Guests - If You want access to member only forums on FM. You will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up on Fishing Minnesota.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

  • Announcements

    • Rick

      Members Only Fluid Forum View   08/08/2017

      Fluid forum view allows members only to get right to the meat of this community; the topics. You can toggle between your preferred forum view just below to the left on the main forum entrance. You will see three icons. Try them out and see what you prefer.   Fluid view allows you, if you are a signed up member, to see the newest topic posts in either all forums (select none or all) or in just your favorite forums (select the ones you want to see when you come to Fishing Minnesota). It keeps and in real time with respect to Topic posts and lets YOU SELECT YOUR FAVORITE FORUMS. It can make things fun and easy. This is especially true for less experienced visitors raised on social media. If you, as a members want more specific topics, you can even select a single forum to view. Let us take a look at fluid view in action. We will then break it down and explain how it works in more detail.   The video shows the topic list and the forum filter box. As you can see, it is easy to change the topic list by changing the selected forums. This view replaces the traditional list of categories and forums.   Of course, members only can change the view to better suit your way of browsing.   You will notice a “grid” option. We have moved the grid forum theme setting into the main forum settings. This makes it an option for members only to choose. This screenshot also shows the removal of the forum breadcrumb in fluid view mode. Fluid view remembers your last forum selection so you don’t lose your place when you go back to the listing. The benefit of this feature is easy to see. It removes a potential barrier of entry for members only. It puts the spotlight on topics themselves, and not the hierarchical forum structure. You as a member will enjoy viewing many forums at once and switching between them without leaving the page. We hope that fluid view, the new functionality is an asset that you enjoy .
Sign in to follow this  
Ryan_V

Ford 6.0 VS 7.3 Litre Diesel

Recommended Posts

Ryan_V    0
Ryan_V

Looking for a good used crew cab diesel. When looking at ford's, I've seen a few of the older 7.3's and some newer 6.0's. is there any advantage either way, is one better than the other, and if so why. What should I look for??? This would be my first diesel and want to make a good decition.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
cold one sd    0
cold one sd

I'm kind of looking too and leaning toward the 7.3 just because I have heard they are pretty bullet proof. They have had some problems with the early 6.0s. My brother has a 6.0 and claims it will "pull the socks off" a 7.3. I talked to another guy and he said the 6.0 pulls somewhat better than his Triton V10. I have the V10 at this time and it has all the power that I need. I wonder how a diesel would start after a 15 below night on the ice. Val seems to be rather fond of the Cummins in his Dodge. If I were looking to buy new, I would probably be looking at Dodges. I have heard that there may be a Mercedes diesel in them soon, but I don't know for sure.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
DEADhead    0
DEADhead

the early 6.0L engines had problems with the computer programming, and bad injectors which would dump raw fuel into the head causing massize engine damage. Both issues were fixed with recalls. The benefit of the 7.3L is that they are a tried and true design and will be cheaper to find than the new 6.0L. The drawback is trying to find a body that is still in good shape, in addition to the tranny and rest of the drivetrain.

The plus side to the 6.0L is the variable rate turbocharger they come with. The fins in the turbo will change direction during different boost levels, allowing for the best of both worlds: very little turbo lag, but good high end boost. Those two conditions are ususally inverse of each other, meaning you can usually only have one or the other, unless you went to two turbo units. Bottom line is, I use to have a 7.3L and would definitely reccomend the 6.0L for power, performance, and fuel economy.

BTW, starts at 15 below will be no problem as long as you run a winter weight diesel oil of 10w30 or pure synthetic. I'd rather try to turn the truck over with a warm crankcase, but the coldest wetaher I've started my old powerstroke without having it plugged in was 25 below.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Powerstroke    20
Powerstroke

I have to echo what deadhead has to say.

I personally owned a 7.3L Diesel in my F250. I ran like a champ and started every time, even though I never plugged it in.

The 6.0L is kinda hit or miss because of the problems that they had with it. For '07 the motor is actually being replaced by a twinturbo 6.4L motor and a design change on the exterior (maybe a full makeover). I'm gonna be looking at getting a crewcab diesel 4x4 in the next 12-18 months so I know how you feel.

