Guests - If You want access to member only forums on FM. You will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up on Fishing Minnesota.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

  • Announcements

    • Rick

      Members Only Fluid Forum View   08/08/2017

      Fluid forum view allows members only to get right to the meat of this community; the topics. You can toggle between your preferred forum view just below to the left on the main forum entrance. You will see three icons. Try them out and see what you prefer.   Fluid view allows you, if you are a signed up member, to see the newest topic posts in either all forums (select none or all) or in just your favorite forums (select the ones you want to see when you come to Fishing Minnesota). It keeps and in real time with respect to Topic posts and lets YOU SELECT YOUR FAVORITE FORUMS. It can make things fun and easy. This is especially true for less experienced visitors raised on social media. If you, as a members want more specific topics, you can even select a single forum to view. Let us take a look at fluid view in action. We will then break it down and explain how it works in more detail.   The video shows the topic list and the forum filter box. As you can see, it is easy to change the topic list by changing the selected forums. This view replaces the traditional list of categories and forums.   Of course, members only can change the view to better suit your way of browsing.   You will notice a “grid” option. We have moved the grid forum theme setting into the main forum settings. This makes it an option for members only to choose. This screenshot also shows the removal of the forum breadcrumb in fluid view mode. Fluid view remembers your last forum selection so you don’t lose your place when you go back to the listing. The benefit of this feature is easy to see. It removes a potential barrier of entry for members only. It puts the spotlight on topics themselves, and not the hierarchical forum structure. You as a member will enjoy viewing many forums at once and switching between them without leaving the page. We hope that fluid view, the new functionality is an asset that you enjoy .
Sign in to follow this  
lilwalter

pwt

Recommended Posts

lilwalter

Just checked on the the results thus far. Seelhoff had quite the first day--4 fish--19.58!! Anybody go to weigh in? Curious how many fish these guys are putting in the boat to get their fish.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
DJH

Was out fishing Thursday morning near 9mile flat, I counted aleast 25 tourny boats trolling cranks in the same area. I heard the Leader of day 1 had 2 over 28" trollong cranks also.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Mark13:33

I was just wondering, does anyone know the ruling on why there is no upgrading in this tournament? Is it due to the fact we're in the month of August and a fishes survival rate is much lower than that of a fish in June? The Ottertail PWT was an upgradable event and the state allows upgrading until a posession limit is reached. I'm sure if upgrading were allowed all of those teams with less than four fish would have been fine. Don't get me wrong I like the strategy involved but as a tournament angler would like to upgrade!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
eyesoneyes

By state law you are not allowed to cull or upgrade fish in your live under any circumstance. Once a fish is placed in the live well it cannot be released. So does the PWT break state laws often?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
wildirishrose

Mark 13 does not mention culling in his post. Upgrading in a tournament, like Mark is talking about means having say a 4 fish limit to weigh but you can have 5 fish in the box or a 6 fish limit with 8 in the boat. The PWT is not breaking any laws.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
bubs

I think the limit is four on milac's this year. so no upgrading, but I don't fish it for walleys any more.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Mark13:33

eyesoneyes you are incorrect on this issue. You are allowed to upgrade until a posession limit is maintained. I fish many tournaments and have been in contact with the DNR directly on this issue. This is a very misinterprated rule across the state. I'm not trying to sound harsh about the issue and understand the four fish limit being set as this was the case on Ottertail as well where the limit is six. On Ottertail however everyone weighed in at the end while I noticed teams in this particular tourney weighing in early putting them at a disadvantage for being successful.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
eyesoneyes

Mark:1313 There must be confusion at the DNR. I called the DNR enforcement division after reading your post this morning. They stated once a fish is put in the live well it cannot be returned to the lake. I believe this has been the law for many years.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Dano_the_jigasaurus

The livewell rule exists except in a tournament situation, then these fish are to be returned to the lake. The livewell is just a means to keep the fish alive until weigh in, when they will be returned to the lake. There are slight variations to rules for the general public and rules for fishing tournaments.

dan

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
steve fellegy #49

Post deleted by steve fellegy #49

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Mark13:33

Thanks Steve, that's about as good of an answer I could get!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
lilwalter

