Jump to content
  • GUESTS

    If You  want access  to member only forums on FM, You will need to Sign-in or  Sign-Up now .

    This box will disappear once you are signed in as a member.

Manziel Debate


DrJuice1980

Recommended Posts

Wouldn't it be a Prototype because it's successful?

Brees and Russell Wilson fit that prototype? Just to name a few.

Nope.

Were/are they successful?

Yep.

Manziel has the wanna-be wonks stymied and it frustrates them to no end. I love it. grin

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Big Dave2

    181

  • DrJuice1980

    176

  • CaptainMusky

    173

  • LMITOUT

    135

Well height a plays little bit into prototypical but by no means does it define it.

Weak.

Ps, Brees is still legit. Where you got "were" from I do not know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would think breaking that "mold" would be beyond the risk of what the Vikes want, or any team in that matter with a top pick.

But yet someone is definitely going to go against YOUR advise and pick him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Someone always defies logic and reason bigdave. Some are just busts. Did people think Leaf, Russell, etc were going to be flops? Maybe but someone still gave them the #1 pick. Its inevitable. Some enjoy the challenge of proving others wrong, others hit a home run and some just flat out screw the pooch. There will be plenty of these picks this year.

I'm not convinced that manziel will be a franchise qb. I'm also not convinced clowney will be the beast his measureables make it look to be.

We will see that's what makes this entertaining.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well height a plays little bit into prototypical but by no means does it define it.

So scratch stats off your list.

And scratch height off your list.

What do you have left?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Most of guys who ended up being bust high draft picks had enough talent and athletic ability to make it in the league, but not the drive and the determination to be great.

Personally, I think Manziel has that drive. Yes, there will be an adjustment period and he'll take his lumps early on, but he will learn from it and work hard to improve. He's got a lot of people to prove wrong...

Jamarcus Russell was lazy and could barely keep himself in playing shape after he got his big pay day. Bryant McKinnie is the same way. Elite size and athletic ability (which barely keeps him in the league) but no drive to be tops at his position.

Peyton Manning isn't great because he's mobile or has a big arm, he's great because he works harder and prepares more than everyone else on the field.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree manziel appears to have the drive but will the drive be funneled toward the right things?

Clowney I think is definitely concern merely because of his work ethic. You cannot dispute manziels just all the distractions which those have killed many careers. Pick your poison.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So scratch stats off your list.

And scratch height off your list.

What do you have left?

Playing under control and not being selfish would be a pretty good start. Wouldn't you agree?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Think Manziel will have some success along the lines of a Vick or Flutie who makes the hilights but isn't going to carry a team to a title unless he ends up in a situation like Wilson where he's got a surrounding cast of teammates and he doesn't need to carry the team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Superbowl winning QBs and where they were drafted.

SB 48: Russel Wilson; 75th

SB 47: Joe Flacco; 18th

SB 46: Eil Manning; 1st

SB 45: Aaron Rodgers; 24th

SB 44: Drew Brees; 33rd

SB 43: Ben Rothlisberger; 11th

SB 42: Eli Manning; 1st

SB 41: Peyton Manning; 1st

SB 40: Ben Rothlisberger; 11th

SB 39: Tom Brady; 199th

SB 38: Tom Brady; 199th

SB 37: Brad Johnson; 227th

SB 36: Tom Brady; 199th

SB 35: Trent Dilfer; 6th

SB 34: Kurt Warner; undrafted

SB 33: John Elway; 1st

9 of the last 15 drafted in the first round. No real point, just FYI.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Superbowl winning QBs and where they were drafted.

SB 48: Russel Wilson; 75th

SB 47: Joe Flacco; 18th

SB 46: Eil Manning; 1st

SB 45: Aaron Rodgers; 24th

SB 44: Drew Brees; 33rd

SB 43: Ben Rothlisberger; 11th

SB 42: Eli Manning; 1st

SB 41: Peyton Manning; 1st

SB 40: Ben Rothlisberger; 11th

SB 39: Tom Brady; 199th

SB 38: Tom Brady; 199th

SB 37: Brad Johnson; 227th

SB 36: Tom Brady; 199th

SB 35: Trent Dilfer; 6th

SB 34: Kurt Warner; undrafted

SB 33: John Elway; 1st

9 of the last 15 drafted in the first round. No real point, just FYI.

