Jump to content
  • GUESTS

    If You  want access  to member only forums on FM, You will need to Sign-in or  Sign-Up now .

    This box will disappear once you are signed in as a member.

Trophy Hunters, Friend or Foe?


DaveT

Recommended Posts

A more pronounced rut, where the bulk of does come into estrus in a shorter period of time and mature bucks do more of the breeding, vs a trickle rut where does are bred late and smaller bucks and spikes are born later the following year, thus perpetuating the cycle, would be one benefit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 148
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Big Dave2

    24

  • 96trigger

    17

  • FISHINGURU

    17

  • kr8r.tom

    11

the theory of: its brown its down, i'm convinced those people are bleeding heart liberals. they only want hunting laws to work their way, theres no give and take to help their fellow sportsman out. they won't think to themselves "you know what i got does for meat and half the hunters in the field would like to grow bigger bucks, so i'll do my share to help out for a couple seasons and see the results, it just might be good. why should i fight them,theres enough people trying to take away our hunting heritage".....bottom line is liberal sportsman not joining the brotherhood of sportsman.

Holy cow! If you think I am even close to a liberal, well you should probably come to work with me for a day and listen to Rush Limbaugh with me!

I would say that YOUR point of view on this is the more liberal point of view. Aren't you the one advocating to take away some of my rights? Aren't you the one trying to enlarge governments role in hunting by creating more regulations, thus enlarging it's role in my life?

I just believe that deer hunting means different things to different people. The way it is now is not infringing on your rights to only shoot large bucks if you want to. You can do your thing and I can do mine. What you are advocating is FORCING me to hunt the way that you want to hunt and the heck with what I think. That sounds liberal to me.

And all of you who talk about only shooting does if you want meat, just remember that there are a lot of lottery zones in MN and if you don't draw a tag, Then what? Leave the deer go because it will benefit the trophy hunters?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote:
And all of you who talk about only shooting does if you want meat, just remember that there are a lot of lottery zones in MN and if you don't draw a tag, Then what? Leave the deer go because it will benefit the trophy hunters?

I said it before, all lottery areas should be exempt from any type of restriction, and I fully understand party hunting in those areas. What I think many of us on here are saying REPEATEDLY, is that in intensive and managed areas, why not shoot the does if you can, why take the little bucks when there are plenty of does for meat. (Obviously this is NOT the case in lottery areas, get it?)

I don't think moving the season back would hinder deer hunter numbers. There have been a lot of times where the opener for 3B had better weather than 3A, like this year. In Wisconsin its pretty much a state holiday and occurs over Thanksgiving week, don't hear them complaining about the weather. However, I'm not sure how they would handle the split 3A and 3B seasons, there would be a ton, and I mean a ton of hunters in one small section of the state.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote:
And all of you who talk about only shooting does if you want meat, just remember that there are a lot of lottery zones in MN and if you don't draw a tag, Then what? Leave the deer go because it will benefit the trophy hunters?

I said it before, all lottery areas should be exempt from any type of restriction, and I fully understand party hunting in those areas. What I think many of us on here are saying REPEATEDLY, is that in intensive and managed areas, why not shoot the does if you can, why take the little bucks when there are plenty of does for meat. (Obviously this is NOT the case in lottery areas, get it?)

I don't think moving the season back would hinder deer hunter numbers. There have been a lot of times where the opener for 3B had better weather than 3A, like this year. In Wisconsin its pretty much a state holiday and occurs over Thanksgiving week, don't hear them complaining about the weather. However, I'm not sure how they would handle the split 3A and 3B seasons, there would be a ton, and I mean a ton of hunters in one small section of the state.

You may have said that but not the other posters.

If I saw a doe first or if I thought that the area was good enough to see multiple deer a season(I don't seem to hunt in such an area) then I would have no problem taking the doe instead of the buck. I just don't really want any laws telling me that I have to do that. Then theres always the problem of a doe being with a fawn yet. That makes for a tough decision.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would like to see this topic posted in the Deer bear elk moose forum as well as the hunting forum.

