Jump to content
  • GUESTS

    If You  want access  to member only forums on FM, You will need to Sign-in or  Sign-Up now .

    This box will disappear once you are signed in as a member.

Manziel Debate


DrJuice1980

Recommended Posts

So is it official LMT is saying johnny is going to be a franchise qb? I like how someone gave him props for being "right all along" when the guy never commits to anything.

He will use these generalities to say "I told ya so" or "I never said that" purely based on what the outcome is in 5 years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Big Dave2

    181

  • DrJuice1980

    176

  • CaptainMusky

    173

  • LMITOUT

    135

It appears that Captain is looking under his bed and in his closet for the boogeyman now.

Heh heh...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Aggressive post from a guy who thinks all its takes is a QB, How'd that work for Denver? How many years has Peyton, Brady, Brees not won a superbowl? Im glad you think its just that simple, shows how ignorant you really are. You build a team, not search for 1 player. And you dont belong on the short bus? You must live in a house with no mirrors.

Oh that's right...if it isn't the one and only full-time ticket holder for the short bus who says "defense wins championships"...but conveniently forgets the regular season is required to get to said championship. crazy

While the rest of those QB's you mentioned are contending on a yearly basis, MN and their moronic "run and stop the run" philosophy is perpetually pretending.

Keep wishing for that lightning in a bottle, Juice.

Someday you'll figure it out...someday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"He's a better thrower than Colin Kaepernick or Russell Wilson were when they came out of college." - Mayock on Johnny Manziel.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mayock now has him as the #1 QB in this class. Pretty significant endorsement coming from a highly respected person in the industry.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's all of a sudden a better "thrower" ? 2 QBs that have made it to the Super Bowl the last 2 years (oh and they're only 2 years in). So moving forward here, a guy puts on a pro day with his guys after weeks of rehearsal and already has a better arm than 2 QBs that have put up pro bowl stats and Super Bowl appearances. You're going to go ahead and quote that as back up for your opinion on JM yet you want to call everybody else kool aid drinkers and short-bus riders?

This really makes sence to you LMIT?

ps, Kaepernick has a friggen GUN, no way possible JM out throws him. No way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It appears that Captain is looking under his bed and in his closet for the boogeyman now.

Heh heh...

come on you can do better than that. At least use some star trek gif or your infamous double face palm.

I would just like you to say what you think manziels legacy will be in 10 years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's all of a sudden a better "thrower" ? 2 QBs that have made it to the Super Bowl the last 2 years (oh and they're only 2 years in). So moving forward here, a guy puts on a pro day with his guys after weeks of rehearsal and already has a better arm than 2 QBs that have put up pro bowl stats and Super Bowl appearances. You're going to go ahead and quote that as back up for your opinion on JM yet you want to call everybody else kool aid drinkers and short-bus riders?

This really makes sence to you LMIT?

ps, Kaepernick has a friggen GUN, no way possible JM out throws him. No way.

After you get your panties unwound, you might want to re-read what Mayock said in the quote above.

Just sayin...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With all this analysis , I still haven't figured out why the Vikings drafted Ponder?....... confused

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's all of a sudden a better "thrower" ? 2 QBs that have made it to the Super Bowl the last 2 years (oh and they're only 2 years in). So moving forward here, a guy puts on a pro day with his guys after weeks of rehearsal and already has a better arm than 2 QBs that have put up pro bowl stats and Super Bowl appearances. You're going to go ahead and quote that as back up for your opinion on JM yet you want to call everybody else kool aid drinkers and short-bus riders?

This really makes sence to you LMIT?

ps, Kaepernick has a friggen GUN, no way possible JM out throws him. No way.

No, Mayock said he was basically a better QB coming out of college than the other two. Doesn't matter how strong your arm is...the other two have adjusted to the pro-level of play very well. They both have the "intangibles" that make very good QB's in the future.

Mayock's statement and endorsement is an interesting read...if you haven't read it yet you should. It simply states that Johnny Football has the "it" factor...combined with all the "talent" that most of the best QB's in recent years has come out with.

