Guests - If You want access to member only forums on FM. You will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up on Fishing Minnesota.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Capt. H (Ret.)

Optimax or 4 Stroke

7 posts in this topic

I am thinking of buying a new 115hp Mercury for my boat. The boat is a Alumacraft 175 Trophy which is used for fishing and has remote steering. I am looking at the 115 Optimax and the 115 4 stroke. What is your preference and why??

Thanks for your input.

Capt. H

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

On that setup with that size motor I would probably go with a 4-stroke, basically because it's quieter (until you get to 4000 or 4500 rpms). It's a tough choice though and depending on what you want from the motor the Opti might be a better choice.

I've never priced those motors but I assume the Opti is cheaper??

The Opti would have a little more punch out of the hole and a little more on the top end, but would be louder and require seperate oil. Fuel economy is going to be identical or perhaps a touch better in the Opti. The Opti will troll down slower, especially if you go with the SmartCraft Tach that lets you adjust rpms. But even though the edge goes to the Opti in many of these categories, they are very close and if you want the 4-stroke I see no reason not to get it.

I assume you are not going with a 4-stroke kicker motor on the boat, but if you are going with a kicker then I'd definately go with the Opti instead of the 4-stroke 115.

With the boat I have now I was going back and forth between the 175 Opti or Verado, went with the Opti and am very happy with it. One of my friends had a 17 foot Crestliner with a 115 4-stroke and that was a really great setup too, although it trolled too fast so he eventually added a kicker). Good luck.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a 2000 model year 115 on the boat now. It is one of those 2+4 engines that goes from 2 cylinders to 4 depending on rpm's. I think it is too noisy plus I don't care for the extra cylinders kicking in at 2000 rpm's. I bought this motor new and have taken care of it but I think the technology on the newer engines is appealing.

My boat dealer feels the 4 stroke is what I need/want and I trust his recomendations as this will be the 3rd new motor I have purchased from him.

The Opti is about $700 cheaper. I do not have a kicker but looked at them to. The 9.9 Pro Kicker 4 Stroke is about $3,200 installed. I would like to have one of them but the wife is pretty observant and I am sure she would notice the extra motor.

Thanks for your thoughts.

Capt. H

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The 2+2 motors were great motors but technology has come a long way, either the Opti or the 4-stroke will be a huge step forward.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was making this same decision a few months ago. I ended up going with a 135 opti. Either way I was going to get a kicker at some point and I wanted to save the weight on the back. So far I like it alot. I don't have many hours on it though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a 2006 115 Optimax. I really like the motor. It is quiet. In my opinion, there is not much difference in noise between the Opti and the 4 stroke. The Opti is also good on gas. The extra oil is not really a big deal. It takes about 30 seconds to fill it on every tank of gas. It is also a very easy motor to winterize. The Opti is also lighter than the 4 stroke.

I did end up going with a 17 pitch prop instead of the 19 that came with it. I lost some top end, but my hole shot is much better and my trolling speeds went down.

In reality, you probably would love either motor.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with JDM. I have an '06 optimax 115 and love it! No smoke and great on gas. Also i have a kicker so the lighter weight than the 4 stroke helps out too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • Wanderer
      Yup!  I can see how that would be annoying!    Welcome to Fishing Minnesota though.  Glad to see your posts. 
    • Jim Almquist
      Got out on Saturday along with my brother who went out in his boat. So much mud that we went our separate ways searching for better water. With 3 in his boat he caught 5 Coho and 5 Lake Trout. I found a nice spot and went 2/5 before the wind messed up the spot. Sunday morning went out with my brother to the same spot and had a double before the third line was out. Ended up going 7/11 before a storm with red in it chased us off the lake. Loonasea was correct on the nice size of the Coho's right now. All fish were caught with stick baits on top.
    • maxpower117
        Ya, I Was corrected already. Sorry. 
    • Rick G
      Soooo many spots to hit, your going to love the yak, JC!   And Royce is right about an anchor. This would be my first investment.   
    • lawman
      My unit is not a link unit. I thought they worked the bugs out of these units. 19 years ago they recalled all of these when almost all of them failed. Fingers crossed I guess.  
    • Cret Jigs
             Hi guys - went out on Blue lake yesterday .... water temps around 61 -62 on the surface.    Tried for some walleye with ripple shads in the weeds with no success, did manage a nice Bass.  we switched to crappies and managed keeping a nice meal.  Let a nice monster Blue Gill go (9.75") and kept some nice Sunnies for the frying pan.   Pan fish were pretty active if you hit the right spots.  A lot of people out there and the access was not a place to be in a hurry!!   We had to work for the crappies and the ones we caught were 9"-10" crappies full of eggs.  I would guess that although the ice was out early, many of the species are now late and delayed on the spawn.   if this weather don't warm up quick, i think the bass will drop their eggs and it won't be a good year for bass spawn this year.    Talked to some anglers out their bass fishing and they thought it was very slow and were puzzled.   Cret
    • Sushilicious
      I apologize for my word choice. I'm from chisholm n most of my camping trips growing up were decided after work on Friday n we can't do that now. The only positives that have come from the reservation system is ppl who have never been 2 the park (5%) now don't have 2 worry about a spot n the fishing guides don't have 2 worry about finding a place 4 shore lunch.
    • Wanderer
      Sorry I had to edit your title.  I've been hearing some people are upset about the change.  But I also heard there were some positives about it too.  I can't say anything one way or the other since I'm not affected.
    • Wanderer
        It does have lakers but I think they closed it for harvest.  I thought I read it was due to those lakers being a different strain and getting fished down a little too much.   That laker Rob caught was a hawg!  Too bad he got it taken away.
    • Sushilicious
      The fact that ppl have to reserve a campsite is absolute BS. The only thing the park accomplished by making ppl reserve campsites is lowering the amount of ppl who visit the park.