Guests - If You want access to member only forums on FM. You will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up on Fishing Minnesota.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
steeplechaser2

How Much Is TOO Much....

20 posts in this topic

I keep my fair share of fish...I'm not a fanatical C & R guy, but I have to admit that watching a few guys harvest 20 catfish on Saturday was a little to swallow...I know I know it was their legal limit, but 60+ pounds of catfish seemed a little overboard...now, maybe it was made that much worse by my inability to land more than a few....but I think we gotta keep in mind that the ecosystem is a little fragile....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

what are they going to do with all them? Way more than enough to eat for a meal.Stock the freezer so they can forget about them and throw away next year. I'm sorry but i just don't understand why people keep that many fish. I think its better to keep them than just throw them on the ice like i have seen before out at cedar island.Was out there last year and seen a good pile on the ice. Dnr came out there and gave me a card so if we seen someone doing it to call him.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 Originally Posted By: steeplechaser2
that watching a few guys

How many guys is a 'few' guys? Are we talking 3,5, or 10? 20 fish for 'x' amount of people will put your allegation into better perspective.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well if they want to clean 20 catfish that is their penalty I guess. That is a lot of fish to eat, maybe they are having a huge fish fry or something, otherwise that is overkill. We caught quite a few tonight out on the chain and we took home 2 of them to try. The walleyes were what I was hoping for but only managed to catch a few nice smallies and some big catfish. Still a good time. Also, good thing there was a definte road, otherwise we would still be trying to find our way off the lake, that fog was thick!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The way I understand it from a few hardcore catfisherfolk, and from one very well known fishing magazine, there are hundreds,if not thousands of cats in the chain in the various holes there.These areas are wintering areas, and hold large numbers of fish.Cats can get really finicky in the winter,so fish catching success can vary from one day to the next, and is not indicative of 'too' many fish taken form one area.If these guys caught their legal number of cats,I don't see a problem with it.Channel cats are a pretty profolic species, so taking 20 out of a lake isn't going to hurt the local population.I should also add I am not throwing selective harvest out the window,either.Fishermen have to use their head when it comes to keeping a few fish.Bigger fish go back into the system if I am catching any. Does it mean I am advocating going gonzo,and taking more than a legal limit? Absolutely not.Read my post on wanton waste in a thread from a couple of days ago in this forum.My reply here may ruffle a few feathers,but I think the fact these guys kept a few cats is much ado about nothing.I'll jump off the soapbox for now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Guess I don't have a big problem with folks keeping channel cats to eat from the H-Chain. Least they were taken home to eat rather than left on the ice which is a practice that also happens quite frequently up there.

What I'm more concerned about is folks don't realize they can have only 1 cat over 24" in possession. The limit is 5 cats with 1 over 24". Measure those H-Chain cats next time when you are keeping fish, 24" is pretty easy to exceed.

What I am happy to see here is concern for that special fishery. There are folks out there who would rather not see channel cats in that lake period. They are real abundant and can be a nuisance in the summer. Bass guys catch them. Walleye guys catch them. Panfish guys catch them. Heck... cat guys catch them too! I know for a fact the MN DNR is even netting catfish out of Horseshoe to transplant in many of the lakes around the Twin Cities metro area.

There is no doubt the lake is becoming more popular for catfishing. Shoot... catfishing in general is becoming a lot more popular.

I've talked to a few COs up there who are on the lookout for fisherman leaving cats on the ice to die. Its a pretty darn hefty ticket to if they cite you for that. These COs have also confirmed the DNR netting.

Guess I'm not really sure where I was going with that other than there are other issues that have a major impact on the cat population than a few fisherman keeping their limit. Hope that makes sense.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hanson,you,dtro and a few others have more experience on the chain fishing cats than I do. I was trying to relay in my prior post what I was told by others. One guy told me of seeing hundreds of fish in one spot, on an underwater camera.I agree with you on the possibility of some not watching the size limit, as well as the possession limit.Having people who watch for the good resource as a whole is fine,but where does the line get drawn with folks going overboard towards others who are keeping fish? If there is a problem with folks keeping too many cats out of the chain,the DNR will have to reduce the bag limits.Simple, really.Wanton waste of these fish is a huge issue with me, as I eluded to on the previous Cedar Island thread.Common sense, and a little bit of knowledge about selective harvest is all a guy needs to do it right in keeping a few fish. Does everybody have those two things to do it right? Well, I will leave that one alone.

