Jump to content
  • GUESTS

    If You  want access  to member only forums on FM, You will need to Sign-in or  Sign-Up now .

    This box will disappear once you are signed in as a member.

Manziel Debate


DrJuice1980

Recommended Posts

Like others have said, with all the rule changes favoring the offense, it's very tough to keep a halfway decent offense under 20 points these days.

Like the Vikings? I believe they have averaged 22 points per game this year... laugh

Good Luck!

Ken

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Big Dave2

    181

  • DrJuice1980

    176

  • CaptainMusky

    173

  • LMITOUT

    135

I don't consider Eli elite,

No, you might not.... but Ellie considers himself ELITE. Just ask him! laugh HA

Good Luck!

Ken

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not only are there mythical QB's and mythical football seasons that just have a Super Bowl in your world, but now we have mythical RB's that are a dime a dozen and will be there year after year, even when they've been rode hard and put away wet every...single...game because the team doesn't have a QB worth squat.

Good grief.

Turn the TV on and watch the Vikings or at least take a look at the standings in the paper once in a while. They've proven this approach doesn't work...year after year after year after...

Enjoy your trip to fantasy land. Send us a postcard.

Tell that to Walter Payton, the Dynasty Cowboys teams of the 90's (Emmitt Smith (more so, his o-line)), Jamal Lewis, and Jerome Bettis, just to name a few. Could even throw out Terrell Davis' name.

Those were proven not to work either....?

Do we need a QB, yes. Is the answer Johnny Football? Nope. (my opinion)

I know why you don't understand my "Defense wins championships" stance, theres no real stat line in the paper for it and you can not watch a Football game and understand how the game is played beyond the ball being hand-off or thrown. My mistake.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tell that to Walter Payton, the Dynasty Cowboys teams of the 90's (Emmitt Smith (more so, his o-line)), Jamal Lewis, and Jerome Bettis, just to name a few. Could even throw out Terrell Davis' name.

Those were proven not to work either....?

Do we need a QB, yes. Is the answer Johnny Football? Nope. (my opinion)

I know why you don't understand my "Defense wins championships" stance, theres no real stat line in the paper for it and you can not watch a Football game and understand how the game is played beyond the ball being hand-off or thrown. My mistake.

If you're going to live in the past, that all makes complete sense. But if you want to move into the 2000's, not so much.

Things change, not always for the better but they do change. If you don't want to change with the times, you'll be left behind.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote:
Is Quarterback The Most Important Position?

BY BOB WALTERS

Picture a kitchen without a chef. You have the flashy cutlery, the heavy pots and pans, and all the right ingredients. With nobody to use these though they about as useful as a 5 year old girl with an easy bake oven.

A team without a solid quarterback isn't much of a team in my opinion. Who is going to lead the team down the field. sure the running back can do a large part be he isn't the one who has to call out audibles and blocking assignments. The quarterback is the heart and soul of a team he makes the big decisions during the plays he can change something if the defense is set up to well or even poorly. The wide receivers cant catch the ball if the quarterback isn't good enough to get them the ball.A team needs a good quarterback to manage the game and that's all there is to it.

I would have to say in other sports the most important positions would have to be a pitcher or a goalkeeper. In baseball if the pitcher does good chances are the team has a good chance of winning, if he does bad then the team has to rely on a strong offense to win the game. In football(soccer) the keeper has to make the saves and direct the defense sometimes to make sure they keep the ball out of the goal. Im not so sure either is near as important as a quarterback but they sure are important and at least somewhat comparable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yup, and Johnny Football is riding in here callin out audibles, telling his lineman who to block, reading coverage schemes, and taking us to the promise land.... This guy wont be a 2nd stringer, he'll sizzle out real quick.

Pick up one of these Chicago QBs, draft a QB next season (more options even if we suck again) and groom him under somebody not namesd Cassel, Ponder, or Freeman or anybody on this list: http://www.vikings.com/team/coaches.html . Clean house. Stack the D, pick up an OL or 2 in the draft. Sign Incognito!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you're going to live in the past, that all makes complete sense. But if you want to move into the 2000's, not so much.

