Jump to content
  • GUESTS

    If You  want access  to member only forums on FM, You will need to Sign-in or  Sign-Up now .

    This box will disappear once you are signed in as a member.

trout stream in franconia area


fish_4_fun

Recommended Posts

hey i saw a trout stream in the franconia area, does anybody know of the regulations and the access to the stream. i know it runs through some peoples yard, and their is a bridge that goes over it. but the guy at frankies said the neighbors do not like people fishing there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not worth it. The little school you see from the bridge is about it most are less then 6". And the neighbors do not like people fishing in it even though you can. Some just give you a hard time if they see you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The folks that live down in that area don't like people fishing around the boat launch area either. When I'm down there i walk the road picking up cans and othe garbage and I was asked why i was picking stuff up around the boat landing by a home owner in that area. some are not the friendlies folks. but I try to talk with them anyway. last night a lady even told me there was no fishing from shore in franconia.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah the Franconia launch will be closed if the residents get their way. The Copas one is in danger of the same thing happening.

It is too bad these people buy a house on a stream or river and expect them to have it privatized.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's unfortunate that it only takes a few bad apples to make the locals bitter towards all fisherman. Your best approach is to keep being courteous and pick up trash like you are already doing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can access the stream from the bridge legally but will PO the neighbor folks if they see you wading the streambed. The downstream side is pretty shallow without alot of pools and the upstream side has a few pools. The trout in there tend to run small like 8-10" range and there aren't alot of them to be had. It is considered a navigable water so by wading the streambed below the high water mark you would be okay. As far as the neighbor folks they have been nice enough to me during the times I have been down there. Fear no fish, thanks for picking up after folks, the landing area tends to collect party hounds going to the eaglesnest campsite. There are alot of canoes launched there as well. It is a DNR landing site and if people tell you you can't fish down there let them know politely that you pay taxes in the state and it is a public access.

Tunrevir~

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've had a few runs in with locals at the franconia and copas landings as well, particularly when I pull my truck along the shoreline to unload my gear. How they approach me is the pre cursor as to how I'll treat them in return...needless to say I'm more times than not an A-hole to them. In the end though, I can't blame them for being like that...all the people that use and disrespect that river now is sickening! I'd like to see some stricter rules applied to the canoers that float down the river.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would not say I do not blame them for treating someone with disrespect. I (we) have not done anything to them that we should be blamed for. What ever someone did to them they need to take it up with them not everyone that goes to fish there. The landings were there when most of them bought homes in the area and just like the airport if you do not like the noise/trafic/people that come with living next to one don't move there then get all P'ed off! These area's and the river are just as much mine and yours as it is their's. Sorry but I have no time for people like this and will not take blame for others actions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

wow, i guess it would be best if i not go back to franconia and fish. the guy at frankies bait told me i could fish along the shore at the boat launch too. but i guess its not such a good idea. and i dont think i want to take my boat out over there either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't let stupid people stop you from enjoying the river. Encounters like that aren't really too common...I just fish the river ALOT more than the average person, so I'm at a better risk of coming across it. You could fish the river several times this summer and end up meeting lot's of friendly people, or dogs (always see about 6 different random dogs at franconia)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nicely said JB, I agree. Who knows you might even bump into one of us FM'ers!

Tunrevir~

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Huh funny I didn't know that anybody had ever bothered to fish there as well. Its a pretty little stream but not many big fish and the locals are pretty uppity at times.

Once I was fishing at Franconia and was told by a teenage kid (while standing IN the river, mind you) that this was private property and I had to leave. I quoted the regs to him and he took off and got the dad, who saw me standing in the water and glared at me, but said nothing before going back to his trailer

Just incredible how often people don't know the rules, or will think that the river or lake is their property just because they live there

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 12 years later...

Hi all, first post here and relatively new to fishing in MN, commenting on a 10+ year old post but hoping to get some insight. I was thinking about fishing Lawrence Creek for trout: park at Franconia Landing and walk/wade down south to the creek then work up the creek inland. Is it possible to wade south in the water from the landing to the creek to avoid walking through private property, and any updates on locals here confronting anglers? The creek seems manageable for a newbie but if there are any other relatively shallow, easy to access streams, please let me know. Thanks!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The mouth of the creek is quite a ways downstream from the landing, and you’ll have to cross several peoples’ docks. Entire stream is surrounded by private property. Sure, you can technically legally access the stream, but why would you want to bother with the headache of dealing with landowners that DON’T want you there? Stream is small enough to step across in most places, it’s very weedy, and lot’s of overhanging brush. Not to mention, below average at best numbers of small trout!

 

You want easy access? Buy a Wisconsin license! Right across the river in Pierce County alone, there’s hundreds of miles of public easements on trout streams that are ten times better than anything Minnesota has to offer!