I replied to this topic when it was posted the last time. I do not agree with trophy hunting. If you want a trophy go to kansas. I looked up the different numbers between Kansas and MN and found this.

2007 Kansas hunter numbers(Firearms only)-141,000

2007 Kansas deer harvest numbers(Firearms and archery combined)90,000 ( I wonder what the Rifle hunting season alone got)?

MN hunter numbers (I assume firearms,archery and muzzleloader combined)- 500,000

MN deer harvest (I assume total # of deer per year harvested) 200,000

These numbers were takin from the MN DNR web sight as well as the Kansas wild life management site.

My bet goes with MN when it comes to deer hunting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanksgiving week used to be the week of deer season. It was a time for our family to get together, give thanks and hunt. We still do that, just can't hunt (muzzleloader) til the weekend after Thanksgiving day. It would be nice to take the kids hunting on the days they are out of school for Thanksgiving break. It might increase participation of kids. I believe Wisconsin season is this way.

Lakevet

When was the season as late as Thanksgiving? I've been hunting for 30+ years and it's always been at the same time as now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would like to see this topic posted in the Deer bear elk moose forum as well as the hunting forum.

I replied to this topic when it was posted the last time. I do not agree with trophy hunting. If you want a trophy go to kansas. I looked up the different numbers between Kansas and MN and found this.

2007 Kansas hunter numbers(Firearms only)-141,000

2007 Kansas deer harvest numbers(Firearms and archery combined)90,000 ( I wonder what the Rifle hunting season alone got)?

MN hunter numbers (I assume firearms,archery and muzzleloader combined)- 500,000

MN deer harvest (I assume total # of deer per year harvested) 200,000

These numbers were takin from the MN DNR web sight as well as the Kansas wild life management site.

My bet goes with MN when it comes to deer hunting.

Not trying to be offensive here pickel, but what is the point you are attempting to make with these statistics?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Depends on where you hunt. The 3B season has always been during thanksgiving week, has been for at least 20 years, still is..

D2, I don't envy your situaion. I think we should think about where we hunt before we throw out all the opinions. If the only deer I saw after 10 days of hunting was a small buck, I'm going to shoot it. I fortunately don't have that problem, where as I know others do. If I was in a lottery area and I never got drawn, I would also probably shoot the first legal deer I saw. I don't want to diss anybody that does. In my area, we have abundant deer, it is easy to pass on small bucks knowing that I can go out and stil get a good doe harvest if I put in the time. I might think otherwise in a lottery area or area that is void of deer even if its intensive harvest. Deer are not stupid. All the deer I see bowhunting don't get shot, but they do disappear for awhile. It often takes at least a month after all seasons close before I start seeing them religiously again, they have an uncanny nack for survival.

In my area, where the deer hunting is good, I wouldn't mind seeing more of those little bucks get a little bit older, thats all. I'd like to see more hunters take that approach, and on the private land I hunt, they are, but those areas don't hold the deer numbers, on the stateland that I bowhunt, the deer numbers are there, but so is the brown its down crowd. I'm kind of caught in the middle, not sure which way to go. The reason I started bow hunting was because I wanted a trophy buck. I got it last year. Took almost 10 years to get him, but it was worth it. Still have yet to even raise the barrel and fire a shot during the 3B season at a trophy or comparable buck. Now its depressing when I swap my matthews for my winchester 1300. I know my opportunity to shoot another trophy has probably passed and its time to fill the freezer. I still try and pass on the small bucks, even during the firearm season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"our deer herd is about as large as it's ever been" - and lopsided in terms of small immature bucks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i think what pickle is getting at is hunting is pretty darn good in mn. i think most deer hunters have dreams of shooting the big buck we all see in paintings, but the truth is, are just happy to fill their tag. i don't personally like all the labeling that are being tossed around, like "meat hunters" or "trophy hunters" i think they both make hunters look bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally Posted By: Pickelfarmer
I would like to see this topic posted in the Deer bear elk moose forum as well as the hunting forum.

