Guests - If You want access to member only forums on FM. You will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up on Fishing Minnesota.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

  • Announcements

    • Rick

      Members Only Fluid Forum View   08/08/2017

      Fluid forum view allows members only to get right to the meat of this community; the topics. You can toggle between your preferred forum view just below to the left on the main forum entrance. You will see three icons. Try them out and see what you prefer.   Fluid view allows you, if you are a signed up member, to see the newest topic posts in either all forums (select none or all) or in just your favorite forums (select the ones you want to see when you come to Fishing Minnesota). It keeps and in real time with respect to Topic posts and lets YOU SELECT YOUR FAVORITE FORUMS. It can make things fun and easy. This is especially true for less experienced visitors raised on social media. If you, as a members want more specific topics, you can even select a single forum to view. Let us take a look at fluid view in action. We will then break it down and explain how it works in more detail.   The video shows the topic list and the forum filter box. As you can see, it is easy to change the topic list by changing the selected forums. This view replaces the traditional list of categories and forums.   Of course, members only can change the view to better suit your way of browsing.   You will notice a “grid” option. We have moved the grid forum theme setting into the main forum settings. This makes it an option for members only to choose. This screenshot also shows the removal of the forum breadcrumb in fluid view mode. Fluid view remembers your last forum selection so you don’t lose your place when you go back to the listing. The benefit of this feature is easy to see. It removes a potential barrier of entry for members only. It puts the spotlight on topics themselves, and not the hierarchical forum structure. You as a member will enjoy viewing many forums at once and switching between them without leaving the page. We hope that fluid view, the new functionality is an asset that you enjoy .
Sign in to follow this  
BobT

.410 vs. 12ga.

Recommended Posts

BobT

A collegue and I were discussing shotgun slugs and the question came up about why 12ga. is more often used than .410. We've been trying to find some ballistic data that compares the two but came up empty so far. Anyone here have some information along these lines? Trajectory, retained energy, etc? Seems that the .41 caliber pistol is a popular big game load, why not the .410 shotgun slug?

We both suspect that the .410 will likely carry a flatter trajectory and have similar muzzle velocity to the 12ga. but would like more accurate information.

Thanks,

Bob

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
yellowsubmarine

If you go to federal's website you can download a ballistics chart for everything they make. I'm not a slug hunter, and I reload everything else I shoot, so I can't give you any first hand experience with them. But, this is still handy to have and I use it often for some quick comparisons. It will give you trajectory, energy, wind drift etc... in increments of 50 or 100 yards starting at the muzzle and going out to 500 yds. Hope this helps.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Cooter

I've been under the impression there is not a .410 slug load available, but I could be wrong. Some comparison would be interesting...I can't see the .410 being a legit slug gun for deer. Hope to see some info posted soon!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
DRH1175

Federal site will answer your question. But I could tell you quick. Energy energy energy!! The 12ga has 2518 at muzzle the .410 has 762. At 50 yds 12ga has 1744 the .410 has 432. the min recomended for deer is around 600-700ftlbs. Also the 12ga weighs 438gr the .410 weighs in at 109gr. I do know a few who have taken deer with .410 but honestly more suited for Coyotes. Do the deer a favor and use a 12ga or 20ga. Actually the 12ga shoots just as flat as the .410 so I really can't see why a person would use the .410 for deer unless that is your only gun owned. The velocitys of the 12ga and .410 are within a few ftsec. Balistically the .410 is very close to the .41mag the .410 is a tad faster but the .41 uses a heavier projectile. if you are going to use a shotgun please do the deer a favor and use the bigger 12ga!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
JDM

There are 410 slugs out there, but I have not used them to take a deer. I read an article once that questioned the validity of the 410 slug for big game due to low velocities and knock down power. From what I remember, they claimed that it hits an animal with a lot less force than a pistol or rifle load of the same size. My guess would be a low powder capacity. It also said that for slugs, 20 guage was the minimum.

I have used 12 guage slugs quite a bit. The old pumpkin slugs for smooth bores hit like a ton of bricks. With sabots, I have found that at close range, you can pencil a deer if you don't hit bone, and they will run quite a ways before they expire. I have only shot one deer with them that folded on the spot. All others have ran at least 50 to 75 yards or more before they go down. All from well placed shots, but the good part is that they do die though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
love to hunt

I have seen .410 in action and I am not impressed. The animal was shot at 30 yards in the sweet spot, and we allowed 20 min for her to lay up. She ran 250 yards before laying down. We are not talking about a large deer either, it was a 1 1/2 year old doe.

When I caught up with her she was still very alive and I put her down with a final head shot at point blank range. The slug did not exit the skull at a distance of 20 feet. After field dressing I found the slug from the first shot, and it had entered 1 lung and stopped, she still had a good pump and 1 good breather.

Had that been a 12ga or even a 20ga that slug would have exited with authority and she would not have gone 30 yards if that.

There is nothing behind that .410 slug IMO and wish the DNR would ban them for deer hunting. Save the .410 for varmints.