The "it" factor...that's what separates Johnny Football from the rest. There are no measurements for that....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It doesn't matter what anyone says, it all comes down to how the player responds when they start in the NFL.

Mock drafts and what any analyst says are for good humor only. Look how the mocks have changed the past couple months.

Blaine Gabbert displayed "precision, timing, footwork, and a big arm" during his workouts also. He was a can't miss franchise QB...LMMFAO

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You got it exactly right FISHINGURU, we won't know anything until these guys lace em up and actually play.

I would love to see the Vikes end up with Manziel or Mack. Odds are that neither of those guys will be on the board when we pick, however. Those chiming for defensive upgrades, who do we take at #8 assuming Mack and Clowney are both gone? They could trade down to the teens and still probably get Gilbert or Dennard. Do they take Anthony Barr at 8?

If they decide to not take a QB early, I think the best move would be to trade down from 8 into the teens and take a defensive player. Then assess the QB situation near the end of the first round and trade back into the first round to grab McCarron or Garoppolo if they need to. If there are multiple QBs left at the end of the first then just stand pat and take one in the early second round. We have two third round picks so that gives us some flexibility to make deals.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You got it exactly right FISHINGURU, we won't know anything until these guys lace em up and actually play.

I would love to see the Vikes end up with Manziel or Mack. Odds are that neither of those guys will be on the board when we pick, however. Those chiming for defensive upgrades, who do we take at #8 assuming Mack and Clowney are both gone? They could trade down to the teens and still probably get Gilbert or Dennard. Do they take Anthony Barr at 8?

If they decide to not take a QB early, I think the best move would be to trade down from 8 into the teens and take a defensive player. Then assess the QB situation near the end of the first round and trade back into the first round to grab McCarron or Garoppolo if they need to. If there are multiple QBs left at the end of the first then just stand pat and take one in the early second round. We have two third round picks so that gives us some flexibility to make deals.

I agree with all of this-

BUT, if Mack or Manziel are not there I would want Gilbert next. Im not sure how far you could drop down and still get him. Pretty sure you wouldn't be able to drop down TOO far. I don't know if i would risk it unless Spielman is able to get a kings ransom for the pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't wait to get this draft over so we can put this thread to rest as everything that could be said has been said and it is getting old! Oh well keeping up on this discussion has given me something to do between ice fishing and turkey hunting. grin

Outdoorswise this is a slow time of the year as I look at the 3+ feet of snow outside my window!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think the draft will slow it down much.

It will start a few "I told you so" from one side or the other.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Aggressive post from a guy who thinks all its takes is a QB, How'd that work for Denver?

Pretty well considering they went to the superbowl.

How many years has Peyton, Brady, Brees not won a superbowl?

But how many have these 3 won?

Im glad you think its just that simple, shows how ignorant you really are. You build a team, not search for 1 player.

That's true but you only get 1 first round pick usually. What do you think will improve a team faster, 1 franchise QB or 1 franchise MLB?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With all this analysis , I still haven't figured out why the Vikings drafted Ponder?....... confused

Neither has anyone else.......including the Vikings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's all of a sudden a better "thrower" ? 2 QBs that have made it to the Super Bowl the last 2 years (oh and they're only 2 years in). So moving forward here, a guy puts on a pro day with his guys after weeks of rehearsal and already has a better arm than 2 QBs that have put up pro bowl stats and Super Bowl appearances. You're going to go ahead and quote that as back up for your opinion on JM yet you want to call everybody else kool aid drinkers and short-bus riders?

This really makes sence to you LMIT?

ps, Kaepernick has a friggen GUN, no way possible JM out throws him. No way.

Makes no sence to me but it does make sense.

So.......the best NFL QB is the guy that can throw the ball the farthest? crazy

I didn't know this was a punt, pass and kick contest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"He's a better thrower than Colin Kaepernick or Russell Wilson were when they came out of college." - Mayock on Johnny Manziel.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

And I dont think the coach is bluffing. We may get him, but I seriously doubt he makes it to us, but that would not be Zimmer's choice.

