• GUESTS

    If You  want access  to member only forums on FM, You will need to Sign-in or  Sign-Up now .

    This box will disappear once you are signed in as a member.

  • WE CREATE LONG TERM, MEANINGFUL RELATIONSHIPS IN HERE ... PLEASE JOIN US.

    You know what we all love...

    RECEIVE THE GIFTS MEMBERS SHARE WITH YOU HERE...THEN...CREATE SOMETHING TO ENCHANT OTHERS THAT YOU WANT TO SHARE
    When you enchant people, you fill them with delight and yourself in return. Have Fun!!!

Sign in to follow this  
chucker34

Crossbows - Yay or Nay During Archery Season, or........

Recommended Posts

chucker34

...should they get a brand new season of their own? I'm looking for some thoughtful, insightful answers, not just "a crossbow is not the same a bow" or "the DNR doesn't support it and they must have good reason," etc.

I personally am considering getting one for gun season as another enjoyable and now legal method of hunting in somewhat residential areas where hunting is permitted but I'd rather not use a firearm.

I've done a lot of reading the past couple of days and the major nock against crossbows being allowed into archery season seems to be that you don't need to be as skilled or practice as much as you do with a bow. The point that you don't have to hold at draw and can steady your weapon allows you to shoot more accurately more consistently at "longer" ranges (30-40 yards, which most also claim to be the maximum effective range with a crossbow).

Given this fact, many bowhunters argue that legions of rifle and gun hunters who've never considered archery season will take to the woods and decimate the deer population while spoiling the bowhunting experience.

But I personally just can't imagine this happening. It's still a short range weapon (30-40 yards max), and it still takes a lot of skill to get that close to a whitetail. And states where the crossbow is legal haven't experienced the commonly anticipated problems in terms of a new onslaught of archery hunters and dwindling deer populations. The numbers from those state's DNR backs that up.

So is it a question of purity or primativeness? The same arguement traditionalists had when compound bows were introduced? Or when releases and other advancements like treestands were introduced to give the hunter another advantage? Or when inline muzzleloaders took over percussion models and flintlocks?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
harvey lee

As far as I'm concerned, all crowbow hunters could hunt the archery season. As you stated, the states that allow it are not without deer.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Jameson

I would prefer crossbows be allowed during the current bow season.

I believe if the bow crowd doesn't want crossbows used during bow season, than a separate season for only crossbow should be created. This would come at the expense of the current season's lengths, or we would need to add additional days to our deer season. Lengthening the deer season is not likely. Since firearms seasons are already short, bow season would likely need to be shortened to create crossbow-only dates in the deer season.

Sure, all hunters would like 3 and half months in the woods to fill there tags. With a separate crossbow-only season all hunters would still have 3 and half months to fill their tags, with the all-season license, only they wouldn't be able to do it with a bow for the full 3 and half months.

My compromise would be a split bow-only season. Sept. 15 through about Oct. 7. Second half of bow only-season would be post ML season to Dec. 31. I think that makes about 6 weeks of bow-only season. Crossbow-only season would be Oct. 7 through start of ML season. Firearm and ML season dates would not be changed. With firearms, bows, and crossbows allowed during the regular firearms season. ML and bows allowed during ML season. I think that would work out to be about 5 or 6 weeks of crossbow-only season. Bow hunters would still have the advantage of being the first deer hunters in the woods.

Excuse me if my compromise doesn't make any sense for Zone 3. I am not familiar with zone 3 season dates.

Again, I would prefer for both bows and crossbows be allowed during all of the current 3 and half month bow season.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
BLACKJACK

I'll stand by my arguments under the post 'Crossbows are Legal' under the deer forum. No to crossbows.

Quote:

Given this fact, many bowhunters argue that legions of rifle and gun hunters who've never considered archery season will take to the woods and decimate the deer population while spoiling the bowhunting experience.

But I personally just can't imagine this happening.


I strongly disagree with you. I think you'll get a lot of gun hunters that don't want to spend the time learning how to shoot a compound, the weekly practice sessions, the fine tuning of arrows and broadheads, that will take the easy way out if its possible. By easy way out I mean a crossbow. Within an hour they'll be hitting the bulls-eye, just like they could with a gun. The fact that its like shooting a gun will influence many to take up crossbows.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
harvey lee

I guess I look at it this way. As long as everyone is hunting legal and the deer herd is always in good shape and the hunting pressure doesnt hurt it, then give some more opportunities if they would like.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
bigbucks

I guess I'm more with you on this one Harvey. I don't really care one way or the other.

