Jump to content
  • GUESTS

    If You  want access  to member only forums on FM, You will need to Sign-in or  Sign-Up now .

    This box will disappear once you are signed in as a member.

New AIS law


harvey lee

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 414
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • harvey lee

    51

  • Scott K

    47

  • reinhard1

    45

  • James_R

    18

Ahhhhhhhhhhhh, if something in effect is a LAW, then it cant be illegal, not following the law is illegal. Maybe going through your home to find yer milfoil stash without a warrent is illegal or searching the inside of your vehical without consent may be illegal. anyways thanks reinhard at least i know im not the onlyone with a fixed plug wooooo

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i sealed up my plug on my banged up 12 footer. i put it upside down when i throw it in my truck. i get a ticket for that i would be surprised but on the other hand why should i be surprised. i'll take my chances on that one, just seems like common sense as long as no water is in there. good luck.

Cover up the plug with one of fancy stickers they were handing out. smile

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i've never had a difficult CO ever. i think most are reasonable. as long as you take reasonable measures to comply there wont be a problem. i think the CO you met are an example of the majority of CO's. i'll do the same as i do every year as far as compliance and all will be fine. good luck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess I am completely confused on this subject. Do I actually need to get these stickers before this weekend? Or what?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

BEEFEATER, I dont believe they can pull you over along side the road without probable cause. Thats all jhall555 and myself are saying.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess I am completely confused on this subject. Do I actually need to get these stickers before this weekend? Or what?

Nope, no sticker needed. Those stickers are out dated already.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

BEEFEATER -

Here's an example

Do you remember the traffic light cameras? Running a red light or stop light and you'd get a ticket in the mail...you don't see those around anymore in Minnesota. Those were ruled illegal after it became a law and the law was reversed and no longer valid.

Same thing here.

Good luck this weekend everyone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

BEEFEATER -

Here's an example

Do you remember the traffic light cameras? Running a red light or stop light and you'd get a ticket in the mail...you don't see those around anymore in Minnesota. Those were ruled illegal after it became a law and the law was reversed and no longer valid.

Same thing here.

Good luck this weekend everyone.

More direct comparison would be the dwi checkpoints that MN has ruled unconstitutional.

I did bring this up a few times, and said that even if I was not in violation, if I'm pulled over randomly and searched, I'm going to court...

I believe the responses I had were to stop wasting taxpayer money on frivolous lawsuits, and that I must be doing something else wrong or I should not mind the cops stopping me randomly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i've never had a difficult CO ever.

consider yourself lucky ... or extremely tolerant of marginal behavior

Link to comment
Share on other sites

More direct comparison would be the dwi checkpoints that MN has ruled unconstitutional.

I did bring this up a few times, and said that even if I was not in violation, if I'm pulled over randomly and searched, I'm going to court...

I'd go as far and argue that the state should reimburse people for the court costs because they should know and have reason to know through public precedent that this law is unconstitutional but they chose to force the situation anyway.

I know, spit in one hand and wish in the other but this law is nonsense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One would think these "Lawmakers" would have a legal dept. to play devils advocate and avoid easily foreseeable lawsuits.

Maybe if the Lawmakers who voted for this sticker program and now the online test + new sticker were held accountable for the cost if the program fails before it pays for itself. We the taxpayers wouldn't have to foot the bill for so many failed programs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

BEEFEATER, I dont believe they can pull you over along side the road without probable cause. Thats all jhall555 and myself are saying.
for sure! Also i agree with reinhard that most CO's are pretty decent. On the other hand ive encountered sum pretty strict local sherrifs on the water. Once the water patroll was writing me out a ticket for not having adult life jackets. Mid way through i picked one out and showed him on the life jacket were it said ADULT SIZE LARGE! haha dident get the ticket afterall
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I created a facebook page to help get the word out on locations of the checkpoints. If your interested in being a part of it i will post the link for you to "like". [Note from admin: Your post has been edited. Please read forum policy before posting again. Thank you.]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

BEEFEATER -

Here's an example

Do you remember the traffic light cameras? Running a red light or stop light and you'd get a ticket in the mail...you don't see those around anymore in Minnesota. Those were ruled illegal after it became a law and the law was reversed and no longer valid.

Same thing here.

Good luck this weekend everyone.

I hate to get technical here, but actually the traffic cameras per se were not found to be unconstitutional. The issue with the traffic cameras was that people figured out that you do have a constitutional right to face your accuser and cross examine them in a court of law. Since you obviously can’t cross examine a camera, the government realized that the word on this would eventually get out to the general public and everyone would just take the citation to court and it would be dismissed. I know, splitting hairs…

Anyhow, I would just like to say that it is interesting to see how the public opinion on this topic has shifted over the last few months. It seems to me that there are a lot of people that have turned against this law but when it was first brought up there were far more people for it. I have even noticed some people on this site do a complete 180. What concerns me is that it took the “nuisance factor” to increase in order for people to change their opinion of the law. Then there are people such as myself, Truth Walleyes, James R, and some others that knew from the start that AIS doesn’t have anything to do with why we should all be fighting this law. I get the impression that some of you wouldn’t have a problem with this law at all if you were only pulled over for five minutes or less and then you were on your way. I hope for the future sake of this country that people start to look at government intervention in the context of whether the limited powers granted to the government by state and federal constitutions is being overstepped or not…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was unconstitutional.