I replied to this topic when it was posted the last time. I do not agree with trophy hunting. If you want a trophy go to kansas. I looked up the different numbers between Kansas and MN and found this.

2007 Kansas hunter numbers(Firearms only)-141,000

2007 Kansas deer harvest numbers(Firearms and archery combined)90,000 ( I wonder what the Rifle hunting season alone got)?

MN hunter numbers (I assume firearms,archery and muzzleloader combined)- 500,000

MN deer harvest (I assume total # of deer per year harvested) 200,000

These numbers were takin from the MN DNR web sight as well as the Kansas wild life management site.

My bet goes with MN when it comes to deer hunting.

Not trying to be offensive here pickel, but what is the point you are attempting to make with these statistics?

I guess I dont see a problem with MN's current Deer managment. If you want a trophy go else where or hunt hard in MN for the BIG ONE if thats what your into.

The poster of this topic already had quite a run with a post about pretty much this same topic on this very Forum.

I was simply pointing out that Kansas SHOULD have a good number of great bucks as there not hunted as hard as MN bucks are. But then again neither are their does.

Kansas as a state, size wise,is the same size as MN, but the number of deer taken each year from kansas is less than half the number takin from MN. There is twice as many hunters in MN and twice as many deer takin from MN each year vrs Kansas. All this from a state thats the same size as kansas (A so called trophy state).

My queastion is, Why are MN hunters able to harvest twice as many deer in a state that is the same size as a so called trophy state? If the answer is because the hunters in Kansas pass up deer to get a trophy, I'll call you a liar.I think its called hunting pressure and a saturation of hunters in "HOT SPOTS". I think MN is right on track to be able to keep up the kind of deer heard that we have here with the hunting pressure the deer herds see. I beleave we are able to do this because of the number of hunters there are here, and the money we put out each year from buying DNR issued licences.

Sure we could turn MN into a trophy state. All we would have to do is LIMIT the amount of hunters that hunt in our state.Because in the end isn't that what you would be doing by putting limits on what kind of deer can be shot and when they can be shot?

Kansas doesn't limit hunter numbers by choice. They just don't have the number of hunters that MN does because they dont have the hunting tradition we MN hunters have.Theres alot of meat hunters in MN and like I said before,"Go trophy hunt else where".

Lets see how long states such as Kansas keep there trophy statis when the hunter numbers flip flop and MN has anly 140,000 hunters and kansas has 500,000.The only thing trophy hunting regulations will produce is less hunters and in the long run less deer.

I guess I think everyone should be able to enjoy the outdoors and deer hunting not just the ones that have the most money and the loudest mouths. Thats what Im trying to say.......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

why do people think just because there is big deer population its a healthy herd? a healthy herd should be as close to even as possible...there's area's in MN that are like 5-7 doe's to 1 buck.

how would anything that produces more mature animals and less hunters in the long run make it so there is less deer? that makes no sense....so less people in the woods shooting less deer would somehow equal less deer? another thing is i don't see why people would quit hunting because they get to shoot a big deer...the only thing different is instead of spikes, 4's, and 6's being the common bucks you see with the more rare bigger ones the average buck would be way bigger because they'd live to be mature...nice 8's, 10's, and 12's would be more common because they actaully got to live to see the day.

i know i don't have to go anywhere to hunt for a MATURE whitetail...and if more people passed on little immature bucks there would be more MATURE animals...you know the kind that are actually smart and have been through a few hunting seasons....i personally feel kinda guilty if i shoot a young deer...they stand no chance.

i'm done with the word trophy..because when it comes down to it i'm not a trophy hunter...i just like to hunt mature whitetails which just so happens to be most mature whitetails are considered trophies....i want to go hunt hard and be patient and get a mature animal.

i guess it depends where you hunt because if i went out on opening day just to fill my tags i'd be done opener weekend every year and my only chance to harvest a mature animal would be if i just happened to see one the first couple days of hunting.

