Guests - If You want access to member only forums on FM. You will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up on Fishing Minnesota.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

  • Announcements

    • Rick

      Members Only Fluid Forum View   08/08/2017

      Fluid forum view allows members only to get right to the meat of this community; the topics. You can toggle between your preferred forum view just below to the left on the main forum entrance. You will see three icons. Try them out and see what you prefer.   Fluid view allows you, if you are a signed up member, to see the newest topic posts in either all forums (select none or all) or in just your favorite forums (select the ones you want to see when you come to Fishing Minnesota). It keeps and in real time with respect to Topic posts and lets YOU SELECT YOUR FAVORITE FORUMS. It can make things fun and easy. This is especially true for less experienced visitors raised on social media. If you, as a members want more specific topics, you can even select a single forum to view. Let us take a look at fluid view in action. We will then break it down and explain how it works in more detail.   The video shows the topic list and the forum filter box. As you can see, it is easy to change the topic list by changing the selected forums. This view replaces the traditional list of categories and forums.   Of course, members only can change the view to better suit your way of browsing.   You will notice a “grid” option. We have moved the grid forum theme setting into the main forum settings. This makes it an option for members only to choose. This screenshot also shows the removal of the forum breadcrumb in fluid view mode. Fluid view remembers your last forum selection so you don’t lose your place when you go back to the listing. The benefit of this feature is easy to see. It removes a potential barrier of entry for members only. It puts the spotlight on topics themselves, and not the hierarchical forum structure. You as a member will enjoy viewing many forums at once and switching between them without leaving the page. We hope that fluid view, the new functionality is an asset that you enjoy .
Sign in to follow this  
Ryan_V

Ford 6.0 VS 7.3 Litre Diesel

Recommended Posts

Ryan_V    0
Ryan_V

Looking for a good used crew cab diesel. When looking at ford's, I've seen a few of the older 7.3's and some newer 6.0's. is there any advantage either way, is one better than the other, and if so why. What should I look for??? This would be my first diesel and want to make a good decition.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
cold one sd    0
cold one sd

I'm kind of looking too and leaning toward the 7.3 just because I have heard they are pretty bullet proof. They have had some problems with the early 6.0s. My brother has a 6.0 and claims it will "pull the socks off" a 7.3. I talked to another guy and he said the 6.0 pulls somewhat better than his Triton V10. I have the V10 at this time and it has all the power that I need. I wonder how a diesel would start after a 15 below night on the ice. Val seems to be rather fond of the Cummins in his Dodge. If I were looking to buy new, I would probably be looking at Dodges. I have heard that there may be a Mercedes diesel in them soon, but I don't know for sure.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
DEADhead    0
DEADhead

the early 6.0L engines had problems with the computer programming, and bad injectors which would dump raw fuel into the head causing massize engine damage. Both issues were fixed with recalls. The benefit of the 7.3L is that they are a tried and true design and will be cheaper to find than the new 6.0L. The drawback is trying to find a body that is still in good shape, in addition to the tranny and rest of the drivetrain.

The plus side to the 6.0L is the variable rate turbocharger they come with. The fins in the turbo will change direction during different boost levels, allowing for the best of both worlds: very little turbo lag, but good high end boost. Those two conditions are ususally inverse of each other, meaning you can usually only have one or the other, unless you went to two turbo units. Bottom line is, I use to have a 7.3L and would definitely reccomend the 6.0L for power, performance, and fuel economy.

BTW, starts at 15 below will be no problem as long as you run a winter weight diesel oil of 10w30 or pure synthetic. I'd rather try to turn the truck over with a warm crankcase, but the coldest wetaher I've started my old powerstroke without having it plugged in was 25 below.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Powerstroke    21
Powerstroke

I have to echo what deadhead has to say.

I personally owned a 7.3L Diesel in my F250. I ran like a champ and started every time, even though I never plugged it in.

The 6.0L is kinda hit or miss because of the problems that they had with it. For '07 the motor is actually being replaced by a twinturbo 6.4L motor and a design change on the exterior (maybe a full makeover). I'm gonna be looking at getting a crewcab diesel 4x4 in the next 12-18 months so I know how you feel.