That's really all it boils down to.

Keep clingin', "bra". rolleyes.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would rather the Vikings work out a trade with redskins for cousins than draft a qb with their #4 pick. Redskins won't have a first round pick since they traded that away and would be looking to get into the first round. I'm not sure I'd give the #4 pick for him but figure something out vs spending that pick on manziel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No way are we dumb enough to shell out a #4 overall for Cousins. That would be the dumbest move in NFL history. I'm sorry Captain, I cant back your play on this one brother. Cousins ain't worth a 1st rd pick at all, I don't care if he rips it up the rest of the season.

To LMIT and Big Dave:

Explain why since 2000 these Super Bowl victories: Giants have 2,Ravens 2, Steelers 2 and throw in the Bucs in 03.

7/13 Super Bowls won defensively. What do you have to say for yourself now?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are QB's a riskier pick than other positions?

http://walterfootball.com/nfldraftquarterbackriskmyth.php

I read down to the part where the guy called Vince Young ok, but definitely not a bust. Credibility was worthless after that. Big Dave, I tried to help you out before and I'll do it again. PLEASE READ THE WHOLE LINK BEFORE YOU POST!!!

But do keep your alliance with LMIT...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here we go again with the mythical 1-game season. crazy

You don't win the Super Bowl by having a terrible season. And would you rather make the playoffs 5 years in a row and lose in the first round or make it once in those 5 years and win it all? I'll take the title.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I read down to the part where the guy called Vince Young ok, but definitely not a bust. Credibility was worthless after that. Big Dave, I tried to help you out before and I'll do it again. PLEASE READ THE WHOLE LINK BEFORE YOU POST!!!

But do keep your alliance with LMIT...

Boy it gets tiring having to explain EVERYTHING to you.

That article was obviously written around 2009. That year Vince Young was 8-2 in games he started with almost 2,000 yards passing and 10 TDs. I would certainly say OK would accurately have described his career so far in 2009.

The article also says that Matthew Stafford was TBA but we all know that he has been a hit. They have Alex Smith as a bust but he seems to be making a comeback and may also belong in the hit category before he's done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You don't win the Super Bowl by having a terrible season. And would you rather make the playoffs 5 years in a row and lose in the first round or make it once in those 5 years and win it all? I'll take the title.

What on earth does that have to do with drafting a QB in the first round? If you have a good QB, more than likely you will be able to do both.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's no doubt about it the Superbowl winner defense gets after the QB and creates turnovers for their offense through out the playoffs and in the Superbowl.

Tom Brady was getting ate alive by the Giants pass rush that game, they might not of been ranked well that yr but they were beasts in the playoffs and Superbowl. That's where you actually have to watch games and not pull stats off the computer, Giants D-line was hurt all season that year and then came back together for the playoff run. Same with the Packers D they got hot, Saints D got hot, ect, ect.

If you get after the other teams QB and create turnovers you win, a little luck always helps. Luck may be the biggest factor, every year the winner of the Superbowl seems like they get all the breaks.

Don't get me wrong you also need a good QB, they all had good QB's. Even though Flacco isn't elite he was putting up monster numbers it was unreal, Big Ben always can buy time and find the open man. Eli threw one of the luckiest passes in history to set up the win, you either gotta be good or lucky lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You do realize that's, like, about half, give or take. Not sure seven thirteenths counts as statistically significant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seriously just over 50% is not significant statistical data? You got to be pulling my leg with that take.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So then there is obvious validity to my statements otherwise it wouldn't even be close, there's even a slight edge in my favor.

Being told that in the 2000's defense is not as important and then proving that since 2000 7/13 Super Bowls were won with defense sure does solidify my stance.

Captain you're just salty I don't think Cousins is worth a 1st rounder.

Next please.

Rinse.

