Guests - If You want access to member only forums on FM. You will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up on Fishing Minnesota.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

  • Announcements

    • Rick

      Members Only Fluid Forum View   08/08/2017

      Fluid forum view allows members only to get right to the meat of this community; the topics. You can toggle between your preferred forum view just below to the left on the main forum entrance. You will see three icons. Try them out and see what you prefer.   Fluid view allows you, if you are a signed up member, to see the newest topic posts in either all forums (select none or all) or in just your favorite forums (select the ones you want to see when you come to Fishing Minnesota). It keeps and in real time with respect to Topic posts and lets YOU SELECT YOUR FAVORITE FORUMS. It can make things fun and easy. This is especially true for less experienced visitors raised on social media. If you, as a members want more specific topics, you can even select a single forum to view. Let us take a look at fluid view in action. We will then break it down and explain how it works in more detail.   The video shows the topic list and the forum filter box. As you can see, it is easy to change the topic list by changing the selected forums. This view replaces the traditional list of categories and forums.   Of course, members only can change the view to better suit your way of browsing.   You will notice a “grid” option. We have moved the grid forum theme setting into the main forum settings. This makes it an option for members only to choose. This screenshot also shows the removal of the forum breadcrumb in fluid view mode. Fluid view remembers your last forum selection so you don’t lose your place when you go back to the listing. The benefit of this feature is easy to see. It removes a potential barrier of entry for members only. It puts the spotlight on topics themselves, and not the hierarchical forum structure. You as a member will enjoy viewing many forums at once and switching between them without leaving the page. We hope that fluid view, the new functionality is an asset that you enjoy .
Sign in to follow this  
Sportland_Bait

Gull Lake Slot Limit!

Recommended Posts

Sportland_Bait    7
Sportland_Bait

What is your opinion on Gull Lake and the daily walleye limit? Would you like to see any changes? Or leave it the same?

Please vote for one:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ImissReeds    0
ImissReeds

Jason, I'm impressed you are conducting a poll like this, I'd like to see the results, as well as a follow up poll soon on who'd like to see muskies in Gull.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sportland_Bait    7
Sportland_Bait

I kind of stole the idea from a similar poll in the Alex area forum. But I thought that this would be a good fit for the Brainerd forum. I'd like to see what FMers think about Gull Lake. There are no wrong answers. I'm interested in the results though. I will try and post a similar Muskie Poll real soon, thanks for the great idea.

Jason Erlandson

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
smartguy    7
smartguy

I picked the 4 walleye limit (without slot) simply because I believe 4 should be the statewide limit, not just for Gull Lake.

four walleyes is more than enough table fare for each person.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
shadow886    0
shadow886

There is more to this, Gull Lake is deep, unlike Mille Lacs Lake. Walleyes that you catch in 50+ feet of water are more or likely going to die. If there air bubble is popped out, there are a few tricks you can do, but I still think mortality rate has got to be very high for Gull Lake.

I personal think that Mille laces should be barb less hooks. Gull should be the same.

Most people are too cheap to leave their 10-cent hook in the fish and let it rust out. They have to rip the fish’s guts out. Cut your line and the fish should live.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
vegas    0
vegas

It has never occured to me to leave a hook in the fish that was in deep, and I am not cheap, just a little slow. What about if it's a jig, would it be better to leave it in also?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
late night    0
late night

I think all lakes in this state should have a limit of four fish. I voted for the protected slot knowing last summer alot of controversy was raised around the Mille Lacs area with the number of fish mortality due to catch and release in hot tempartures. what do you do? Tell people to catch there four fish and quit for the day?

I think after everything is said and done a slot limit will ensure good fishing for a number of years to come. However, my opinion is bias about the daily limit because I am able to fish more than the average joe but I feel four fish is more than an adiquate amount for a meal of one to two people. Somebody who fishes only a couple of times a year will disagree with me, and I can understand that. That is why I think we should have two different fishing licenses. One for a guy who fishes alot, four fish limit, and one for a guy who fishes a few times a year, six fish limit. And of course by guy I mean fisherperson!

