Guests - If You want access to member only forums on FM. You will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up on Fishing Minnesota.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

  • Announcements

    • Rick

      Members Only Fluid Forum View   08/08/2017

      Fluid forum view allows members only to get right to the meat of this community; the topics. You can toggle between your preferred forum view just below to the left on the main forum entrance. You will see three icons. Try them out and see what you prefer.   Fluid view allows you, if you are a signed up member, to see the newest topic posts in either all forums (select none or all) or in just your favorite forums (select the ones you want to see when you come to Fishing Minnesota). It keeps and in real time with respect to Topic posts and lets YOU SELECT YOUR FAVORITE FORUMS. It can make things fun and easy. This is especially true for less experienced visitors raised on social media. If you, as a members want more specific topics, you can even select a single forum to view. Let us take a look at fluid view in action. We will then break it down and explain how it works in more detail.   The video shows the topic list and the forum filter box. As you can see, it is easy to change the topic list by changing the selected forums. This view replaces the traditional list of categories and forums.   Of course, members only can change the view to better suit your way of browsing.   You will notice a “grid” option. We have moved the grid forum theme setting into the main forum settings. This makes it an option for members only to choose. This screenshot also shows the removal of the forum breadcrumb in fluid view mode. Fluid view remembers your last forum selection so you don’t lose your place when you go back to the listing. The benefit of this feature is easy to see. It removes a potential barrier of entry for members only. It puts the spotlight on topics themselves, and not the hierarchical forum structure. You as a member will enjoy viewing many forums at once and switching between them without leaving the page. We hope that fluid view, the new functionality is an asset that you enjoy .
Sign in to follow this  
MIKE IN lINO III

Shooting Deer Illegally OK with Director

Recommended Posts

MIKE IN lINO III    0
MIKE IN lINO III

I read an article about a young TRUE sportsman this morning on the Tribune web page this morning. While I applaud the young man for his decision not to shot too early I can not believe the comment by the Executive Director stating that it could/would have been ok.

His quote:

"Five minutes on one side or another, a conservation officer might not have a problem with that,'' said Mark Johnson, executive director of the Minnesota Deer Hunters Association.

Seem to me that he is advocating breaking the law.

Hopefully it was taken out of context.

Thoughts?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
zrmo440    0
zrmo440

You would think that it has too have been misinterpreted. I can't imagine someone from MDHA coming out and blatently saying that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
pumper317    0
pumper317

it is only five minutes. it isnt like he said 30 minutes one side or the other. I agree with mr johnson. No ones watches are the same time, so who is to say. I mean i agree completely with the law, and try to follow to the best of my ability, but it is not worth blaming a guy saying he is ok with breaking the law. I think you read too much into it personally.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
BobT    104
BobT

I hope we don't all have to synchronize our watches with the international clocks before we go out. Sure glad I have my GPS with me calibrated to correctly offset the time to my position.

I agree. There are times when we tend to take things too literal but then there are times when we tend to do just the opposite as well.

Bob

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
bigbucks    6
bigbucks

It's great he did that, but to be truly honest I'd say at least 50% of the deer hunters out there in that situation would take that shot. I'm sure I'll get bashed for this, but I know it's true & would say it's probably much higher than that.

Okay I forgot to hit shift when I wanted the percent hence the 505 that's now been corrected to 50%.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
pumper317    0
pumper317

i would say more than 505 people would shoot there. True sportsmen are not measured by there ability to tell time. sorry mike

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
fishnhuntnboy    0
fishnhuntnboy

I would have to go with everyone else. Honestly I think if you had a trophy one in a lifetime buck infront of you, you cant say that you wont shoot if it is 5 min before/after times. Like everyone said no ones watch is exactly the same.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
MIKE IN lINO III    0
MIKE IN lINO III

I thought it was an interesteing comment. Being out in that young mans situation I might have a hard time with holding back alao.

Now, I hunt ducks and I read the threads about shooting 2-5 minutes early and it is totally different. It really gets some people worked up. I guess duck hunters can tell time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
BLACKJACK    3
BLACKJACK

Especially on duck hunting its alwasy interesting to see how early you hear the first shot. 10 minutes before the hour is almost normal, at times I've heard shots 15-20 minutes before opener, and you go 'what the *&^%$'??!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
zrmo440    0
zrmo440

I don't see why he needed to come out and say it like that. If its generally understood between hunters that they are going to shoot a deer 5 minutes before legal shooting time, then shoot the deer. My point is that the non hunting public is going to read it as a blatent violation of the law. I just dont think its the right thing for the leader of a hunting organization to say.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
UdeLakeTom    0
UdeLakeTom

