Guests - If You want access to member only forums on FM. You will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up on Fishing Minnesota.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Capt. H (Ret.)

Optimax or 4 Stroke

7 posts in this topic

I am thinking of buying a new 115hp Mercury for my boat. The boat is a Alumacraft 175 Trophy which is used for fishing and has remote steering. I am looking at the 115 Optimax and the 115 4 stroke. What is your preference and why??

Thanks for your input.

Capt. H

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

On that setup with that size motor I would probably go with a 4-stroke, basically because it's quieter (until you get to 4000 or 4500 rpms). It's a tough choice though and depending on what you want from the motor the Opti might be a better choice.

I've never priced those motors but I assume the Opti is cheaper??

The Opti would have a little more punch out of the hole and a little more on the top end, but would be louder and require seperate oil. Fuel economy is going to be identical or perhaps a touch better in the Opti. The Opti will troll down slower, especially if you go with the SmartCraft Tach that lets you adjust rpms. But even though the edge goes to the Opti in many of these categories, they are very close and if you want the 4-stroke I see no reason not to get it.

I assume you are not going with a 4-stroke kicker motor on the boat, but if you are going with a kicker then I'd definately go with the Opti instead of the 4-stroke 115.

With the boat I have now I was going back and forth between the 175 Opti or Verado, went with the Opti and am very happy with it. One of my friends had a 17 foot Crestliner with a 115 4-stroke and that was a really great setup too, although it trolled too fast so he eventually added a kicker). Good luck.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a 2000 model year 115 on the boat now. It is one of those 2+4 engines that goes from 2 cylinders to 4 depending on rpm's. I think it is too noisy plus I don't care for the extra cylinders kicking in at 2000 rpm's. I bought this motor new and have taken care of it but I think the technology on the newer engines is appealing.

My boat dealer feels the 4 stroke is what I need/want and I trust his recomendations as this will be the 3rd new motor I have purchased from him.

The Opti is about $700 cheaper. I do not have a kicker but looked at them to. The 9.9 Pro Kicker 4 Stroke is about $3,200 installed. I would like to have one of them but the wife is pretty observant and I am sure she would notice the extra motor.

Thanks for your thoughts.

Capt. H

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The 2+2 motors were great motors but technology has come a long way, either the Opti or the 4-stroke will be a huge step forward.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was making this same decision a few months ago. I ended up going with a 135 opti. Either way I was going to get a kicker at some point and I wanted to save the weight on the back. So far I like it alot. I don't have many hours on it though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a 2006 115 Optimax. I really like the motor. It is quiet. In my opinion, there is not much difference in noise between the Opti and the 4 stroke. The Opti is also good on gas. The extra oil is not really a big deal. It takes about 30 seconds to fill it on every tank of gas. It is also a very easy motor to winterize. The Opti is also lighter than the 4 stroke.

I did end up going with a 17 pitch prop instead of the 19 that came with it. I lost some top end, but my hole shot is much better and my trolling speeds went down.

In reality, you probably would love either motor.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with JDM. I have an '06 optimax 115 and love it! No smoke and great on gas. Also i have a kicker so the lighter weight than the 4 stroke helps out too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • Luttes
      That's so awesome! Good work on the video!! Where were you?
    • Vexilar
      I also needed to buy a receiver so my total cost was $500 but they did have them at Scheels beginning of the year but you can buy it from dish. I think they charge $7 a month for use of the receiver. 
    • EJ
      I was out last night in west metro and the water had mostly either frozen again or gone down the open holes. I was pleasantly surprised. We lost about an inch of ice though the top few inches were starting to soften.
    • Musky hunter 82
      I would build a frame that your current otter sled would fit in that has downhill skis on the bottom of it.  I did this for my setup that is very similar to yours, I can pull 100 pounds through 8" of snow with very little effort.  Side note I wouldn't pull it with a four wheeler, mine slides to easy and wants to hit the back of the wheeler when I try to stop.
    • Bdeanpete
      I've got an Eskimo 949I which I love. We occasionally go deep off the trail to isolated lakes and my otter sled is too much like dragging an anchor when we break new trail or if there is deeper snow on the ice. I am in search of a slender long sled that pulls easier and can still accommodate my hub house, auger, buckets, poles etc.   ive looked at gander, FF, cabelas, Joe's and the like without finding exactly what I want. Does anyone know of a sled that fits my description?  Thanks and tight lines.