I usually fish Mille Lacs and find myself very fortunate to come home with four fish, expecially this year. When I fish around Brainerd and happen upon a good bite and go home with six fish I think "This is alot of fish for one day." After one or two days of fishing fist ice and keeping enough for a few meals I throw most of my catch back. I keep a couple for a meal every so often but I get the biggest rush fishing when I set the hook and land the fish. Its the best drug ever!. A few days ago I kept four fish off a local lake and when I got home I wondered "Why did I keep any, I dont want to clean these." Of course I did and I enjoyed eating them but I got just as much enjoyment tonight when I caught more fish and released them all and had to clean none.

I guess in the end the state can set as many limits as they want but its up to us as sportsman, and women, to do what we feel is necessary to protect our sport for ourselves.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
JConrad    0
JConrad

Jason, this is a good idea and the results should be shared with the DNR... When do you plan on posting the results....

Also, I like the idea of a poll regarding putting muskies in Gull and also the Whitefish chain...

Looks like a really cold one tonight...Brrrrrr.

The last few days spoiled us!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
fishroger    0
fishroger

I think 4 wallys are plenty. I like the barbless idea too, think that would help lower mortality some. Should have slot, see alot of people keeping the 8-12" dinkers, they should be ashamed of themselves. Wouldn't mind seeing some sort of conservation license like Canada has.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
fish_on    0
fish_on

I love the idea of a conservation license like they do up north. To many big fish are taken from our lakes. I voted for the 4 limit and the slot. This has ben said before but if you are so hungry for fish yank some pannies and eat them. As for the muskie poll I would like to see that as well. However I think that there is no chance of it happening on Whitefish because of the numbers of small pike. great post

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ImissReeds    0
ImissReeds

Not that I keep the 8-12" dinks myself, but I've been know to eat 13-15" walleyes often out of LOW and the Miss. I still remember my Ichthyology Professor saying how it takes way more out of the ecosystem to harvest one 19-20" walleye than twenty 13" walleyes. I don't think the sardines need to be eaten, but I'm definately for the slot to protect the 18-29" beauties so they can reach trophy size and spawning potential(if feasible on that body of water).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hopper    0
Hopper

It would be nice if something was done to enhance the fishery. It could only help it by having a protective slot limit. Canada has done it for years. Protect the females, eat the males. Didnt that happen with our deer population in the mid 90's? Protect the females (doe), harvets the males ( Buck)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Chode2235    0
Chode2235

I am usually not all that libertarian, but what about increases in angler education rather than new and tougher laws?

For instance, circle hooks on lindy rigs. They work great, and really help reduce the deep fatal hookings. Lindy rigs are bread and butter for a lot of us, and helping anglers fish the rig less lethally would be a good practice.

Much in the same way C&R has revolutionized fishing, especially bass fishing, there are plenty of opportunities to help anglers understand their impacts on the fisheries. When they know this, they are less likely to exploit the resource and take home 4 25" + fish.

Another example, where I deer hunt it is understood by all the groups in the area that we won't shoot the small basket racks. Nobody shoots a buck unless the antlers are outside the ears. This has really increased the size of the bucks in the area. Did the DNR do it? No we took it upon ourselves to try to improve the hunting. Everyone was very cooperative and helpful.

Culture moves faster than the legislature, if keeping more than 4 fish is bad management practices, share that info with other anglers. Tell them why, and share some data and research to support your conclusions. Most anglers are open to preserving the lake for future fishing opportunities. The DNR isn't necessarily the best place to start to change attitudes and practices regarding fishing and harvesting.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
AWH    0
AWH

Chode2235,

Good idea in theory. But realistically, it's not reasonable with the hundreds of thousands of anglers that hit our waters every year. Education is great and it's something that we always need to be working on. But regulations are often times the best form of education out there. Sort of a forced education, if you will.

I would like to believe that the majority of anglers are educated and understand the importance of selective harvest, proper fish handling, good ethics, etc. But there is also that core of anglers that you will never reach without regulations. Heck, even with regulations, you can't reach some of them.

Think back to your days in school. Some people get it, some don't. Some people take a lot longer to get it than others. Some people are willing to be educated, some aren't. Some people just don't care.

If it was as simple as just making sure that all licensed anglers were educated, I'd be all for it.

Aaron

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Team Otter    0
Team Otter

My vote is in; 4 'eyes and a protected slot.

I look at lakes like Winnie and Mille Lacs, both of which have protected slots, and think of the fisheries they have become. I can only imagine Gull would improve from where it is already.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sportland_Bait    7
Sportland_Bait

Thanks guys for voting. Can everyone view the results? You should be able to see them after you vote. I am excited to share these results with the DNR. It would be nice to have a couple of hundred votes so lets keep it going. Tell your friends to check out this poll.

