Guests - If You want access to member only forums on FM. You will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up on Fishing Minnesota.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
NightWarrior

Do you eat?

7 posts in this topic

Do any of you eat watch you catch out of the red? If so whats ur preferred pounds or size?

I keep only up to 3lbs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've eaten plenty of them in the past. However, I tend to put almost everything I catch out of the river back. I have no major concerns about the quality of the fish, I just love the idea of catching each fish when it gets a little bigger. For me, I never keep anything bigger than 18 or 19 inches, and that applies to my river fishing too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

YOu should check the DNR website on PCB and Mercury level for the Red River, then decide what you can and cannot eat and how often...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The lakes seem to have more murcury than the river.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

was out on the red this evening, caught 2 perfect 'eaters' 15" and 18", however I don't eat fish from the Red, partly because I question the sanitation, but mostly because I get more enjoyment releasing those fish, so 'back water eddy' can catch her when she's a 30" hog!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Irony....2 days after I post that I don't eat the 'perfect eaters' that I catch on the Red, I get caught biting my lip. This evening (which was beautiful by the way 40 degrees!) the second 18" walleye that I pulled from the Red had a buckshot treble lodged in its stomach.

I used surgeon like precision to try remove the treble but I knew the damage was too severe the moment I saw it. I gave it a solid 4-6 minute nursing in the cold silty waters of the Red, but it was too late. So.....there are cases (rare) that I will eat fish from the Red.

***side note, I looked up the Mercury levels of the Red, and the DNR lists them on par with that of Devils Lake***

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The larger the fish, the greater the danger of contaminants built up in the meaty tissue. It transfers from fat to meat with age. Fatter the fish, the heavier the contaminant load you will consume.

The safest bet is to eat smaller fish, no matter what species.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • DrJuice1980
      Lots of water and slush on the ice yesterday. Ice wasn't as thick as I thought it'd be either.  Spot I was on I marked 13".  Ended up not driving all the way to where I was going and glad I did. Walked about 1/3 mile.  Caught some perch, gills, and a 14.5" eye. Saw some larger marks moving through when I caught the 14 but just sniffers. I was in 20' bottom of a break with some deeper water near and weeds not far.        
    • sausageman
      It's true, people were driving out on the river yesterday, but the ice is melting quickly and the current has picked up.  The snow cover is gone and there is about 1" to 2'' of standing water.  This extended warm weather has me worried.   Personally, I think vehicle traffic is "Iffy" now.  Be careful.
    • cavalierowner
      The webcam has been running for a few days now. I was watching it on and off all day yesterday and saw a fair number of vehicles going on and off the lake. But I haven't seen anything yet this morning. I was thinking about going out tomorrow, but I'm starting to get a bit nervous. I may call Harty's this afternoon and see what they say.
    • PSU
      Interesting Norway, thanks for the insight!  
    • Slobslayer99
      Haven't been out since last Monday and the launch at bald eagle was allready looking sketchy how are the east metro accesses looking