Guests - If You want access to member only forums on FM. You will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up on Fishing Minnesota.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

  • Announcements

    • Rick

      Members Only Fluid Forum View   08/08/2017

      Fluid forum view allows members only to get right to the meat of this community; the topics. You can toggle between your preferred forum view just below to the left on the main forum entrance. You will see three icons. Try them out and see what you prefer.   Fluid view allows you, if you are a signed up member, to see the newest topic posts in either all forums (select none or all) or in just your favorite forums (select the ones you want to see when you come to Fishing Minnesota). It keeps and in real time with respect to Topic posts and lets YOU SELECT YOUR FAVORITE FORUMS. It can make things fun and easy. This is especially true for less experienced visitors raised on social media. If you, as a members want more specific topics, you can even select a single forum to view. Let us take a look at fluid view in action. We will then break it down and explain how it works in more detail.   The video shows the topic list and the forum filter box. As you can see, it is easy to change the topic list by changing the selected forums. This view replaces the traditional list of categories and forums.   Of course, members only can change the view to better suit your way of browsing.   You will notice a “grid” option. We have moved the grid forum theme setting into the main forum settings. This makes it an option for members only to choose. This screenshot also shows the removal of the forum breadcrumb in fluid view mode. Fluid view remembers your last forum selection so you don’t lose your place when you go back to the listing. The benefit of this feature is easy to see. It removes a potential barrier of entry for members only. It puts the spotlight on topics themselves, and not the hierarchical forum structure. You as a member will enjoy viewing many forums at once and switching between them without leaving the page. We hope that fluid view, the new functionality is an asset that you enjoy .
Sign in to follow this  
Capt. H (Ret.)

Optimax or 4 Stroke

Recommended Posts

Capt. H (Ret.)    1
Capt. H (Ret.)

I am thinking of buying a new 115hp Mercury for my boat. The boat is a Alumacraft 175 Trophy which is used for fishing and has remote steering. I am looking at the 115 Optimax and the 115 4 stroke. What is your preference and why??

Thanks for your input.

Capt. H

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
PerchJerker    0
PerchJerker

On that setup with that size motor I would probably go with a 4-stroke, basically because it's quieter (until you get to 4000 or 4500 rpms). It's a tough choice though and depending on what you want from the motor the Opti might be a better choice.

I've never priced those motors but I assume the Opti is cheaper??

The Opti would have a little more punch out of the hole and a little more on the top end, but would be louder and require seperate oil. Fuel economy is going to be identical or perhaps a touch better in the Opti. The Opti will troll down slower, especially if you go with the SmartCraft Tach that lets you adjust rpms. But even though the edge goes to the Opti in many of these categories, they are very close and if you want the 4-stroke I see no reason not to get it.

I assume you are not going with a 4-stroke kicker motor on the boat, but if you are going with a kicker then I'd definately go with the Opti instead of the 4-stroke 115.

With the boat I have now I was going back and forth between the 175 Opti or Verado, went with the Opti and am very happy with it. One of my friends had a 17 foot Crestliner with a 115 4-stroke and that was a really great setup too, although it trolled too fast so he eventually added a kicker). Good luck.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Capt. H (Ret.)    1
Capt. H (Ret.)

I have a 2000 model year 115 on the boat now. It is one of those 2+4 engines that goes from 2 cylinders to 4 depending on rpm's. I think it is too noisy plus I don't care for the extra cylinders kicking in at 2000 rpm's. I bought this motor new and have taken care of it but I think the technology on the newer engines is appealing.

My boat dealer feels the 4 stroke is what I need/want and I trust his recomendations as this will be the 3rd new motor I have purchased from him.

The Opti is about $700 cheaper. I do not have a kicker but looked at them to. The 9.9 Pro Kicker 4 Stroke is about $3,200 installed. I would like to have one of them but the wife is pretty observant and I am sure she would notice the extra motor.

Thanks for your thoughts.

