Jump to content
  • GUESTS

    If You  want access  to member only forums on FM, You will need to Sign-in or  Sign-Up now .

    This box will disappear once you are signed in as a member.

High School State Basketball


BartmanMN

Recommended Posts

Anyone watching these games? I caught a couple last night and they were entertaining.

What is your opinion on Hopkins holding the ball for over 3 minutes per overtime and then attempting a last second shot. Is this normal for basketball or not?

I'm a hockey guy so this was really strange to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To me it is pretty classless to play that way. Its a sport, so you PLAY the sport. You dont stand around for 7 mins. Winning that way cheapens the game. I guess I wouldnt expect anything more from a school like Hopkins. A bunch of spoon fed babies.

Hey coach, great game plan! Way to open up the play book and find something that can crack the zone!

No Bartman, thats not the way it is suppose to go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Didn't see the game, but I love the irony of a presumably grown adult calling a bunch of high school kids classless.

In high school I had a varsity coach attempt the "keep away" strategy against a team that clearly had more talent than we did. Their fans were booing, our players were embarrassed, and it didn't work anyway. By half-time the team decided to play our regular style of ball and get take our lumps in stride.

I can see holding onto the ball at the end of the game for a little while, but 3 minutes does sound extreme.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Didn't see the game, but I love the irony of a presumably grown adult calling a bunch of high school kids classless.

Mmm, you must not know much about high school sports. Coaches call the games not the players. If the kids did play classless I wouldnt have a problem calling them out. I guess they would get a pass from you though. I love the irony in the statement as if I were wrong but your enabling is right. Getanet, you should change that name to Getaclue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Psst........Hopkins wasn't the only team on the court just standing there.

One team was trying to play the sport of basketball, the other was just standing around.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

it was an interesting stand of game plans...Hopkins couldn't beat the zone and Shakopee knew that they couldn't defend one on one so they waited...I would be embarrassed to be Hopkins but hey they played within the rules of the game and won. Shakopee coach didn't fault Hopkins in the paper and said it just goes to show we need a shot clock in HS basketball.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mmm, you must not know much about high school sports. Coaches call the games not the players. If the kids did play classless I wouldnt have a problem calling them out. I guess they would get a pass from you though. I love the irony in the statement as if I were wrong but your enabling is right. Getanet, you should change that name to Getaclue.

Please explain exactly how was I enabling anyone? By calling you out for being a keyboard cowboy?

You are correct, you didn't call the kids classless, just spoonfed babies. Again, it takes a pretty big man to call 16, 17 and 18 year old kids names.

Based on the majority of your post I would guess you can count the number of friends you have on one hand, with a few fingers left over.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only way that Shakopee could have forced play would have been by switching to man to man or pulling their zone way out, and Novak knew that.  Nobody is to blame but the system.  A shot clock or a ban on zone defense would eliminate this happening in the future and sure Hopkins didn’t do anything wrong, but it was just a chicken $hit way of playing the game and the biggest chicken was leading the bunch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Definitely the team not willing to leave its zone defense and go after the ball shares the blame in making it a boring game. As it turns out Hopkins wins and the other team is left wishing they would have went out and gone after the ball. I didn't see the game or care who won, but if your going to not go after the ball and let the other team have the last shot you have nothing to complain about. I do hope this helps bring about a shot clock in Minnesota, it just makes the game more fun to watch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was listening to a segment on the radio about this, and adding a shot clock is probably a long-shot. The costs to purchase and install a shot clock, along with having to pay an extra person to work the shot clock during games, seemed to be the main obstacles.

Of course, anywhere they play the state tournament would have shot clocks installed, but I don't think you should play tournament games under different rules than the regular season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please explain exactly how was I enabling anyone? By calling you out for being a keyboard cowboy?

You are correct, you didn't call the kids classless, just spoonfed babies. Again, it takes a pretty big man to call 16, 17 and 18 year old kids names.

Based on the majority of your post I would guess you can count the number of friends you have on one hand, with a few fingers left over.

I guess it takes a bigger man to attempt to bash somebody with something that has nothing to do with the topic. That one finger left over isnt worth pointing at you, jaggoff.

Spoon fed babies is a culture that embodies more than the age group your implying.

This is a prime example of the decline in sports in America. Play the game and let the game decide the winner. The game has advanced tremendously since Mr. Naismith created it. A game like this just took it back 60+ years. You fail to hold anybody accountable, thats why your an enabler.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's Dr. Naismith. Unlike you, he earned it. Done feeding trolls now who make incredible leaps in "logic," if you can call it that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Psst........Hopkins wasn't the only team on the court just standing there.

That is a good point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is a lame way to play, but its within the rules. You do see this tactic at times in high school ball. Years back I scouted the blaine vs coon rapids. It was when blaine had Patrick Bryant. Coon rapids held the ball the entire game. By doing this they kept the game close but in the end lost. Until a shot clock is put in it will continue to happen. For some, it can.actually be a good strategy...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's Dr. Naismith. Unlike you, he earned it. Done feeding trolls now who make incredible leaps in "logic," if you can call it that.