And not a single one of them had better college stats than Johnny Football.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote:
A couple of weeks ago, we detailed how teams around the league feel that two of the top quarterback prospects, Teddy Bridgewater and Johnny Manziel, could be facing a potential draft-day free fall. In following up with some of the quarterback-needy teams picking in the top 10, three of them have Fresno State quarterback Derek Carr as their second-rated quarterback behind Central Florida's Blake Bortles. The common media and fan projection is that Carr is the fourth-rated quarterback and a late first-round or early second-round pick, but at least three NFL teams aren't in agreement with the consensus opinion.

The reason that Carr is being rated second is that teams feel he is the most polished passer in the draft. Two of the teams told us that Carr is the best passer of the draft class, while Bortles presents the most athletic upside. A number of teams have varying doubts about Manziel and Bridgewater as pro prospects and are lukewarm on them as players. They feel as though a late first-round or second-round pick would be more appropriate for Manziel and Bridgewater.

One NFC team picking in the 20s told us that they expect the Minnesota Vikings to take Carr with the eighth-overall pick, unless he is selected by the Raiders at No. 5 overall.

Looks like we are trading up to take Tajh Boyd.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Superbowl winning QBs and where they were drafted.

SB 48: Russel Wilson; 75th

SB 47: Joe Flacco; 18th

SB 46: Eil Manning; 1st

SB 45: Aaron Rodgers; 24th

SB 44: Drew Brees; 33rd

SB 43: Ben Rothlisberger; 11th

SB 42: Eli Manning; 1st

SB 41: Peyton Manning; 1st

SB 40: Ben Rothlisberger; 11th

SB 39: Tom Brady; 199th

SB 38: Tom Brady; 199th

SB 37: Brad Johnson; 227th

SB 36: Tom Brady; 199th

SB 35: Trent Dilfer; 6th

SB 34: Kurt Warner; undrafted

SB 33: John Elway; 1st

9 of the last 15 drafted in the first round. No real point, just FYI.

7 out of 12, really, since there are repeat winners. And Brees was taken at the top of Rd 2, so effectively 2/3 of em. Yeah, one can pray that a late round flier turns into a franchise QB, but in reality that only happens once in a generation in the modern NFL. It's a QB-driven league, period

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Problem is picking the right one...there have been a few 1st round busts and mediocres thru the years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Problem is picking the right one...there have been a few 1st round busts and mediocres thru the years.

At least it wont be so bad as if we were picking 1 2 or 3. Then to draft a guy and have him bust it hurts a lot more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would be happy with Manziel, Bortles, or Carr. In that order.

You meant Bortles, Carr, Manziel.

at least its not Blunder, T-junk, McNothing

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bortles screams "bust" to me...just doesn't do it for me. What makes Bortles a better QB than Murray, Mettenberger, or McCarron? At least the three M's played in the SEC against the best defenses in the country week in and week out.

Johnny Football or Bridgewater I could live with in the 1st...I'd wait until round 2 or later on the rest.

I would love to see the Vikes pick up Murray in the 3rd...let him heal and learn...and draft two defensive studs in Round 1 and 2.

I still wouldn't pass on Manziel or Bridgewater if they were there at 8 though....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hate to say it but Bridgwater I think will slip into the late first round, or second round. I just dont see him amounting to more then TJack.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we're ranking based on college stats, it's tough to not have Carr ranked high. He had 5000 yards and 50 td passes this past season on 659 pass attempts.

He didn't play against the best teams, but neither did Bortles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would love to see the Vikes pick up Murray in the 3rd...let him heal and learn...and draft two defensive studs in Round 1 and 2.

I still wouldn't pass on Manziel or Bridgewater if they were there at 8 though....

I am kinda thinkin Murray might be there in the early fourth yet. Wouldnt it be funny if the Vikes got him. Him and Ponder could start their own reality TV show because Murray's GF is Ponder's ex.

She must have saw more in Murray than she did in Blunder and that's why she dumped him. Maybe we should be asking her for a scouting report since our guys blew it on Blunder.

I am not opposed to taking two QBs at all. We need to get rid of Blunder next year and if we have two this year we could have a nice back up and get rid of Cassel and Blunder next year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote:

NFL Network's Albert Breer reports Texas A&M QB Johnny Manziel scored a 32 on the Wonderlic exam, while Louisville's Teddy Bridgewater scored a 20.