I've always been a strong Ford guy, but I would have to say that I am leaning towards a lightly used Chevy with the Duramax/allison combo. Dodge would be the last on my list. I've never been impressed with their stuff EXCEPT for their motors. The motor is great, but if you can't put the power to the wheels then whats the point.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
LABS4ME    0
LABS4ME

As a current owner of (8) 7.3 powerstrokes, and (3) 6.0's, I'd personally look long and hard at a 7.3 in good shape. I actually can say everyone of our 7.3's gets better highway mileage and towing mileage than the trucks with the 6.0's. There is a little savings in the city with the 6.0's and they do have a better bottom end on the power band. Overall I can't say that they blew my socks off with the 6.0's, I feel they over hyped them and I don't feel they met the anticipated MPG. I average 15.5 overall and 18 on the highway... Our 7.3's would routinley hit 20-22 on the highway. When I tow with my 6.0 it easily dips to 12-14 depending on the weight, the 7.3's would go down to 14-15. My brother in law will be selling his as it used more fuel the last two years on his annual trips (where he can keep track of fuel used) and he verifies that he uses more with the 6.0 vs. his 7.3. I know 2 others who had there turbo go out on their 6.0 also.

I'll tell you this, they start no matter what the temp. I was up on Red with a -27 temp (not windchill) and the 6.0 started right up. I'd usually wake up at least once a night with the 7.3 to start it and let it run for a half hour in the middle of the night on the coldest nights.

Just an honest assessment from a FORD guy... yeah yeah yeah I agree the duramax is a nice motor and the cummins is something else too....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
DEADhead    0
DEADhead

Quote:

Our 7.3's would routinley hit 20-22 on the highway.


I suppose I didn't give a fair fuel economy comparison with my old truck... It was a '97 F250HD; the motor was an A225, not the a210s from '94-'96. No wastegate on the turbo. The best I ever got was about 19mpg running brand new 15w40 Rotella (CI-4) and running the Flint Hills Premium #2 Gold Fuel. But I was running 4.10s and not the 3.73s that most other powerstrokes I saw claiming 20mpg+ out there. I miss that truck, but not the fuel bill...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ryan_V    0
Ryan_V

Thanks for the info so far, you guys are a great wealth of information. Anyone else have their 2 cents?? I've looked at a few so far, missed a heckuva deal on one, and am still looking. Now, anyone know of any for sale?? I'd like a chevy with the duramax also, but they are a little more money than I can part with. Thanks again!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
JEV    0
JEV

For me it was a matter of proven reliability and performance. I picked up a used 2001 F350 with the 7.3 this spring. So far it's been a great truck. It's been like night and day when towing compared to my half ton. It gets better fuel mileage then my half ton with more power to boot. I have no complaints so far.

JEV

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
CodyDawg    0
CodyDawg

I have a 2002 with the 7.3 and love it. I average 16-17 mpg in town. My cousin has about 10, roughly half 7.3s and half 6.0s. He likes the 7.3 better and actually thinks the 6.0s are lacking in power.

You know what you are getting with a 7.3, thus I would go that way. Someone is gonna get a great truck when I decide to sell mine, but that wont be for awhile yet.

I have a buddy with the Duramax and for the most part he likes it, but has more problems than I have. That is only 1 example though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
iffwalleyes    0
iffwalleyes

At least you are looking at a diesel. I personally have a Duramax and I love it. I have drove several power strokes though and they have always impressed me as well. But I am a chevy guy at heart. I have had great luck with mine. And diesel motors in general reguardless of brand are just alot better than they used to be. Especially with the winter fuels and additives. I have had my start when it was -35 below. Not by choice though darn outlet I plugged into wasn't working mad.gif. A little stiff but it started all the same. Biggest thing with diesel is to keep the fuel filter fresh. I change mine every 12,000 miles so everyother oil change for me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ryan_V    0
Ryan_V

I would certainly take a chev with the duramax, but what I've found is that they are more $$. Generally, I'm looking for a good used 3/4 ton or 1 ton ford or chevy, crew cab, short box, diesel. these are the non negotiable facts, everything else is open. my budget is small, so it's probably a non-attainable goal, but I'm looking. found a few, but everytime I call on one, or go to look at one, it has just been sold!!! hopefully the right deal falls my way!! thanks for the advice so far!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
DEADhead    0
DEADhead

Quote:

And diesel motors in general reguardless of brand are just alot better than they used to be.


what's wrong with those gutless detroits they use to throw in those bowties? tongue.gifgrin.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
iffwalleyes    0
iffwalleyes

Quote:

Quote:

And diesel motors in general reguardless of brand are just alot better than they used to be.


what's wrong with those gutless detroits they use to throw in those bowties? tongue.gifgrin.gif


