Guests - If You want access to member only forums on FM. You will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up on Fishing Minnesota.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Moose-Hunter

Real Estate Question...

50 posts in this topic

Howdy All...

Two people (A & B) are deeded half ownership in a property. Party "A" holds the mortgage. Party "B" has only been deeded half the property and their name is not on the mortgage.

Party "A" hates party "B" and wants out of the property ownership, but wants to get their 50% value out of the property... Party "B" does not want to sell, or buy out party "A"...

What can party "A" do to get the heck out of this deal?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

One option, depending on how badly they want out, is to deed their ownership to the other party. Sucks but if they want out bad enough, that is one option.

Is it possible for Party A to sell their portion to someone else and if so, does Party B have any say in the matter?

Bob

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If it is like any partnership contract... Party A gives 'right of 1st refusal' to Party B, if Party B denies a purchase agreement, Party A can then sell off his intrest to any other Party that would like to take ownership without regard to Party B's desires... The other option is a fair and equitable sale of the entire property with the disbursements split 50-50...

Good Luck!

Ken

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote:

One option, depending on how badly they want out, is to deed their ownership to the other party. Sucks but if they want out bad enough, that is one option.

Is it possible for Party A to sell their portion to someone else and if so, does Party B have any say in the matter?


Hi Bob...

Yes this one is a bit on the sticky side.

Party "A" has quite a bit of moola invested in this property, being the original/sole mortgage holder. Down payment, most of the monthly's, property upgrades... We're talking in the 45K range (+/-).

The Reader's digest version...

Party "A" came on some hard times financially, and party "B" , had the cash, and bailed party "A" out with the mortgage company in exchange for 50% deeded ownership. Party "A" was, and still remains, the only name on the mortgage since party "B" couldn't borrow a hose if they were on fire... (I don't think party "B" will EVER have the financially ability to get the funds necessary to buy out "A"...) Sorry, I digress...

Party "A" and "B" have since parted company and the deed is all that's binding them together. Party "B" still resides on the property and has been making the monthly payment for a little while now.

Party "A" is "okay" with party "B" becoming sole owner IF some form of financial settlement can be worked out.

Party "A" only wants a fair "cut" of the value and is actually willing to deal on their half of the deed for way below market rates. Party "B" is not willing to either sign off on the total sale of this property and split the proceeds or to buy out party "A"'s half ownership.

Party "A" feels that they have a substantial financial interest in this property and will probably not just "walk away" from it.

If party "A" could sell their half to someone... Anyone who is able to buy, GREAT!!! It would happen in a heartbeat.

If party "A" could force the complete sale of the property... Even better as this would send party "B" packin'...

Confidence is "high" that party "B" is the planning stages with some kind of legal "abandonment" thing to "take" the property from party "A"... Is this possible?

Without a partition action, what can party "A" do to get some value from the property?

Any help would be greatly appreciated!!! Real Estate folks? Lawyers? Anyone? Bueller?

If you's like to write me directly, I'll make sure party "A" gets the messages... northernstaroutfitters at yahoo (Contact Us Please)... wink.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's lookin like the party of the first part and the party of the second part will never group hug and make up and sing koombyah around the camp fire.

Soooooooo, I guess if boilerguy were either party he'd be looking at hiring a lawyer.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote:

It's lookin like the party of the first part and the party of the second part will never group hug and make up and sing koombyah around the camp fire.

Soooooooo, I guess if boilerguy were either party he'd be looking at hiring a lawyer.


No sir!!! No camp fires for these two. Group hugs ain't gonna happen either...

I'm sure lawyers will be in the mix shortly... Just looking for a little insight...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sounds like a sticky situation for sure.

I am not sure about the laws involved and all the legal mumbo jumbo but since party B is not named as an owner he probably doesn't have alot of recourse to get the property without buying party A's share.

Am I reading it right that party B stepped in to help out in a tough time and in exchange for the money party A verbally committed half ownership of the property to him? If party A did this and they want to sell the property they should give party B first crack at buying it and if he doesn't want it then party A should have full right to sell it and give half the money to party B. It seems logical that if party A is the only one listed as owner they are the only one that should need to approve sale of the property.

Is the 50-50 agreement between party A and B on paper anywhere or just verbal with a handshake?

Personally I say party A should sell it and just give party B half the money. Party B shouldn't be able to say to much about it since he isn't legally an owner.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote:

Sounds like a sticky situation for sure.

