Jump to content
  • GUESTS

    If You  want access  to member only forums on FM, You will need to Sign-in or  Sign-Up now .

    This box will disappear once you are signed in as a member.

Results for Zone 3


someday

Recommended Posts

Maybe they think the DNR hasn't gone far enough with APR and no cross tagging.

When reviewing the results of the DNR survey in that area I would argue they've gone far enough. Only 53% of respondents support "enacting mature buck regulations," 47% support APR and 50% support no cross tagging.

If I'm an elected official, those figures are a long way from a mandate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with you, my comment was sarcasm. Although, I don't see 53% percent as being an "only" percentage. 53% would be more than enough to elect someone to office.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With corn futures approaching $7 and bean futures over $14 allot of peoples plans are changing especially if they are feeding livestock. Land rents for 200bu corn ground are getting into the $400 range. Hard to say what one might do if someone showed up and offered you say $20,000 to go hunt somewhere else. As for Whitewater the genetics are there as are everything else to grow a world record he just needs a sanctuary where he can reach his prime.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Resolution No.: 2010-225

Whereas, Whitetail deer are a valuable and renewable natural resource, and;

Whereas, Minnesota is home to a large deer herd and vast amounts of high quality deer habitat, much of it available to the public for hunting, and;

Whereas, Minnesota was once the top state in the nation for producing high numbers of Boone and Crockett record book bucks, but because of the way the herd has been managed for more than 35 years, Minnesota has fallen steadily in the record books, and; Whereas, this dramatic fall in the numbers of trophy bucks is an indication of the number of mature bucks in the deer herd in this state, and is also an indicator of the health of the Minnesota deer herd, and;

Whereas, because of the relatively few mature bucks in the deer herd, this has cost the state of Minnesota millions of dollars in lost revenue, and has cost the private sector in this state many millions more in revenue from lost opportunity as well as in real dollar costs, and;

Whereas, Deer management decisions and changes have proven to be very difficult for the DNR to make and for the deer hunting community to accept,

Now Therefore be it Resolved by the Wabasha County Board of Commissioners urges that a commission of all interested stakeholders including the hunting and conservation, government, political, agriculture, business and tourism communities be formed in order to evaluate the current deer management system in Minnesota, and to consider management practices, changes and goals that could be made to the current system in order to maximize the recreational and economic potential of the deer recourses of Minnesota in the future.

Adopted Unanimously

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do not believe the Commissioners have any interest in getting involved with the DNR's management of the deer herd just doing a study on a economic plan presented to them. The author of the plan how ever if I remember right clearly states he should be the one managing the deer herd since he would do so for its greatest economic value.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I watched a program on the outdoor channel a while back on hunting deer in Illionis. they mentioned that since the conception of QDM, the price of even marginal farm land had gone way up and has been leased and bought up by outfitters.

Could this happen here? Nah, Unkle Bill would never do that to us, Would He?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All of this is just a normal progression of things and has been going on since civilization first began. When the first hunter-gathers decided they didn't want to travel around anymore and take what nature gave. they settled in one place and cultivated natural things for themselves and their local community. When they got better at cultivating they produced more than they needed locally and learned they could trade them to those who didn't have as much and so started commerce. In time many of these items became common and standards got established. Today many of these items along with other things we now use are called commodities. All commodities have several things in common. They have value, not every one who wants them has their own ready supply, a standard is established by which quality can be determined, and the ability to produce more of the item that meets or exceeds the standard than is needed by the producer exists. While corn and soybeans are obvious commodities, even traded on the CBOT. Few think of big bucks as commodities. Yet recent changes in the rules have given them all the needed qualifications to be one. Deer with large horns have always had value, and more people desired to have them than had ready access. What has changed here in SE Minnesota is a standard has been set which is to be reached before harvest and this should increase the local supply. It was inevitable that someone would seek to set up a market to profit from this new commodity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.