i could tell everyone how good of a hunter i am because i always fill all my tags and most of my friends to that are in my party...i'd be so stuffed on venny every night....instead its shame on me for letting young deer walk and being willing to eat my buck tag when i could be filling all my tags every year.

i guess for me i'm happy knowing there are alot of deer out there right now that wouldn't be if i was a hunter that took anything...when all else fails i harvest a doe because there are alot more of them out there then bucks and our herd is lopsided.

what are some of your guy's opinions on some places that have the earn a buck program? you can't shoot a buck until you tag a doe..by then you already have some meat and now your looking for your buck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No anlter restrictions.But I do agree things could change in helping with the deer.Moving the season would help.Just an idea moving from rifle to shotgun only?Is Iowa that way?Maybe that would not make a difference how far of shots we are making better judments on size of deer being shot at then no ground shrinkage.I will shoot any type of buck from spike to 12pointer.If you want to hold out for a larger buck good for you and that is your choice but don't try and get reg's changed for those that don't mind what they harvest and put on the grill.Yeah I would shoot a doe no problem but I have only seen 2 does this year and 10 different bucks from stand.I'm going to put something in the freezer I shot one doe and that is almost gone.I use it all year long and go through 3 deer for the year.Buck doe ,does not matter to me.I get to hunt with my old man and friends.Never will I hold it against anyone that likes to hold out for what they call a trophy or the guy next door that shot a 6 point cause his son was with or only had one day to hunt for the season and would like to put some venison in the freezer.This is great topic and I think most would agree that changes could be done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

why do people think just because there is big deer population its a healthy herd? a healthy herd should be as close to even as possible...there's area's in MN that are like 5-7 doe's to 1 buck.

how would anything that produces more mature animals and less hunters in the long run make it so there is less deer? that makes no sense....so less people in the woods shooting less deer would somehow equal less deer? another thing is i don't see why people would quit hunting because they get to shoot a big deer...the only thing different is instead of spikes, 4's, and 6's being the common bucks you see with the more rare bigger ones the average buck would be way bigger because they'd live to be mature...nice 8's, 10's, and 12's would be more common because they actaully got to live to see the day.

i know i don't have to go anywhere to hunt for a MATURE whitetail...and if more people passed on little immature bucks there would be more MATURE animals...you know the kind that are actually smart and have been through a few hunting seasons....i personally feel kinda guilty if i shoot a young deer...they stand no chance.

i'm done with the word trophy..because when it comes down to it i'm not a trophy hunter...i just like to hunt mature whitetails which just so happens to be most mature whitetails are considered trophies....i want to go hunt hard and be patient and get a mature animal.

i guess it depends where you hunt because if i went out on opening day just to fill my tags i'd be done opener weekend every year and my only chance to harvest a mature animal would be if i just happened to see one the first couple days of hunting.

i could tell everyone how good of a hunter i am because i always fill all my tags and most of my friends to that are in my party...i'd be so stuffed on venny every night....instead its shame on me for letting young deer walk and being willing to eat my buck tag when i could be filling all my tags every year.

i guess for me i'm happy knowing there are alot of deer out there right now that wouldn't be if i was a hunter that took anything...when all else fails i harvest a doe because there are alot more of them out there then bucks and our herd is lopsided.

what are some of your guy's opinions on some places that have the earn a buck program? you can't shoot a buck until you tag a doe..by then you already have some meat and now your looking for your buck.

You have some great POINTS grin that you make and I understand and agree with most of what your saying. All I'm saying is, its todays hunters and the DNR that have brought the deer herd of MN to the great thing it is state wide. You said yourself that you could shoot a doe anytime you want. 10-20 years ago you wouldn't have been able to say that.

With the mentallity of, "One day everyone will have a chance at a monster buck", I have a feeling that it won't happen like that. In the process of trying to get to that point our deer will suffer. Maybe not everyone wants to shoot a big buck. I for one don't like the way an old buck tastes. I perfer to have a young but yet Mature doe or buck 1.5 - 2.5 years old.