I've always been a strong Ford guy, but I would have to say that I am leaning towards a lightly used Chevy with the Duramax/allison combo. Dodge would be the last on my list. I've never been impressed with their stuff EXCEPT for their motors. The motor is great, but if you can't put the power to the wheels then whats the point.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
LABS4ME    0
LABS4ME

As a current owner of (8) 7.3 powerstrokes, and (3) 6.0's, I'd personally look long and hard at a 7.3 in good shape. I actually can say everyone of our 7.3's gets better highway mileage and towing mileage than the trucks with the 6.0's. There is a little savings in the city with the 6.0's and they do have a better bottom end on the power band. Overall I can't say that they blew my socks off with the 6.0's, I feel they over hyped them and I don't feel they met the anticipated MPG. I average 15.5 overall and 18 on the highway... Our 7.3's would routinley hit 20-22 on the highway. When I tow with my 6.0 it easily dips to 12-14 depending on the weight, the 7.3's would go down to 14-15. My brother in law will be selling his as it used more fuel the last two years on his annual trips (where he can keep track of fuel used) and he verifies that he uses more with the 6.0 vs. his 7.3. I know 2 others who had there turbo go out on their 6.0 also.

I'll tell you this, they start no matter what the temp. I was up on Red with a -27 temp (not windchill) and the 6.0 started right up. I'd usually wake up at least once a night with the 7.3 to start it and let it run for a half hour in the middle of the night on the coldest nights.

Just an honest assessment from a FORD guy... yeah yeah yeah I agree the duramax is a nice motor and the cummins is something else too....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
DEADhead    0
DEADhead

Quote:

Our 7.3's would routinley hit 20-22 on the highway.


I suppose I didn't give a fair fuel economy comparison with my old truck... It was a '97 F250HD; the motor was an A225, not the a210s from '94-'96. No wastegate on the turbo. The best I ever got was about 19mpg running brand new 15w40 Rotella (CI-4) and running the Flint Hills Premium #2 Gold Fuel. But I was running 4.10s and not the 3.73s that most other powerstrokes I saw claiming 20mpg+ out there. I miss that truck, but not the fuel bill...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ryan_V    0
Ryan_V

Thanks for the info so far, you guys are a great wealth of information. Anyone else have their 2 cents?? I've looked at a few so far, missed a heckuva deal on one, and am still looking. Now, anyone know of any for sale?? I'd like a chevy with the duramax also, but they are a little more money than I can part with. Thanks again!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
JEV    0
JEV

For me it was a matter of proven reliability and performance. I picked up a used 2001 F350 with the 7.3 this spring. So far it's been a great truck. It's been like night and day when towing compared to my half ton. It gets better fuel mileage then my half ton with more power to boot. I have no complaints so far.

JEV

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
CodyDawg    0
CodyDawg

I have a 2002 with the 7.3 and love it. I average 16-17 mpg in town. My cousin has about 10, roughly half 7.3s and half 6.0s. He likes the 7.3 better and actually thinks the 6.0s are lacking in power.

You know what you are getting with a 7.3, thus I would go that way. Someone is gonna get a great truck when I decide to sell mine, but that wont be for awhile yet.

I have a buddy with the Duramax and for the most part he likes it, but has more problems than I have. That is only 1 example though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
iffwalleyes    0
iffwalleyes

At least you are looking at a diesel. I personally have a Duramax and I love it. I have drove several power strokes though and they have always impressed me as well. But I am a chevy guy at heart. I have had great luck with mine. And diesel motors in general reguardless of brand are just alot better than they used to be. Especially with the winter fuels and additives. I have had my start when it was -35 below. Not by choice though darn outlet I plugged into wasn't working mad.gif. A little stiff but it started all the same. Biggest thing with diesel is to keep the fuel filter fresh. I change mine every 12,000 miles so everyother oil change for me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ryan_V    0
Ryan_V

I would certainly take a chev with the duramax, but what I've found is that they are more $$. Generally, I'm looking for a good used 3/4 ton or 1 ton ford or chevy, crew cab, short box, diesel. these are the non negotiable facts, everything else is open. my budget is small, so it's probably a non-attainable goal, but I'm looking. found a few, but everytime I call on one, or go to look at one, it has just been sold!!! hopefully the right deal falls my way!! thanks for the advice so far!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
DEADhead    0
DEADhead

Quote:

And diesel motors in general reguardless of brand are just alot better than they used to be.


