Jump to content
  • GUESTS

    If You  want access  to member only forums on FM, You will need to Sign-in or  Sign-Up now .

    This box will disappear once you are signed in as a member.

Manziel Debate


DrJuice1980

Recommended Posts

Johny will be long gone before we pick. We would need to move up to #3 to ensure either Bridgewater, or JM. I dont think we have what it would take to move up from 8 to get him.

Houston will pick either Manziel, or Bridgewater with the top pick, and if Jacksonville doesnt trade the pick, they will take whichever is left. The Rams wont be picking QB, so no worries about them.

Love or Hate JM, he is many times better then what we have had in years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Big Dave2

    181

  • DrJuice1980

    176

  • CaptainMusky

    173

  • LMITOUT

    135

We have plenty to move up and get anybody at any spot. Question is...do you want to give the majority of this years draft and probably the upper end of next years in order to do it.

I say no way!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Manziel or Mosely, just keep drafting for need please.... those who say draft the best player available don't know how to make a team better. I see no need to trade up or down in the first 2 rounds, let the chips fall where they may.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Go ahead and try to compare his athleticism to Kaepernick and you have obviously misjudged talent. Or attempt to relate him to Russell Wilson and then go watch how many plain stupid throws JM makes in comparison to Wilson and you have been mistaken once again.

The kids an athlete that is for sure (not many NFL players arent athletes). You need more than that to be successful in the NFL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Manziel completed 48 percent of his passes thrown 25 yards or longer this season, up nine percentage points from last season and in the top 10 among AQ quarterbacks.

Manziel had at least one such completion in every game he started this season.

In terms of comparisons to recent draft picks, among first-round picks in 2011 and 2012, only Robert Griffin III had a higher completion percentage on passes of 25 yards or longer than Manziel in his final year of college. Griffin’s was a hair better -- 52 percent.

I'm owned because he had a 6-5 beast target and he competed at least 1 pass every game?

Yawn...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The spot is open for grabs, the question, who wants it the most? I would think our 8th pick, and next years first would suffice? The Rams dont have any huge glaring needs, that they need 2 firsts this year. If Manziel works out, we have a franchise QB, if not, it is just another wasted first round pick.

Quote:

Rams GM Les Snead strongly hinted the Rams are willing to trade back from the No. 2 spot in May's draft.

"I think the (phone lines) are always open," Snead said Thursday. However, Snead suggested the Rams wouldn't make a move just for the sake of doing so. "You've always got to prepare for: What if you're there and nobody wants to trade? What if you actually want to take a player? I think it just helps you thoroughly prepare." With the Rams one of the few teams in the league without a pressing need for a player like South Carolina DE Jadeveon Clowney — and apparently content at quarterback — it would be stunning if they held put at No. 2.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Scott...please do some research to find out what the Skins had to do to trade up for RGIII. If I'm remembering correctly, it was a whole lot more then that. I still don't think they own a 1st round pick and RGIII has been in the league for 2 full years now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Scott...please do some research to find out what the Skins had to do to trade up for RGIII. If I'm remembering correctly, it was a whole lot more then that. I still don't think they own a 1st round pick and RGIII has been in the league for 2 full years now.

Any team knows that next years Vikings pick is a top 8 pick more then likely, so a couple top 8 picks, put us in about the same value, or better. Just because the Skins traded away their long term future, doesnt make it the norm. 2 #8 picks>#2 pick

full-17556-41280-valuechart.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not many teams will give up, a #6, #39, plus the next 2 years first round picks, to move up 4 spots. In fact, I think only Washington would do that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's right. That's just F'n crazy.

By all means...RGIII is still NOT a proven franchise QB. The picks they gave up for him is crazy. That's why Washington is Washington.

There are no Andrew Lucks in this draft...that would be the only player in recent memory that could command that type of commitment as far as draft picks is concerned.

Sammy Watkins needs to be the pick at #8...I'd take Denard there too. Pair either one of them together with either Patterson or Rhodes and we're good.

AP only has a few years left...get the offense that will replace him now. Watkins is the real deal...Jennings, Patterson, Watkins and a healthy Rudolph is scary stuff. Add AP in the mix and defenses won't know what hit them.