"Everyone can be a winner" is not the correct way of looking at Deer management. I know thats not your words I'm just adding that as a point. There are some really nice deer takin each year from MN and just because everyone dosen't get a chance to bag a trophy it doesn't meen we need to change the game (everyone can't be a winner every year).

If there is less hunters in the woods there is less money going into paying for hunting land and habitat, as well as disease managment. Thining the deer herd keeps the deer healthy, the DNR wealthy and... Well I got nothin for the wise part. laugh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally Posted By: Bear55
However, times are changing and more and more people are tired of the same old school deer management. Moving the gun season back and eliminating party hunting are two small steps that are going to save a lot of bucks and help balance the age structure. ......

Why is it all everyone ever talks about is moving the gun season. I'll hunt no matter when it is, BUT if you move the gun season later, you will have less participation. Every season that has a poor weather opener, the hunter numbers are down. If you move it back, to say this week, the DNR would sell a lot less licenses. Also, there are parts of MN that don't hold much, if any deer once the crops are completely harvested or the forage is covered with snow. This leads to more ground being worthless, in turn leading to more pressure on other hunting areas. Lastly, if we are for moving the gun season to protect more bucks, then I say we close the bow season for that time as well. No hunting means the bucks are protected. Moving the gun season sure sounds like catering to the bow hunters to me.

Look at Wisconsin & Michigan, their gun seasons open later in the year an both states have far more hunters than us. I would hate to think that hunters from MI and WI are a tougher breed of men and women to be able to handle the weather. I am not buying the worthless ground argument either, the deer might be on different food sources a little later in the season but they don't move completely out of an area. It may seem that way now but is because they have been highly pressured during rifle seaons so the smart ones hunker down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote:
I for one don't like the way an old buck tastes. I perfer to have a young but yet Mature doe or buck 1.5 - 2.5 years old.

"Everyone can be a winner" is not the correct way of looking at Deer management.

Not everyone is going to like what the DNR does, right now, its obvious that some think the DNR is doing a lousy job. I don't think they have a clue (the people, not the DNR). Our herd is doing very well. I just think that in some places where the herd is well populated and its not uncommon to see at least one deer in range when you go out, that we can do more to help some more bucks reach maturity. I think changing the season dates would be drastic, and logistically difficult in zone 3. I'd like to hear some options though. I think that antler restrictions could be beneficial, but I don't like the DNR telling me what to shoot, however, I don't mind making some hunters get a good look at what they are shooting first. When someone sees a mature buck, it doesn't matter if its going full tilt through brush, you will know when its a "shooter" buck. They have the large things on their head, usually look white in the woods. As for party hunting, I don't have a problem with it, you want to to use your buddies tag for a doe, go ahead, but I think you should only be allowed one antlered deer a year, once you have shot and registered and antlered deer, you should not be able to legally party hunt for another. Give the bucks a chance, put someone else in your stand, let them have a go if you think there are more out there. We already hunt the rut, why do some individuals need to shoot 2 or even 3 bucks a year????? Its too bad that it would be so tough to enforce, I don't have any idea how they could do except to say that once you shoot a mature buck, you would be done for that season and have to wait until the next opens up to hunt again for does, wouldn't be too bad, but I'm sure that some will really think that is a horrible idea. I don't care if you do go to your hunting shack for a week and tag out on opening morning. I'd be darn happy to hunt for 2 hours and shoot a monster. I'm sure that I'd spend the rest of the week squirrel hunting or day dreaming about the hunt that was.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Managing for deer shouldn't be about maximizing the number of animals. It should be for trying to keep a steady constant number of healthy animals that does not exceed the area's carrying capacity.

I'm curious, what sort of programs have the DNR done to boost/enhance the deer herd. Or better yet what could they do? I see some logging (which aids deer greatly for a few years), and purchasing a some land tracts. Note this doesn't do anything new for for the deer, but does give access to hunters. I believe private land owners have the oppportunity to do WAY more than the DNR can.