So how many times have we been heading out to our stands and figuring we will get there about time to start shooting, and somebody is already shooting. Most of the time, I can's see in front of me yet.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hammer Handle    0
Hammer Handle

Salmon fishing in Alaska, if you dro your nets 30 seconds before the CO thinks season is open...you can be fined thousands of dollars....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
lawdog    0
lawdog

I personally think if you know its time, then its time and you absolutely don't shoot (or conversely if you know it isn't time yet...). But honestly I don't know that many guys sit around and check the watch every minute. That's probably what he meant by you could be off a few minutes (especially when combined with what a watch may be off). I have no problem with not knowing the exact second because honestly not even the sunrise/sunset tables are that accurate, but you have to make a good effort to be right.

If he's openly saying, hey even if you know its five minutes past or before shooting time, go ahead, then that's telling him to go ahead and break the law and that's just plain wrong.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
bigbucks    6
bigbucks

I can't speak for your situation. I know those who have stands on field edges can often see pretty well in the field a bit before legal light, while those in the woods, might still have trouble seeing a deer well. There are definitely those shots that you know are too early & others that you, think well it's got to be about that time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
chucker34    0
chucker34

You will notice the regs talk about half an hour before and after sunrise and sunset, not by any specific hour and minute. You use your judgement, if you can see the deer, shoot.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
BobT    104
BobT

Actually the law is more specific than that. Sunrise and sunset are both defined to the minute along with a table to caculate the offset based on your location. It's all in the handbook. This surely seems to specify a rather particular time of day. In the end, it would still be somewhat of a judgement call on the part of an arresting officer.

Bob

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Bandit    0
Bandit

I hunt in the woods, I can't see the sunrise or set, and I don't wear a watch. I suppose I'm bad, but I always figured if I could see what it was then it's close enough. If it's not a fawn, it's probably in trouble.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
analyzer    2
analyzer

This season I shot a doe, I waited until almost the end of shooting light to start back to the truck so I could bring it around to pick up the deer (farm country, SE MN). As I'm walking the mile or so back to the truck, a big buck walks out of the thicket in front of me. I can tell it's a big mature deer, and assume it's a buck by the deep gutteral grunt it throws at me, and the indignant stomp. But I can't see it's rack very clearly, and I know it's probably 10 minutes or so past legal shooting.

I did the right thing and passed on the shot, but I've been kinda kickin myself for the last 5 months. I know this though, had it been any closer to the legal shooting time, I doubt if I take the time to check my watch. I'm putting a bead on him, and taking him down.

I am VERY regs conscious. I read the time tables and calculate as best as possible the appropriate shooting time. But in this example, it's going to happen too quickly. I did consider the time, but had it been closer, there's no way I have time to check the watch first, he's only there for a fleeting second or two.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
SpearPike    13
SpearPike

I also read this article. At the end of the article is says the young man used his cell phone to call his dad. Am I wrong or isn't illegal to use a cell phone while big game hunting. It says in the regs unlawful to use while taking big game. If it is illegal they should be giving him a fine not an award.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
BobT    104
BobT

It isn't illegal to use cell phones but it is illegal to use them for the purpose of taking game.

 Quote:
Radios and Other Wireless Devices

• Using walkie talkies, cell phones, remote control or other radio

equipment to take big game or small game is unlawful.

Bob

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Wanderer    313
Wanderer

The point being, when Bob and I are making a drive, I can't call him and say, "Hurry up! Get around the North side of the woods. There's two tens and fourteen coming. Let the tens pass!" (Illegal)

VS

"Bob, I forgot my watch and water bottle in the truck. Could you bring them to my stand for me?" ;\) (Legal, but lazy)

***No, Bob and I don't hunt together****

Re-read the Director's qoute guys. He said he didn't think a CO would have a problem with +/- 5 mins. Thats all. No mention of his personal recommendations according to the first post.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
james_walleye    81
james_walleye

Ok here is something i'm surprised hasnt been brought up here. The young man was 12 years old and the article stated he and his dad walked to seperate stands. They were far enough away from each other that the dad had to ask his son if he had shot the deer. He wasnt even close enough to hear if his son had shot?? The hunting regs state that 12 and 13 year olds MUST be accompanied by an adult does it not?? So i'm confused. Either something was left out of the article (mom was sitting there, uncle was sitting there), there is a loophole in the law that the adult does not have to actually be physically sitting there with the youth which i can't believe would be true, or a game law was broken. Anyone else wondering about this??? Its my understanding the accompanying adult must be right there with the youth.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
james_walleye    81
james_walleye