what's wrong with those gutless detroits they use to throw in those bowties? tongue.gifgrin.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
iffwalleyes    0
iffwalleyes

Quote:

Quote:

And diesel motors in general reguardless of brand are just alot better than they used to be.


what's wrong with those gutless detroits they use to throw in those bowties? tongue.gifgrin.gif


Well of course they did run for ever and you could rid the area of insects but they lacked power for sure grin.gif.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  



  • Posts

    • curt quesnell
        Fall is very nearby and things are going the way they should.  Fishing is good, it is too windy and the water is cooling down quickly.....On this weeks report and important bit on our very own Aquatic Invasive Species......Enjoy it!  
    • Wanderer
      That's understandable given how you use the back reel technique.  I haven't used it the same way. Most of my trolling is done with baitcasters or levelwinds with counters.  The jigging part I hadn't considered before. "David, have you ever parred with a 7 iron?" "Well, Roy, it never occurred to me to even try." 
    • Rick
      An independent laboratory has confirmed zebra mussel larvae in Garfield Lake in Hubbard County. The lab provided photos of two zebra mussel larvae, called veligers, found in a water sample taken from the lake. Property owners on Garfield Lake hired the lab as part of their own monitoring. Invasive species specialists from the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources found no zebra mussels in the lake during a six-hour dive survey. Garfield Lake will be added to the Infested Waters List for zebra mussels, with the provision that it may be removed from the list if future surveys continue to show no zebra mussels in the lake. Whether or not a lake is listed as infested, Minnesota law requires boaters and anglers to: Clean watercraft of aquatic plants and prohibited invasive species, Drain all water by removing drain plugs and keeping them out during transport, and Dispose of unwanted bait in the trash. Some invasive species are small and difficult to see at the access. To remove or kill them, take one or more of the following precautions before moving to another waterbody, especially after leaving infested waters: Spray with high-pressure water. Rinse with very hot water (120 degrees Fahrenheit for at least two minutes or 140 degrees Fahrenheit for at least 10 seconds). Dry for at least five days. As boat owners begin taking boats and equipment out of the water for the season, the DNR reminds them to carefully check for aquatic invasive species and contact the DNR with any suspected new infestations. Look on the posts, wheels and underwater support bars of docks and lifts, as well as any parts of boats, pontoons and rafts that may have been submerged in water for an extended period. Minnesota law requires that docks and lifts be allowed to dry for at least 21 days before being placed in another body of water, whether aquatic invasive species are present or not. People should contact an area DNR aquatic invasive species specialist if they think they have found zebra mussels or any other invasive species that has not already been confirmed in a lake. More information is available at www.mndnr.gov/AIS. Discuss below - to view set the hook here.
    • Rick
      City may apply for DNR pilot project treatment The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources has confirmed zebra mussels in Lake Marion, in the city of Lakeville, in Dakota County. Five adult zebra mussels were found at the public access by a lake consulting business, as part of an early detection monitoring program conducted for the city of Lakeville. The city may apply for a pilot project treatment after a more thorough search of the lake is completed. As boat owners begin taking boats and equipment out of the water for the season, the DNR reminds them to carefully check for aquatic invasive species and contact the DNR with any suspected new infestations. Look on the posts, wheels and underwater support bars of docks and lifts, as well as any parts of boats, pontoons and rafts that may have been submerged in water for an extended period. Minnesota law requires that docks and lifts be allowed to dry for at least 21 days before being placed in another body of water, whether aquatic invasive species are present or not. Minnesota law requires boaters and anglers to: Clean watercraft of aquatic plants and prohibited invasive species. Drain all water by removing drain plugs and keeping them out during transport, and Dispose of unwanted bait in the trash. Some invasive species are small and difficult to see at the access. To remove or kill them, take one or more of the following precautions before moving to another waterbody, especially after leaving infested waters: Spray with high-pressure water. Rinse with very hot water (120 degrees Fahrenheit for at least two minutes or 140 degrees Fahrenheit for at least 10 seconds). Dry for at least five days. People should contact an area DNR aquatic invasive species specialist if they think they have found zebra mussels or any other invasive species that has not already been confirmed in a lake. More information is available at www.mndnr.gov/AIS. Discuss below - to view set the hook here.