Repeat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's worth a first round pick before any of these other silly-me clowns in this draft. I don't think he would be worth our top pick but if we were to trade down late first round or early second I would use it on him in a heartbeat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So then there is obvious validity to my statements otherwise it wouldn't even be close, there's even a slight edge in my favor.

Being told that in the 2000's defense is not as important and then proving that since 2000 7/13 Super Bowls were won with defense sure does solidify my stance.

...and we're back to the mythical 1-game season again.

Rinse.

Repeat.

Yawn.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yup mythical 1-game seasons where you don't need to win to play in that 1-game. Dude, you make zero sense. Keep telling yourself that you got me though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To LMIT and Big Dave:

Explain why since 2000 these Super Bowl victories: Giants have 2,Ravens 2, Steelers 2 and throw in the Bucs in 03.

7/13 Super Bowls won defensively. What do you have to say for yourself now?

Sorry, but I already explained to you how the Giants were quite poorly ranked in defense their superbowl years and the Ravens in 2012 were only ranked 12th in defense. I guess you are down to 4/13 at best.

You do realize you have to MAKE it to the superbowl in order to have a chance of winning it, right? crazy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess you are down to 4/13 at best.

If yous guys are going to start tossing crazy fractions out there, at least use common tool sizes. 7/16/ 1/2, 9/16, 3/8, etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 'we have more fun' FishingMN Creators

For my money give us QB Derek Carr with that 4th pick. If Carr is gone at #4 I would be happy if they went with QB Bridgewater as well OVER ANY MLB at that spot.

Question for Juice and his sidekick captainmuskie...

If we're at the 4th pick....It's safe to assume DE Clowney is gone by then so which MLB ya gonna take if no one trades with us?

The more and more I look at what's out there coming up in the draft for a QB the less and less I get excited about anybody. Late 2nd or 3rd round, anything earlier than that is way too much of a stretch. If you think our answer to that position is in the draft you are mistaken.

MLB is our #1 concern, we have to make tackles.

As for my take on MLBs, I'm fine waiting for Mauti at Mike backer and Hodges at the Will spot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bring them in for a workout and I'll tell you. Haha

Since Hendersons been benched I don't see it being as big of a need but then again I'm not too confident in these guys being complete studs. Mosley shows signs of being quite the player but then he puts himself way out of position once in a while. I'd be happy taking Blair from Cinncinatti later in the draft.

If we don't trade down I don't know what I'd do with that pick. If we were to pick a Q I like Carr more than the rest as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Your Responses - Share & Have Fun :)