I'm pretty sure it was thrown out due to the fact that the owner of the vehicle may not actually be driving the vehicle. You can't issue a ticket to someone who didn't commit a traffic violation...and there was no way to prove otherwise.

Either way, the law was reversed.

http://www.startribune.com/local/11585516.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, legal precedent should be the main concern here. Government loves to test the constitutional waters with laws like this and expand them once they become firmly established. Just because a new law as it is currently written won't have a direct effect on you doesn't mean that law makers or LE won't expand on it at a later date and target you or your favorite activity. The government loves to go after and isolate small groups like hunters, fishermen, smokers etc. Just because you are not in one of those demographics doesn't mean that they won't eventually use those same tactics on you or your group. It kind of seems like if the state passed a law that taxed everyone with a red truck a $5000 user fee; most people without red trucks in our state would say "I don't care, I don't have a red truck." We all need to start looking beyond our little corner of the world and start looking at what's happening to other people especially when it comes to the law.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They will continue to push unconstitutional laws our way because they know that one of these times we are not going to push back, and the flood gates will be open.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LOL!!!!i guarentee the one's i support do not support this. do yourself a favor and call and ask questions dude. also call your reps and express your feelings to them. that's what's important. good luck.
Dude???LOL all you want You have not a clue. crazy I am so up in the faces of the reps they would see the brown eye of all the folks they represent.

Just like you I am concerned, well maybe not like you as I dont like to be spoon fed with propaganda, for our interest in our stride for good management of our resources .

I actually have a bit of biology behind me and references of DNR biologist I deal with, as for hatcheries, that under the table disagree with actions being taken. Under the table because any outspoken publicity is cause for retaliation from the higher ups. Its all public record as for studies done and all come back inconclusive as for interrupting the Eco system, check it out.

In an earlier post on Zebs and the report being buried, I submit this as an example. Let me guess you regarded this as false and did not fallow up on the claim, right? The sum like you with the head berried in the sand to only listen to what you want to here from a certain faction that is fed to you is our downfall to our freedom. Knowledge should free us all! I do not know if its true but it sounds good.

SERIOUSLY! If you have questions look for an outside creditable source to get an an even objectionable view on the dilemma to further your horizon on the subject. Talk to your bait shop, Hunt down the whole seller, talk to former hatcheries and so on to get a clear view on whats going on. Leave that suburban shell and talk with them then make a conclusion. Your rep does not know [PoorWordUsage] and your buds don't have a clue!

Joust with me! Really! I'll wait until you contact your uninformed buds to tell you what is. Then I'll let you in on the truth. cool

Call me yonk or Yonk! If you want my respect. If you don't want my respect I can not do the same for you. reinhardt.

LOL!!!!!!!! No disrespect laugh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll give you an example how messed up the DNR is. The DNR rely on boom shocking in parts for tallying a count on species. Well this system does not affect all species. Take in account the short nose gar or even sturgeon or the long nose gar. DNR says no Short nose gar inhabit the St.Croix. I just witnessed a spawn of hundreds of short nose gar just recently in the backwaters of the St.Croix.

Yes ,I do know the difference between the long nose and the short and besides that I had a hatchery guy that raised both there that time to teach me on the spawning and the the stages after. It was an awesome experience to witness this ,then to come back to see the eggs clinging to plant life 3 days later. In five or so days we will go back to see the fry clinging to leaves as they migrate to the surface gulping for food and air.

Same goes for the Minnesota river. Boom shocking shows lows yields so what do they do? On ground surveys contradict the boom shocking surveys. Funny DNR takes Boom Shocking as the model to fallow.

Point is Testing is flawed for an accurate count. Is this purposeful or just plain incompetence ? Please! school me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll give you an example how messed up the DNR is. The DNR rely on boom shocking in parts for tallying a count on species. Well this system does not affect all species. Take in account the short nose gar or even sturgeon or the long nose gar. DNR says no Short nose gar inhabit the St.Croix. I just witnessed a spawn of hundreds of short nose gar just recently in the backwaters of the St.Croix.

Yes ,I do know the difference between the long nose and the short and besides that I had a hatchery guy that raised both there that time to teach me on the spawning and the the stages after. It was an awesome experience to witness this ,then to come back to see the eggs clinging to plant life 3 days later. In five or so days we will go back to see the fry clinging to leaves as they migrate to the surface gulping for food and air.

Same goes for the Minnesota river. Boom shocking shows lows yields so what do they do? On ground surveys contradict the boom shocking surveys. Funny DNR takes Boom Shocking as the model to fallow.

Point is Testing is flawed for an accurate count. Is this purposeful or just plain incompetence ? Please! school me.

Not sure what this has to do with the AIS law, but you might want to check your claims, the St. Croix is on this species distribution table for long and shortnose gar as is the Minnesota River:

http://hatch.cehd.umn.edu/research/fish/fishes/distribution_table.html

Are you suggesting that boom electroshocking is ineffective for longnose gar, shortnose gar, or both?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I got a kick out of this one.