Hi-jacked!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
castmaster

can someone explain why tournaments are allowed to have rules different from what the rest of us must abide by? these people are already profiting off a PUBLIC resource, and then they get special treatment as well? talk about WRONG!!

i have to say it is nice to see the rules getting a bit more stringent after the findings of the release studies at pwt events and delayed mortality.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
steve fellegy #49

Post deleted by steve fellegy #49

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
river rat316

boy your gonna make friends fast..... SO what your saying is noone would be catching fish or advancing the sport if it wasn't for you tournament anglers? Give me a break... get off your high horse.... Thats about the most condesending, and cocky statement I have ever read on FM..... Have a good one confused.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
whippingpost

I prefished the tournament with some of the pros last weekend. All I can say is, boy those guys can fish! But I hope they can come back to Mille Lacs during a better time of the year. I think even those guys were having a hard time putting slot fish in the boat. It says something when over half of the 60 entries couldn't even bring in a limit of walleyes. Why not bring them in May or June?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
eyesoneyes

I contacted Michael Hamm the Director of Enforcement. He holds the highest post in the Enforcement Division. According to Mr. Hamm once you put a fish in your live well it counts towards your limit. If your are on Mille Lacs and come in with a limit of Walleyes in your live well and release them because you don’t feel like cleaning them, then you have caught your limit for the day and are not allowed to keep any more Walleyes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest

I also contacted DNR. Same ruling once in posession you can not replace with another fish. I also asked if you could continue to fish walleye with your limit in the boat.

Was told you can continue fishing for walleyes(in season)as long as you dont replace any in live well.

LCA

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Vickie

Mille Lacs is a No cull, No Sort lake -- yes, that means that once you decide to put a fish in the livewell, it is your fish. And once you reach your possession limit - which is 4 per person - you are done fishing. Either the PWT or the DNR tournament permit TIGHTENED the regulation and only allowed 4 fish (per 2 anglers ) to be in the boat. Once they had 4 they were finished fishing for the day. There are lakes in MN where you can cull, however Mille Lacs is not one of them.

Tournament rules are USUALLY stricter then the rules for those of us that are just out fishing for the day. Not sure why Dano thought/thinks tournament anglers don't have to follow the rules confused.gif

We fish the Minnesota Tournament Trail - which allows us to weigh 6 fish (per team of 2 people) but we can have 8 in the boat. Again once you make the decision to put that last fish in the livewell you are done. The scales are open all day - knowing that some of the teams will come in early with therir fish.

Good fishing to everyone.

Vickie

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
aanderud

Vickie -- You're wrong about the "done" statement. When you have 4 in the well you can continue fishing catch and release, because you are no longer reducing any 'eyes to possession (possession means you failed to immediately release the fish -- you put it in a bucket, livewell, stringer, etc). In a tournament, obviously you're going to be "done" at that point, because you're no longer going to move up in the standings with catch and release -- but recreational fisherman can continue to catch and release with their limit in the well. That's what the previous poster was saying and he was correct. Catch and immediate release of fish is only illegal if targeting a fish during a closed season or without proper license for targeted species (trout, for instance).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
vaneeck

I think half you guys are wrong, if you have a tournement with two anglers in a boat these two anglers are allowed 4 fish each on milacs (of the right sizes or course) during the fishing the anglers might put 6 fish in the livewell and then when weigh-in occurs they weigh their biggest 4 fish!

unless the pwt had a specific rule saying the anglers are only allowed to have 4 fish in their livewell at any point I would think the above would apply.

Most tournements I've fished have been ruled the first way not the second.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Koldfront Kraig

PWT Superpro rules were 4 fish per day per boat total. 4 fish total for two guys, not 4 each.

Once it's in the livewell it can't be replaced with a bigger fish.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
STMA_I_HUNTER

smile.gifBoy you're smart!

How did the guy that you prefished with end up?

Have not seen the results.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
castmaster

i'd like to know why the post that pointed out the different rules that these tourneys are allowed to go by was deleted? seems a little "fishy" to me!! confused.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
PerchJerker

Personally I've never heard of a tournament that didn't have rules that were tighter and more restrictive than state or lake-specific regulations. The pwt rules on mille lacs were tighter than the lake-specific regulations.