Most any QB could thrive given that....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Watkins and Dennard will be gone before the 8th pick.

You can almost certainly cross off these players

Bridgewater

Manziel

Clowney

Watkins

Dennard

After that, there isnt many huge play makers left. Then you just get solid starters, which isnt a bad thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A couple reasons why Manziel is worth trading up to take him.

Jersey money, whatever team drafts Johny will make a ton of money on jerseys, and marketing. More then enough to cover Johnys football contract.

Media attention, whichever team drafts Johny, will be all but certain to have several national games televised, with ESPN updates on Johny, and the highlights, which in terms, gets free agents interested in coming to them. Something MN has always had problems with.

Fan excitement, Johny will fill the stadium, and bring many fans with him. He is an exciting player to watch.

Not only that, but the football skills he brings to the game, he has pocket presence, something Ponder hadnt a clue, he isnt locked onto any one receiver during a play, he can scramble, and get out of the pocket, and can complete a pass while doing so. He has to be respected by linebackers for his threat to run, which only opens up the middle of the field for the receivers more.

An look on the bright side, he cant be any worse then what we have drafted for QB in the past couple decades, and if he is, look again at the first couple reasons to get him, money, media, and marketing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Smoke screen

Quote:

Draft Insider Tony Pauline writes that UCF QB Blake Bortles is a "clear-cut favorite" to be the Texans' pick at No. 1 overall.

Pauline believes Texans owner Bob McNair prefers Johnny Manziel, but Bortles is a "Bill O'Brien type of passer," and Houston seems likely to lock in on signal callers with the draft's top pick. Bortles has drawn media comparisons ranging from Jake Locker to Andrew Luck. In his latest mock draft, Pauline pencils in Bortles at No. 1, and Texas A&M LT Jake Matthews at No. 2 to St. Louis.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Would you guys rather lose a couple meaningless regular season games or have to trade multiple first round picks and additional picks for yrs to come to move up a few spots?

I'll take a couple meaningless losses anyday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree. I was hoping the games would be interesting at the end, but that they lost. The Baltimore game was exactly what I wanted. A blast to watch, but ended in a L.

Not that it matters. I could honestly care less if they had the #1 overall pick in THIS draft because I am not all warm and fuzzy with anyone that high in this draft. But it certainly would have been nice to SUCK FOR LUCK a couple years back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yep, the vikes win against Washington 2 years ago hurts as much to me as the loss against the Saints in 2009... There was never a bigger turning point for this franchise than that pathetic, meaningless, worthless, etc... game. Adrian tears his knee, and we move from 2-4 for nothing!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Would you guys rather lose a couple meaningless regular season games or have to trade multiple first round picks and additional picks for yrs to come to move up a few spots?

I'll take a couple meaningless losses anyday.

Too late now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

and we move from 2-4 for nothing!

Not too sure RGIII would've been your salvation either. No way Muskrat would have been smart enough to run the pistol offense and as predicted, it was a one year phenomenon. Indy was always taking Luck. So he wouldn't have been there at #2. We'll have to wait and see if RGIII can transition into a prototypical NFL QB. Not sure Ricky would have made the same trade with the Redskins... I think he would've eld on the the second pick and taken RGIII. (or maybe a punter laugh ha)

Good Luck!

Ken

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Too late now.

Obviously, just find it funny you got some people wanting the Vikes to win no matter what but then want to trade the farm during the draft to move up.

Then you have the people that want us to lose them meaningless games so we get better draft position since a win at that point means absolutely nothing except a later draft pick.

The latter get ripped on during the season that they aren't true fans wanting the team to lose but in reality they are the ones looking out for the future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hear what your saying guru, but when guys are being paid millions of dollars to go out on the field and put forth their best effort I just think in the end that is what they need to do. It is the honest and dignified way to do things, not that every team holds to that dignity but they should.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

C'mon! Where's all the chatter about how the NFL is a passing league, need an incredible QB, defense is meaningless, running game is meaningless....