Like I said, what you would give up would be 1-2 years of not being able to shoot a small buck. That's it. By year 3 you would have a many bucks that be mature/legal to harvest. You wouldn't have to travel to Kansas/Iowa to have a legit chance a mature buck AND plenty of other opportunities for meat.

I don't think comparing MN to KS/IA is a good comparison. First they are vastly different in land types/terrain and I beleive KS/IA are heavily privatized and restrict Non-Res hunters.

One thing that I am heavily in favor is, is a call-in registration. It would save a ton of money and be much quicker. You punch in your dnr #, a few questions and boom, your'e done. Give people 3 days to do it. You'd still have a tag to put on the animal. If you're up at deer camp, you can go to town and call in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey Guru,read your comment about the earn a buck program.Here in Wis its been going on for about 5 years in different areas,YOU DO NOT WANT THIS IN MINN.Our deer pop. has taken a drastic decline since our dnr has started it.I dont care if you are a meat hunter or trophy hunter,BROWN ITS DOWN.Here in Wis our dnr has got the deer pop. est.so screwed up no one is seeing deer.Take a look at the Wis DNR website and look at the kill numbers from this year,they are down 23% statewide.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

GSWATTER, thank you. I have a brother that lives in Menomonie. Has a 40 acre farm, hates the EAB. Said people pick up road kill and do all sorts of nasty stuff to get their EAB tag. They let their population get way out wack over there. Yeah, they have big deer, but they also have a population problem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I will let the 2007 buck harvest data speak for itself. Look at links to these maps. MN has far fewer bucks per square mile. In fact, our highest zone only goes to 2.7-4.3.

mn deer buck harvest 2007 per square mile

Now look at WI?

WI 2007 buck harvest per square mile

Theirs goes up to 4.3 -7.4 with multiple zones that are 2.0 - 3.0 and 3.1 to 4.2

I know, stats are just that stats. But they don't lie.

there is a lot more interesting data on both sites too. I would have posted them, but who wants to read a book

Link to comment
Share on other sites

well there's gonna be loop holes in any law...just like the party hunting...people are morons if they pick up roadkill to use as their EAB lol...your not even a hunter if you do stuff like that...them are the same kind of people that bend or break any law...why don't they just go register a fake deer? the register stations i go to don't even come out to look at your deer.

the harvest #'s might be down where there is EAB but i wonder if the doe harvest #'s are up? which would be a good thing if the buck to doe ratio is lopsided. i wonder if alot hunters just get their doe then kinda give up on their buck since they already got some venny? are the actually #'s of hunters up or down in the EAB areas? it sure would suck to have a huge buck in front of ya and you couldn't shoot it because you haven't got a doe yet though lol.

if your a kid or a new hunter you'd be happy with anything...a deer is a deer right? i know my first deer i ever shot was a doe with a bow and i was stoked.

i know EAB would make me shoot a doe on the first day so i could get that out of my way and now hunt for my buck...almost all mature buck hunters would then take a doe asap..which would help even out the buck to doe ratio.

another thing about a more even ratio is the bucks actually have to go out and search for available doe's...the more they'd have to search the more we'd see...most bucks around here don't have to go any further then over the next ridge to find a family of doe's....if people had chances to see more bucks then they'd be more willing to pass on smaller bucks.

calling, rattling, decoying, ect, would all work way better and would make that type of hunting way more fun for people...i love the agressive tactics the way it is but it could be much better.

i'm not really for or against law changes or restrictions i just know things could be better and if there's changes that could make things better i'd be willing to do what it takes.

in the meantime all people can do is express their opinions and shoot around ideas and concerns...i think everyone see's where everyone else is coming from on either side.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I will let the 2007 buck harvest data speak for itself. Look at links to these maps. MN has far fewer bucks per square mile. In fact, our highest zone only goes to 2.7-4.3.

mn deer buck harvest 2007 per square mile

Now look at WI?