If they made a separate crossbow season I would assume regular archery season would remain open like it does through all of the other ones in MN. I don't think that's necessary. The thing is there are a lot of crossbows being used now. Have a shoulder injury, a bad knee or hip, a heart condition, etc. you can get the Dr. to get you a permit to hunt with a crossbow. I know a lot of guys that have taken up "archery" in their 50's or 60's because they can now use a crossbow. If too many deer start being taken they can cut back the number of tags, but as long as their's plenty of deer & at least in our area they've wanted us to shoot them, why not? It's certainly not an unethical kill, it's not like you're setting land mines for the deer.

As far as someones commentted that a crossbow add's more range I suppose that's probably true for the average & below average bow shooters. I'd consider myself about average. From my understanding though the really skilled shooters can shoot 50 yards & beyond, I'm told a pretty common shot out West, & cross bows just don't pack enough punch at that kind of range. That's just my understanding, which certainly could be wrong.

I think this is a good discussion. I guess if push comes to shove & I have to say aye or naye I'll probably say aye, but I don't really care. It won't affect the amount of hunting I do nor would it have helped take more than maybe 2-3 more deer than I've taken in 16-17 years of bowhunting. I suppose a few more that I might not have missed early on.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
chucker34

I have no arguement with you Blackjack on that it probably is easier to learn to shoot. But I still think the fact that it's a short range weapon would keep the number of new crossbow hunters in check. The patience factor in the field is still at play. Learning how to pattern a deer so you can get to within 30 yards of it would be too much to take for someone used to going out into the field/woods for one weekend a year with their rifle and taking 100 yard plus shots several times at a deer.

So my point is, would some gun hunters try because the firing method is similar, sure. Would it be signifigant? May see an adjustment the first year but probably minimal after that and word gets around that it's not the same thing as gun hunting. In terms of range and style of hunting. You also don't have everyone and their mother pushing deer around the woods as in gun season. So patience would still be required.

I'm not so sure I will get one this year after all due to budget constraints and that I want to get some new gear for my bow. But I will support those who want to try it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
chucker34

Also, yes this is a good discussion bigbucks and thanks to everyone for their comments. Good stuff. Hope more chime in.

I also agree that at best, for most shooters, I think crossbows would give you an extra 10 yards. Most of the xbow mfgr sites I visited said 40 yards is the maximum hunting rage as energy starts to reduce substantially after that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Gus

I would rather see them publisize and perhaps liberalize the requirements to get a permit to use one during the bow season. When I'm over the hill and my body won't let me bowhunt traditionally rather than hang it up I would like to be able to get a permit for a crossbow. I would just like some decent rules and have them somewhat liberal so it does not seem so taboo to have a permit.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Jameson

Quote:

I strongly disagree with you. I think you'll get a lot of gun hunters that don't want to spend the time learning how to shoot a compound, the weekly practice sessions, the fine tuning of arrows and broadheads, that will take the easy way out if its possible. By easy way out I mean a crossbow. Within an hour they'll be hitting the bulls-eye, just like they could with a gun. The fact that its like shooting a gun will influence many to take up crossbows.


I strongly disagree with some of this. I don't see crossbows being used during bow season as the easiest way out. High powered semi-automatic rifles would still be the easiest way out. I would think that the hunters looking for the easy way out would still hunt with a gun. The crossbow being fired the same as a gun may lead to some gun hunters giving it a try. Then I think many of those hunters trying a crossbow, if possible, would likely in the future switch to a bow, or go back to the easy way out of gun hunting.

Also, I thought I read somewhere that the crossbow's darts and the bow part needed to be tuned much the same as a compound bow. Not too sure of this, though. Anybody else know?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
harvey lee

I guide for a handicapped hunt in North dakota every year and have for the past 8 years. The majority of these archers will use a crossbow.

From working with these hunters and yes some have very good crossbows as in Ten Points. I think they are very accurate within 35 yards. If I am going to take a 40 plus yard shot and that is a rarity, I will use my compound any day.

The one big downside I see in using them is if you miss your first shot it is very hard to get off another as they are a tad on the loud side when shot.

Long story short, I will keep hunting with my compound until I cannot anymore.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
BLACKJACK

I agree that anyone that is handicapped or hurt should be able to use a crossbow. There should be some sort of process where they have to reapply and/or prove that they need to use a crossbow though. I talked to a guy this spring that was bragging about his brother-in law getting a permit 6 years ago and still using it to shoot two deer last fall.