I am not sure about the laws involved and all the legal mumbo jumbo but since party B is not named as an owner he probably doesn't have alot of recourse to get the property without buying party A's share.

Am I reading it right that party B stepped in to help out in a tough time and in exchange for the money party A verbally committed half ownership of the property to him? If party A did this and they want to sell the property they should give party B first crack at buying it and if he doesn't want it then party A should have full right to sell it and give half the money to party B. It seems logical that if party A is the only one listed as owner they are the only one that should need to approve sale of the property.

Is the 50-50 agreement between party A and B on paper anywhere or just verbal with a handshake?

Personally I say party A should sell it and just give party B half the money. Party B shouldn't be able to say to much about it since he isn't legally an owner.


Thanks folks for all the info thus far...

This is the place where the mud gets even deeper...

Party "B" would not help out party "A" unless it was put on paper. So yes there is a quit claim deed with both of their names on it... The documents that do NOT have party "B"s name anywhere on them is the mortgage.

Deed yes, mortgage no...

I'm in complete agreement with you... The property should be sold, with the proceeds gettting split 50/50 and giving party "B" first crack at the purchase...

How would the outstanding debt with the mortgage company be staisfied and how would party "A" get their "cut"?

Sounds to me that party "B" would have to buy the property outright, take on a new loan, pay off the outstanding debt and the remainder (or a set amount) would then be distributed to party "A"...

I know the Eagles got back together and that was a "sure thing" compared to these two coming to any type of understanding. The above scenerio would take an agreement from both sides and that's NOT gonna happen as neither one trusts the other... As told to me... "No, not even a little bit"...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I believe in the State of Minnesota....the law comes down to the simple concept of.....It takes one to buy and two to sell. Meaning A can be on the mortgage alone, and buy the property alone and add B to the deed. But, in order to sell both parties (A and B)have to agree. Usually in a divorce situation, if the husband or wife wants to stay in the property that party has to refinance in order to pay off the other. The refinance is usually forced by the judge and has to be completed within a certain amount of time. If kids are involved then the timeframe for refinance and buyout can become pushed back until the kids reach a certain age. Maybe more information than you need, but this is my take on the law and process and I have watched it first hand many times as a Mortgage Broker. So in your situation it sounds like this sale or buyout needs to be pushed by a judge. Just my thoughts, not sure it is exactly correct. Ohhh, and if party B is unable to obtain financing to buyout party A within the time required by the judge, then party A has the right to sell to a third party by putting the house on the market.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Is anyone else wondering what happend between A and B to create such a messy situation?

If I were party A I would be contacting a lawyer ASAP. A lawyer can be pricey but in some cases they are worth every penny and this seems like just that sort of case.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm just darn glad I'm neither party A or B.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote:

I'm just darn glad I'm neither party A or B.


Me too!!! It's a VERY stinky situation and thankfully, I'm just an innocent bystander...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote:

Is anyone else wondering what happend between A and B to create such a messy situation?

If I were party A I would be contacting a lawyer ASAP. A lawyer can be pricey but in some cases they are worth every penny and this seems like just that sort of case.


You echo my advice exactly.... As for what caused this.... Man, let me tell you... You REALLY don't want to know the nasty details... I wish I didn't... crazy.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The question right now is who is paying on the mortgage now? Party A or B or both.....If it is a quit claim deed there is probably a clause in there that states that if party A stops paying the mortgage he forfeits his half of the mortgage to B and this means he's out the whole works.....this protects party B's money interest in the mortgage.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Toonfish has hit the nail right on the head. A formal buy/sell agreement should have been in place before "B"

ever gave any money. Without one in place, the two parties have to mutually decide on things, or else a judge will have to.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you know if the property is held in joint tenancy or tenancy in common? It should be on the quit claim deed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote:

Toonfish has hit the nail right on the head. A formal buy/sell agreement should have been in place before "B"

ever gave any money. Without one in place, the two parties have to mutually decide on things, or else a judge will have to.