WI 2007 buck harvest per square mile

Theirs goes up to 4.3 -7.4 with multiple zones that are 2.0 - 3.0 and 3.1 to 4.2

I know, stats are just that stats. But they don't lie.

there is a lot more interesting data on both sites too. I would have posted them, but who wants to read a book

What are you trying to say Swill? Those numbers mean nothing by themselves. All they say is more bucks were shot in Wisconsin. They say nothing about the size or age of the deer. I could interpret them as saying Minnesota hunters are shooting fewer bucks and therefore passing on smaller ones.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

According to Wisconsin's DNR site they only use earn a buck in deer management units if it has had at least two years of consecutive herd control or earn a buck seasons, which failed to reduce the population to near goal and if another non-EAB season is not likely to do so.

Earn a buck isn't used there as a way to get bigger bucks, which is the topic of this thread.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Black Bay, you are correct on EAB. But the spin off effect is that some people are less likely to pull the trigger once they get a deer in the freezer.

The big key IF (or assumption) on those types of season structures is to have an accurate population estimate. Which is extremely tough to do across an entire management unit. For instance two seasons ago there were lots of antlerless deer in the zone we hunt in WI, but you had to buy a normal deer tag. Last year it was herd control, which it should have been. As it should have been the year before when it was a regular unit. This year it was herd control again, when there is NO way it should have been. I've got no idea what sort of count they used, but they should scrap it. Next year if they "count" is high it could go to EAB, but from my experiences it should go back to a normal unit with limited antlerless tags available.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

True, nothing on size or age; but they still are killing more bucks then MN hunters. And passing on smaller ones in MN? In the brown it is down capital on the midwest? Ummm sure that is what is happening.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally Posted By: Coach1310
Originally Posted By: Bear55
However, times are changing and more and more people are tired of the same old school deer management. Moving the gun season back and eliminating party hunting are two small steps that are going to save a lot of bucks and help balance the age structure. ......

Why is it all everyone ever talks about is moving the gun season. I'll hunt no matter when it is, BUT if you move the gun season later, you will have less participation. Every season that has a poor weather opener, the hunter numbers are down. If you move it back, to say this week, the DNR would sell a lot less licenses. Also, there are parts of MN that don't hold much, if any deer once the crops are completely harvested or the forage is covered with snow. This leads to more ground being worthless, in turn leading to more pressure on other hunting areas. Lastly, if we are for moving the gun season to protect more bucks, then I say we close the bow season for that time as well. No hunting means the bucks are protected. Moving the gun season sure sounds like catering to the bow hunters to me.

Look at Wisconsin & Michigan, their gun seasons open later in the year an both states have far more hunters than us. I would hate to think that hunters from MI and WI are a tougher breed of men and women to be able to handle the weather. I am not buying the worthless ground argument either, the deer might be on different food sources a little later in the season but they don't move completely out of an area. It may seem that way now but is because they have been highly pressured during rifle seaons so the smart ones hunker down.

First off, you are right Michigan and Wisconsin have more hunters than we do, but in Michigan roughly 6.7% of the population hunts. In Minnesota the number is 9.6%. Michigan has about twice as many people so you can't just compare the number of licenses sold. However, both states lag far behind Wisconsin which is about 15% of the population buying licenses.

As far as the "worthless ground" argument. You must have little experience in farm country. Areas that contain a high percentage of crop land and a low percentage of timber/set aside areas have a very hard time holding deer after the crops are gone and like you mentioned once pressure is applied it gets worse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Earn a buck isn't used there as a way to get bigger bucks, which is the topic of this thread.

what is the purpose of EAB?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe baiting has a lot to do with better success rates.MN it's not legal.But I think Michigan,Wisconsin,Canada, you can bait.I'm also saw a show this past weekend with feeders on it saying they where hunting Kansas.Can you bait in Kansas?Just putting something else out there.I would not bait but if legal who knows.I know you have to worry about diasease and other things but maybe bringing in more deer(does) to bait piles helps with the more bucks harvested.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Your Responses - Share & Have Fun :)