The minimum weight for a compound bow in MN was changed from 40 pounds to 30 pounds this year to encourage more youth and women hunters. I would think that would help a lot of older hunters too. Especially when you consider that you can get 65-80% letoff bows.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
harvey lee

I know for the handicapped license for fishing you need to apply annually. You use to be able to have a handicapped license to shot from a vechile and also get a doe permit automaticly and it was a lifetime license but those days are gone. I also believe you have to apply for all handicapped permits annually now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Eric Wettschreck

It really doesn't matter to me. I agree with Harvey in that if the deer population is healthy, then why not offer options. I would very much like to try using crossbow.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
fivebucks

The disability permit time for a crossbow is determined at the time of application. It is either a temporary or permanent and your doctor checks off which one. I've had a permanent for about 5 years and have not had to renew it. My comfort range is 30 maybe 35 yards. I am not for a separate season but I would not be opposed if they let people hunt the regular archery season. Either way, compound bow or crossbow, it is not easy to tag an archery deer. You still have to get close, be able to bring up your weapon without getting busted, and make the shot.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
BLACKJACK

fivebucks, how long did it take you to learn to shoot a crossbow accurately? How noisy are they? How many pins do you have on your site?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
so haaad

I am in favor of crossbows and the way they are used within our current regulations. Last year I saw an older guy walking out to the woods carrrying a crossbow. He walking about as fast as a snail and looked like the wind could have blown him over. I started thinking that maybe he was a bowhunter back in the day and without the crossbow, he would not have the opportunity to get out there and enjoy the early season hunt that all of us bowhunters get to enjoy. I say keep the crossbow regs the way they are...they are working very well and allows those with physical limitation another option to enjoy our outdoors.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
harvey lee

Guys

I know this is a touchy subject but, lets keep this thread from turning to name calling or arguing about it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
surewood

I'm not in favor of crossbows, unless of course they are for disabled hunters. I know this is not true everywhere but the sad truth in my area is that there are unethical hunters here. I know some of those hunters or as I call them slobs, who cant wait for the oppurtunity to use a crossbow. It just seems more apealing to them as it is more like a gun than a bow. Now I'm not saying that crossbow hunters are slobs I'm just saying some of the people I have heard around here talk about using them are the same unethical hunters that irratate me come rifle season. As far as attracting more hunters it seems that there are more archery hunters than there ever has been and it is incresing. The only way to bring the numbers up is to be ethical an introduce family and friends to hunting to carry on the tradition.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Jameson

Quote:

I'm not in favor of crossbows, unless of course they are for disabled hunters. I know this is not true everywhere but the sad truth in my area is that there are unethical hunters here. I know some of those hunters or as I call them slobs, who cant wait for the oppurtunity to use a crossbow. It just seems more apealing to them as it is more like a gun than a bow. Now I'm not saying that crossbow hunters are slobs I'm just saying some of the people I have heard around here talk about using them are the same unethical hunters that irratate me come rifle season. As far as attracting more hunters it seems that there are more archery hunters than there ever has been and it is incresing. The only way to bring the numbers up is to be ethical an introduce family and friends to hunting to carry on the tradition.


Sure sounds like another selfish bow-hunter wanting a public resource to themselves. If the "slob" hunters are doing something illegal, turn them in. If the "slob" hunters are doing something legal that you don't like, then get used to it, or get away from them.

If the "slob" hunters took up bows, started taking unethical shots and wounding deer, then should we outlaw bow hunting?

It's thinking that a small group of hunters represents the whole that is really stupid thinking.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
92python

My vote would be Nay for including cross bows into the regular archery season. Have a separate season for cross bows.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
fivebucks

Blackjack,

It did not take too long for me to become proficient in shooting my crossbow being a longtime rifle hunter also. I bought a used one and it came with a scope so it was a matter of getting the scope sighted in. The scope has 3 horizontal lines and your normal scope screws for up and down and right to left. I sighted in the middle line for 20 yards (the lines do not move independantly) and then thru some trial and error I learned where the other lines shot. My top line is at 10 yards and 1/2 way between my middle and bottem lines is 30 yards.

