Guests - If You want access to member only forums on FM. You will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up on Fishing Minnesota.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

  • Announcements

    • Rick

      Members Only Fluid Forum View   08/08/2017

      Fluid forum view allows members only to get right to the meat of this community; the topics. You can toggle between your preferred forum view just below to the left on the main forum entrance. You will see three icons. Try them out and see what you prefer.   Fluid view allows you, if you are a signed up member, to see the newest topic posts in either all forums (select none or all) or in just your favorite forums (select the ones you want to see when you come to Fishing Minnesota). It keeps and in real time with respect to Topic posts and lets YOU SELECT YOUR FAVORITE FORUMS. It can make things fun and easy. This is especially true for less experienced visitors raised on social media. If you, as a members want more specific topics, you can even select a single forum to view. Let us take a look at fluid view in action. We will then break it down and explain how it works in more detail.   The video shows the topic list and the forum filter box. As you can see, it is easy to change the topic list by changing the selected forums. This view replaces the traditional list of categories and forums.   Of course, members only can change the view to better suit your way of browsing.   You will notice a “grid” option. We have moved the grid forum theme setting into the main forum settings. This makes it an option for members only to choose. This screenshot also shows the removal of the forum breadcrumb in fluid view mode. Fluid view remembers your last forum selection so you don’t lose your place when you go back to the listing. The benefit of this feature is easy to see. It removes a potential barrier of entry for members only. It puts the spotlight on topics themselves, and not the hierarchical forum structure. You as a member will enjoy viewing many forums at once and switching between them without leaving the page. We hope that fluid view, the new functionality is an asset that you enjoy .
Sign in to follow this  
Sandmannd

The Packers QB for 2035

Recommended Posts

Sandmannd

Thought this was funny as heck.

Favre2035.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
walleyes12

LMAO

They need aaron rodgers holding the clip board behind him!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sheephead Slayer

Isn't that a current photo? \:\)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
otto_man

Even with him at that age, should be no problem beating the Vikings! \:\)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Nate McVey

Holding a walker and an O2 tank he would still be able to beat the Vikings!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Windy City Walleye Hunter

Did they "morph" Terry Bradshaw's head onto Brett's face! LOL

Windy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
outdoor ran

He would still be better then anything the bears or vikings could put out there for qb. \:Dgrin.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sandmannd

I thought the same about the bradshaw comment. I'd probably put old Fran up against Favre at the same age and see how that goes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ole

Boy that sure got around fast.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
bassNspear

nice photo

let me ask you this, if your one of the best QB in the league, and hold all the records, would you retire.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
jltimm

Maybe he needs the $$$$$? \:D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Burnham

he is good, but he also does have the most interceptions in nfl history. vikes time will come

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Burnham

ok i guess he is great not good..but he still has the most interceptions in nfl history grin.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this