Guests - If You want access to member only forums on FM. You will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up on Fishing Minnesota.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

  • Announcements

    • Rick

      Members Only Fluid Forum View   08/08/2017

      Fluid forum view allows members only to get right to the meat of this community; the topics. You can toggle between your preferred forum view just below to the left on the main forum entrance. You will see three icons. Try them out and see what you prefer.   Fluid view allows you, if you are a signed up member, to see the newest topic posts in either all forums (select none or all) or in just your favorite forums (select the ones you want to see when you come to Fishing Minnesota). It keeps and in real time with respect to Topic posts and lets YOU SELECT YOUR FAVORITE FORUMS. It can make things fun and easy. This is especially true for less experienced visitors raised on social media. If you, as a members want more specific topics, you can even select a single forum to view. Let us take a look at fluid view in action. We will then break it down and explain how it works in more detail.   The video shows the topic list and the forum filter box. As you can see, it is easy to change the topic list by changing the selected forums. This view replaces the traditional list of categories and forums.   Of course, members only can change the view to better suit your way of browsing.   You will notice a “grid” option. We have moved the grid forum theme setting into the main forum settings. This makes it an option for members only to choose. This screenshot also shows the removal of the forum breadcrumb in fluid view mode. Fluid view remembers your last forum selection so you don’t lose your place when you go back to the listing. The benefit of this feature is easy to see. It removes a potential barrier of entry for members only. It puts the spotlight on topics themselves, and not the hierarchical forum structure. You as a member will enjoy viewing many forums at once and switching between them without leaving the page. We hope that fluid view, the new functionality is an asset that you enjoy .
Sign in to follow this  
castindad

3/8 tax

Recommended Posts

castindad    0
castindad

what is your take on the tax purposed for the ballot? would be interested in both sides of the coin castindad

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
gopher_nation    0
gopher_nation

Check out the Outdoor Discussion forum. Look at "Tax me some more" thread. Kind of blew open pretty quick. You can talk all the politics you want over there!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
castindad    0
castindad

this is not political unless you make it so? the future of minn fishing as we know it is as stake or ? just my take

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sartell Angler    0
Sartell Angler

we are over-taxed in this state...not many disputing that. I think the legislators should make better use of the taxes they are collecting for natural resources...also it would be nice if they directed the lottery $ to where it is supposed to go in the first place!

That said, if this money is dedicated (at least part of it--the rest goes to garbage pits like "arts" and "culture") to the outdoors I am okay with paying that.

I love the idea of all the anti hunters/anglers paying the same taxes to support the future of our favorite past times.

As a republican it is hard to vote for a tax increase of any kind in a blue state like MN, but as an outdoorsman this is where I'll make an exception.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
bturck    38
bturck

IMHO the legislaters screwed up big time when they opted out of the structure licensing which we have been paying for years and years. Was it nice not to have a buy one? YES, but the State lost moocho dollars on that deal and THEY WILL make up for it you can bet your best rod and reel on that. The cost of this license, $13 is pretty insignificant when you look at the cost of the equipment we carry to the lake. If just in portable houses the number would lets say be 100,000 at $13 per house, do the math. Lots of stocking dollars lost here, or better access money. Its going to have an impact, either through additional taxes to cover the loss, or loss of services within the resource sector. Good luck and hang on. Bill

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
SchloeRide    0
SchloeRide

Didn't the state plan on making up the lost revenue by increasing out of state licenses? I thought when I initially read about the change that the state didn't plan on losing anything by doing this. Does anyone know if that actually happened?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sartell Angler    0
Sartell Angler

Schloe is right on--they said they were recouping the losses with OOS anglers (which I think is plenty legit considering what they charge for hunting licenses in states like SD and ND).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
bturck    38
bturck

yes that was part of the strategy to make up the difference on out of state tourists. The license fee would need to be raised significantly to make up that lost revenue, $2 or $3 per license isn't going to do it IMHO. Bill

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
stellarfisher    0
stellarfisher

Fairly certain they did some good research and looked at the number of house licences sold and what it would take to recoupe the lost revenue with the increase for out of state licenses. Remember they did this to save money for you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
bturck    38
bturck

And now they are going to raise taxes to cover the supposed deficit, where is the savings?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sartell Angler    0
Sartell Angler

as a whole there might not be savings, but since everyone in the state will be paying the 3/8 (assuming it passes) and not just fish house license buyers, it will at least spread the responsibility around a bit \:\)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
castindad    0
castindad

bill i think the voters will take care of the frivalous spending by our goverment both state and in washington enough is enough castindadf

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
castindad    0
castindad

seems to me that we passed a tax when we gave the casino TAX THAT HAS AND WILL CONTINUE TO GO TO GENERAL FUND TO BE SQUANDERED JUST MY TWO CENTS WORTH CASTIN DAD

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
jimBo    0
jimBo

Ok here we go If this taxes goes through the state will make a lot more money than they do on lic.So in the long run there will

be no lic for any outdoor rec.And we will lose all right as sportman/woman and be a C/R State.And be able to go to the lake

to look at dead fish on the shorelines.Because of over populated lakes. And as far as the state spending this so called % on nat resorces they buy up this land in the smaller countys and the people that live there are going to take a double hit.Because who do you think pays the taxes on this plot of land.(county tax).I think people have to look at this with wide open eyes or we as sportman/woman are goig to lose a awful lot and never get it back and the state does not care.enought said

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  



  • Posts

    • curt quesnell
      What a morning jigging on one of the best, fastest bites of the summer for me Tuesday morning of this week.  I had a guide trip but they cancelled that morning and I almost stayed on shore. Since I had the boat in the water and everything was set I went out by myself to check out a couple of spots.  I didnt get very far    
    • jj56342
       Anyone have any good news or been up there lately waz up  over the Fourth of July did OK nothing to brag about a few walleyes  or any other lakes around the area not looking for hotspots or nothing trying to catch a few panties
    • jj56342
      OK thank you thinking about going up first week in September
    • proguide
      Low water continues to be the issue on the Red. Below the dams still remains sketchy so use boats at your own risk.  The fishing remains stable, similar to last week in that the fish are spread out but in the holes in the middle of the river.  Short 15-20 minute sits on spots keeping the bait fresh looking for the active catfish.
        Bait is still heavy to frogs and frozen suckers with goldeyes working some but it seems that frog and sucker are the best.  As water cools down I suspect fresh sucker will come into play as well.
    • monstermoose78
      I used to have many fields but some guides came in and pay for the fields. I am down to 3 farms but they don't have any small grains this year. So I am going to take the early season off. As I know the geese will use some ponds to rest and I have access to them so I will wait until the regular season to pick off a few geese.
    • Cheers
      get a guide for a day
    • Daniel Anderson
      Pulled a nice cat out of the Cloquet tonight... 
    • ZachD
      That's what I planned on doing while I bow hunted but wasn't sure since I got one in spring if I could get another. Thanks  
    • delcecchi
      I was marking various things, but I didn't note a correlation between marking something and catching the walleye.  Also was catching smallies on the same reefs, although maybe at a little different depth.   In fact I was surprised when the walleye hit.  Likewise the other one the next evening.
    • Mark Lee
      Eden prairie purgatory lake is full of carp. You can see them from the dock or the bridge.