  • Thumbs Up 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Your Responses - Share & Have Fun :)

    • LakeofthewoodsMN
      On the South Shore...  The focus for many this week is the ongoing deer hunting season which is a big tradition in these parts, even for avid walleye anglers.  There were some that either already harvested their deer or are more into catching fall walleyes than hunting.     Those that are fishing are taking advantage of the unseasonably warm weather and excellent walleye and sauger bite that is happening across the lake.  Cold weather is in the forecast in the upcoming days and weeks so that is also getting many excited. The best depths on the south end of LOW are 22-28 feet of water.     Vertical jigging with frozen emerald shiners is catching most of the walleyes, saugers and jumbo perch.  Depending upon where on the lake you are fishing, some slots and big trophies are in the mix as well, but most reports are talking about good numbers of eaters.    Jumbo perch are coming in good numbers this fall which will serve ice anglers well.  Watch out for an occasional pike or even lake sturgeon mixed in with the walleyes.      There are good numbers of walleyes and saugers across the south shore which is setting up nicely for early ice.   On the Rainy River...  There continues to be good numbers of shiners in the river, and consequently, there are good walleyes in the river as well.     Walleyes along with saugers, pike and some sturgeon are coming in up and down the river.  Most walleyes are being caught in 10-25 feet of water in various stretches of the river.   Jigging with live or frozen emerald shiners is the key. Some anglers are also still slow trolling crankbaits upstream to cover more ground and find fish. Both methods are producing solid results. Sturgeon fishing remains strong.  The catch-and-release sturgeon fishing is open into the spring when it changes to the "keep season" on April 24th. Up at the NW Angle...  As temps are getting colder, most are in the woods hunting and not fall fishing, however, for those who bundle up, fishing continues to be excellent.     A nice mixed bag with walleyes, saugers, perch, pike and crappies being caught. Very good muskie fishing with the colder water temps and shorter days.  Some big fish and some good numbers are being caught amongst the islands.  Both casting and trolling is getting it done.  
    • gimruis
      I hunt in the rifle zone so I don't have a need to use a shotgun to hunt deer, but I would be looking at this if there was ever a need to.   There could be state legislation introduced next summer that eliminates the shotgun zone completely.  It has bipartisan support.  Wisconsin removed theirs years ago and MN is usually later to follow.  They've tried to pass it more than once and it came up just short both times.  Probably just a matter of time.
    • Wanderer
      Oh, h e l l no! 
    • leech~~
      Screw that, here's whatch need!  😆   Power-Shok Rifled Slug 10 Gauge 766 Grain Grain Weight: 766 Shotshell Length: 3-1/2in / 89mm Muzzle Velocity: 1280
    • Wanderer
      20 ga has become a real popular deer round in the last 5 or so years.  The rifled barrels are zinging those sabot slugs with rifle like accuracy out to 100 yards easily.  Some go so far as dialing in for a 200 yard shot but really, by 150 they’re falling off pretty low.   I have a single shot Ultraslug in 20 ga that shoots really well at 100 yards.  Most everyone I know that has bought a slug gun lately has gotten the Savage 220 in 20ga.  Problem can be finding the shells you want.
    • leech~~
      My son always bugs me about getting a nice light over-under 20ga for grouse hunting.  I say Heck no, I'm getting a 3 1/2" 10ga so I can put as much lead in the air that I can!!     So, I'm keeping my 12ga.  
    • 11-87
      That’s almost exactly what I was thinking.  Have slug barrels for both   One for turkey and one for deer.      I have a 20ga mosseberg as well. (Combo came with the scope but never used.   I always liked the 12 better
    • leech~~
      Wanderer is right on the money and covered it well.  I was wondering too if you had a slug barrel for one of your guns?  If so you could make that your slug gun with a scope, and the other your turkey gun with the Red dot.  As you can afford it. 
    • Wanderer
      Kinda depends on if you want magnification or quick target acquisition.   More magnification options and better accuracy with a scope.  You get what you pay for too so get comfortable with a budget for one.  Tasco and Bushnell work but I find they lose their zero easier, have low contrast and don’t gather light well in low light conditions.  That said, I’m still using one I haven’t replaced yet.  Vortex has been the hot brand for the past several years for bang for the buck.  Good products.  Nothing beats Swarovski though.  Huge dough for those.  Burris is another decent option.   There are some specific models for shotgun/slug hunting in the economy brands and bullet drop compensation (BDC) reticles.  Based on experience I’d recommend not falling for that marketing ploy.   Red dots are usually lower magnification and easier to get on target.  Reasonably accurate but don’t do well with definition, like searching the brush for your target.  I put a HAWKE red dot on a .22 for squirrels and it’s been good.  For turkey, that’s probably the route I’d go.     If your slug shots are normally not too far and too brushy, I’d think a red dot could work there too if you’re only buying 1 scope.  You’ll be better off dimming the reticle to the lowest setting you can easily use to not over shine the target and get a finer aim point.   If you don’t have a slug barrel, you might appreciate one of those.  I had a browning with a smoothbore slug barrel that shot Brenneke 2-3/4 inch well.  The 11-87 would well fitted with a cantelever rifled barrel. 
    • 11-87
      Looking for recommendations on scope or red dot    I basically hunt turkey and whitetail, live in southern MN. So it’s all deer/ shotgun    looking to add a scope/ red dot as my eyes don’t work like they used to to with the open sights.    my gun options are 11/87 12. Browning BPS 12    not looking for the most expensive or the cheapest    pros and cons of one over the other
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.