I think he is too honest, and he actually thinks the guy is a distraction.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Isn't there a difference between a passer and a "thrower"? I know baseball rubes differentiate between pitchers and throwers. Someone who throws had doesn't equate to a good pitcher. I think the same premise could be applied here.

I would also caution those putting tons of stock in mayocks opinion. If memory serves he had Blaine gabbert his top rated qb in the draft that year. Hmmm

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think the draft will slow it down much.

It will start a few "I told you so" from one side or the other.

Oh it hasn't even reached its climax...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And I dont think the coach is bluffing. We may get him, but I seriously doubt he makes it to us, but that would not be Zimmer's choice.

I think he is too honest, and he actually thinks the guy is a distraction.

You mean like how Zimmer was honest when he said they'll be building the team through the draft and not FA, but then when FA opened they signed numerous players? That kind of honest?

FYI - You've been hoodwinked.

During this time of year you can't believe a word from any front office.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And I dont think the coach is bluffing.

blazingsaddles4_zpsa048c0d7.jpg

Hold it men, He's not Bluffing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just go "all-in" on Johnny Football this year....

If you're wrong, you're wrong....We've been there before.

If you're right...it's play-off speculation for years to come.

I don't see where the Vikings could possibly lose in this deal...he'll sell more jerseys than anybody in the league the next few years...make the Wilfs tons of $$$$, and entertain us all.

Bortles, Carr, Bridgewater...blah, blah blah.

I think Zimmer likes the guy cause he doesn't necessarily know how to defend him....much like Sabin.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think we are throwing around the "red flag" comment hoping it helps him fall to us at #8. If he doesn't fall we will just say we weren't interested because of the "red flags".

On the other hand we could pass on him at #8 and grab him in the 2nd round according to Shaun King!!! grin

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I too think it is just a smoke screen, but the media sure ate up the fact that Zimmer had red flags on a Manziel. I think Johny is their guy, and we will be moving up to take him. While I think JM is worthy of a top 3 pick, I dont think the Vikes should give a kings ransom to get him. If we can get him for our first, and one of our thirds this year, and maybe our second next year, go for it. I wouldnt give up more then that. I wouldnt mind Bortles, or Carr either. One of them should be on the board by #8. I think Carr can be a good QB, and he fits Turners scheme better the JM.

This draft will have a good play maker available at #8, and we shouldnt reach to much to go after a certain player.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Your Responses - Share & Have Fun :)

