Guests - If You want access to member only forums on FM. You will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up on Fishing Minnesota.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Kylersk

Using flashers on open water?

14 posts in this topic

Is it worth the investment of a high speed transducer or puck transducer so I can use my flasher on my boat? Or is it better to buy another graph?

Currently, the boat I'm going to pick up, has an Eagle accura depth finder on it and that's all. It's mounted by steering wheel. I thought about mounting my flasher on the bow or something, but not sure...

Thoughts?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I run a Lowrance X-125 on my bow with a transducer in back (switch with console) and a Vexlar FL-8 on the bow using the transducer in the Minnkota.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Kylersk,

I run my FL-8 off my bow and love it. I just bought a bow-mount kit, a low-profile Johnny Ray Mount and it wasn't too expensive to rig up. When fishing completely vertical with the gain tuned up I can see a 1/4 ounce jig and react to fish like I would under harwater conditions under calm conditions.

Its a nice feature when fish congregate in a small spot.

If you have an older unit like the Fl-8, that doesn't get too bright, I'd recommend a sun-shield. Just make sure you take it off before running the lake. Good luck.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote:

Just make sure you take it off before running the lake.


Sounds like the voice of experience. wink.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have used my FL-18 on my Minnkota with universal sonar. It has some interference because the connection isn't shielded. I used to have a puck transducer on a different bow mount. That didn't have the interference issue.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For years I used a flasher on the bow of my boat. No more. Today's graphs are just as good or better than flashers, and not much more expensive than rigging your ice fishing flasher to be used on the boat. The old arguments against graphs like there being a delay in the display, or not marking baits, are no longer valid.

There's nothing wrong with using a flasher in open water, I just find it better and more convenient and not much more expensive to use a graph. Hope this helps.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I use a flasher on my bow.

Same one I use for winter fishing.

Just move it back and forth. Nice to have something you can use year round. laugh.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep, I've had flashers in my boat for as long as I can remember. In fact, my old FL-8 was the only graph in a couple of my first boats...

I ran the FL-8 off the bow of my boats for several years with a puck transducer on the bow trolling motor. Now I run the LX-5 off the bow the past year, and love it. I run a Lowrance 350A right next to the LX-5. Personally I watch the flasher over the graph. I use the LCD graph as comparison of fish marked off the flasher, depth history, weeds, etc...but the graph doesn't always show those finicky bottom hugging walleyes, or short weeds.

I know, the 350A is not a choice piece of equipment anymore, but even if it was a new high powered color graph I'd still watch the flasher over the graph. grin.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Flashers have always been my primary electronics in my boats. Although I do like my graph in certain situations as well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I used to use my Clearwater Classic in the bow. When I got the new bowmount last year (more thrust, longer shaft), I also got the universal sonar. I then bought the FishMark 480 to run on it. For most of my fishing the memory trail that the graph leaves is important. It's nice for other people in the boat to be able to see what's going on. Summer fishing isn't like winter fishing when you can stare at the flasher most of the time. I fish from the console a lot using the corded foot control. My Humminbird 777C is there and uses a transom transducer. I can still see the bow graph with its memory. If I see fish on one I can check the other to see how big the school is. I have an Lx3 but didn't want to go with an external transducer so I bought a graph that has the adapter cord available. People who use an Lx5 like them because the target separation is better than most graphs they have in the bow. Most have their better graphs at the console.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am running a 332c from the console and a x125 from the bow with the transducer on the trolling motor.I also want to run my fl-18 off the bow. Any ideas on how/where to put the fl-18 transducer?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Kylersk...I am doing the same thing on my boat when I take it out of storage easter weekend. Got the puck for the tolling motor, acutally going to get a ram mount for the front.

I'll let you know how it turns out....also not too sure where to hard wire it to yet either.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

While on the subject of dual flasher/graphs, does anyone have experience good or bad hooking up two graphs to one transducer. I would like to have one at the back (tiller motor) and one at the front (trolling motor). Any ideas here?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a similar set up to Chuck N. I run a flasher with a graph both. The graph is nice because it is your memory but it is also nice to have the instance response of the flasher. Since you have the flasher I would use it. It is to expensive to put it on cheaper than a new unit.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • Mike89
      snack time for sure, just need cold beer!!
    • Skibo
      I may get a big ration of doodoo for this post, but here goes.  As a business owner (not food related) I guess I'm a bit confused by all of these negative posts.  The new owners (remember, they invested their money in the place) have evidently decided on a business model that they feel will work for them to be profitable.  I don't know them, don't know what their background or experience is, and it really doesn't matter.  It's their business, so they get to do with it whatever they choose.  If their model doesn't work, it stands to reason that they'll change their model, but that is entirely up to them.  There's likely a reason that the ownership of The Landing has changed several times in the last decade.  Trying to drive these owners out of business won't bring back 1980's priced cheap food and drink.   There are lots of places in many towns and cities that I choose not to eat at or visit because I don't want to pay the prices they charge.  But I don't go on the Internet and demean the owners and their places of business because I choose not to buy from them.  I'm a few times a year visitor to The Landing, and it is generally for lunch off the lake.  If I thought it was too expensive I simply wouldn't go back.  Vote with your dollars, not your posts on this forum.  Get a Trip Advisor or Yelp account and post a review if it's that important for you to vent.   The alternative for all of you of course, is that if anyone else has a model where they can charge half as much and still make a profit (not likely), well maybe that person ought to buy The Landing and give us all cheap food and drink.  We'll line up at the dock for you.  It's the old "put your money where your mouth is" adage.  The fact is, most of the old favorite local establishments you talk about have been in the same family for years or generations, and the owners make a living because of low overhead.  Someone investing in a new venture has lots to pay for, and as you all know, owning anything on a lake, and especially on Vermilion in Greenwood Township, is not a low-cost endeavor.   Let's support those who choose to invest in these expensive pieces of real estate on our lake (or at least not disparage them in these posts), and help them to keep them open.  Time to forget about getting $1 tap beers and $2.50 hamburgers, when the owners have to pay 2017 overhead costs.  Guys, the 80's want their lunch tab back.
    • Wanderer
      It's pretty driveable out there.
    • fishin4sum
      I must have missed it, but where are the fish pictures?  
    • Wanderer
      And when they do, they'll hire a guide.