison Smith are studs. I have a feeling we will see more emerge on the defensive side than do on the offensive side.

Teddy better get it going.

He can get out of trouble in the pocket which keeps him out of the Ponder comparison but he can do without the sailed balls and use the long ball a little at least.

Edited by Rick
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I did not have to watch the Monday night game, way past a reasonable time when you get up at 5 for work.

What I noticed against the Lions is that Teddy is showing improvement.  While I don't know if he will ever be a star quarterback, he is an upgrade over Cassel and Ponder.  I am also going to give him the benefit of the doubt as he has only played two games with both Rudolph and Peterson in his offense.  He is also down two o-linemen.  I think in general the offense still needs some time to gel.

Bring on San Diego!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

The team the last 2 weeks has looked like a completely different squad! Defense looks relatively solid, defensive line is getting push and putting pressure on opposing QB's and our run game has been established the last 2 games. All of those I think will be needed for the purples success this year. Teddy had good decision making in Week 2 vs the Lions but regressed in Week 3. I'm boarding my plane to Denver tomorrow and will be cheering on our beloved Purple at Sports Authority Field. We need to put pressure on Peyton, if that happens I think we have a good shot at winning.

  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 'we have more fun' FishingMN Creators

Go Vikes!! :)

Teddy, let's see more of what you showed us at the end of last year!!!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 'we have more fun' FishingMN Creators

Vikes offense against Denver's number one Defense and the Denver offense going against our Defense that mauled both Stafford and Rivers.

Mannings O-line is a little shaky. I think this is a close game and favors Denver being it's in Denver.

What do you see coming?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 'we have more fun' FishingMN Creators

They lost. I missed the game. How did it look to those of you that watched?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It looked like they lost as well :)

 

I only watched the last 2 minutes of the game, and got to see them lose. So not much useful observation from me!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They fought harder than I thought.  I was impressed with Teddy when he had time to throw, but 7 sacks (and many of those 13-14 yard losses) is too many.  Some blame on him but most on the O line.  The D did a fine job against both the run and pass if you take away that one 78 yard scamper.  (and to be fair, I think the same about the run defense that the broncos put up against AP).  But, between the missed field goal and the sacks stalling drives, it was hard to get a lot of offense going.  On one drive they were within field goal range (a long one to be sure) but two sacks put them way outside of range and they had to punt.  That's basically points taken off the board by not having a QB alert enough to get rid of that ball.

Really impressed with Diggs and Wallace.  I'm surprised Patterson is still on the team, to be honest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Your Responses - Share & Have Fun :)

    • gimruis
      I hunt in the rifle zone so I don't have a need to use a shotgun to hunt deer, but I would be looking at this if there was ever a need to.   There could be state legislation introduced next summer that eliminates the shotgun zone completely.  It has bipartisan support.  Wisconsin removed theirs years ago and MN is usually later to follow.  They've tried to pass it more than once and it came up just short both times.  Probably just a matter of time.
    • Wanderer
      Oh, h e l l no! 
    • leech~~
      Screw that, here's whatch need!  😆   Power-Shok Rifled Slug 10 Gauge 766 Grain Grain Weight: 766 Shotshell Length: 3-1/2in / 89mm Muzzle Velocity: 1280
    • Wanderer
      20 ga has become a real popular deer round in the last 5 or so years.  The rifled barrels are zinging those sabot slugs with rifle like accuracy out to 100 yards easily.  Some go so far as dialing in for a 200 yard shot but really, by 150 they’re falling off pretty low.   I have a single shot Ultraslug in 20 ga that shoots really well at 100 yards.  Most everyone I know that has bought a slug gun lately has gotten the Savage 220 in 20ga.  Problem can be finding the shells you want.
    • leech~~
      My son always bugs me about getting a nice light over-under 20ga for grouse hunting.  I say Heck no, I'm getting a 3 1/2" 10ga so I can put as much lead in the air that I can!!     So, I'm keeping my 12ga.  
    • 11-87
      That’s almost exactly what I was thinking.  Have slug barrels for both   One for turkey and one for deer.      I have a 20ga mosseberg as well. (Combo came with the scope but never used.   I always liked the 12 better
    • leech~~
      Wanderer is right on the money and covered it well.  I was wondering too if you had a slug barrel for one of your guns?  If so you could make that your slug gun with a scope, and the other your turkey gun with the Red dot.  As you can afford it. 
    • Wanderer
      Kinda depends on if you want magnification or quick target acquisition.   More magnification options and better accuracy with a scope.  You get what you pay for too so get comfortable with a budget for one.  Tasco and Bushnell work but I find they lose their zero easier, have low contrast and don’t gather light well in low light conditions.  That said, I’m still using one I haven’t replaced yet.  Vortex has been the hot brand for the past several years for bang for the buck.  Good products.  Nothing beats Swarovski though.  Huge dough for those.  Burris is another decent option.   There are some specific models for shotgun/slug hunting in the economy brands and bullet drop compensation (BDC) reticles.  Based on experience I’d recommend not falling for that marketing ploy.   Red dots are usually lower magnification and easier to get on target.  Reasonably accurate but don’t do well with definition, like searching the brush for your target.  I put a HAWKE red dot on a .22 for squirrels and it’s been good.  For turkey, that’s probably the route I’d go.     If your slug shots are normally not too far and too brushy, I’d think a red dot could work there too if you’re only buying 1 scope.  You’ll be better off dimming the reticle to the lowest setting you can easily use to not over shine the target and get a finer aim point.   If you don’t have a slug barrel, you might appreciate one of those.  I had a browning with a smoothbore slug barrel that shot Brenneke 2-3/4 inch well.  The 11-87 would well fitted with a cantelever rifled barrel. 
    • 11-87
      Looking for recommendations on scope or red dot    I basically hunt turkey and whitetail, live in southern MN. So it’s all deer/ shotgun    looking to add a scope/ red dot as my eyes don’t work like they used to to with the open sights.    my gun options are 11/87 12. Browning BPS 12    not looking for the most expensive or the cheapest    pros and cons of one over the other
    • SkunkedAgain
      That's good news. I haven't seen any ice in Black Bay yet, but it looks like the small bays should start to freeze up this weekend. Hopefully we make some ice next week.   Below is the forecast for Cook. We should have temps mostly below zero . The bottom section below shows that it should not be windy, and no snow is predicted. All good signs for making ice.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.