Guests - If You want access to member only forums on FM. You will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up on Fishing Minnesota.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
quackattack13

fenced in hunting

26 posts in this topic

i want to know what peoples views are on fenced in hunting ranches where you go pay to shoot animals? i think its stupid!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a feeling pretty much everyone on this site will agree that it is stupid. Myself included.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ditto. Take that Gentry guy. I can't figure it out. Someone with lots of money could have paid for a guided hunt that pretty much would have guaranteed him a bear. The major arguement I've heard from the few people that supported him was that he probably doesn't have a lot of time so go easy on him. Bull. I bet he had plenty of time when not in studio or on tour and so do most of the people who go to these places. They just don't want to put in the effort.

If a guy hunts fair chase his entire life, nabs some decent bucks, and then one year gets a monster due to his years of hard hunting and scouting, well...that's, "that's something to be proud of..." grin.gif

A guy walking into a high fenced ranch and plunking down $10,000 grand for that same monster he takes after a day or two. Not so special in my books. But thats just my 2 cents...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not only is it stupid, it should be outlawed plain and simple.

FAIR CHASE ONLY!!!!!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i totally agree with all of you guys the point of hunting is the hunt. if it was meant for fenced in animals it would strickly be called killing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

what you guys said

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I won't claim to support that type of activity but are we talking about truly wild deer or pen-raised animals? If they are fenced in on a ranch are they truly wild? If not then how is it really much different than taking a steer except they are willing to pay top dollar to make the kill themselves and then pay someone else to process.

What they do is not hunting and doesn't even fall under the laws of hunting.

Edit: I have heard first-hand stories on a similar note regarding some of the more prominent pheasant ranches in SD. The stories are that they truck in farm raised pheasants to be released on their ranches and then advertise the hunt as natural. True or not it's hard to believe this doesn't happen not only in SD but just about anywhere. Would that be much different if it is true?

Bob

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Anything that is not fair chase is not hunting, it is shooting. I would never do it for big game, but sometimes I do go to a pheasant farm, usually for dog training or as an outing with my customers. Yes, it can be fun, but it is nowhere near the satisfaction I get from actually "hunting" wild birds. I know it is not really hunting, nor do I pretend it is.

I also have a problem with the guys who shoot game out the patio door over / under their bird feeders or who bait in the woods. It really isn't a challenge. It is only target practice.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't agree with it, but sometimes these ranches can be 100's even thousands of acres. If they are not paddocked off, whats the difference? However, I don't like to see people go out there and shoot on a game farm that has feeders and all the deer marked. You might as well go out there and pick your deer out of a book, I totally don't agree with that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There is no difference between harvesting pen-raised deer or pen-raised pheasants or pen-raised ducks or pen-raised cattle or pen-raised hogs...none of these animals are "wild"! If you don't like it, don't spend your money there. Otherwise, leave the game farm operators alone...they have a right to earn a living, too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't like Deer Pay n Slays. I think they are a big risk of spreading CWD or TB. Any time an animal is found with a disease than there is a risk of spreading to the wild heard and we have to kill a bunch of animals around the farm to see if it has spread.

The argument that everyone has a right to earn a living at something doesn't hold much water to me. First off they could do something else, and if they are going to pick something to make money off of that the public doesn't like than they are setting themselves up for public criticism.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

yea nate i think it is not good either and thanks for askin this question so i can get ideas for my report

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree about gettin another job and im thinkin that hutch guy is a fenced in hunter cuz he got a lil irritated with the topic! LOL~! shocked.giflaugh.gifgrin.giftongue.gifwink.gifooo.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is for Hutchbucks are u a fenced in hunting farm operater or owner just wondering cause of your reply and the nickname for the kind of hunting is canned hunts

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hutchbucks, the problems is that high fence hunting

a) reflects poorly on all hunters

B) disease's like CWD are spread from game farm animals to the wild populatons, most cases where CWD has been found, it was tracked back to game farm animals. If it was up to me, game farms would be outlawed or be required to have double fences to reduce the risk of escapees or nose-to-nose contact. Lets not risk contaminating the wild deer in MN!!!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

High fence hunting... Do I like it? No...