Just my 2 cents.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
harvey lee

I would agree with Ed on using a 410 for deer,to small.Now a 20ga might be a pretty good slug.But,how do you beat the power of the 12.?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
HuskerBen

I have found .410 slugs, and I bought some. In my opinion, the 12-gauge is far superior, for a number of reasons. First is that the 12 will drop a deer in its tracks, if you make a decent hit. More energy downrange, due to the similar velocity but greater mass. Also, 12 gauge rifled slugs are cheaper! I paid something like 6 bucks for 5 slugs for my .410, and 3.50 for the 12-gauge slugs.

I've seen and heard about too many deer, hit in the vitals with a .410 slug, that were never recovered. They are an alright load for keeping foxes out of the chicken coop, and that's about it, as far as I'm concerned. Legal for deer, yes, but not ethical (IMHO).

Ben

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
BobT

Thanks for the info. Sounds like an overwhelming majority would shy away from using the .410. Actually, it looks more or less unanimous.

Bob

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
love to hunt

I went to the Federal web sight and did a comparison and here is the data;

.410

Velocity

Muzzle------25 yds------50 yds-----75 yds------100 yds

1775---------1540--------1337-------1175--------1061

Energy

762-----------574--------432--------334---------277

12 ga

Velocity

Muzzle------25 yds------50 yds------75 yds------100 yds

1610---------1467--------1340--------1229--------1139

Energy

2518--------2090---------1744--------1468--------1206

I would say the numbers speak for them self.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
BuckRuttinFool

A .410 is OK for the young kids or the ladies....my mom used one for as many years as I can remember and she has gotten a deer evey year....again the problem lies like everyone said......the farther the distance the least amount of knockdown power......50 yrd max shot with a .410.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
icehousebob

I don't think a .410 should be allowed for deer. It doesn't have the power to consistantly kill deer cleanly. I know deer can be killed with it, they can also be killed with a .22 but that doesn't make it a deer cartridge. I started my sons with a scoped 20 gauge with Brenneke slugs and limited them to shots under 50 yards. If you respect the deer enough to hunt them, use enough gun for a humane kill.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
mnmarlin

I have used a .410 to shoot a deer, it does the job, but like other posters have stated, the range should be kept short, like 25 -30 yards. As for those that say the .410 should be outlawed for deer, I have chased far more deer wounded with a .243 than from anyother firearm. Should the .243 be banned?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
HuskerBen

I have also seen a lot of deer, shot with a .243, lost. That's a whole different can of worms, though. I'm not sure, but I would imagine that the .243 carries more energy downrange due to its velocity.

I've always been told, and I live by this: Shoot the heaviest gun or bow you can shoot accurately.

Ben

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
FarByondDrivn

Good post guys! A 12 ga. is .73 when fired as a slug while a .410 is around .45. Like the earlier data said, the 12 ga. is a bigger, more powerful animal. I shot my first deer with a .410 so I do have a sentimental spot for it. That being said, I would get my child into a 20 ga. way before a .410.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
love to hunt

The main thing with any weapon is shot placement, resonable distances and hunter ability.

.410, .243, .270, 30-06, blackpowder or archary, a poorly placed shot and the animal will run.

Along with shot placement is reasonable distance. To 30 yards and well placed a .410 may be adiquate, and there inlies the problem. I usually see the .410 put in the hands of a kid or first time hunter that usually does not have the experience to place a shot well, wait for the animal to present a standing broadside, or come to with in a distance suitable for the weapon. In this situation I am a great advocate of a 30-30. The recoil is managable, the weapon has enough umph to do the job. If you are in the shotgun zone I guess 20ga would be my choice.

This also falls into the ability of the hunter and the ability to recognize your own personel limitations. I take 40 yard shots at deer with my bow because I can do it effectivly, it falls with in my limitations. If they are 50 yards I let them walk. I have nothing to prove by taking long, low percentage shots and leave them on the range.

IMO

16 Days till opener grin.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
UdeLakeTom

My brother used a .410 until the 10 pointer he hit kept on walking as though nothing happened. It was not a long distance shot, 35 yrds or less. My son-in-law from No. Dak. says for that reason, .410 slugs aren't allowed over there. At least they weren't when he was hunting there.

I use a 50 year old .16 guage....no problems dropping them when I see them. So if a .16 guage works, a .12 should be even better.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
BobT

Like LoveToHunt says, it's a matter of shot placement and target distance. Get far enough away and any projectile will lose enough energy to be inadequate. Place the shot poorly and the deer may just keep going.

I've shot deer with my 30-06 using 180gr projectiles and watched them take off like they were missed. Fortunately for me, my shot placement was good and they fell soon enough for me to find them. The problem? Poor bullet choice. I was using Winchester Silver-tip in close range. The bullet didn't mushroom so had I not peirced the heart as I did, the deer may still be alive today.