    • LakeofthewoodsMN
      On the South Shore...  The focus for many this week is the ongoing deer hunting season which is a big tradition in these parts, even for avid walleye anglers.  There were some that either already harvested their deer or are more into catching fall walleyes than hunting.     Those that are fishing are taking advantage of the unseasonably warm weather and excellent walleye and sauger bite that is happening across the lake.  Cold weather is in the forecast in the upcoming days and weeks so that is also getting many excited. The best depths on the south end of LOW are 22-28 feet of water.     Vertical jigging with frozen emerald shiners is catching most of the walleyes, saugers and jumbo perch.  Depending upon where on the lake you are fishing, some slots and big trophies are in the mix as well, but most reports are talking about good numbers of eaters.    Jumbo perch are coming in good numbers this fall which will serve ice anglers well.  Watch out for an occasional pike or even lake sturgeon mixed in with the walleyes.      There are good numbers of walleyes and saugers across the south shore which is setting up nicely for early ice.   On the Rainy River...  There continues to be good numbers of shiners in the river, and consequently, there are good walleyes in the river as well.     Walleyes along with saugers, pike and some sturgeon are coming in up and down the river.  Most walleyes are being caught in 10-25 feet of water in various stretches of the river.   Jigging with live or frozen emerald shiners is the key. Some anglers are also still slow trolling crankbaits upstream to cover more ground and find fish. Both methods are producing solid results. Sturgeon fishing remains strong.  The catch-and-release sturgeon fishing is open into the spring when it changes to the "keep season" on April 24th. Up at the NW Angle...  As temps are getting colder, most are in the woods hunting and not fall fishing, however, for those who bundle up, fishing continues to be excellent.     A nice mixed bag with walleyes, saugers, perch, pike and crappies being caught. Very good muskie fishing with the colder water temps and shorter days.  Some big fish and some good numbers are being caught amongst the islands.  Both casting and trolling is getting it done.  
    • gimruis
      I hunt in the rifle zone so I don't have a need to use a shotgun to hunt deer, but I would be looking at this if there was ever a need to.   There could be state legislation introduced next summer that eliminates the shotgun zone completely.  It has bipartisan support.  Wisconsin removed theirs years ago and MN is usually later to follow.  They've tried to pass it more than once and it came up just short both times.  Probably just a matter of time.
    • Wanderer
      Oh, h e l l no! 
    • leech~~
      Screw that, here's whatch need!  😆   Power-Shok Rifled Slug 10 Gauge 766 Grain Grain Weight: 766 Shotshell Length: 3-1/2in / 89mm Muzzle Velocity: 1280
    • Wanderer
      20 ga has become a real popular deer round in the last 5 or so years.  The rifled barrels are zinging those sabot slugs with rifle like accuracy out to 100 yards easily.  Some go so far as dialing in for a 200 yard shot but really, by 150 they’re falling off pretty low.   I have a single shot Ultraslug in 20 ga that shoots really well at 100 yards.  Most everyone I know that has bought a slug gun lately has gotten the Savage 220 in 20ga.  Problem can be finding the shells you want.
    • leech~~
      My son always bugs me about getting a nice light over-under 20ga for grouse hunting.  I say Heck no, I'm getting a 3 1/2" 10ga so I can put as much lead in the air that I can!!     So, I'm keeping my 12ga.  
    • 11-87
      That’s almost exactly what I was thinking.  Have slug barrels for both   One for turkey and one for deer.      I have a 20ga mosseberg as well. (Combo came with the scope but never used.   I always liked the 12 better
    • leech~~
      Wanderer is right on the money and covered it well.  I was wondering too if you had a slug barrel for one of your guns?  If so you could make that your slug gun with a scope, and the other your turkey gun with the Red dot.  As you can afford it. 
    • Wanderer
      Kinda depends on if you want magnification or quick target acquisition.   More magnification options and better accuracy with a scope.  You get what you pay for too so get comfortable with a budget for one.  Tasco and Bushnell work but I find they lose their zero easier, have low contrast and don’t gather light well in low light conditions.  That said, I’m still using one I haven’t replaced yet.  Vortex has been the hot brand for the past several years for bang for the buck.  Good products.  Nothing beats Swarovski though.  Huge dough for those.  Burris is another decent option.   There are some specific models for shotgun/slug hunting in the economy brands and bullet drop compensation (BDC) reticles.  Based on experience I’d recommend not falling for that marketing ploy.   Red dots are usually lower magnification and easier to get on target.  Reasonably accurate but don’t do well with definition, like searching the brush for your target.  I put a HAWKE red dot on a .22 for squirrels and it’s been good.  For turkey, that’s probably the route I’d go.     If your slug shots are normally not too far and too brushy, I’d think a red dot could work there too if you’re only buying 1 scope.  You’ll be better off dimming the reticle to the lowest setting you can easily use to not over shine the target and get a finer aim point.   If you don’t have a slug barrel, you might appreciate one of those.  I had a browning with a smoothbore slug barrel that shot Brenneke 2-3/4 inch well.  The 11-87 would well fitted with a cantelever rifled barrel. 
    • 11-87
      Looking for recommendations on scope or red dot    I basically hunt turkey and whitetail, live in southern MN. So it’s all deer/ shotgun    looking to add a scope/ red dot as my eyes don’t work like they used to to with the open sights.    my gun options are 11/87 12. Browning BPS 12    not looking for the most expensive or the cheapest    pros and cons of one over the other
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.