Jason Erlandson

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
brittman    0
brittman

4 walleye limit. 15" to 20" or 22" slot. One over 28".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
JConrad    0
JConrad

Nice to see that over 50% agree on the 4 fish limit and the slot size... This would really be good for Gull Lake and all other walleye lakes... I for one hope it happens and happens soon...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sportland_Bait    7
Sportland_Bait

I think that the DNR has done a great job with the stocking of Gull. The numbers are there thats for sure. I would love to see some of those mid sized walleyes protected. Just to balance the system out a little.

Jason Erlandson

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
BeerMe    0
BeerMe

I voted for 6 fish with slot because I have 3 kids and a wife who like to eat walleye(not sunfish or perch,there is a difference in taste!) and I have grandparents who like to eat fish but can't get out themselves. So I give them some. I like the protected slot but I would like the 6 fish limit to stay. And no my wife and kids dont fish so they cant help get the limit.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
smartguy    7
smartguy

Just get a combination fishing license so you can keep some more walleyes for your wife. With a 4 possession limit, you ould now have 8 . . . even if she doesn't actually throw in a line.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Write-Outdoor    0
Write-Outdoor

Acre per acre Gull Lake just gets pounded by anglers.

I don't know the exact data on it, but in speaking with guides, anglers, the DNR and observing events like the recent Extravaganza it would appear that the average size of walleye is shrinking.

I know there were a bunch of 14 inchers out there a few summers ago, but those big girls just don't seem to be as prevalent. That said, there's a lot of water never fished by most anglers including myself. If you know how to fish deep water for walleye you can have those parts of the lake to yourself even on the busiest summer day.

Thanks for conducting this survey Jason! It's great to see the results so far favor a tight restriction.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sportland_Bait    7
Sportland_Bait

Hi Ron, Thanks for dropping in. Congratulations on the newest member of your family. My wife and I are also learning a lot since we had our first about 4 months ago. Sure is awesome. I am very surprised by the poll. I didn't think it would be as one sided as it has been. Slowly I think some old thinking about fishing is starting to fade away. I love Gull Lake and think it is one of the best lakes in the state but I also see the potential to be something world class.

Jason Erlandson

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
subzero    0
subzero

I think change is good but change just to change is usually going in the wrong direction. What I mean by that is the DNR has said that there is no benifit to change the limit because most people don't catch 6 walleye's in the first place. Just because you catch them doesn't mean you have to keep them. There is more at stake here than just 2 fish, the resort and hotel/motel business may suffer if there is a slot.That also carries through to food service and entertainment bussinesses. Mille Lacs resorts suffered last summer when the slot was tightened and I read a lot of posts that said it didn't matter what the slot was but parking at the boat landings was a lot easier after the slot change. This is big business, the resource has to come first but I have talked to people at Devils Lake and they went to Mille Lacs for years before the slot got to restictive. If the resource will benifit from a slot limit I am all for it buut to change just to change doesn't make sense to me. Back it up with science and I support it all the way.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  