The two teams who advanced yesterday to their conference championships... Their QBs combined for what? 300 yards, 0 TDs... While the RBs and Ds got it done. It's still a team sport! Oh and a tricky coach like Belichek doesn't hurt either! Listening on the radio this morning and peope calling in saying how boring the game was... I loved. It! A great running ame and stiff defense is just as exciting as an aerial assault. Brady was reduced to a game manager... Not saying he doesn't have greater talent than that, but Belichek knew what was needed yesterday...

Good Luck!

Ken

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's pretty funny isn't it.

The league has tried as hard as it can to make it a passing league, you know why with all them cry baby fans calling in saying the games were boring. They want the NFL to be like college football. It's more exciting watching defenses shut down high flying offenses these days especially with all the rules favoring the offense.

Brady has been a game manager all season. Love him or hate him Belichicks team is always prepared and always have the game plan to attack your weakness. They lost their whole identity losing Hernandez and Gronk but still get it done week in and week out.

Seattle has built the perfect team over there the past couple years, they can slow down any QB, can pound the ball at will, and just when they need a nice play from the QB he can make something happen. Their only mistake as been taking the Vikes WR's lol. Percy and Rice can be beasts on the field but man are they always getting hurt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anybody bother to check the weather reports from yesterday's games?

Didn't think so.

Carry on.

kaffeetrinker_2.gif

Yeah and everyone knows that defense and running is how New England has won all their games this year. crazy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Johny will be long gone before we pick. We would need to move up to #3 to ensure either Bridgewater, or JM. I dont think we have what it would take to move up from 8 to get him.

Houston will pick either Manziel, or Bridgewater with the top pick, and if Jacksonville doesnt trade the pick, they will take whichever is left. The Rams wont be picking QB, so no worries about them.

Love or Hate JM, he is many times better then what we have had in years.

The spot to move up to will be the #2 spot. I think it is just too expensive to move up to #1.

You would really have to have a bromance for a player to go all the way to 1 from 8.

You know, like Little Dave has for his man crush for Little Johnny or Dr Juice and his franchise saving MLB.

BTW Juice. Good thing Kueckley(sp?)carried Carolina all the way to.... Opps, I forgot they lost cause there QB was turning the ball over. Did he see how he ALMOST made that game saving tackle against Kapernick right before he put on the superman costume??

Anyways.

Not worth it to move up. I sure hope we stay put or even move back. I see nobody worth blowing the next three drafts for. I dont want to be the Washington Redskins.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really think the Vikings need to go all in on this draft and pick Johny, or Bridgewater. They need to find their QB of the future. Do I think either of them will be a 20 year franchise QB? Probably not, but I think we can get above average play from either of them for 5-7 years, and that is something you can build around.

By all in, I am not saying a Washington type trade, I would say two 1st picks, and maybe a third, or fourth type of deal. But they need to address QB this year. I would then bring back Cassel to mentor the rookie this season. Let Freeman, and Ponder walk.

The Vikings will have some spending money to fill some holes in the defense this offseason, so if we happen to gamble with draft picks this year, we can mask it with FA's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Your Responses - Share & Have Fun :)