They are fairly noisey. When you are sitting quite in the woods and then shoot, it seems like everything within a couple hundred yards would be alerted. I have taken shots twice that I now know were a little too long and missed cleanly and the deer would run off a ways and stop, trying to fiqure out where the noise came from. I am just glad to be able spend the time in the woods, although once pheasant season starts my dog hates my crossbow.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
chucker34

Harvey Lee, right on. I want to keep this civil. I would agree that bow hunters against crossbows may be so for selfish reasons in many respects. But I do also think we need to consider the implications this new type of weapon has on the experience and deer numbers. That's why I'm a big fan of studying how its worked in other states and not taking a giant leap at once. Perhaps there is a shortened season at first - only part of bow season, etc.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
metrojoe

Quote:

Sure sounds like another selfish bow-hunter wanting a public resource to themselves. If the "slob" hunters are doing something illegal, turn them in. If the "slob" hunters are doing something legal that you don't like, then get used to it, or get away from them.

If the "slob" hunters took up bows, started taking unethical shots and wounding deer, then should we outlaw bow hunting?

It's thinking that a small group of hunters represents the whole that is really stupid thinking.


So any opinion that differs from yours is stupid?

I’d be inclined to say “Yay” with a “but”.

Being a bow hunter, I doubt many traditional/compound bow hunters would be putting down they’re bows anytime soon for a crossbow. This would more than likely be a new breed of hunters using a new weapon. I’d like to see a required crossbow hunter education class put into place and maybe even a proficiency test. Mainly because you’re now hunting with what is essentially a loaded weapon.

Quote:

My compromise would be a split bow-only season. Sept. 15 through about Oct. 7. Second half of bow only-season would be post ML season to Dec. 31. I think that makes about 6 weeks of bow-only season. Crossbow-only season would be Oct. 7 through start of ML season. Firearm and ML season dates would not be changed. With firearms, bows, and crossbows allowed during the regular firearms season. ML and bows allowed during ML season. I think that would work out to be about 5 or 6 weeks of crossbow-only season. Bow hunters would still have the advantage of being the first deer hunters in the woods.


I agree with giving crossbow hunters they’re own season, but your “compromise” completely eliminates bow hunting during the best parts of the season. I’d gladly give up the first 6 weeks of bow hunting season to crossbow and firearm hunters to bow hunt during the rut. And yes I am well aware that I can bow hunt during the firearm season, but from my experience, there are too many hunters, to much shooting and when I do see a deer it always seems to be running. This of course makes for a tough shot with a bow. And before all the firearms guys get on me, I’m not complaining. This has just been my experience so I opt out of bow hunting during the firearm season. It’s my choice.

If being first in the woods is what concerns you then I would propose the first 2 weeks of the season be set aside for crossbow hunters.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
dukhnt

I have to get my crossbow permit renewed every two years. I think it is great for those of us that aren't able to use regular bows. As far as able body hunters, I am not to sure. I sure wish I could use my compound bow instead. I try every year, but it just isn't in the cards for me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  

Announcements



  • Your Responses - Share & Have Fun :)