Is it the one thing that will give sportsmen a balck eye? I'm not so sure.

A lot has to due with the operation of the high fence ranch. Most are good well run operations that manage the animals on their property far better than any of us dreamed we could on our own hunting land. In most cases these are "Big" chunks of land. Not a few hundred acres. The fences are there to protect the fruits of their labor.

A couple of areas seem to be at the heart of the no high fence arguements.

1. Fair Chase:

How big would a high fence property need to be before it could be considered "fair chase"? Is 500 acres enough? Is 5,000 acres enough? Is 50,000 acreas enough? Maybe it's never fair chase even if it 200,000 acres. In the larger ranches I doubt many of the animals would even know there's a fence.

In bad situations with the flash hunts it's usually a small, poorly managed place. Definitely not fair chase, unethical and in some cases bordering on illegal.

2. Pay to hunt:

These are big dollar operations. Prices start at $5,000 plus and go up fast from there. Many of the operations have a pay by the inch system as well. Get all excited and shoot a buck of a life time and then experience sticker shock!

However, it appears that the pay to hunt aspect of hunting is not going away. I run into more and more land owners that are asking for a lease when I approach them for permission(ducks, pheasants, turkeys, deer). Even if you go out and get your own land to hunt on it's still a pay to hunt. Although not as directly.

3. Access to good hunting land.

As more and more land goes to pay to hunt. The less is availble for those with less financial resources. That results on many ending up hunting public land. Public land is great and it's a great resource. However, you don't get tot pick who you hunt with. You never know who you'll bump into or even where you'll hunt.

4. Spread of disease:

There is some creadance to this. However, it's not fair to equate high fence operations with the spread of disease. Most the CWD and Tuberculosis have been found with small breaders high fence operations. Not those intended for hunting. It has more to do with animal densities and common feeding areas. There have been isolated incidents of CWD and tuberculosis out west and throughout the nation in the wild.

I guess I'm saying that I don't care for high fence hunts. However, I wonder why others are so strongly against it. It's easy to pull the fair chase card. But with ranches the size of many of the counties we hunting in is it really a fair statement for all ranches. I guess for me it's the smaller places and the fact that the cost is so high for me. Not the mention that thing last year where a ranch owner was selling hunt accessed through a computer. Where a person(notice I didn't say hunter) could watch animals on a web cam and shoot the animal from home. That's not what we're talking about here. But you see how they all get a bad name from the exploits of a few.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is for quackattack13, gforce, blackjack and anyone else that's wondering...nope, I'm not a "fenced in hunting farm operater or owner", even though I have the option of having a partnership in one. Nor have I ever participated in a so-called "canned hunt"...this includes pheasants, quail, or whatever!

I say to each their own.

Also, if you have ever participated in a "hunt" on a game farm for pheasants you are no better than someone who chooses to shoot/harvest a deer from one of these establishments. After all, these pheasants are pen raised(like chickens)and let loose just so someone can have an easy shoot. BTW--most of these areas are fenced in too blush.gif! Hmmm...almost "fair chase". I guess they could always fly over the fence. Oops..can't have that, they might have the bird flu and spread it to the wild pheasants out there. Maybe the owners of these operations should have chicken wire around and over their hunting grounds so this doesn't happen.

As for spreading CWD...it can happen at any backyard deer feeder. That's why "recreational" feeding of deer should be illegal. What about the outbreak of TB in those cattle up north? I'd be more concerned about the deer contracting that since it's more easily spread to humans than CWD is.

Borch has brought up some great points in his post, too.

...Just a little bit for you people to think about...

Picture this guys/gals...if you shut down the deer farms it won't be long before ALL "game farms" will have to be shut down. Where would we be then? We'd have overcrowding on public land and inaccessable private land because it would most likely all be leased/bought by the big $$$ guys that can afford to spend their money at these game farms. NOT a pretty picture in my head! frown.gif

This is not meant as a personal attack on anyone or their beliefs.

This is my personal opinion and anyone else is welcome to join in and voice theirs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good thoughtful post Borch!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote:

Picture this guys/gals...if you shut down the deer farms it won't be long before ALL "game farms" will have to be shut down.