Well of course they did run for ever and you could rid the area of insects but they lacked power for sure grin.gif.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  



  • Posts

    • delcecchi
      About 69 this morning.... And this concludes my reporting until sometime in 2018, Lord willing. But I will still be watching....
    • delcecchi
      I will add that it is nothing like the old days when throwing a marker was practically life threatening..... But that is west end.   If it wasn't for the musky  guys there would only be like three of us...
    • delcecchi
      Told my wife I wanted to watch hooker....  she said " you aren't watching any hookers while I'm around"   rim shot.
    • Rick
      The public access on Grand Lake in Stearns County will be temporarily closed Wednesday, Thursday and Friday from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. for hand removal of starry stonewort. This temporary closure is necessary for the safety of workers and divers.  A relatively light population of the invasive algae was recently confirmed around the Grand Lake public access, following a coordinated starry stonewort search involving 200 trained detectors in 20 counties. DNR invasive species specialists will hand-pull starry stonewort while preserving native aquatic plants. Starry stonewort has never been eradicated from any lake in the United States, but treatment can ease access and recreational use of a lake, while helping to reduce the risk of infestation to other water bodies. Discuss below - to view set the hook here.
    • TomWehler
      Skunked.  Reruns on late nite so watch Hooker for laughs. Never saw it much in 1983. Shatter is Kirk as Hooker. To fun. He an his three self trained rookies are the answer to everything  the only squad with action an Hooker solves every case by end of show ending with a real dramatic line an stop action shot  acting is really bad but fun. City neeeds Hooker an he an crew kick it into high gear. Real 80's corn. Locklear n James Darren an Adrain Zmed prove trying to act is not hard but acting is. Total fun an totally predictable. Best lure I been use in is a simple black buck tail an a huge ol red n white spoon. Wallys like my raps dragged on a 2oz bottom bouncer an pike for some reason been eating my worms on a floaty. Smaller are a hoot an my Hounds love the action. Speaking of action. I have never seen a show with as much running in it as TJ Hooker. Ol Capt. Kirk is always on the go. "You call it in. I'll get'nm". "I want him bad. Ya hear. BAD".   :  ). I sure miss my pup Moe Rock. Bummer so this is a treat. Keep on rocken!  Fish on. T
    • RoosterMan
      Had right around 70 give or take a degree this weekend.  East end
    • gimruis
      Here are some of the toads we have been catching on the Rum River this summer.  The biggest has been 19 1/4 inches.
    • gimruis
      I agree with rudrave, a boat will open up a lot more opportunities to fish off shore.  You could get a brand new 16 foot fishing boat with a 25 hp motor and a basic sonar unit with trailer for about $10 grand and that sort of rig would get you on a lot of small to medium-sized lakes in addition to rivers around here.
    • Fish Head
      Enjoy your well-deserved retirement Ace. I'm glad we'll still be hearing from you.          
    • Rick
      The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources has confirmed Hubbard County’s first case of Eurasian watermilfoil, an invasive aquatic plant, in Bad Axe Lake near Emmaville. DNR invasive species specialists confirmed Eurasian watermilfoil around the resort access to the lake. They reported it did not appear to be widespread into other areas of the lake. Eurasian watermilfoil can limit recreational activities on water bodies by forming mats on the water surface, and can alter aquatic ecosystems by displacing native plants. It is typically spread when plant fragments have not been properly cleaned from trailered boats, personal watercraft, docks, boat lifts, anchors or other water-related equipment. Treatment options include selective herbicides and mechanical removal, to minimize the plant’s impact while protecting native aquatic plant species. Treatment is unlikely to eradicate Eurasian watermilfoil from a lake. It may minimize impacts, but rarely prevents broader dispersion within a lake. This new confirmation is a reminder to boaters and anglers to follow Minnesota laws to prevent the spread of aquatic invasive species: Clean aquatic plants and animals from watercraft. Drain all water by removing drain plugs and keep drain plugs out while transporting watercraft. Dispose of unwanted bait in the trash. Some invasive species are small and difficult to see at the access. To remove or kill them, take one or more of the following precautions before moving to another waterbody, especially after leaving infested waters: Spray with high-pressure water. Rinse with very hot water (120 degrees Fahrenheit for at least two minutes or 140 degrees Fahrenheit for at least 10 seconds). Dry for at least five days. Details about Eurasian watermilfoil and other aquatic invasive species are available at mndnr.gov/ais. Discuss below - to view set the hook here.