I've seen a doe hit from less than 30yds using a .375 Weatherby magnum only to have it get up a run away as the shooter was walking toward it never to be seen again. The problem? Poor shot placement. Certainly a heavy enough caliber with plenty of punch.

I can see by the balistic charts that the .410 just wouldn't be a very reliable choice expecially in the hands of a greenhorn who is more likely to not place the shot well.

Bob

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
love to hunt

I will add visual to this subject.

I took the balistics from .410, 12ga, .243 and 30-06 and plotted them on a line graph so you can see the results.

Obviously the 30-06 is head and shoulders above the rest but that was expected. But the .410 balistics and extreamly low to be considered adiquate. It also shows that velocity isn't everything.

balistics.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Fishook

Iowa does not allow any shotgun slug less than 20 gauge to be used on deer. I think the reasons are pretty obvious and have been explained by others. You can kill a deer with a .22 but it is not practical nor is a .410 slug.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
irvingdog

Ahhhh.....the .410 slug. We'd shake our heads at every person who came in to buy them. We'd try to talk folks out of it, but if it's legal, some guys are gonna use it, regardless of the ethics.

When stocking them, we'd refer to this round as "the crippler". mad.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ufatz

I was always taught, by my father and grandfather, that we have an ethical obligation to make quick,clean kills. We must learn to shoot straight and use enough gun. I know some of these old fashioned ideas bother many of todays young hunters, but I gotta say that aside from the fact that use of a .410 for deer hunting is use of an improper tool ir is, to me, unsporting. We still have to maintain respect for the animals we hunt.

Leave the .410 for what it was designed for: Rook hunting in Europe.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  



  • Posts

    • JFitz
      I've experienced the same thing - V can be tricky through the ice. There's a ton of structure to choose from and you're pretty limited with how much you can move. We've had the most success just staking out a likely spot during primetime. Drill a bunch of holes and wait for the fish to move up. Tip-ups have helped to cover more ground and locate fish. Like Cliff said, bite windows are real short so you've gotta be out there when it's happening!
    • rainylakefisher
      Did they ever find the two missing boaters from the incident a couple weeks ago?  Haven't seen anything...
    • Cliff Wagenbach
      I agree with gimruis. Do not expect to see the same type of action or type of bite that you can get in the summer on open water! Generally the winter bite is short, ( a couple hours in the morning and a couple hours just as it is getting dark), especially if you are fishing for walleyes. Dark cloudy days can sometimes be the exception. What works one day may not work the next day also. I like to jig with a 1/8 oz. to 1/4 oz. spoon baited with a crappie minnow or just a minnow head on one of my lines. The other line is a plain hook set line with either a fathead minnow, shiner, pike sucker, or a rainbow chub as bait. Type of minnow that works best varies greatly depending upon where you are fishing! I like to set up close to rocks that drop into deeper water most of the time. Cliff    
    • smurfy
      anyone with any info as to how the ice conditions are up this way???????????
    • gimruis
      While I can't offer you any sound advice on your success while ice fishing, I can tell you that very rarely is the consistent success you've had in open water going to be near as good as it is on ice.   And that is mostly because the water is bitter cold and fish are cold-blooded, meaning that their activity is only going to be as much as they need to survive.  Other things working against you are the inability to cover as much water as you could from a boat and not as many bait/lure options, in addition to being limited to a vertical style of fishing.  I'm not saying that you should give up completely, but just keep in mind that a variety of factors comparing one to the other could be why your success isn't sustained.
    • OhioVike
      I have owned a place on Lake Vermilion(WE) since 2011 and have absolutely enjoyed every visit and season on the lake.  Our knowledge of the lake and fishing patterns have grown tremendously.  However, this experience has not translated success onto the ice.  We catch some fish, but feel like we should be doing better.  Typically we use small gear 1/16th or 32nd jigs with minnows, Spoons with just a minnow head or when we go after panfish we'll use wax worms.  We fish all the same spots and don't catch nearly as big or many fish.  When we do catch most of our fish, it's typically on mud flats and we drill a lot of holes.  Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.  
    • OhioVike
      I have owned a place on Lake Vermilion(WE) since 2011 and have absolutely enjoyed every visit and season on the lake.  Our knowledge of the lake and fishing patterns have grown tremendously.  However, this experience has not translated success onto the ice.  We catch some fish, but feel like we should be doing better.  Typically we use small gear 1/16th or 32nd jigs with minnows, Spoons with just a minnow head or when we go after panfish we'll use wax worms.  We fish all the same spots and don't catch nearly as big or many fish.  When we do catch most of our fish, it's typically on mud flats and we drill a lot of holes.  Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.  
    • curt quesnell
      Ice out as far as I could see today, little wind and a cool night tonight. Some wind forecast tomorrow night. It should be fine though. Here is the report   20171119_153600.mp4
    • Fishing Frenzy
      Any ice starting to form again?
    • Dirtyfisheyes
      By the look of the forecast, single digit lows at night and no snow. Should it be safe to say that the first of December would be safe for snow machines? Itching to make the trip. Also any recommendations for lodging would be helpful