  • Posts

    • mrpike1973
      Same here saw on another site I will be taking off work and letting them know my opinion.
    • Rick
      Through a federal grant from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources’ has awarded more than $450,000 in local grants to protect and enhance inland coastal resources. The annual grant program is managed by the Minnesota’s Lake Superior Coastal Program, which is a voluntary federal-state partnership distributing federal dollars to projects along the inland coast of Lake Superior. This year, grant funding is being awarded to nine projects in the coastal area: Researchers at the University of Minnesota will monitor and analyze measures designed to reduce erosion of bluffs adjacent to North Shore streams. Results will inform guidance on design criteria for future projects. $35,900. The Arrowhead Regional Development Commission will conduct an economic impact assessment of paved trails within the coastal area; determine the number of users of four popular trails (Duluth Lakewalk, Willard Munger State Trail, Gitchi-Gami State Trail, and St. Louis River Trail), and simultaneously conduct large-scale survey of trail-user habits and impacts on coastal economy. $11,500. Laurentian Resource Conservation and Development is planning to host a two-day conference for academia and coastal managers to bridge a gap between research results and practices of watershed assessment, protection and stream restoration. $23,000. Researchers at the University of Minnesota will increase scientific understanding of success rates of coastal forest seeds. Results will inform coastal managers for improved adaptive management and help determination whether coastal trees should be protected and treated as a unique seed collection zone. $98,875. Duluth Children’s Museum in collaboration with Positive Energy Outdoors will create a year round, innovative outdoor science, technology, engineering, and math active learning experience for children, particularly those in low-income households with limited access. $33,100. University of Minnesota Duluth – Natural Resources Research Institute and several partners will develop protocols for assessing the biomass of periphyton (algae attached to rocks) in Duluth area trout streams for use by professional aquatic and citizen scientists. $77,440. City of Duluth will improve public safety and access to the St. Louis River estuary through upgraded wayfinding signage and amenities on the Western Waterfront Trail.  $89,080. Lake County will develop engineering designs and construct trailhead for Lake County Mountain Bike Trail System, a planned 100-plus mile mountain bike trail system. connecting both beginner and advanced cyclists to nature and physical activity in the coastal area. $70,000. City of Carlton will replace an outdoor restroom facility at the Willard Munger trailhead in city of Carlton. The updated structure will meet current sewer requirements and meet compliance with Americans with Disabilities Act. $11,225. For 18 years, the DNR and NOAA have worked together to better Minnesota’s inland coast. Together, the agencies have granted $12.6 million in pass-through funding to more than 550 local projects and provided thousands of hours of technical assistance. Projects are selected for funding through an annual competitive grants process. For more information about Minnesota’s Lake Superior Coastal Program, visit www.mndnr.gov/mlscp. Discuss below - to view set the hook here.
    • delcecchi
      Second the guide.  Fishing a lake in the north is totally different from fishing Mississippi or lake Zumbro or other lakes in the southern half of the state.  Otherwise you should look at the best place to launch your boat to be close to good fishing.  Rainy is a very big lake.. Ask in http://fishingminnesota.com/forums/forum/98-rainy-lake-fishing-reports-hunting-events/ the rainy lake forum. 
    • leech~~
      Unless they find a way to stop all the kinds of waterfowl from swimming, diving, eating and pooping from lake to lake. It's never going away.
    • RuddyDuck
      I saw this on the Wright County website today: http://www.wrightswcd.org/Water_Mana...e_species.html
      There's a link in Blue on the home page.


      Sounds like they are having a meeting about it on AUG 23. From talking to the DNR, I believe they didn't allow the initial dates for this to happen. Mostly because there was really no comment period on it. Sounds like they are gonna have it now. Guess if your against it, now's your chance to speak up. You can also send in written comments. Not sure exactly to who, at least I didn't see that part clearly. Maybe to Alicia O'Hare.


      Like others have said, I believe their ultimate goal is to have this implemented county wide at some point. When you look at the committee info, most groups are lake associations. Hopefully it still can be stopped. Here is the DNR person I called on this, she was helpful: Heidi Wolf - 651-259-5152

      Anyone else have new info on this?
    • guitpic
      Tx all
    • BobT
      I resisted converting to braided lines. I liked my TrileneXL. Then, one day about four years ago I decided to spool up with fireline and at first I didn't think I could really feel much difference. Skeptical me, I always held on to that spool loaded with my trusty Trilene. One day I decided to put that mono back on and immediately could feel the difference. It felt like I was fishing with a rubber band. I went back to braided and haven't looked back. 
    • monstermoose78
      Last night a flock of geese buzzed the house and Finn went nuts! I think he wants to get out hunting as much as I do.
    • Rick
        Anyone with a 2017 Minnesota fishing or hunting license can receive a free St. Paul Saints logo baseball cap and discounted tickets though a special Saints ticket offer online at mndnr.gov/saints.  The offer is good for the 7:05 p.m. Monday, Aug. 21, game vs. the Wichita Wingnuts. Tickets are $17 and all ticket holders under this partnership will pick up their cap at the game. Instructions for purchasing tickets are at mndnr.gov/saints. Buy licenses at any Minnesota Department of Natural Resources license agent, online with a mobile or desktop device at mndnr.gov/buyalicense, or by phone at 888-665-4236. Mobile buyers receive a text or email that serves as proof of a valid fish or game license to state conservation officers.   Discuss below - to view set the hook here.
    • birdguy
      Having my annual Shoot on Saturday, always a good warm up to fall hunting.....Food - Fun and Guns!