That would be fine by me, I've never been to a game farm and never will!!! For one thing, I'm too cheap, I can't see spending +$10 per bird!!! And if I need some 'hunting' to train my pup, I'll get my some pigeons.

I think there is big difference in public perception between shooting pheasants on a preserve and shooting deer on preserve, "my Gosh, you're putting Bambi in a fence and shooting it"!!!! Bad public perception and hunting doesn't need that.

I tend to lump deer game farms and deer game preserves together, my concern is that they are CWD spawning grounds, the deer get transported around, CWD gets transported around, and before you know it, CWD shows up in wild deer in that area. I don't think its worth the risk and deer farming should be banned. But that just my humble opinion.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well said BLACKJACK! Well said!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just my opinion here, but the way I see it is that if someone wants to spend there money on this type of hunting then go for it. Just don't brag to me about how great the hunt was cause I would not listen. Hutchbucks brings up a great point about backyard feeders. I've noticed in the past that a lot of trail camera pictures on this site in the backgroud you can see the feeders. Now I'm no biologist but have read a few articles about cwd being tranfered though saliva and I guess that would make you just a guilty as the game farms. I'm not trying to start anything that is just my opinion!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a point to make- the reason boiligists are so shook up about CWD is that NO ONE KNOWS how its spread. Once they figure that out maybe we will all find ourselves guilty. wink.gif

And I think if a guy can make a better living farming elk or deer in the cattle yard, and people are going to pay mad cash for an experience like that, WELL - more power to ya! Thats just a good business decision.

But to the guy that pays the bill and pulls the trigger- GET A LIFE- and dont get all fired up or mad when we treat your big buck like a pet cow! blush.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think its sad when hunters don't get fired up about this fenced slaughter being equated to hunting.

The poor guy just doing blue collar work to try and make it by through promoting penned hunts song is getting old too. I was born and raised blue collar in farm country and would never consider berating the beauty of the sport/art of big game hunting to this level.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I do not disagree with fenced hunting as long as it follows these guidelines:

1) Deer are raised and checked free of disease and highly regulated.

2) Fences are high enough to prevent escapes

3) It's not sold as hunting.

A few years back, a few of us went to a buffalo ranch to buy a side of buffalo. We picked one out, and the farm hands went and took it to a trailer and hauled it to a slaughter house. What difference would it be if instead of the hands walking it to the trailer to take it to it's great reward if we would have just shot it right there????

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

First of all I am a proud FAIR-CHASE hunter.

The only difference I see, which is common, and a detriment to the average sportsman is you referring to it as HUNTING.

The fair chase aspect is gone and why should we allow for anti's to have more ammunition against us. Don't lump them into the same category.

If the animals are to be treated, fed, and raised as livestock (inside a fence) them we owe it to them to slaughter them as humanely and efficiently as one, not chase and shot at from a distance.

This is not hunting and I hate when people call it that, especially ones who claim to be hunters.

If an animal is no longer wild it can no longer be hunted, only slaughtered.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

  • Posts

    • delcecchi

      Posted

      Gee, think things might be rigged?  Got to be there in person to bid.  Maybe they would get a better price if bidding were on line?  Of course that would inhibit the buddy system.  Make it inconvenient to bid, get lower bids, make the in crowd happy. 

    • yomammy

      Posted

      Anyone sniffing any fall-pattern crappies??   Have they found the way to the basin-areas or nearby the basin areas ?   Thanks 

    • Thanks friends, much better luck today, but worked pretty hard. 30-35' rainbows kept two 15's and a 16. Dog will get her allotment of a 1/4 filet for her time on the boat and able to save some in the freezer for my family!!!

       

       

    • Live to hunt another day by wearing a life jacket or float coat
      Hunters preparing to hit the water this fall in pursuit of ducks, geese and other wild game are reminded to include life jackets on their hunting gear checklist.
      “Hunters in Minnesota are trained from a young age to always put safety first. For duck and goose hunters, that means always wearing a life jacket on the water, no exceptions,” said Lt. Col. Greg Salo waterfowl-safetyof the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Enforcement Division.

