Jump to content
  • GUESTS

    If You  want access  to member only forums on FM, You will need to Sign-in or  Sign-Up now .

    This box will disappear once you are signed in as a member.

Pitter Patter Lets Get at Er -- College Hockey Chatter


CaptainMusky

Recommended Posts

The season is among us. Some teams had a little warm up last weekend, but real action starts for most this weekend.

Let's hear your predictions for your favorite team?

I'll go first :-)

Gophers will win the Big Ten and be NCAA Champs. They returned many of the key components from last year's Runner Up team including most importantly Wilcox who is arguably one of the best goalies in the Country.

They have some youth coming in at D, which has me a bit concerned, but with that youth we have some size. Nice to have some beef on the back end.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Women's volleyball? That's what I found last year when I looked for a game in November. Wasn't one of the excuses for ruining college hockey more tv exposure and better revenue? Way to go Big 10.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe 31 of the 36 gopher games are televised. It is lame because it used to be every game with the exception of Michigan tech would be televised.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As a rabid Bulldog fan, I have to ask who the H#!@ is Kasimir Kaskisuo and why has he let in 2 of 4 shots? Never heard of this guy, but I see he's from Finland. Hopefully Sandy knows what he is doing.

Too bad the game is not on TV.

Seems like the Dogs could have a good year, but have really struggled finding solid goaltending since Reiter graduated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is it just me, or has college hockey gone by the wayside? Maybe I just don't get any exposure to it anymore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The dismantling of the wcha is what really hurt college hockey regionally. We can thank the big ten for that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The dismantling of the wcha is what really hurt college hockey regionally. We can thank the big ten for that.

No doubt that Is the problem. The big ten has to steal every dime every chance they get.

College hockey has transphered to the pro level more now than ever. It makes it a lot more fun to watch the NHL. It seems every NHL team has a handful of Americans and several from the wcha/big ten.

6 or 8 years ago I went to a wild game with all the Arena managers across the state.

They new their attendance was about to take a dip, they asked what they could do to boost interest from outside the metro. I mentioned not only did they not have any Minnesotans on the team at the time but they didn't have 1 American up with the team. Basically I'm just saying that with some recognizable names to follow from college, makes for good hockey for the viewers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All around good showing by the lowly WCHA last night.
nothing wrong with the wcha. Some good teams but they are going to have a tough time over the next 5 to 10 years. Its sad as the wcha was the best conference in college hockey with the best conference tourney and that's all gone. Now there are 3 different conferences those schools play in and not one of them has sellouts in the tourney. Pathetic. One year they are packing Xcel the next they should have all been playing at a school site.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Barring any serious injuries or poor refereeing the Gophers should be the team to beat. Put the bulls eye on them and watch game by game the opponents run at them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lets see in relevant college hockey, we have:

Denver at Minn Duluth: split-skis. Only 1 of UMD's 2 goalies ever show up

Ala-bammer at the Purple Land Cows: Purple Land Cow riding a broom

St Cloud at Union: No idea, is Union good again this year?

Bemidji at Minnesota: Obvious, but how can only 6 teams makeup the BIG 10?

Did Bucky need a break already? I don't see them on this weekend's schedule.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

St Cloud - Need to find secondary scoring, if they do that they'll be tough. Depends on how the younger players develop and if they get a goalie to step up. I think Union lost a lot last year and it NOT the #2 team in the nation.

Huskies earned a split at Union but it sounds they switched goalies in the first period the first night. However, 3G on 6 shots then it was probably warranted.

I'm cautiously optimistic on St. Cloud. Need to see how they are looking in early Jan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wilcox didn't have his best outing last night but gophers still find a way to win. That Bristedt kid is going to be a monster. Dang can he play. Might be the best skater on the team!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gophers vs Huskies on my favorite bow hunting weekend of the year, that bites!!

Huskies outshot Union pretty bad last weekend both nights in NY but goal tending wasn't stellar. Gotta expect 2 Gopher wins on the weekend but maybe we can steal a win....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This series is always fun. Wilcox was shaky last Saturday so who knows who shows up there. Gophers definitely have the firepower but these games can really go either way.

Having said that gopher sweep with 4-1 and 5-2 wins. :-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know if it rings true anymore to the extent it used to but even though I went to the U I like that some of the Husky players were passed up by Lucia and have a chip on their shoulder and come out to prove a point and have come through quite a few times. I still want the Gophers to win but really don't mind when the Huskies come through. Like said great series that in a short amount of time has really made and Gopher Wolverine Little Brown Jug game pale in comparison, great rivalry.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

leechlake,

I think the rivalry was a little bigger a while ago. Also sucks they both teams aren't in the WCHA, but I can't fault the Gophs there as they were the only team B10 that wanted to stay in the old conference.

I always loved the fact that the NHC was HOPPING when the Gophs showed up. Should always be a good rivalry with the close proximity of the schools.