"Done feeding" typed that right after an attempted dig, ironic. Go on with your bad self.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No thats just good coaching actually.

Putting this as simple as possible for you guys.... you are not going to send DTRO out to force action on Michael Jordon. MJ would just walk around DTRO and create a 5 on 4 thus crippling your team.

And as it turns out it was brilliant coaching on Shak-towns part as Hopkins looked like a grade school team on all of last possessions. Bad shot on the 1st, not even getting shot off on the 2nd and stepping out of bounds on the 3rd.

Unfortunately it took a couple of poor plays on Shaks part and a lucky hail-marry to win it for Hopkins.

Hope that clears things up for the non basketball types like my man Duffman! who probably ducked in here based on 27 viewers "red flag" in the Basketball forum... grin

One other thing its highly doubtful we will see a shot clock over this rare isolated incident.

Minnesota HS basketball actually leads the nation in points scored per game so its not a real problem.

Go Panthers!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I personally thought it stunk when Hopkin's did what they did even though they were within the rules.

I would hope something could be done to stop this type play.

Let's play the ball and not hold it for 6-9 minutes to get a shot at the end of a OT period.

Very boring and sad as far as I was concerned.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only way that Shakopee could have forced play would have been by switching to man to man or pulling their zone way out, and Novak knew that.  Nobody is to blame but the system.  A shot clock or a ban on zone defense would eliminate this happening in the future and sure Hopkins didn’t do anything wrong, but it was just a chicken $hit way of playing the game and the biggest chicken was leading the bunch.

BINGO!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What about this for MN HS hoops?

Mon: All four class quarterfinals (16 games. 4 arenas)

Tue: All four class semifinals [8 games. 2 (or 4) arena(s)]

Wed: All four class finals [4 games. 1 (or 2) arena(s)]

Thu: Off (much needed for A and AA I'm thinking)

Fri: A winner vs. AA winner, AAA winner vs. AAAA winner (2 games. 1 arena)

Sat: Game 1 winner vs. Game 2 winner (1 game.)

Try it for 5-10 years and see if it will always be AA vs. AAAA or if AAAA always wins it. If it is, scrub it. If not, who knows.

I see opening round logistics as the big problem (4 nicer gyms in the TC area. Target, Williams, St. Thomas?, Somewhere else? I realize you are tying some of them up for quite a few days). Hotels aren't different other than two teams spend one extra night and two teams spend two extra. It's one extra game for two teams and two extra for two.

Of course, it flies in the face of the "Soccer Paradigm" where EVERYBODY is a champion (you have a pulse, you get: a trophy, Gushers, and a juice box...Sheesh).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hope that clears things up for the non basketball types like my man Duffman! who probably ducked in here based on 27 viewers "red flag" in the Basketball forum... grin

I actually watched the game my friend, I have nothing against the strategy of not forcing the issue, but they are kids and kids are more prone to make mistakes in a game of this magnitude. Even you said that when Hopkins decided to finally start the offense it led to not much of an offence and a mistake.

Shakopee could have at least sent the pg out there a couple of times to try and force an errant pass or even a double dribble and then drop back into the zone. After holding the ball that long, maybe enough time has passed that they really don't know if they dribbled already? Like I said..... they're just kids, talented kids but kids none the less. Mistakes can be made, but not when there isn't an opportunity to make a mistake.

As for Hopkins strategy, it worked, they controlled the tempo and I dare say had all the moxy because of it. Clock management is huge in most sports, especially basketball and football. It doesn't make for exciting games, but if you can keep the ball out of your opponents hands and grind clock, you can keep them from scoring as much.

Then again, what do I know about sports or anything else for that matter?

wink

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought you had more of sense humor.

My bad

I do disagree with the actual strategy working saying it "worked" via a freakish 2/3 court hail mary shot, just as intended I'm sure crazy and that somehow Shakopee shares or deserves more of the blame of the ugliness is IMO not accurate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought you had more of sense humor.

My bad

We're good, no worries.

(I didn't take it that way)

I actually found the strategy interesting and not ugly.

Better than a foul fest at the end of a game.

I felt the same way about both teams strategy........indifferent, if Shakopee would have won, I'd still feel the same way. And would have expressed that Hopkins strategy didn't work. The hail mary doesn't even come into play for my "argument".

smile

But I'd rather lose putting forth some effort into dictating a game other than playing zone and just standing there with my hands on my knees for three minutes. But that's just me, and the reason I brought up the issue in the first place. No skin off my back. laugh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why on Earth would you change what has worked the entire game? Switch to man and its game over.

What Hopkins essentially said is that we can't score on you so we just have to make sure we score last.