My buddy just moved up by Leech lake, lives on Emily. He's workign for the forest service. About a month ago, there were lot of fires, so my buddy and I are talking and he says, "We pump water from any lake, infested or not, and spread it all over" He knows of a few times where they took from infested lakes and distributed very near to non infested lakes to put out natural or controlled burn areas...

Good to see our state services are concerned with transfering invasives...Maybe they'll transfer them for us and we can get rid of these laws. sick

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I got a kick out of this one.

My buddy just moved up by Leech lake, lives on Emily. He's workign for the forest service. About a month ago, there were lot of fires, so my buddy and I are talking and he says, "We pump water from any lake, infested or not, and spread it all over" He knows of a few times where they took from infested lakes and distributed very near to non infested lakes to put out natural or controlled burn areas...

Good to see our state services are concerned with transfering invasives...Maybe they'll transfer them for us and we can get rid of these laws. sick

HA!!

Now that is funny.

We really only have ourselves to blame. Mankind that is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Your Responses - Share & Have Fun :)

    • mulefarm
      With the early ice out, how is the curlyleaf pondweed doing?
    • LakeofthewoodsMN
      On the south end...   The big basin, otherwise known as Big Traverse Bay, is ice free.  Zippel Bay and Four Mile Bay are ice free as well.  Everything is shaping up nicely for the MN Fishing Opener on May 11th. With the walleye / sauger season currently closed, most anglers are targeting sturgeon and pike.  Some sturgeon anglers are fishing at the mouth of the Rainy River, but most sturgeon are targeted in Four Mile Bay or the Rainy River.  Hence, pike are the targeted species on the south shore and various bays currently.   Pike fishing this time of year is a unique opportunity, as LOW is border water with Canada, the pike season is open year round. The limit is 3 pike per day with one being able to be more than 40 inches. All fish 30 - 40 inches must be released. Back bays hold pike as they go through the various stages of the spawn.  Deadbait under a bobber, spinners, spoons and shallow diving crankbaits are all viable options.   Four Mile Bay, Bostic Bay and Zippel Bay are all small water and boats of various sizes work well. On the Rainy River...  Great news this week as we learned sturgeon will not be placed on the endangered species list by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.     The organization had to make a decision by June 30 and listing sturgeon could have ended sturgeon fishing.  Thankfully, after looking at the many success stories across the nation, including LOW and the Rainy River, sturgeon fishing and successful sturgeon management continues.   A good week sturgeon fishing on the Rainy River.  Speaking to some sturgeon aficionados, fishing will actually get even better as water temps rise.     Four Mile Bay at the mouth of the Rainy River near the Wheeler's Point Boat Ramp is still producing good numbers of fish, as are various holes along the 42 miles of navigable Rainy River from the mouth to Birchdale.   The sturgeon season continues through May 15th and resumes again July 1st.   Oct 1 - April 23, Catch and Release April 24 - May 7, Harvest Season May 8 - May 15, Catch and Release May 16 - June 30, Sturgeon Fishing Closed July 1 - Sep 30, Harvest Season If you fish during the sturgeon harvest season and you want to keep a sturgeon, you must purchase a sturgeon tag for $5 prior to fishing.    One sturgeon per calendar year (45 - 50" inclusive, or over 75"). Most sturgeon anglers are either a glob of crawlers or a combo of crawlers and frozen emerald shiners on a sturgeon rig, which is an 18" leader with a 4/0 circle hook combined with a no roll sinker.  Local bait shops have all of the gear and bait. Up at the NW Angle...  A few spots with rotten ice, but as a rule, most of the Angle is showing off open water.  In these parts, most are looking ahead to the MN Fishing Opener.  Based on late ice fishing success, it should be a good one.  
    • leech~~
      Nice fish. I moved to the Sartell area last summer and just thought it was windy like this everyday up here? 🤭
    • Rick G
      Crazy windy again today.... This is has been the norm this spring. Between the wind and the cold fronts, fishing has been more challenging for me than most years.  Panfish have been moving in and out of the shallows quite a bit. One day they are up in the slop, the next they are out relating to cabbage or the newly sprouting lilly pads.  Today eye guy and I found them in 4-5 ft of water, hanging close to any tree branches that happened to be laying in the water.  Bigger fish were liking a 1/32 head and a Bobby Garland baby shad.   Highlight of the day way this healthy 15incher
    • monstermoose78
    • monstermoose78
      As I typed that here came a hen.  IMG_7032.mov   IMG_7032.mov
    • monstermoose78
      So far this morning nothing but non turkeys. 
    • monstermoose78
      Well yesterday I got a little excited and let a turkey get to close and I hit the blind!!
    • smurfy
      good......you?? living the dream..in my basement playing internet thug right now!!!!!! 🤣 working on getting the boat ready.......bought a new cheatmaster locator for the boat so working on that.   waiting for warmer weather to start my garden!!!
    • monstermoose78
      How is everyone doing? Holy moly it’s chilly this morning I stayed in bed and will hunt later today when it warms up.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.