    • Kettle
      Walked today and yesterday, flushed 9, shot at two and got two. Hopefully next year I'll have a dog to hunt with. Still warm up here, skim of ice on ponds. Weather has been nice. Hopefully walk a bit more the next few weeks. Been pretty cautious walking for birds to not interfere with deer hunters. There sure are not the deer hunters there used to be 
    • LakeofthewoodsMN
      On the South Shore...  The focus for many this week is the ongoing deer hunting season which is a big tradition in these parts, even for avid walleye anglers.  There were some that either already harvested their deer or are more into catching fall walleyes than hunting.     Those that are fishing are taking advantage of the unseasonably warm weather and excellent walleye and sauger bite that is happening across the lake.  Cold weather is in the forecast in the upcoming days and weeks so that is also getting many excited. The best depths on the south end of LOW are 22-28 feet of water.     Vertical jigging with frozen emerald shiners is catching most of the walleyes, saugers and jumbo perch.  Depending upon where on the lake you are fishing, some slots and big trophies are in the mix as well, but most reports are talking about good numbers of eaters.    Jumbo perch are coming in good numbers this fall which will serve ice anglers well.  Watch out for an occasional pike or even lake sturgeon mixed in with the walleyes.      There are good numbers of walleyes and saugers across the south shore which is setting up nicely for early ice.   On the Rainy River...  There continues to be good numbers of shiners in the river, and consequently, there are good walleyes in the river as well.     Walleyes along with saugers, pike and some sturgeon are coming in up and down the river.  Most walleyes are being caught in 10-25 feet of water in various stretches of the river.   Jigging with live or frozen emerald shiners is the key. Some anglers are also still slow trolling crankbaits upstream to cover more ground and find fish. Both methods are producing solid results. Sturgeon fishing remains strong.  The catch-and-release sturgeon fishing is open into the spring when it changes to the "keep season" on April 24th. Up at the NW Angle...  As temps are getting colder, most are in the woods hunting and not fall fishing, however, for those who bundle up, fishing continues to be excellent.     A nice mixed bag with walleyes, saugers, perch, pike and crappies being caught. Very good muskie fishing with the colder water temps and shorter days.  Some big fish and some good numbers are being caught amongst the islands.  Both casting and trolling is getting it done.  
    • gimruis
      I hunt in the rifle zone so I don't have a need to use a shotgun to hunt deer, but I would be looking at this if there was ever a need to.   There could be state legislation introduced next summer that eliminates the shotgun zone completely.  It has bipartisan support.  Wisconsin removed theirs years ago and MN is usually later to follow.  They've tried to pass it more than once and it came up just short both times.  Probably just a matter of time.
    • Wanderer
      Oh, h e l l no! 
    • leech~~
      Screw that, here's whatch need!  😆   Power-Shok Rifled Slug 10 Gauge 766 Grain Grain Weight: 766 Shotshell Length: 3-1/2in / 89mm Muzzle Velocity: 1280
    • Wanderer
      20 ga has become a real popular deer round in the last 5 or so years.  The rifled barrels are zinging those sabot slugs with rifle like accuracy out to 100 yards easily.  Some go so far as dialing in for a 200 yard shot but really, by 150 they’re falling off pretty low.   I have a single shot Ultraslug in 20 ga that shoots really well at 100 yards.  Most everyone I know that has bought a slug gun lately has gotten the Savage 220 in 20ga.  Problem can be finding the shells you want.
    • leech~~
      My son always bugs me about getting a nice light over-under 20ga for grouse hunting.  I say Heck no, I'm getting a 3 1/2" 10ga so I can put as much lead in the air that I can!!     So, I'm keeping my 12ga.  
    • 11-87
      That’s almost exactly what I was thinking.  Have slug barrels for both   One for turkey and one for deer.      I have a 20ga mosseberg as well. (Combo came with the scope but never used.   I always liked the 12 better
    • leech~~
      Wanderer is right on the money and covered it well.  I was wondering too if you had a slug barrel for one of your guns?  If so you could make that your slug gun with a scope, and the other your turkey gun with the Red dot.  As you can afford it. 
    • Wanderer
      Kinda depends on if you want magnification or quick target acquisition.   More magnification options and better accuracy with a scope.  You get what you pay for too so get comfortable with a budget for one.  Tasco and Bushnell work but I find they lose their zero easier, have low contrast and don’t gather light well in low light conditions.  That said, I’m still using one I haven’t replaced yet.  Vortex has been the hot brand for the past several years for bang for the buck.  Good products.  Nothing beats Swarovski though.  Huge dough for those.  Burris is another decent option.   There are some specific models for shotgun/slug hunting in the economy brands and bullet drop compensation (BDC) reticles.  Based on experience I’d recommend not falling for that marketing ploy.   Red dots are usually lower magnification and easier to get on target.  Reasonably accurate but don’t do well with definition, like searching the brush for your target.  I put a HAWKE red dot on a .22 for squirrels and it’s been good.  For turkey, that’s probably the route I’d go.     If your slug shots are normally not too far and too brushy, I’d think a red dot could work there too if you’re only buying 1 scope.  You’ll be better off dimming the reticle to the lowest setting you can easily use to not over shine the target and get a finer aim point.   If you don’t have a slug barrel, you might appreciate one of those.  I had a browning with a smoothbore slug barrel that shot Brenneke 2-3/4 inch well.  The 11-87 would well fitted with a cantelever rifled barrel. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.