Ok i called the DNR in St. Paul about what i stated. The adult must be within earshot of the youth. I still question the situation though as it was stated the father had to question the youth on whether he shot the deer. If he was in earshot wouldnt he have known that his son didnt shoot?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
whitetailfreak    0
whitetailfreak

i would have to agree to. 5 min either way isnt gunna be a big difference.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Crappyman    0
Crappyman

Sorry guys but I have to disagree that it is OK to shoot 5 minutes early. The law is the law and we can't tolerate people that knowingly disregard the laws. If 5 minutes are OK then why isn't 8 minutes? Laws are laws and as sportsman, we should respect the laws and encourage all others to do the same. Why do duck hunters get upset when someone shoots early? Because most hunters do try to follow the rules and then you get some meathead that thinks they are above the law and fires early thus screwing things up for those of us that are trying to play the game by the rules. It was wrong for the guy from the MDHA to say it was OK to shoot early. I will be sending a note to the MDHA to voice my disappointment.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  



  • Posts

    • curt quesnell
        Fall is very nearby and things are going the way they should.  Fishing is good, it is too windy and the water is cooling down quickly.....On this weeks report and important bit on our very own Aquatic Invasive Species......Enjoy it!  
    • Wanderer
      That's understandable given how you use the back reel technique.  I haven't used it the same way. Most of my trolling is done with baitcasters or levelwinds with counters.  The jigging part I hadn't considered before. "David, have you ever parred with a 7 iron?" "Well, Roy, it never occurred to me to even try." 
    • Rick
      An independent laboratory has confirmed zebra mussel larvae in Garfield Lake in Hubbard County. The lab provided photos of two zebra mussel larvae, called veligers, found in a water sample taken from the lake. Property owners on Garfield Lake hired the lab as part of their own monitoring. Invasive species specialists from the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources found no zebra mussels in the lake during a six-hour dive survey. Garfield Lake will be added to the Infested Waters List for zebra mussels, with the provision that it may be removed from the list if future surveys continue to show no zebra mussels in the lake. Whether or not a lake is listed as infested, Minnesota law requires boaters and anglers to: Clean watercraft of aquatic plants and prohibited invasive species, Drain all water by removing drain plugs and keeping them out during transport, and Dispose of unwanted bait in the trash. Some invasive species are small and difficult to see at the access. To remove or kill them, take one or more of the following precautions before moving to another waterbody, especially after leaving infested waters: Spray with high-pressure water. Rinse with very hot water (120 degrees Fahrenheit for at least two minutes or 140 degrees Fahrenheit for at least 10 seconds). Dry for at least five days. As boat owners begin taking boats and equipment out of the water for the season, the DNR reminds them to carefully check for aquatic invasive species and contact the DNR with any suspected new infestations. Look on the posts, wheels and underwater support bars of docks and lifts, as well as any parts of boats, pontoons and rafts that may have been submerged in water for an extended period. Minnesota law requires that docks and lifts be allowed to dry for at least 21 days before being placed in another body of water, whether aquatic invasive species are present or not. People should contact an area DNR aquatic invasive species specialist if they think they have found zebra mussels or any other invasive species that has not already been confirmed in a lake. More information is available at www.mndnr.gov/AIS. Discuss below - to view set the hook here.
    • Rick
      City may apply for DNR pilot project treatment The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources has confirmed zebra mussels in Lake Marion, in the city of Lakeville, in Dakota County. Five adult zebra mussels were found at the public access by a lake consulting business, as part of an early detection monitoring program conducted for the city of Lakeville. The city may apply for a pilot project treatment after a more thorough search of the lake is completed. As boat owners begin taking boats and equipment out of the water for the season, the DNR reminds them to carefully check for aquatic invasive species and contact the DNR with any suspected new infestations. Look on the posts, wheels and underwater support bars of docks and lifts, as well as any parts of boats, pontoons and rafts that may have been submerged in water for an extended period. Minnesota law requires that docks and lifts be allowed to dry for at least 21 days before being placed in another body of water, whether aquatic invasive species are present or not. Minnesota law requires boaters and anglers to: Clean watercraft of aquatic plants and prohibited invasive species. Drain all water by removing drain plugs and keeping them out during transport, and Dispose of unwanted bait in the trash. Some invasive species are small and difficult to see at the access. To remove or kill them, take one or more of the following precautions before moving to another waterbody, especially after leaving infested waters: Spray with high-pressure water. Rinse with very hot water (120 degrees Fahrenheit for at least two minutes or 140 degrees Fahrenheit for at least 10 seconds). Dry for at least five days. People should contact an area DNR aquatic invasive species specialist if they think they have found zebra mussels or any other invasive species that has not already been confirmed in a lake. More information is available at www.mndnr.gov/AIS. Discuss below - to view set the hook here.