This is more of the issue. Without a buy/sell agreement it is open to interpretation of each party (most likely slanting in their favor). Without a that agreement Litigation may be the only solution.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Quick question for party "A" How has party "B" been making the payments? Cash/check to you and then you send it in or B sends it in themselves. Sounds like you have a contract for deed and most have a clause in them saying if they are late on payments to you, you have the right to boot them out. Is the property 2 different parcels now or still 1?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I didn't see anything about a contract for deed....Did I miss it? because that would change alot of the issues into party A's favor.....But I think all that is in place and has been executed is a quit claim deed. With a quit claim deed it doesn't matter who or how the payments are made, it just places both parties on title and there lies the problem. Both are on title, but do not agree on what should be done with the property. This will probably have to end up in front of a judge to decide.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote:

The question right now is who is paying on the mortgage now? Party A or B or both.....If it is a quit claim deed there is probably a clause in there that states that if party A stops paying the mortgage he forfeits his half of the mortgage to B and this means he's out the whole works.....this protects party B's money interest in the mortgage.


WOW!!! What a stinky can of worms. eh?

Party "B" has been paying the mortgage as he is the one that resides on the property after forcing party "A" to leave. I have the quit claim deed in my gloved hand and there is no clause in regards to non-payment. As I stated earlier, party "A" is the only person on the mortgage papers. Party "B" just sends the mortgage company money. And not regularly I might add... shocked.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote:

Toonfish has hit the nail right on the head. A formal buy/sell agreement should have been in place before "B"

ever gave any money. Without one in place, the two parties have to mutually decide on things, or else a judge will have to.


From what I know, no buy/sell agreement was ever in place. These two parties are never going to agree on anything, let alone on the sale/possession of the property... I fear legal action is going to be the only way to resolution...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote:

Do you know if the property is held in joint tenancy or tenancy in common? It should be on the quit claim deed.


According to the deed that I have seen, "joint tenants" is the wording...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote:

Quick question for party "A" How has party "B" been making the payments? Cash/check to you and then you send it in or B sends it in themselves. Sounds like you have a contract for deed and most have a clause in them saying if they are late on payments to you, you have the right to boot them out. Is the property 2 different parcels now or still 1?


Party "B" has been making payments directly to the mortgage company via a sent in money orders... If there were a "late payment" clause anywhere in this whole mess, party "B" would have been sent packin' a long time ago... The property is a single "parcel"...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote:

I didn't see anything about a contract for deed....Did I miss it? because that would change alot of the issues into party A's favor.....But I think all that is in place and has been executed is a quit claim deed. With a quit claim deed it doesn't matter who or how the payments are made, it just places both parties on title and there lies the problem. Both are on title, but do not agree on what should be done with the property. This will probably have to end up in front of a judge to decide.


toonfish... You didn't miss a thing... As far as I know there was no contract for deed, only a quit claim. We have yet to check on the actual title... Where would I look or who would I contact on this?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would like to thank each and everyone who has posted thus far!!! Although some of the info was already known, the rest has given party "A" a few more ideas and possibly an extra avenue or two towards "freedom"...

Please... If anyone else can add to this, please post!!!