Gophers have the experience and talent. I haven't watched the Huskies this year but they should be solid on D and the first line, need a little depth. But maybe a game like this gets some of the young guys going.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its always the same. The Superbowl or Stanley cup is when these other schools play the gophers. Always has been probably always will. U of M is by far the biggest school in the former wcha so the clearly have a target. Its what makes those rivalries so much fun. [PoorWordUsage] that its only once a season now. Oh well end of rant on that beeeesssss move.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its always the same. The Superbowl or Stanley cup is when these other schools play the gophers. Always has been probably always will. U of M is by far the biggest school in the former wcha so the clearly have a target. Its what makes those rivalries so much fun. [PoorWordUsage] that its only once a season now. Oh well end of rant on that beeeesssss move.

Yep, the "little six" conference ended all but 2 real good rivalries in college hockey east of the Hudson River.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yep, the "little six" conference ended all but 2 real good rivalries in college hockey east of the Hudson River.
Agreed. I wish it never happened. The days of the WCHA Final 5 were awesome. Always HUGE turnouts. Now they have 3 Conference Tournaments who couldnt even fill a College venue let alone the X. VERY SAD.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Your Responses - Share & Have Fun :)

    • gimruis
      I hunt in the rifle zone so I don't have a need to use a shotgun to hunt deer, but I would be looking at this if there was ever a need to.   There could be state legislation introduced next summer that eliminates the shotgun zone completely.  It has bipartisan support.  Wisconsin removed theirs years ago and MN is usually later to follow.  They've tried to pass it more than once and it came up just short both times.  Probably just a matter of time.
    • Wanderer
      Oh, h e l l no! 
    • leech~~
      Screw that, here's whatch need!  😆   Power-Shok Rifled Slug 10 Gauge 766 Grain Grain Weight: 766 Shotshell Length: 3-1/2in / 89mm Muzzle Velocity: 1280
    • Wanderer
      20 ga has become a real popular deer round in the last 5 or so years.  The rifled barrels are zinging those sabot slugs with rifle like accuracy out to 100 yards easily.  Some go so far as dialing in for a 200 yard shot but really, by 150 they’re falling off pretty low.   I have a single shot Ultraslug in 20 ga that shoots really well at 100 yards.  Most everyone I know that has bought a slug gun lately has gotten the Savage 220 in 20ga.  Problem can be finding the shells you want.
    • leech~~
      My son always bugs me about getting a nice light over-under 20ga for grouse hunting.  I say Heck no, I'm getting a 3 1/2" 10ga so I can put as much lead in the air that I can!!     So, I'm keeping my 12ga.  
    • 11-87
      That’s almost exactly what I was thinking.  Have slug barrels for both   One for turkey and one for deer.      I have a 20ga mosseberg as well. (Combo came with the scope but never used.   I always liked the 12 better
    • leech~~
      Wanderer is right on the money and covered it well.  I was wondering too if you had a slug barrel for one of your guns?  If so you could make that your slug gun with a scope, and the other your turkey gun with the Red dot.  As you can afford it. 
    • Wanderer
      Kinda depends on if you want magnification or quick target acquisition.   More magnification options and better accuracy with a scope.  You get what you pay for too so get comfortable with a budget for one.  Tasco and Bushnell work but I find they lose their zero easier, have low contrast and don’t gather light well in low light conditions.  That said, I’m still using one I haven’t replaced yet.  Vortex has been the hot brand for the past several years for bang for the buck.  Good products.  Nothing beats Swarovski though.  Huge dough for those.  Burris is another decent option.   There are some specific models for shotgun/slug hunting in the economy brands and bullet drop compensation (BDC) reticles.  Based on experience I’d recommend not falling for that marketing ploy.   Red dots are usually lower magnification and easier to get on target.  Reasonably accurate but don’t do well with definition, like searching the brush for your target.  I put a HAWKE red dot on a .22 for squirrels and it’s been good.  For turkey, that’s probably the route I’d go.     If your slug shots are normally not too far and too brushy, I’d think a red dot could work there too if you’re only buying 1 scope.  You’ll be better off dimming the reticle to the lowest setting you can easily use to not over shine the target and get a finer aim point.   If you don’t have a slug barrel, you might appreciate one of those.  I had a browning with a smoothbore slug barrel that shot Brenneke 2-3/4 inch well.  The 11-87 would well fitted with a cantelever rifled barrel. 
    • 11-87
      Looking for recommendations on scope or red dot    I basically hunt turkey and whitetail, live in southern MN. So it’s all deer/ shotgun    looking to add a scope/ red dot as my eyes don’t work like they used to to with the open sights.    my gun options are 11/87 12. Browning BPS 12    not looking for the most expensive or the cheapest    pros and cons of one over the other
    • SkunkedAgain
      That's good news. I haven't seen any ice in Black Bay yet, but it looks like the small bays should start to freeze up this weekend. Hopefully we make some ice next week.   Below is the forecast for Cook. We should have temps mostly below zero . The bottom section below shows that it should not be windy, and no snow is predicted. All good signs for making ice.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.