Blake Bortles scored 28. There is no correlation between Wonderlic scores and NFL success, and we're not even convinced they factor much into NFL teams' evaluations anymore, but people always seem to be interested in them. For some perspective, Andrew Luck scored a 37 before the 2012 draft. Geno Smith scored a 24 last year. Blaine Gabbert scored 42. Christian Ponder scored 35. Colin Kaepernick scored 37, and Ben Roethlisberger scored a 25.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lets see

Scored highest on the wonderlick- check

Plays in a big conference- Check

Passed for Huge yards against big teams- Check

Has great passer rating in a big conference- check!

Scored many passing TD's against some of the best college defenses- Check

Is a good on the field leader- Check

Has the drive to win- Check

Has many NFL scouts drooling over him- Check

Has the support of Drjuice- oops, not this one

Looks like JM checks out with all of the important things an NFL QB needs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If ponder scored a 35 on that wonderlik scale whatever that is, then either that scale us useless or this draft is hurting big time for qbs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well having a nice score doesn't make up for having a noodle arm and happy feet. Blunder has always been smart but that alone doesn't cut it. We were hoping his noodle arm was because of a past injury and he'd get over his happy feet but looks like neither has happened.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lets see

Scored highest on the wonderlick- check

Plays in a big conference- Check

Passed for Huge yards against big teams- Check

Has great passer rating in a big conference- check!

Scored many passing TD's against some of the best college defenses- Check

Is a good on the field leader- Check

Has the drive to win- Check

Has many NFL scouts drooling over him- Check

Has the support of Drjuice- oops, not this one

Looks like JM checks out with all of the important things an NFL QB needs.

Yeah but he's about an inch too short.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just hope that not too many folks are pinning their hopes on the fact that Wilson has a ring because he's not tall or that the hawks would not have won this year without him. Let's face it; there are quite a few nfl qbs out there right now who would be celebrating the title if they wore a hawks uniform this past season. Not saying he isn't decent qb but he isn't reason they are sb champs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree 100%...Wilson IS the real deal though. He's just going to keep getting better and better....

The key to Wilson's success is he landed with a team and COACH who let him be who he is...they didn't try to "change" him.

That's why I think the Jags take JF at #3...Gus Bradley is smart enough to do the same with him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just hope that not too many folks are pinning their hopes on the fact that Wilson has a ring because he's not tall or that the hawks would not have won this year without him. Let's face it; there are quite a few nfl qbs out there right now who would be celebrating the title if they wore a hawks uniform this past season. Not saying he isn't decent qb but he isn't reason they are sb champs.

I hear that, T-Junk probably could of started for the SeaChickens this season and won it all (ok that might be pushing it). That just goes to show what a strong running game and mean defense can do.

I think Wilson would just be another middle of the pack type QB playing with a different squad. His game fits nicely for what they want to do though, he don't make many dumb mistakes and pulls out a nice play here and there when needed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Your Responses - Share & Have Fun :)