    • Rick
      Extensive multi-agency search showed no other zebra mussels The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources has confirmed that a single zebra mussel was removed from Lake Harriet in Minneapolis. Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board (MPRB) staff reported one adult zebra mussel on a boat cover recovered from the bottom of the lake. No additional zebra mussels were found during 67 hours of diving, snorkeling and wading searches involving the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, MPRB, two MPRB contractors and the DNR. Lake Harriet will be added to the Infested Waters List for zebra mussels, with the provision that it may be removed from the list if future surveys continue to show no zebra mussels in the lake. “We’re grateful that no zebra mussels were found during the extensive dive, snorkel and wading search of Lake Harriet,” said Heidi Wolf, DNR invasive species unit supervisor. “Strong partnerships and interagency cooperation are key, and we thank the Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board and the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District for their ongoing efforts. “While we regret that Lake Harriet will be added to the Infested Waters List because one zebra mussel was confirmed, we’re hopeful that the lake may be removed from the list if future searches continue to show no zebra mussels in the lake,” Wolf said. DNR invasive species specialist Keegan Lund said Lake Harriet will be carefully monitored the rest of this season and next year, but no treatment is necessary at this time. Lund said individual zebra mussels sometimes die after they are brought into a new lake, before they become established. “There is a common misperception that zebra mussels are everywhere and that their spread is inevitable. The reality is, of Minnesota’s 11,842 lakes, fewer than 250, about 1.8 percent, are listed as infested with zebra mussels. More Minnesotans than ever before are following our state’s invasive species laws,” Lund said. “People spread zebra mussels, and people can prevent their spread.” Whether or not a lake is listed as infested, Minnesota law requires boaters and anglers to: Clean watercraft of aquatic plants and prohibited invasive species. Drain all water by removing drain plugs and keeping them out during transport, and Dispose of unwanted bait in the trash. Some invasive species are small and difficult to see at the access. To remove or kill them, take one or more of the following precautions before moving to another waterbody, especially after leaving infested waters: Spray with high-pressure water. Rinse with very hot water (120 degrees Fahrenheit for at least two minutes or 140 degrees Fahrenheit for at least 10 seconds). Dry for at least five days. People should contact an area DNR aquatic invasive species specialist if they think they have found zebra mussels or any other invasive species that has not already been confirmed in a lake. More information is available at www.mndnr.gov/AIS. Discuss below - to view set the hook here.
    • Meterman
      I fish the big water of Minnesota side of Lake of the Woods almost exclusively and purchased my boat with what I will call "truck suspension" shock absorbing seats at the helm (first row).   In the waves of LOW, these will bottom out and your back still takes a pounding.   I am planning to replace the helm seats (will need seats, pedestal and base) with one of the above mentioned shock absorbing pedestals next spring.   My boat does have high sides so will need a taller pedestal. Looking for others to comment on their experiences with these.   Thanks.
    • Meterman
      I have typically used the back reeling feature more for letting out line when trolling or jigging.   When fighting a fish, I let the drag take care of business.   I guess it is just a pain to now get used to no back reeling on a new reel . . . may have to switch to another brand?
    • JBMasterAngler
      Well, fishing wasn't very good. But the weather certainly didn't help. Fished caribou the first day, marked lots of cisco and lakers, but no bites. Planned on bluewater on Monday, but because of the wind, we took the channel to trout instead. Caught several nice bluegills and a 30 inch pike. No lakers, but I did get stuck in weeds in 35 ft of water, never had that happen before. Was going to launch at same access on wabana on Tuesday, and go to bluewater, but wind was even worse. We took a drive and went up to Larson lake. Lost a nice pike, but nothing else. Thought for sure I'd at least catch 1 splake! Survived the storm that night. Stopped at pokegama on way home and fished for a couple hours. Lost a muskie, and had a big pike break my line. My son was really excited to catch his first rock bass. It would be nice to come back someday, but it might be awhile. Caribou could be good in the winter, maybe. Oh well. Final camping trip of the year is in the books!
    • BSLNORTH
    • BSLNORTH
      Hi, I am selling my 2012 Polaris Ranger 800 XP camo. Very low miles, 1200. Full hard cab, flip out glass windshield, windshield wiper, almost like new still. Great for ice fishing, hunting and work around the house.  I also have this ad on C.L.  10,000 b/0 text me for pics, thanks.  I am located in west metro 763-two34-0837