Smart? Maybe. Gutless? Absolutely

Shakopee was bound to lose that game, the tactic only has to work one time. Even if they had to do it 10 times.

For the supporters of this lame strategy, should they just have done this from the beginning of the game? If 3 minutes is ok, why not 40?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think what Hopkins pulled was pretty lame but I also think it was pretty lame for Shakopee to stand around and not do a thing too. Sure if Hopkins wants they can due this for the whole game.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank god Hopkins didn't win. Someone needs to punch that weasel of a head coach right in his stupid smirking mouth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Someone needs to teach Hopkins how to lose with some grace. They Come shlumpin' up to get their medals, no acknowledgment of the congratulations, no thank you's, they're given the trophy and handle it like it means nothing, don't even look at it, just carry it like a dead cat. I know it's tough to lose but you gotta have some class when you lose. There was, however, one team member who appreciated the experience, which was nice to see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting to watch how people react when they win and when they lose. Some of the athletes still said thank you when they were given their second place medal and some took it off as if it meant nothing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Your Responses - Share & Have Fun :)

    • gimruis
      I hunt in the rifle zone so I don't have a need to use a shotgun to hunt deer, but I would be looking at this if there was ever a need to.   There could be state legislation introduced next summer that eliminates the shotgun zone completely.  It has bipartisan support.  Wisconsin removed theirs years ago and MN is usually later to follow.  They've tried to pass it more than once and it came up just short both times.  Probably just a matter of time.
    • Wanderer
      Oh, h e l l no! 
    • leech~~
      Screw that, here's whatch need!  😆   Power-Shok Rifled Slug 10 Gauge 766 Grain Grain Weight: 766 Shotshell Length: 3-1/2in / 89mm Muzzle Velocity: 1280
    • Wanderer
      20 ga has become a real popular deer round in the last 5 or so years.  The rifled barrels are zinging those sabot slugs with rifle like accuracy out to 100 yards easily.  Some go so far as dialing in for a 200 yard shot but really, by 150 they’re falling off pretty low.   I have a single shot Ultraslug in 20 ga that shoots really well at 100 yards.  Most everyone I know that has bought a slug gun lately has gotten the Savage 220 in 20ga.  Problem can be finding the shells you want.
    • leech~~
      My son always bugs me about getting a nice light over-under 20ga for grouse hunting.  I say Heck no, I'm getting a 3 1/2" 10ga so I can put as much lead in the air that I can!!     So, I'm keeping my 12ga.  
    • 11-87
      That’s almost exactly what I was thinking.  Have slug barrels for both   One for turkey and one for deer.      I have a 20ga mosseberg as well. (Combo came with the scope but never used.   I always liked the 12 better
    • leech~~
      Wanderer is right on the money and covered it well.  I was wondering too if you had a slug barrel for one of your guns?  If so you could make that your slug gun with a scope, and the other your turkey gun with the Red dot.  As you can afford it. 
    • Wanderer
      Kinda depends on if you want magnification or quick target acquisition.   More magnification options and better accuracy with a scope.  You get what you pay for too so get comfortable with a budget for one.  Tasco and Bushnell work but I find they lose their zero easier, have low contrast and don’t gather light well in low light conditions.  That said, I’m still using one I haven’t replaced yet.  Vortex has been the hot brand for the past several years for bang for the buck.  Good products.  Nothing beats Swarovski though.  Huge dough for those.  Burris is another decent option.   There are some specific models for shotgun/slug hunting in the economy brands and bullet drop compensation (BDC) reticles.  Based on experience I’d recommend not falling for that marketing ploy.   Red dots are usually lower magnification and easier to get on target.  Reasonably accurate but don’t do well with definition, like searching the brush for your target.  I put a HAWKE red dot on a .22 for squirrels and it’s been good.  For turkey, that’s probably the route I’d go.     If your slug shots are normally not too far and too brushy, I’d think a red dot could work there too if you’re only buying 1 scope.  You’ll be better off dimming the reticle to the lowest setting you can easily use to not over shine the target and get a finer aim point.   If you don’t have a slug barrel, you might appreciate one of those.  I had a browning with a smoothbore slug barrel that shot Brenneke 2-3/4 inch well.  The 11-87 would well fitted with a cantelever rifled barrel. 
    • 11-87
      Looking for recommendations on scope or red dot    I basically hunt turkey and whitetail, live in southern MN. So it’s all deer/ shotgun    looking to add a scope/ red dot as my eyes don’t work like they used to to with the open sights.    my gun options are 11/87 12. Browning BPS 12    not looking for the most expensive or the cheapest    pros and cons of one over the other
    • SkunkedAgain
      That's good news. I haven't seen any ice in Black Bay yet, but it looks like the small bays should start to freeze up this weekend. Hopefully we make some ice next week.   Below is the forecast for Cook. We should have temps mostly below zero . The bottom section below shows that it should not be windy, and no snow is predicted. All good signs for making ice.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.