      Each year, more waterfowl hunters die from drowning than from other types of hunting accidents. Swamping, capsizing and falling overboard are all common factors leading to these deaths, but in nearly all cases the hunter would have survived had they been wearing a life jacket.

      “Before launching the duck boat, make sure everyone on board is wearing a life jacket or float coat,” Salo said. “It’s the one item that greatly increases your odds of surviving a water emergency and living to hunt another day.”

      The wide variety of comfortable, camouflage life jackets designed specifically for waterfowl hunting includes inflatable vest and belt-pack styles, insulated flotation jackets, and foam-filled shooting vests with quilted shoulders and shell loops.

      “Typical foam-filled vests or float coats provide optimal insulation against cold air and the effects of hypothermia, but without question, the best life jacket for waterfowl hunting is the one you will actually wear,” said Lisa Dugan, DNR boating and water safety outreach coordinator. “Choosing a life jacket style that works for you, and wearing it every time you’re on the water, is not only a good choice – it could save your life.”

      At the very least, all boats must carry one U.S. Coast Guard-approved life jacket for each passenger, and boats longer than 16 feet must also have a throwable flotation device immediately available. Children under 10 must wear a life jacket.

      Other water safety tips for duck hunters include:

      • Don’t overload the boat; take two trips if necessary.
      • If wearing hip boots or waders, learn how to float with them on.
      • Stay near shore and avoid crossing large expanses of open water, especially in bad weather.
      • Share your trip plans with someone and advise them to call for help if you don’t return on schedule.
      • Use a headlamp, spotlight or navigation lights to alert other boaters of presence in dark and/or foggy conditions.
      • Carry a cell phone or personal locator beacon in case of emergency.
      • Don’t drink and boat and don’t drink and hunt

      Visit mndnr.gov/boatingsafety to download the DNR’s “Water Safety for Duck Hunters” brochure and to learn more about boating safety for hunters.

      Discuss below - to view set the hook here.

    • The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources is seeking applications for grants to support off-highway vehicle (OHV) trail projects and new trail proposals.

      Application forms for projects on existing trails are due to a Parks and Trails area supervisor’s office each year by Nov. 30. New trail proposals are accepted throughout the year.

      First authorized in 1984, Minnesota’s OHV trails assistance program is a cost-share program intended to help develop and maintain trails for use by all-terrain vehicles (ATVs), off-highway motorcycles (OHMs) and off-road vehicles (ORVs).

      Known as the OHV grant-in-aid (GIA) program, it helps to establish and maintain recreational trails at the initiative of clubs and other organizations, with the support and participation of local government sponsors.

      Organizations can apply for GIA funds through counties, cities or townships. All aspects of OHV trail development and maintenance are eligible for funding, including project administration, site planning, trail improvements, land acquisition for trail development, and trail maintenance. Proposals with a focus on maintaining or improving existing trails and trail systems will be assigned a higher priority.

      Program and application information is www.dnr.state.mn.us/grants/recreation/gia_ohv.html
      or by contacting the DNR Information Center at info.dnr@state.mn.us or 651-296-615, or 888-646-6367 between 8 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. Monday through Friday.
                                                                                                     -30-

      Discuss below - to view set the hook here.

    • The Department of Natural Resources will sell 40 northern Minnesota parcels in three public oral bid auctions in October and November.

      • Tuesday, Oct. 25 – Nine northwestern Minnesota parcels will be auctioned at the County Administration Building in Bemidji.
      • Thursday, Oct. 27 – 27 northeastern Minnesota parcels will be auctioned at the Lake County Courthouse in Two Harbors.
      • Thursday, Nov. 3 – Four parcels in north-central Minnesota will be auctioned at DNR Brainerd area office.

      The properties include unimproved recreational land and residential lakeshore parcels in Aitkin, Cass, Clearwater, Cook, Crow Wing, Hubbard, Itasca, Lake, and St. Louis counties. There is a wide range of sizes and land uses in this selection of sales, from a small 0.80 acre former water access site on Pine Lake in Clearwater County to a 200-acre recreational parcel in Breitung Township in northeastern St. Louis County.

