Guests - If You want access to member only forums on FM. You will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up on Fishing Minnesota.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
hartner62

Navionics vs. Lake Master

17 posts in this topic

Which one do you guys prefer and why? I've heard Navionics is slower but has more lakes. Usually I just fish MN but a couple times a year I go to Devils Lake. Have you found one to be more acurate then the other?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There have been A TON of posts about this in the last few months, trying searching through the archives. Schweedy (not sure if I spelled that right) has a lot of good posts and info about them, you could try searching just under his user name if you want.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No comparison if you fish mostly MN get Lakemaster fo sure. Nav you can only zoom to 1/8nm. Also Nav doesn't seem to be as accurate. We were on Big Stone yesterday at times it showed us on shore when we were 100' from shore. Missouri river didn't seem any better. I bought Nav for BS & Missouri River because Lakemaster doesn't have these surveyed. I wouldn't buy Nav again after using both!!!

Eyewarrior

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Can't beat the detail of the lakemaster maps.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It depends on what Lakes you will be fishing.

schweady is how it's spelled.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Can't beat Lakemaster on Devils Lake with the 1 foot contours, seperate chip costs about 100 bucks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have Lakemaster MN V4 and am surprised how wrong a few areas are on White Bear Lake. One bar isn't even on the map at all.. but is very much on the lake (and marked by those hazard buoys).. but for the most part pretty good for 3' contour lines.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is a wealth of info for Navionics Navionics thread

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I really liked the zoom on the LM better then navonics. Navonics was good because I fish water outside of MN. However if you are going with the newer Hummingbird units they are not compatible with the LM software you have to go with Navonics.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My new Navionics LOTW card will "overzoom" down to 1/63nm, or just under .02 mile. I think the zoom level is more dependent on the gps unit than the card.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Xplorer:

What gps unit are you using with that LOW chip? I'm wondering if the tightest zoom in your unit would still only be 1/8nm when using either of the Navionics Premium North cards? Seems like it's the amount of data on the card that limits the zoom capability, but my LakeMaster chips zoom in to 0.02 mi even though they have an incredible amount of roadmap data. I was disappointed that it was still only 1/8nm with the 2007 Navionics on my ExpeditionC, since they did go to a 1GB chip vs. the 512MB chip for the 2006 model.

Is this "overzoom" providing more detail, or just magnifying the image seen at 1/8nm?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Now maybe I misunderstood something... I just took my LakeMaster out for the first time on Saturday... But when I was shopping around the Map describing regions for Navionics showed that MN was broken up into 2 sections... So for me, as someone who fishes all around the state, it meant buying 2 chips with Navionics, vs 1 with Lake Master...

And all but one of my favorite lakes were in High Detail on the LM chip, and 3 were not on Navionics...

Maybe I misunderstood the Navonics lake regions map though?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You misunderstood. Navionics is separated into a number of zones and the zones are all in one chip.

As a user of both chips you get a lot more lake maps and as good if not better detail with Navionics. They zoom down as far as needed given the accuracy of GPS. Lake master does have road maps which I like.

Here is a link to all the maps you get with the Navionics Chip - Click Here

I prefer Navionics for fishing because it has a lot more lake maps and that's important when a person fishes differant lakes and in differant states.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Are you folks talking about the Lowrance LakeMaster ProMaps?

I have one oredered for my new Lowrance 520C but they seem to be backordered. I assume all comments are on the chip from last year? Thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

schweady,

I'm using it in a new globalmap 5300. The unit has a basemap with roads etc, and I'll use the chip for lake data. The overzoom is not adding additional data from the 1/8nm chart, but simply getting you to a smaller area. Where I can see this coming in very handy is on those high def maps where you have 1' contours.

I still need to do alot of tinkering with it since this is my first plotter, but i really like what I've seen so far.

PS: And, yes this is a Lowrance with an internal antenna and I have had no problems with it acquiring signal thru my boats windshield while sitting inside of my garage. So I dont expect any issues like those of the 334 last year.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Xplorer-

I'd still be interested to know if:

a) the 2007 Navionics Premium North chip still only allows a maximum zoom of 1/8nm on newer units like your GlobalMap 5300, and if

B) the new Navionics LOTW+2K chip also allows "overzooming" closer than 1/8nm on other units, such as handhelds like the H2Oc or ExpeditionC.

Anyone?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote:

I'm using it in a new globalmap 5300


Are you 100% positive that you are zooming in that close on the Nav chip, vs. zooming in that close on the base map in the 5300? Did you go into the menus and select the Nav chip?

I am not very familiar with the new 5-series Lowrances, but I suspect that is what is happening in your case??

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • Wanderer
      Yup!  I can see how that would be annoying!    Welcome to Fishing Minnesota though.  Glad to see your posts. 
    • Jim Almquist
      Got out on Saturday along with my brother who went out in his boat. So much mud that we went our separate ways searching for better water. With 3 in his boat he caught 5 Coho and 5 Lake Trout. I found a nice spot and went 2/5 before the wind messed up the spot. Sunday morning went out with my brother to the same spot and had a double before the third line was out. Ended up going 7/11 before a storm with red in it chased us off the lake. Loonasea was correct on the nice size of the Coho's right now. All fish were caught with stick baits on top.
    • maxpower117
        Ya, I Was corrected already. Sorry. 
    • Rick G
      Soooo many spots to hit, your going to love the yak, JC!   And Royce is right about an anchor. This would be my first investment.   
    • lawman
      My unit is not a link unit. I thought they worked the bugs out of these units. 19 years ago they recalled all of these when almost all of them failed. Fingers crossed I guess.  
    • Cret Jigs
             Hi guys - went out on Blue lake yesterday .... water temps around 61 -62 on the surface.    Tried for some walleye with ripple shads in the weeds with no success, did manage a nice Bass.  we switched to crappies and managed keeping a nice meal.  Let a nice monster Blue Gill go (9.75") and kept some nice Sunnies for the frying pan.   Pan fish were pretty active if you hit the right spots.  A lot of people out there and the access was not a place to be in a hurry!!   We had to work for the crappies and the ones we caught were 9"-10" crappies full of eggs.  I would guess that although the ice was out early, many of the species are now late and delayed on the spawn.   if this weather don't warm up quick, i think the bass will drop their eggs and it won't be a good year for bass spawn this year.    Talked to some anglers out their bass fishing and they thought it was very slow and were puzzled.   Cret
    • Sushilicious
      I apologize for my word choice. I'm from chisholm n most of my camping trips growing up were decided after work on Friday n we can't do that now. The only positives that have come from the reservation system is ppl who have never been 2 the park (5%) now don't have 2 worry about a spot n the fishing guides don't have 2 worry about finding a place 4 shore lunch.
    • Wanderer
      Sorry I had to edit your title.  I've been hearing some people are upset about the change.  But I also heard there were some positives about it too.  I can't say anything one way or the other since I'm not affected.
    • Wanderer
        It does have lakers but I think they closed it for harvest.  I thought I read it was due to those lakers being a different strain and getting fished down a little too much.   That laker Rob caught was a hawg!  Too bad he got it taken away.
    • Sushilicious
      The fact that ppl have to reserve a campsite is absolute BS. The only thing the park accomplished by making ppl reserve campsites is lowering the amount of ppl who visit the park.