My first cat,caught earlier this winter out of the chain, was longer than 24 inches.I immediately released it back into the hole.That being said,there is obviously bigger fish to catch out there.I am definitely looking forward to the next trip there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I feel your concern Rockman. The cats have been getting pounded more in the last couple of years, and the fishing pressure on them has increased significantly. I don't have scientific evidence, but it seems the cats as a whole have gotten smaller the last year or two and the big fish are now tougher to come by. There are still big fish out there, and beleive me that there's still lots of fish out there. Heck, I was on the chain yesterday and dropped the camera down into a school of what was easily 75-100 fish. I'd love to see the DNR do some studies on the cats in the chain, and increase the regulations accordingly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

so haaad, do you think that is because there is too much harvest going on of those bigger sized fish, or is it because the fish are reacting accordingly to the increase in the fishing pressure? My intention of fishing cats was/is to catch them just for the fun of it, not necessarily keeping any to eat.A couple small to medium sized fish to harvest would be fine for me, and that is about it. Fishing pressure has to be having an effect on the cats daily patterns vs. decreased fishing pressure from some time ago.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think it's both overharvesting of mature cats in select areas and an increase in fishing pressure. Like I said, I don't have scientific evidence. But those fish are getting pounded.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

steeplechaser2, these guy's had all the right to keep there limit. Crappie, bluegill, walleye, perch fisherman keep there limits just as well. We give the DNR huge amounts of money every year to keep the populations of fish in check. These guys could very well of caught nothing on previous outings makeing the 20 cats not seem like too many to them. As for the cats, I've C&R hundreds on the chain, and many of my buddies also, and probably most others C&R chain cats. I wish more would keep them, the population of cats in the chain is far too extreme, they eat young game fish. Leaving cats on the ice to waste is stupid.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I guess I would be lying if I said that I wasn't concerned about overharvest, because it could become an issue, if its not already.

You are definitely right Rockman about cats holing up in the winter. They pile into them making them very susceptible to angling pressure.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hard to believe that angling pressure alone could affect the cat population out there. Then again, Mille Lacs is a huge lake with the same problem.

Either way, it's unacceptable for so many reasons to leave fish out to die because you don't want them swimming in your lakes.

The primitive and uneducated have been trying to eradicate dogfish from Minnesota.......since the beginning of time.......and it's not working so well.

Hopefully it's a pressure/location thing, not a population thing. Maybe a special fishery deserves some special regs. I'll stop short of ranting on C & R.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

not to start a war, but i heard these cats are hard on the small sunfish. is this accurate. stories of cats having 20plus little sunnies in there bellies. that alone makes me not like them since they are not original to the lake to start with. more interested in what there typical meal is than anything.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

not sure, just know that the spot we were in has always been a solid choice for us for late-season walleyes and crappies...we caught none of these and a mess of cats. Had never before caught a cat in this spot...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure about the small sunfish. I know in the winter time you will find very little in a cat's stomach. Their feeding/eating habits change dramatically in the winter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you could look at this many different ways. They could be stockin up on some fish, they could be having a fish fry for the end of the year, they could just really love eating fish, or they could be taking more then they really need and could be wasting. Its a touchy subject cause you dont really want to walk up to them and tell them there wrong when in the laws eye they are right, but its more ethics then anything. If they had good intentions of eating the fish with no wasting i see nothing wrong. I have more of a problem with the guys who keep 10-12 inch walleyes

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

this time of year alot of people have fish feeds for lent. So that would be my guess. I love catfish and this time of the year is when they taste the best so ya if my freezer wasnt full of deer meat I to would probably stock up on some of the best catfish meat of the year.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

you could always put the deermeat in my freezer! yummy!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I see no problem with harvesting that many fish as long as it's in your legal limit, plus if they were having a fish fry, that would feed quite a few people and catfish taste pretty darn good.