Thanks so very much!!! cool.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • portageguy
      Day trip canoe only can fill out and use permit at portage. October 1 - April 30 permits at portage cover all trips. We have all been driving to Cook for permits so Y-store would be great. 
    • Rick
      Minnesota state parks have made it easy—and free —to experience the fun of fishing.  “We’ve eliminated some of the barriers that were keeping today’s busy families from getting out fishing,” said Erika Rivers, director of Minnesota state parks and trails. “Now, you and your family can try your hand at fishing – at no cost – before investing in equipment or purchasing a fishing license.” People are able to fish from shore without a license in most state parks on a lake or river that doesn’t require a trout stamp. Other rules and regulations still apply, such as the number and size of fish that the person can keep. Details, including a map showing where to find the free fishing opportunities, can be found online. Free fishing kits, which include a rod and tackle, are loaned out on a first-come, first-served basis at many state parks, thanks to funding from the DNR’s MinnAqua program. “These fishing kits make it easy for families,” said Jeff Ledermann, education and skills leader for DNR’s fish and wildlife outreach section. “The many fishing opportunities state parks offer are a great way for families to have fun, learn together and build a tradition that connects them to the outdoors.” Beginners and those who haven’t fished in awhile can brush up on their fishing skills at one of many I Can Fish! programs this summer. These hands-on learning opportunities ($5 for adults and free for children under age 12) cover fish identification, casting, knot-tying and more. Fishing gear is provided for use during the programs, and fishing licenses are not required. Experienced anglers will demonstrate skills and then give participants time to practice. Participants will also get a small tackle box to take home with them. For a complete schedule of I Can Fish! programs and information on how to register, visit www.mndnr.gov. For more information, contact the DNR Information Center at info.dnr@state.mn.us, 651-296-6157 or 888-646-6367 (8 a.m.-8 p.m. Monday through Friday, 9 a.m.-1 p.m. Saturday). Discuss below - to view set the hook here.
    • overdalimit
      getting thicker now. no big slicks on lake yet probably another week and the "carcass trails" will start showing up.
    • Cliff Wagenbach
      Fish Head, I believe that only applies to winter entry. Cliff
    • Rick
      Cost for hunting and fishing licenses won’t increase until 2018 The Department of Natural Resources reminds state park visitors, snowmobilers and ATV riders that modest fee increases will go into effect on July 1.  However, the cost of fishing and hunting licenses, including deer licenses, won’t increase until 2018. “I want to thank the many Minnesotans and state lawmakers who supported these modest increases in parks, snowmobile, all-terrain vehicle, hunting and fishing fees during the recent legislative session,” said Commissioner Tom Landwehr. “These fees will help maintain quality outdoor experiences for now and for future generations. We are fortunate to live in a state that offers such great outdoor opportunities and passionate citizenry that supports those resources.” One-day state park vehicle permits will increase $2 to $7 and year-round vehicle permits will increase $10 to $35. These fees have not changed in more than a decade, and the increases were needed to continue to provide quality facilities and services at these important places at a level that maintains their nation-leading status. Also effective July 1, the fee to register all-terrain vehicles and snowmobiles will increase and a $15 license will be required for ice shelters that do not collapse, fold or disassemble. “ATV and snowmobile clubs throughout the state provide a large and well-maintained system of trails throughout Minnesota,” Landwehr said.  “These trails are supported in large part by the user fees that contribute to the state’s grant-in-aid trail systems.  High-quality trails give snowmobilers and other motorized recreation enthusiasts a reason to travel, which bolsters tourism and strengthens local economies in Minnesota.” For a list of all the Parks and Trails fees that are changing, visit the fee details page. Effective with the 2018 license year, the cost for some fishing and hunting licenses will rise. The cost of a resident fishing license will increase $3, from $22 to $25, and a resident deer license will increase $4, from $30 to $34. A complete list of license fee increases is available on the DNR website at www.mndnr.gov/LicenseDollarsAtWork. These increases won’t build fish and wildlife programs but do ensure that fish stocking will not be reduced; deer management and research will continue at current levels; and nuisance wildlife and wildlife damage complaints will be answered in a timely manner. For more information, contact the DNR Information Center at info.dnr@state.mn.us or 888-646-6367 (8 a.m.-8 p.m. Monday through Friday, 9 a.m.-1 p.m. Saturday). Discuss below - to view set the hook here.
    • smurfy
      I've never fished it but am very familiar with the area. Here is what I know of it. Good bass fishing. There are muskies in it. Walleye fishing is best at night. There is a place called frontier sports in Marcel that may give better insite to the lake then I, also info on guides. It's a pretty lake with cery clear water.
    • Rick