    • Rick
      Extensive multi-agency search showed no other zebra mussels The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources has confirmed that a single zebra mussel was removed from Lake Harriet in Minneapolis. Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board (MPRB) staff reported one adult zebra mussel on a boat cover recovered from the bottom of the lake. No additional zebra mussels were found during 67 hours of diving, snorkeling and wading searches involving the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, MPRB, two MPRB contractors and the DNR. Lake Harriet will be added to the Infested Waters List for zebra mussels, with the provision that it may be removed from the list if future surveys continue to show no zebra mussels in the lake. “We’re grateful that no zebra mussels were found during the extensive dive, snorkel and wading search of Lake Harriet,” said Heidi Wolf, DNR invasive species unit supervisor. “Strong partnerships and interagency cooperation are key, and we thank the Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board and the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District for their ongoing efforts. “While we regret that Lake Harriet will be added to the Infested Waters List because one zebra mussel was confirmed, we’re hopeful that the lake may be removed from the list if future searches continue to show no zebra mussels in the lake,” Wolf said. DNR invasive species specialist Keegan Lund said Lake Harriet will be carefully monitored the rest of this season and next year, but no treatment is necessary at this time. Lund said individual zebra mussels sometimes die after they are brought into a new lake, before they become established. “There is a common misperception that zebra mussels are everywhere and that their spread is inevitable. The reality is, of Minnesota’s 11,842 lakes, fewer than 250, about 1.8 percent, are listed as infested with zebra mussels. More Minnesotans than ever before are following our state’s invasive species laws,” Lund said. “People spread zebra mussels, and people can prevent their spread.” Whether or not a lake is listed as infested, Minnesota law requires boaters and anglers to: Clean watercraft of aquatic plants and prohibited invasive species. Drain all water by removing drain plugs and keeping them out during transport, and Dispose of unwanted bait in the trash. Some invasive species are small and difficult to see at the access. To remove or kill them, take one or more of the following precautions before moving to another waterbody, especially after leaving infested waters: Spray with high-pressure water. Rinse with very hot water (120 degrees Fahrenheit for at least two minutes or 140 degrees Fahrenheit for at least 10 seconds). Dry for at least five days. People should contact an area DNR aquatic invasive species specialist if they think they have found zebra mussels or any other invasive species that has not already been confirmed in a lake. More information is available at www.mndnr.gov/AIS. Discuss below - to view set the hook here.
    • Meterman
      I fish the big water of Minnesota side of Lake of the Woods almost exclusively and purchased my boat with what I will call "truck suspension" shock absorbing seats at the helm (first row).   In the waves of LOW, these will bottom out and your back still takes a pounding.   I am planning to replace the helm seats (will need seats, pedestal and base) with one of the above mentioned shock absorbing pedestals next spring.   My boat does have high sides so will need a taller pedestal. Looking for others to comment on their experiences with these.   Thanks.
    • Meterman
      I have typically used the back reeling feature more for letting out line when trolling or jigging.   When fighting a fish, I let the drag take care of business.   I guess it is just a pain to now get used to no back reeling on a new reel . . . may have to switch to another brand?
    • JBMasterAngler
      Well, fishing wasn't very good. But the weather certainly didn't help. Fished caribou the first day, marked lots of cisco and lakers, but no bites. Planned on bluewater on Monday, but because of the wind, we took the channel to trout instead. Caught several nice bluegills and a 30 inch pike. No lakers, but I did get stuck in weeds in 35 ft of water, never had that happen before. Was going to launch at same access on wabana on Tuesday, and go to bluewater, but wind was even worse. We took a drive and went up to Larson lake. Lost a nice pike, but nothing else. Thought for sure I'd at least catch 1 splake! Survived the storm that night. Stopped at pokegama on way home and fished for a couple hours. Lost a muskie, and had a big pike break my line. My son was really excited to catch his first rock bass. It would be nice to come back someday, but it might be awhile. Caribou could be good in the winter, maybe. Oh well. Final camping trip of the year is in the books!
    • BSLNORTH
    • BSLNORTH
      Hi, I am selling my 2012 Polaris Ranger 800 XP camo. Very low miles, 1200. Full hard cab, flip out glass windshield, windshield wiper, almost like new still. Great for ice fishing, hunting and work around the house.  I also have this ad on C.L.  10,000 b/0 text me for pics, thanks.  I am located in west metro 763-two34-0837