    • LakeofthewoodsMN
      On the South Shore...  The focus for many this week is the ongoing deer hunting season which is a big tradition in these parts, even for avid walleye anglers.  There were some that either already harvested their deer or are more into catching fall walleyes than hunting.     Those that are fishing are taking advantage of the unseasonably warm weather and excellent walleye and sauger bite that is happening across the lake.  Cold weather is in the forecast in the upcoming days and weeks so that is also getting many excited. The best depths on the south end of LOW are 22-28 feet of water.     Vertical jigging with frozen emerald shiners is catching most of the walleyes, saugers and jumbo perch.  Depending upon where on the lake you are fishing, some slots and big trophies are in the mix as well, but most reports are talking about good numbers of eaters.    Jumbo perch are coming in good numbers this fall which will serve ice anglers well.  Watch out for an occasional pike or even lake sturgeon mixed in with the walleyes.      There are good numbers of walleyes and saugers across the south shore which is setting up nicely for early ice.   On the Rainy River...  There continues to be good numbers of shiners in the river, and consequently, there are good walleyes in the river as well.     Walleyes along with saugers, pike and some sturgeon are coming in up and down the river.  Most walleyes are being caught in 10-25 feet of water in various stretches of the river.   Jigging with live or frozen emerald shiners is the key. Some anglers are also still slow trolling crankbaits upstream to cover more ground and find fish. Both methods are producing solid results. Sturgeon fishing remains strong.  The catch-and-release sturgeon fishing is open into the spring when it changes to the "keep season" on April 24th. Up at the NW Angle...  As temps are getting colder, most are in the woods hunting and not fall fishing, however, for those who bundle up, fishing continues to be excellent.     A nice mixed bag with walleyes, saugers, perch, pike and crappies being caught. Very good muskie fishing with the colder water temps and shorter days.  Some big fish and some good numbers are being caught amongst the islands.  Both casting and trolling is getting it done.  
    • gimruis
      I hunt in the rifle zone so I don't have a need to use a shotgun to hunt deer, but I would be looking at this if there was ever a need to.   There could be state legislation introduced next summer that eliminates the shotgun zone completely.  It has bipartisan support.  Wisconsin removed theirs years ago and MN is usually later to follow.  They've tried to pass it more than once and it came up just short both times.  Probably just a matter of time.
    • Wanderer
      Oh, h e l l no! 
    • leech~~
      Screw that, here's whatch need!  😆   Power-Shok Rifled Slug 10 Gauge 766 Grain Grain Weight: 766 Shotshell Length: 3-1/2in / 89mm Muzzle Velocity: 1280
    • Wanderer
      20 ga has become a real popular deer round in the last 5 or so years.  The rifled barrels are zinging those sabot slugs with rifle like accuracy out to 100 yards easily.  Some go so far as dialing in for a 200 yard shot but really, by 150 they’re falling off pretty low.   I have a single shot Ultraslug in 20 ga that shoots really well at 100 yards.  Most everyone I know that has bought a slug gun lately has gotten the Savage 220 in 20ga.  Problem can be finding the shells you want.
    • leech~~
      My son always bugs me about getting a nice light over-under 20ga for grouse hunting.  I say Heck no, I'm getting a 3 1/2" 10ga so I can put as much lead in the air that I can!!     So, I'm keeping my 12ga.  
    • 11-87
      That’s almost exactly what I was thinking.  Have slug barrels for both   One for turkey and one for deer.      I have a 20ga mosseberg as well. (Combo came with the scope but never used.   I always liked the 12 better
    • leech~~
      Wanderer is right on the money and covered it well.  I was wondering too if you had a slug barrel for one of your guns?  If so you could make that your slug gun with a scope, and the other your turkey gun with the Red dot.  As you can afford it. 
    • Wanderer
      Kinda depends on if you want magnification or quick target acquisition.   More magnification options and better accuracy with a scope.  You get what you pay for too so get comfortable with a budget for one.  Tasco and Bushnell work but I find they lose their zero easier, have low contrast and don’t gather light well in low light conditions.  That said, I’m still using one I haven’t replaced yet.  Vortex has been the hot brand for the past several years for bang for the buck.  Good products.  Nothing beats Swarovski though.  Huge dough for those.  Burris is another decent option.   There are some specific models for shotgun/slug hunting in the economy brands and bullet drop compensation (BDC) reticles.  Based on experience I’d recommend not falling for that marketing ploy.   Red dots are usually lower magnification and easier to get on target.  Reasonably accurate but don’t do well with definition, like searching the brush for your target.  I put a HAWKE red dot on a .22 for squirrels and it’s been good.  For turkey, that’s probably the route I’d go.     If your slug shots are normally not too far and too brushy, I’d think a red dot could work there too if you’re only buying 1 scope.  You’ll be better off dimming the reticle to the lowest setting you can easily use to not over shine the target and get a finer aim point.   If you don’t have a slug barrel, you might appreciate one of those.  I had a browning with a smoothbore slug barrel that shot Brenneke 2-3/4 inch well.  The 11-87 would well fitted with a cantelever rifled barrel. 
    • 11-87
      Looking for recommendations on scope or red dot    I basically hunt turkey and whitetail, live in southern MN. So it’s all deer/ shotgun    looking to add a scope/ red dot as my eyes don’t work like they used to to with the open sights.    my gun options are 11/87 12. Browning BPS 12    not looking for the most expensive or the cheapest    pros and cons of one over the other
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.