As far as the sunnies go they do eat some small panfish, but with the amount of water in the chain, they aren't going to affect it much. Tha=e chain is still amazing for panfish.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • OhioVike
      With social media the new normal is for people to rant the open airways.  Unfortunately, some times people cross the line. I don't think that has happened here, but I would also say that I have sympathy for the new owners of the Landing.  I continue to go there knowing I will pay more than I generally would want to.  I would probably go more if their prices were lower as they are much closer to me than The Crescent.  
    • cookie129
      Another sunrise and another sunset made my day yesterday as I  enjoyed a day on such a grand lake. I spent part of the morning in old Minnesota making some phone calls, planning my day and even wetting a line.
       Berry and his crew Ted, Mike  and Scott had left early do to the weather conditions in southern Minnesota. They only managed 3 more fish after the move. "Stupid fish".
       I hung out in old minnesota until the generator ran out of gas so I could figure out how long it ran on a tank. !0 1/2 hours as she quit running at 8:30 am. Sure would be nice to have that burg system? Oh that's right its in the snow bank . "Stupid thing" not sure why it fails.
       After fueling up the generator I made the morning rounds to be a little disappointed with the fishing report "Stupid fish" Oh well as Wayne always says if we caught them all there would not be any to catch.
       I then went over to clean and prep Montana for Brian and Stacy as they were coming up for there 25th anniversary.
        I also gave Reid and Jason a couple tips as they were off to find the very elusive yet still catchable upper red lake crappie. They only caught one walleye in North Carolina so I told them when they came back it would be in a new spot.
       I then said goodbye to Steve from Michigan  and his crew in Florida. They did horrible on low and did not fair much better in florida the third night. They did have some action on tip ups though just outside the house.
       Then over to north Dakota where again no fish "stupid fish" what a horrible spot that turned out to be. We talked and I told them I would be back at 10:30 to move the house. Arriving back at 10:38  we were on the move. I told them if all went well they would be wetting a line again by noon. I also said if they wanted they could ride in north Dakota. Scott ask if I had any more shovels and I said sure do I have 3  so they all pitched in to dig her out. The move went well and just like I promised they were wetting a line  by noon. Cory said the ride was way smoother then he expected.
       The phone rings and its Stacy and Brian 2 hours early, perfect as the house is ready to go. At the same time Buddy Hillmen calls and says he is over the pressure ridge and were going to open another mile of road. OH! Oh! plan A is now switched to plan B. I get them checked in and I'm off to help with the new road.
       It did not take long to burn up a 1/2 tank of gas. I checked in with Buddy Hillmen and headed home to  gas up, check the fluids and get back out to the houses as I still had more work there. Moving north Carolina went well other then a few issues with the extension cords. As my very good pal Wayne says. "Here at Cookies we do it right cause we do it Twice"
       Once North Carolina was all set I was back out to Hillmen's highway where we would keep plugging away on the new mile of road. 2 hours later and I was heading home for a quick bite before making the evening rounds.
      Stacy and Brian were the first stop where Stacy had lost 5 fish at the hole. I gave her a tip on landing them so we will see if that pans out.
       Reid and Jason found north Carolina and had a blast fishing outside all day. They landed a few walleyes but no" elusive yet still catchable upper red lake crappie". I guess that's why I call them elusive.
       Last stop was at North Dakota ! I had played a round of Texas Hold um with them the night before and wanted another shot. 
        Scott did not play, he sure deserves to catch a few fish as he was always holding his fishing rod and jigging  when I stopped in. One fish was all they caught on the new spot "stupid fish".
       I lost a second time in hold um and headed home where I ran into a local Dave him and his son had set up just to the north east of us where they landed 3 nice fish.
       Well back to the grind again today. we have mike coming for north Dakota and Kieth and his kids coming for florida. I told both them that check in was at 2pm.
       
    • ZachD
      Lundeens was out of shiners when I was there granted it was Sunday
    • ZachD
      I believe that one in Monticello closed down
    • BassThumb.
      Most of our fish came on minnows under bobbers. I spooked countless fish with even subtle jigging.