    • Kettle
      Walked today and yesterday, flushed 9, shot at two and got two. Hopefully next year I'll have a dog to hunt with. Still warm up here, skim of ice on ponds. Weather has been nice. Hopefully walk a bit more the next few weeks. Been pretty cautious walking for birds to not interfere with deer hunters. There sure are not the deer hunters there used to be 
    • LakeofthewoodsMN
      On the South Shore...  The focus for many this week is the ongoing deer hunting season which is a big tradition in these parts, even for avid walleye anglers.  There were some that either already harvested their deer or are more into catching fall walleyes than hunting.     Those that are fishing are taking advantage of the unseasonably warm weather and excellent walleye and sauger bite that is happening across the lake.  Cold weather is in the forecast in the upcoming days and weeks so that is also getting many excited. The best depths on the south end of LOW are 22-28 feet of water.     Vertical jigging with frozen emerald shiners is catching most of the walleyes, saugers and jumbo perch.  Depending upon where on the lake you are fishing, some slots and big trophies are in the mix as well, but most reports are talking about good numbers of eaters.    Jumbo perch are coming in good numbers this fall which will serve ice anglers well.  Watch out for an occasional pike or even lake sturgeon mixed in with the walleyes.      There are good numbers of walleyes and saugers across the south shore which is setting up nicely for early ice.   On the Rainy River...  There continues to be good numbers of shiners in the river, and consequently, there are good walleyes in the river as well.     Walleyes along with saugers, pike and some sturgeon are coming in up and down the river.  Most walleyes are being caught in 10-25 feet of water in various stretches of the river.   Jigging with live or frozen emerald shiners is the key. Some anglers are also still slow trolling crankbaits upstream to cover more ground and find fish. Both methods are producing solid results. Sturgeon fishing remains strong.  The catch-and-release sturgeon fishing is open into the spring when it changes to the "keep season" on April 24th. Up at the NW Angle...  As temps are getting colder, most are in the woods hunting and not fall fishing, however, for those who bundle up, fishing continues to be excellent.     A nice mixed bag with walleyes, saugers, perch, pike and crappies being caught. Very good muskie fishing with the colder water temps and shorter days.  Some big fish and some good numbers are being caught amongst the islands.  Both casting and trolling is getting it done.  
    • gimruis
      I hunt in the rifle zone so I don't have a need to use a shotgun to hunt deer, but I would be looking at this if there was ever a need to.   There could be state legislation introduced next summer that eliminates the shotgun zone completely.  It has bipartisan support.  Wisconsin removed theirs years ago and MN is usually later to follow.  They've tried to pass it more than once and it came up just short both times.  Probably just a matter of time.
    • Wanderer
      Oh, h e l l no! 
    • leech~~
      Screw that, here's whatch need!  😆   Power-Shok Rifled Slug 10 Gauge 766 Grain Grain Weight: 766 Shotshell Length: 3-1/2in / 89mm Muzzle Velocity: 1280
    • Wanderer
      20 ga has become a real popular deer round in the last 5 or so years.  The rifled barrels are zinging those sabot slugs with rifle like accuracy out to 100 yards easily.  Some go so far as dialing in for a 200 yard shot but really, by 150 they’re falling off pretty low.   I have a single shot Ultraslug in 20 ga that shoots really well at 100 yards.  Most everyone I know that has bought a slug gun lately has gotten the Savage 220 in 20ga.  Problem can be finding the shells you want.
    • leech~~
      My son always bugs me about getting a nice light over-under 20ga for grouse hunting.  I say Heck no, I'm getting a 3 1/2" 10ga so I can put as much lead in the air that I can!!     So, I'm keeping my 12ga.  
    • 11-87
      That’s almost exactly what I was thinking.  Have slug barrels for both   One for turkey and one for deer.      I have a 20ga mosseberg as well. (Combo came with the scope but never used.   I always liked the 12 better
    • leech~~
      Wanderer is right on the money and covered it well.  I was wondering too if you had a slug barrel for one of your guns?  If so you could make that your slug gun with a scope, and the other your turkey gun with the Red dot.  As you can afford it. 
    • Wanderer
      Kinda depends on if you want magnification or quick target acquisition.   More magnification options and better accuracy with a scope.  You get what you pay for too so get comfortable with a budget for one.  Tasco and Bushnell work but I find they lose their zero easier, have low contrast and don’t gather light well in low light conditions.  That said, I’m still using one I haven’t replaced yet.  Vortex has been the hot brand for the past several years for bang for the buck.  Good products.  Nothing beats Swarovski though.  Huge dough for those.  Burris is another decent option.   There are some specific models for shotgun/slug hunting in the economy brands and bullet drop compensation (BDC) reticles.  Based on experience I’d recommend not falling for that marketing ploy.   Red dots are usually lower magnification and easier to get on target.  Reasonably accurate but don’t do well with definition, like searching the brush for your target.  I put a HAWKE red dot on a .22 for squirrels and it’s been good.  For turkey, that’s probably the route I’d go.     If your slug shots are normally not too far and too brushy, I’d think a red dot could work there too if you’re only buying 1 scope.  You’ll be better off dimming the reticle to the lowest setting you can easily use to not over shine the target and get a finer aim point.   If you don’t have a slug barrel, you might appreciate one of those.  I had a browning with a smoothbore slug barrel that shot Brenneke 2-3/4 inch well.  The 11-87 would well fitted with a cantelever rifled barrel. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.