    • smurfy
      i cant help you with the weed thing, but i just came back form out that way......Regal, New London Hawick area. i dont no how big the swat of rain was but there is water standing everywhere. my buddy told me they had over 3 inches of rain yesterday/last night 
    • mulefarm
      With the early ice out, how is the curlyleaf pondweed doing?
    • LakeofthewoodsMN
      On the south end...   The big basin, otherwise known as Big Traverse Bay, is ice free.  Zippel Bay and Four Mile Bay are ice free as well.  Everything is shaping up nicely for the MN Fishing Opener on May 11th. With the walleye / sauger season currently closed, most anglers are targeting sturgeon and pike.  Some sturgeon anglers are fishing at the mouth of the Rainy River, but most sturgeon are targeted in Four Mile Bay or the Rainy River.  Hence, pike are the targeted species on the south shore and various bays currently.   Pike fishing this time of year is a unique opportunity, as LOW is border water with Canada, the pike season is open year round. The limit is 3 pike per day with one being able to be more than 40 inches. All fish 30 - 40 inches must be released. Back bays hold pike as they go through the various stages of the spawn.  Deadbait under a bobber, spinners, spoons and shallow diving crankbaits are all viable options.   Four Mile Bay, Bostic Bay and Zippel Bay are all small water and boats of various sizes work well. On the Rainy River...  Great news this week as we learned sturgeon will not be placed on the endangered species list by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.     The organization had to make a decision by June 30 and listing sturgeon could have ended sturgeon fishing.  Thankfully, after looking at the many success stories across the nation, including LOW and the Rainy River, sturgeon fishing and successful sturgeon management continues.   A good week sturgeon fishing on the Rainy River.  Speaking to some sturgeon aficionados, fishing will actually get even better as water temps rise.     Four Mile Bay at the mouth of the Rainy River near the Wheeler's Point Boat Ramp is still producing good numbers of fish, as are various holes along the 42 miles of navigable Rainy River from the mouth to Birchdale.   The sturgeon season continues through May 15th and resumes again July 1st.   Oct 1 - April 23, Catch and Release April 24 - May 7, Harvest Season May 8 - May 15, Catch and Release May 16 - June 30, Sturgeon Fishing Closed July 1 - Sep 30, Harvest Season If you fish during the sturgeon harvest season and you want to keep a sturgeon, you must purchase a sturgeon tag for $5 prior to fishing.    One sturgeon per calendar year (45 - 50" inclusive, or over 75"). Most sturgeon anglers are either a glob of crawlers or a combo of crawlers and frozen emerald shiners on a sturgeon rig, which is an 18" leader with a 4/0 circle hook combined with a no roll sinker.  Local bait shops have all of the gear and bait. Up at the NW Angle...  A few spots with rotten ice, but as a rule, most of the Angle is showing off open water.  In these parts, most are looking ahead to the MN Fishing Opener.  Based on late ice fishing success, it should be a good one.  
    • leech~~
      Nice fish. I moved to the Sartell area last summer and just thought it was windy like this everyday up here? 🤭
    • Rick G
      Crazy windy again today.... This is has been the norm this spring. Between the wind and the cold fronts, fishing has been more challenging for me than most years.  Panfish have been moving in and out of the shallows quite a bit. One day they are up in the slop, the next they are out relating to cabbage or the newly sprouting lilly pads.  Today eye guy and I found them in 4-5 ft of water, hanging close to any tree branches that happened to be laying in the water.  Bigger fish were liking a 1/32 head and a Bobby Garland baby shad.   Highlight of the day way this healthy 15incher
    • monstermoose78
    • monstermoose78
      As I typed that here came a hen.  IMG_7032.mov   IMG_7032.mov
    • monstermoose78
      So far this morning nothing but non turkeys. 
    • monstermoose78
      Well yesterday I got a little excited and let a turkey get to close and I hit the blind!!
    • smurfy
      good......you?? living the dream..in my basement playing internet thug right now!!!!!! 🤣 working on getting the boat ready.......bought a new cheatmaster locator for the boat so working on that.   waiting for warmer weather to start my garden!!!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.