      The DNR regularly sells land which is no longer needed for its original conservation purpose, after a thorough internal review, and after giving state agencies and local governments opportunities to purchase the land. Proceeds from sales of lands the DNR had once acquired go to the DNR division that had managed the land and are used to purchase and develop lands better suited to that division’s conservation goals.

      Many of the parcels to be sold are School Trust lands. Proceeds from these auction sales are deposited to a fund that benefits the state’s public school system. School Trust land by law can only be sold at public auction.
      Bidders are advised to obtain and view the property data sheet, be familiar with the property, minimum bid price, and terms and conditions of sale prior to attending the auction.

      To obtain a property data sheet or terms and conditions of sale call 651-259-5432, or 888-646-6367 or email landsale@dnr.state.mn.us. The property data sheets are also available online at www.dnr.state.mn.us/lands_minerals/landsale/.

      Discuss below - to view set the hook here.

    • Minnesota’s absentee voting law makes it easy for hunters who plan to be in the field on Election Day to make their vote count on Tuesday, Nov. 8. Minnesota’s firearms deer season opens Saturday, Nov. 5.

      Minnesotans can request an absentee ballot to be mailed to them, or they can vote absentee in-person at their county or local elections office. Ballots must be returned on or before the Nov. 8 general election.

      Details about early voting are available on the Minnesota Secretary of State website at www.sos.state.mn.us/elections-voting/other-ways-to-vote, or by calling 877-600-8683, or
      651-215-1440 in Twin Cities area.

      Discuss below - to view set the hook here.

    • State forest trail use and management in northern St. Louis and Lake counties will be the topic of an open house, Wednesday, Oct. 19, 6-8 p.m., at Vermillion Community College, Room NS111, 1900 East Camp St., Ely.

      During the open house, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources staff will provide maps of existing trails, answer questions and take comments and suggestions from the public.

      Between 2003 and 2008, the DNR inventoried all routes and designated trails for various types of recreation within state forests.

      This current project will reevaluate the designations made during the initial review of the Bear Island, Burntside, Insula Lake, Lake Isabella, Lake Jeanette and Sturgeon River state forests in St. Louis and Lake counties.

      Changes could include redefining how trails can be used, determining options for motorized trail routes and trail connections, closing unsustainable trails, designating “areas with limitations” during hunting and trapping activities, and developing new hunter-walking trails. Changes to state forest trail designations must be made by commissioner’s order and published in the State Register.

      Written comments may be submitted to foresttrailplanning.dnr@state.mn.us or by mail to Joe Unger, DNR Parks and Trails, 500 Lafayette Road, St. Paul, MN 55155-4039. The DNR will accept written comments through Nov. 2.

      For more information, contact:

      • Joe Unger, OHV planner, Parks and Trails Division, 651-259-5279.
      • Joe Majerus, area supervisor, Parks and Trails Division, Tower Area Office, 218-300-7842.

      Information is also available online at www.dnr.state.mn.us/input/mgmtplans/ohv/designation/revisions.html.

      Discuss below - to view set the hook here.

    • Sartell artist Scot Storm won the 2017 Minnesota Pheasant Habitat Stamp contest. The painting was selected by judges from among 15 submissions for the annual contest sponsored by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources.

      Storm’s painting will be featured on the 2017 pheasant habitat stamp. His artwork has been featured on the pheasant stamp in 2011, 2006 and 2000; and on the waterfowl stamp in 2015, 2009 and 2004.

      The pheasant stamp validation for hunting is $7.50 and is required for pheasant hunters ages 18 to 64. For an extra 75 cents, purchasers can receive the validation as well as the pictorial stamp in the mail. It also is sold as a collectible. Revenue from stamp sales is dedicated to pheasant management and habitat work.

      Four entries advanced as finalists and were selected Sept. 22 at DNR headquarters in St. Paul. Other finalists were Mark Thone, second place; Nicholas Markell, third place; and Mark Kness, fourth place.

      The DNR offers no prizes for the stamp contest winner, but the winning artist retains the right to reproduce the work. The 2017 pheasant stamp will be available for sale in March.

      Discuss below - to view set the hook here.