      Active military personnel in any branch or unit of the United States Armed Forces and veterans with a service-related disability are now eligible to receive a free year-round vehicle permit, providing unlimited access to all 75 Minnesota state parks and recreation areas.  These new benefits were proposed by the Department of Natural Resources and approved by state lawmakers during the 2017 Minnesota legislative session (Minnesota Statutes, section 85.053, subdivisions 8 and 10). “We are grateful to the men and women who have served in the military,” said DNR Commissioner Tom Landwehr. “Providing free access to Minnesota state parks is just one way to thank them for their service and sacrifice.” To see all of the licenses, permits and passes that are available to military personnel and veterans, and the form of identification that an individual needs to show, visit www.mndnr.gov. The DNR is recognized as a Yellow Ribbon Company for its support of active and retired military personnel and their families. “We invite active military personnel and veterans with a service-related disability to come get their free permit over the Fourth of July weekend,” said Erika Rivers, director of Minnesota state parks and trails. “Minnesota state parks and recreation areas offer a firework-free environment for those who want to celebrate the holiday in peace and quiet.” A list of especially quiet getaways is included in the summer guide on the Parks and Trails website. For more information, contact the DNR Information Center at info.dnr@state.mn.us, 651-296-6157 or 888-646-6367 (8 a.m.-8 p.m. Monday through Friday, 9 a.m.-1 p.m. Saturday). Discuss below - to view set the hook here.
    • Rick
      The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources has released an environmental assessment worksheet for a proposed construction project to widen and manage flow rates for a section of the Mississippi River channel near Hastings that has narrowed with sediment build up.  Changing sediment patterns have made it difficult and costly to maintain safe navigation through this river channel. The St. Paul District U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is proposing to remove sediment and build two new rock sills on the right and left river banks to help control water flow and increase water velocity to help maintain the full channel width. The DNR environmental assessment worksheet for the proposed project is integrated with a draft federal environmental assessment. The DNR will accept comments on the EAW for the “Lower Pool 2 Boulanger Bend to Lock and Dam No. 2 Maintenance Project” through 4:30 p.m. July 26. A copy of the document is available on the DNR website. Additional copies may be requested by calling 651-259-5082. A copy is also available for public review at: DNR Library, 500 Lafayette Road, St. Paul, MN 55155. DNR Central Region Headquarters, 1200 Warner Road, St. Paul, MN 55106. Hennepin County – Minneapolis Central Library, Government Documents, Second Floor, 300 Nicollet Mall, Minneapolis, MN  55401-1992. Park Grove Branch, Washington County Library, 7900 Hemingway Ave. South, Cottage Grove, MN 55016. Pleasant Hill Library, 1490 South Frontage Road, Hastings, MN 55033. The EAW notice is being published in the June 26 Environmental Quality Board Monitor, also known as the EQB Monitor. Written comments must be submitted no later than 4:30 p.m. Wednesday, July 26, to the attention of Kate Fairman, EAW project manager, Environmental Policy and Review Unit, DNR Ecological and Water Resources Division, 500 Lafayette Road, St. Paul, MN 55155-4025. Electronic or email comments may be sent to environmentalrev.dnr@state.mn.us or by fax to 651-296-1811 with “Boulanger Bend EAW” in the subject line.  If submitting comments electronically, include name and mailing address. Discuss below - to view set the hook here.
    • Rick
      Anyone looking for summer adventure may want to explore the mountain bike trails at Cuyuna Country State Recreation Area during one of the I Can Mountain Bike! programs on Saturday, July 8, and Saturday, Aug. 12. Three I Can Mountain Bike! sessions will take place each day, from 9 to 11:30 a.m., from noon to 2:30 p.m. and from 3 to 5:30 p.m. During the first half of the program, participants will practice shifting, braking and body position in a wide open setting. During the second half, they’ll take a guided ride and explore the single-track mountain-bike trails. I Can Mountain Bike! Use of bikes and helmets will be included with the registration fee ($25/adult and $15/child). A Minnesota state parks vehicle permit ($7/day or $35/year-round) is also required to enter the park. Children should be at least 10 years old to participate and should be able to comfortably ride a bike on pavement prior to attending this program. Anyone under age 18 must be accompanied by a parent or guardian. Reservations are required and can be made online or by phone.   CLICK: www.mndnr.gov/reservations (24 hours a day). CALL: 866-857-2757 between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. daily, excluding holidays. I Can Mountain Bike! is part of a series of skill-building programs offered by the DNR’s Parks and Trails Division. Other programs in the series introduce camping, rock climbing, fishing, paddling and archery to beginners. The I Can! programs are made possible with support from the Parks and Trails Fund, created after voters approved the Clean Water, Land and Legacy Amendment in November 2008. The Parks and Trails Fund receives 14.25 percent of the three-eighths percent sales tax revenue that may only be spent to support parks and trails of regional or statewide significance. Cuyuna Country State Recreation Area, near Brainerd, features 25 miles of single-track mountain bike trails. It also has an 8-mile paved trail. For more information, including program dates, times, locations, and minimum age requirements, visit www.mndnr.gov/ican or contact the DNR Information Center at info.dnr@state.mn.us, 651-296-6157 or 888-646-6367 (8 a.m.-8 p.m. Monday through Friday, 9 a.m.-1 p.m. Saturday). Discuss below - to view set the hook here.
    • certified jumbo
      Good reports guys.   We were up Wednesday to Sunday.   I second you on the weather, rain and wind got old.  Not to mention bugs were terrible.  No see ums bothered us the most.      For us luckily the fishing was great.   Limited on bows and Lakers.   Had several stellar meals too.