Capt. H

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
PerchJerker    0
PerchJerker

The 2+2 motors were great motors but technology has come a long way, either the Opti or the 4-stroke will be a huge step forward.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sutty    0
Sutty

I was making this same decision a few months ago. I ended up going with a 135 opti. Either way I was going to get a kicker at some point and I wanted to save the weight on the back. So far I like it alot. I don't have many hours on it though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
JDM    0
JDM

I have a 2006 115 Optimax. I really like the motor. It is quiet. In my opinion, there is not much difference in noise between the Opti and the 4 stroke. The Opti is also good on gas. The extra oil is not really a big deal. It takes about 30 seconds to fill it on every tank of gas. It is also a very easy motor to winterize. The Opti is also lighter than the 4 stroke.

I did end up going with a 17 pitch prop instead of the 19 that came with it. I lost some top end, but my hole shot is much better and my trolling speeds went down.

In reality, you probably would love either motor.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Tim Ellis    0
Tim Ellis

I agree with JDM. I have an '06 optimax 115 and love it! No smoke and great on gas. Also i have a kicker so the lighter weight than the 4 stroke helps out too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  



  • Posts

    • Meterman
      I fish the big water of Minnesota side of Lake of the Woods almost exclusively and purchased my boat with what I will call "truck suspension" shock absorbing seats at the helm (first row).   In the waves of LOW, these will bottom out and your back still takes a pounding.   I am planning to replace the helm seats (will need seats, pedestal and base) with one of the above mentioned shock absorbing pedestals next spring.   My boat does have high sides so will need a taller pedestal. Looking for others to comment on their experiences with these.   Thanks.
    • Meterman
      I have typically used the back reeling feature more for letting out line when trolling or jigging.   When fighting a fish, I let the drag take care of business.   I guess it is just a pain to now get used to no back reeling on a new reel . . . may have to switch to another brand?
    • JBMasterAngler
      Well, fishing wasn't very good. But the weather certainly didn't help. Fished caribou the first day, marked lots of cisco and lakers, but no bites. Planned on bluewater on Monday, but because of the wind, we took the channel to trout instead. Caught several nice bluegills and a 30 inch pike. No lakers, but I did get stuck in weeds in 35 ft of water, never had that happen before. Was going to launch at same access on wabana on Tuesday, and go to bluewater, but wind was even worse. We took a drive and went up to Larson lake. Lost a nice pike, but nothing else. Thought for sure I'd at least catch 1 splake! Survived the storm that night. Stopped at pokegama on way home and fished for a couple hours. Lost a muskie, and had a big pike break my line. My son was really excited to catch his first rock bass. It would be nice to come back someday, but it might be awhile. Caribou could be good in the winter, maybe. Oh well. Final camping trip of the year is in the books!
    • BSLNORTH
    • BSLNORTH
      Hi, I am selling my 2012 Polaris Ranger 800 XP camo. Very low miles, 1200. Full hard cab, flip out glass windshield, windshield wiper, almost like new still. Great for ice fishing, hunting and work around the house.  I also have this ad on C.L.  10,000 b/0 text me for pics, thanks.  I am located in west metro 763-two34-0837
    • partyonpine
      Any bass reports?  Have the walleyes been moving in shallow at night?  South wind I am guessing their is fish on the south side of pine? 24-32 feet sounds like right in front of the cabin.  Any in crawlers or have they transitioned to minnows.  Did well in 18 feet last weekend.  No matter what cannot wait for 3 solid days of fishing!!!
    • BisoNation
      1st time ever I've seen zebra mussels in ottertail on west side   this SUCKS!!!!   had a red solo cup in the water... apparently they love RED.     at least 5 of them    it sucks
    • Wanderer
      From someone who grew up as a back reeling aficionado, I've learned to appreciate a quality drag on a reel.  It's the one thing I'll gladly pay for. Modern drag systems are so much better than they used to be.  Not taking advantage of them is leaving a lot of the value of a quality reel on the table.  Unused and wasted. So, is that the kind of opinion you were looking for?   
    • slammer
      They are already established in OT.  Pulled docks at my sisters place with about 75% covered in zebes.  Wear shoes when your in the water.
    • Meterman
      I noticed this spring that the higher end Shimano Stradic and others have eliminated the ability to back reel (no reverse) which I believe is a huge mistake, I don't like it!    any others have comments?