The guy that posted the rules deleted the posts himself. If you read his published print columns and articles you will find that he is forever whining about the advances in fishing and technology, and how the spots he used to have to himself are now covered with boats -- he was whining about that in his posts here -- and he's whining about them now on another board. I agree completely with what river rat316 said to the guy. My opinion is he doesn't like getting debated on it in an open forum.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  



  • Posts

    • Rick
      Applications due by Saturday, Dec. 16  The Department of Natural Resources, the Metropolitan Council and the Greater Minnesota Regional Parks and Trails Commission are seeking qualified applicants to serve on the Parks and Trails Legacy Advisory Committee.  “The Parks and Trails Legacy Advisory Committee plays a critical role in helping us achieve the vision Minnesotans have for use of the Parks and Trails Legacy Funds and creates an accessible and equitable, integrated system of state and regional parks and trails in Minnesota,” said DNR Commissioner Tom Landwehr. The purpose of the committee is to promote and coordinate implementation of the 25-Year Parks and Trails Legacy Plan. Funding recommendations for individual projects is not a part of this committee’s work. The plan can be found at on the parks and trails legacy plan page. 2018 will mark the 10th anniversary of the passage of the Legacy Amendment by Minnesota voters. The committee is planning a series of regional events during the year to celebrate Legacy accomplishments and engage Minnesotans on the question, “Why Parks and Trails Legacy Matters.”  Information about the events will be available in January on Facebook (/PTLegacyMN) and on the committee website (www.legacy.leg.mn/ptlac). The deadline for applications is Saturday, Dec. 16. The committee is made up of 17 members, including, to the practical extent possible, diverse geographical and demographic representation. The committee has a mixture of park and trail professionals and Minnesota residents. Committee members should have expertise in two or more of the four strategic pillars of the plan: Connect people and the outdoors. Acquire land and create opportunities. Take care of what we have. Coordinate among partners. Terms are two years with the option of being reappointed for a maximum of three terms. Meetings are scheduled every two months around the state, with an option to attend remotely. Interested individuals may complete the application form online at www.legacy.leg.mn/ptlac/member-application or print it out and return it to Paul Purman, Department of Natural Resources, Box 39, 500 Lafayette Road, St. Paul, MN 55155. Anyone with questions can contact Paul via phone at 651-259-5643 or email at paul.purman@state.mn.us. Discuss below - to view set the hook here.
    • Cliff Wagenbach
      Big bay did not look to be completely frozen over yesterday afternoon. Broken up and refrozen by McKinley Landing. Cliff
    • TheTuna
      The wind today has eliminated the little ice we had.  
    • MUSKY18
      Thanks much Huntnfish and ZachD!!!  Had the wife pick me up some CCI 209 Magnum primers and seems to have fixed the issue.  Went out the other night and put 7 rounds through the ole CVA and didn't have a single hangfire.  I'm ready for the weekend.
    • JerkinLips
      Is Big Bay completely frozen over yet?
    • Rick
      Anglers and others interested in Department of Natural Resources strategies for managing Grand Marias area lakes and streams are invited to review and comment on management plans scheduled for review this fall. This annual process includes several waters located within the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness (BWCAW). Comments on lakes within the BWCAW will be accepted until Dec. 20. The comment period for lakes and streams outside the BWCAW, will extend through Feb. 15. A management plan identifies specific management activities planned for a lake or stream over the next five to 20 years, including any proposed stocking or special regulations. “Management plans are our best single sources of information on past, present and desired future conditions in our lakes and streams,” said Steve Persons, Grand Marais area fisheries supervisor. “Comments and suggestions from those most interested in these waters are crucial when it comes to making plans and determining management success. For anglers this is the best opportunity to influence how these lakes and streams are managed.” In the Grand Marais area, plans for the following lakes and streams will reviewed this winter. Lake plans under review: The status and preservation of native lake trout populations will be the primary concern in plans being revised for Blue Snow and Gabimichigami Lakes. Both are located inside the BWCAW. Stream trout stocking and management strategies will be reviewed in Thompson, Thrush, Turnip, Olson, Kraut, Little Portage, Olga, Mavis (BWCAW), Missing Link (BWCAW), Meditation (BWCAW), Talus, Trout, Pine (near Two Island Lake), Unnamed (near Tom Lake), Chester, Extortion, and North Shady Lakes. Options to consider include changes in species, reductions in stocking frequency, and changes in the number or size of fish stocked. In Mine, Peanut, Weasel (Sled), Tomato, Trip, and Rog (BWCAW) Lakes, fisheries managers are considering eliminating trout stocking, due to the high cost of stocking remote lakes by air, poor survival of stocked fish, or use that appears to have been too low to justify the cost of continued stocking.  