    • eyeguy 54

      Posted

      A dandy beast visited the yak this morning. 

      image.jpeg

      image.jpeg



  • Posts

    • delcecchi
      Gee, think things might be rigged?  Got to be there in person to bid.  Maybe they would get a better price if bidding were on line?  Of course that would inhibit the buddy system.  Make it inconvenient to bid, get lower bids, make the in crowd happy. 
    • yomammy
      Anyone sniffing any fall-pattern crappies??   Have they found the way to the basin-areas or nearby the basin areas ?   Thanks 
    • PSU
      Thanks friends, much better luck today, but worked pretty hard. 30-35' rainbows kept two 15's and a 16. Dog will get her allotment of a 1/4 filet for her time on the boat and able to save some in the freezer for my family!!!    
    • Rick
      Live to hunt another day by wearing a life jacket or float coat
      Hunters preparing to hit the water this fall in pursuit of ducks, geese and other wild game are reminded to include life jackets on their hunting gear checklist.
      “Hunters in Minnesota are trained from a young age to always put safety first. For duck and goose hunters, that means always wearing a life jacket on the water, no exceptions,” said Lt. Col. Greg Salo of the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Enforcement Division. Each year, more waterfowl hunters die from drowning than from other types of hunting accidents. Swamping, capsizing and falling overboard are all common factors leading to these deaths, but in nearly all cases the hunter would have survived had they been wearing a life jacket. “Before launching the duck boat, make sure everyone on board is wearing a life jacket or float coat,” Salo said. “It’s the one item that greatly increases your odds of surviving a water emergency and living to hunt another day.” The wide variety of comfortable, camouflage life jackets designed specifically for waterfowl hunting includes inflatable vest and belt-pack styles, insulated flotation jackets, and foam-filled shooting vests with quilted shoulders and shell loops. “Typical foam-filled vests or float coats provide optimal insulation against cold air and the effects of hypothermia, but without question, the best life jacket for waterfowl hunting is the one you will actually wear,” said Lisa Dugan, DNR boating and water safety outreach coordinator. “Choosing a life jacket style that works for you, and wearing it every time you’re on the water, is not only a good choice – it could save your life.” At the very least, all boats must carry one U.S. Coast Guard-approved life jacket for each passenger, and boats longer than 16 feet must also have a throwable flotation device immediately available. Children under 10 must wear a life jacket. Other water safety tips for duck hunters include: Don’t overload the boat; take two trips if necessary. If wearing hip boots or waders, learn how to float with them on. Stay near shore and avoid crossing large expanses of open water, especially in bad weather. Share your trip plans with someone and advise them to call for help if you don’t return on schedule. Use a headlamp, spotlight or navigation lights to alert other boaters of presence in dark and/or foggy conditions. Carry a cell phone or personal locator beacon in case of emergency. Don’t drink and boat and don’t drink and hunt Visit mndnr.gov/boatingsafety to download the DNR’s “Water Safety for Duck Hunters” brochure and to learn more about boating safety for hunters. Discuss below - to view set the hook here.
    • Rick
      The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources is seeking applications for grants to support off-highway vehicle (OHV) trail projects and new trail proposals. Application forms for projects on existing trails are due to a Parks and Trails area supervisor’s office each year by Nov. 30. New trail proposals are accepted throughout the year. First authorized in 1984, Minnesota’s OHV trails assistance program is a cost-share program intended to help develop and maintain trails for use by all-terrain vehicles (ATVs), off-highway motorcycles (OHMs) and off-road vehicles (ORVs). Known as the OHV grant-in-aid (GIA) program, it helps to establish and maintain recreational trails at the initiative of clubs and other organizations, with the support and participation of local government sponsors. Organizations can apply for GIA funds through counties, cities or townships. All aspects of OHV trail development and maintenance are eligible for funding, including project administration, site planning, trail improvements, land acquisition for trail development, and trail maintenance. Proposals with a focus on maintaining or improving existing trails and trail systems will be assigned a higher priority. Program and application information is www.dnr.state.mn.us/grants/recreation/gia_ohv.html
      or by contacting the DNR Information Center at info.dnr@state.mn.us or 651-296-615, or 888-646-6367 between 8 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. Monday through Friday.
                                                                                                     -30- Discuss below - to view set the hook here.