Angler feedback on fisheries in these lakes is critically needed for these important decisions. Plans for Devilfish, Gust, Hand, and Tom Lakes will be reviewed with attention to the status and needs of walleye fisheries in those lakes. Moore Lake will be reviewed to determine whether it offers any potential for panfish management. Plans for several lightly-used BWCAW lakes in the area, including Caribou (by Clearwater), Clove, Kiskadinna, Long, Mora, Morgan, Skipper, and Tepee Lakes will be reviewed. Those plans will be revised primarily to incorporate any new survey data that may have been obtained, and to establish survey schedules for the next few years. Streams plans under review: Plans for Beaverdam Creek and the Swamp River will be reviewed.  Both are marginal trout streams, and may be considered for removal from the State’s list of designated trout streams. Plans for the Cascade River, Elbow Creek, and the Onion River will also be reviewed. All three support thriving brook trout populations, with the Cascade and Onion Rivers also supporting steelhead and salmon in their lower reaches. Plans will focus on habitat and water quality, hydrology and watershed issues. The DNR is considering removing the portion of Elbow Creek above Elbow Lake from the State’s list of designated trout streams, since no trout have been found in that part of the stream in recent surveys. Current plans for lakes and streams in the area as well as recent fish population assessment information are available for review at the DNR’s Grand Marais area fisheries office, at 1356 E. Highway 61, Grand Marais, Monday through Friday, between 8 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. For more information, call or email Steve Persons at 218-387-6022 or steve.persons@state.mn.us. Public comments on management of BWCAW waters are due by Dec. 20. The comment period for lakes and streams outside the BWCAW will extend through Feb. 15. Comments, suggestions and other feedback on the management of these, and all other streams and lakes in the area are welcomed at any time and will be considered when those plans are next due for review. Discuss below - to view set the hook here.
    • Hookmaster
      The first set of replacements I bought from a dealership but they are spendy. I bought some Ancos at Fleet Farm like I have in the past for all my vehicles, but there is no adapter that fits the end of the  blade arm. What are others using?
    • Rick
      The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) and the city of Willow River will host a public open house on Wednesday, December 6, 2017 to discuss options for the Willow River dam which was severely damaged during a July 2016 rain storm. The open house will be held from 6:30 p.m. to 8:30 p.m. at the Willow River School located at 8142 Pine Street, Willow River, Minn. Participants can visit displays during the first hour of the open house to learn more about three options currently being considered.  At 7:30 p.m. DNR staff will make a presentation about the features, benefits and cost of each option and answer questions about next steps. The meeting purpose is to receive public input about the options and to answer questions about the state’s process. The dam was built in 1940 as a cooperative venture between the Works Progress Administration and the then Department of Conservation. Heavy rains from a July 2016 thunderstorm overwhelmed the capacity of the dam and caused a significant breach of the north embankment. Options include replacement of the dam to meet current safety standards, removal of the dam, or restoration of the river channel with a series of rock weirs, or rock rapids, to retain water levels but to allow passage of small craft as well as the movement of fish. “We have a rare opportunity to reimagine how this stretch of river might function and look like in the future,” said project manager Jason Boyle. “We look forward to hearing from area residents and moving the project forward.” Discuss below - to view set the hook here.
    • opsirc
      Any new ice reports?  Looking For s something about Nicholas or strand
    • rundrave
      what if you pull a wheel house to Mn from out of state or are a non resident?