    • Rick
      A region-wide effort to better understand West Nile virus in ruffed grouse is getting underway in Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin.  “In the Great Lakes region, West Nile virus has been found in a small number of grouse with no known population-level effects at this point,” said Charlotte Roy, grouse project leader with the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. “Still, we want to let hunters know we’re in the first steps of monitoring the virus, and we’re planning to do some limited testing of birds this fall.” In 2017, West Nile virus was identified in more ruffed grouse in the Great Lakes states than in the past. The virus has been present in Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin for about 17 years. West Nile virus has been documented in more than 250 species of birds; however, not all birds develop clinical disease from the virus. Corvids (including blue jays and crows) are very prone to illness and death from the virus, while other species may be less so or may not develop symptoms at all. Last year, Michigan had 12 positive cases of West Nile virus in ruffed grouse. Prior to 2017, only one positive ruffed grouse had been found in Michigan, and that was in 2002. The virus was confirmed in one ruffed grouse in the early 2000s in Minnesota, and is yet to have been detected in a Wisconsin ruffed grouse. West Nile virus in ruffed grouse has become a topic of concern because of a recent study in Pennsylvania reporting that the virus may have contributed to population declines in areas of lower-quality habitat or where habitat was scarce. Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin are in the early stages of planning to test samples from grouse this fall but at this point there is no evidence that the virus is having a population-level impact in the Great Lakes region. “By monitoring birds at a regional level, we will be able to gain a better understanding of this disease in ruffed grouse,” said Kelly Straka, state wildlife veterinarian with the Michigan Department of Natural Resources. Ruffed grouse are hunted annually by around 300,000 hunters across the three states. Preliminary reports from 2017 hunters were mixed across the Great Lakes region. While the virus could impact brood survival of grouse, other factors such as cold, wet springs during nesting and hatching; drought conditions; or habitat decline can also affect birds seen and harvested. Biologists in the region are optimistic that the great habitat for ruffed grouse in the Great Lakes states will help populations thrive despite the virus. “We are looking to hunters and outdoor enthusiasts to help us in this endeavor,” said Mark Witecha, upland wildlife ecologist with the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources. “This is an excellent example of agencies and organizations taking a proactive approach and working together to expand our knowledge about WNV and ruffed grouse.” Recently, the Midwest Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies Health Committee held its annual meeting in Traverse City, Michigan. West Nile virus was one of the topics for state wildlife health leaders. More than 25 wildlife health professionals from 13 Midwestern states and Canada were in attendance. Individual agencies are currently reviewing ways they will be monitoring their grouse populations for West Nile virus, and additional information will be shared when more details are determined. Like humans, wild animals can be exposed to West Nile virus and survive the exposure. Currently, there is no evidence of humans becoming infected by consuming properly cooked birds or by handling birds. Research has shown dogs can be infected but are very resistant to developing clinical signs of the disease and are considered an end host. Ruffed grouse hunting is open in the fall and Minnesota hunting information can be found at mndnr.gov/hunting/grouse. Discuss below - to view set the hook here.
    • TheEyesofanAngler
      what temp is between 55-60 degrees in central minnesota 
    • gimruis
      Isn't that something how they don't recognize the blind as a problem?  I've had turkeys walk literally right next to it too.  Nice bird FishandFowl, hope you didn't pulverize it too bad.
    • Rick
      An angler from Stillwater has set a new record for lake sturgeon in the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources’ catch-and-release category.  Jack Burke and fishing buddy Michael Orgas were recently on a lake sturgeon fishing trip to remember. Fishing on the Rainy River in Koochiching County, the duo was having a lot of success fishing for Minnesota’s biggest fish, landing 20 fish in three days including six lake sturgeon over 60 inches before hooking into the new state record – a 73-inch long lake sturgeon. “We had been having some great action and knew there were big fish in the Rainy River,” Burke said. “This particular fish took about 45 minutes to reel in. When we got it closer to the boat it blew some bubbles and came to the top; I knew it was a huge fish!” Burke caught the fish on May 4, around 11 a.m. using a muskie rod supplied by his fishing partner Orgas, with 80-pound braided line rigged with a circle hook and crawlers. The fish measures 73 inches in length and 30 inches in girth. This beats the previous record by 3 inches that was set by two separate anglers who both boated 70-inch fish on the same day in April 2017. There are two kinds of Minnesota state records: one for catching and keeping the biggest fish in each species based on certified weight; and the other for the length of a caught and released muskellunge, northern pike, lake sturgeon or flathead catfish. The DNR announces new state records in news releases, on social media and on the DNR website. Find current records and guidelines for each type of state record at mndnr.gov/recordfish. Discuss below - to view set the hook here.
    • gimruis
      I went out on Saturday for about 5 hours and my friend and I caught a lot of crappies but they were mostly all dinks (8-10 inchers).  We only caught 4 of them over 10 inches.  Plus a few small bass and one pike.  We released all of them.  Water temp was right around 60, a little warmer up shallow in a bay.
    • Rick
      Avid angler Dustin Stone caught a new state record silver redhorse in the certified weight category of the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources’ record fish program.  Stone caught the 10-pound, 6-ounce silver redhorse while fishing for lake sturgeon on the Rainy River in Koochiching County on April 28. He was fishing with 80-pound braided line tipped with a night crawler. “We had been doing very well fishing for sturgeon, landing seven fish over the 60-inch mark,” Stone said. “We started catching a bunch of suckers and redhorse before this fish, so this fish felt quite a bit bigger than the others.” Fortunately for Stone, his fishing buddy had extensive knowledge about fish like silver redhorse, and Stone almost released the fish until his partner advised him to check the weight and current record on that species of fish. The new state record silver redhorse was weighed on a certified scale at a meat shop in Granite Falls, where two observers witnessed the weighing. Two DNR fisheries experts in the Ortonville office confirmed the species identification of silver redhorse. The official weight is 10-pounds, 6-ounces with a length of 26-3/4 inches and a girth of 17-1/2 inches, beating the previous state record of 9-pounds, 15-ounces held since 2004. “I’m glad the DNR does this record fish program. It’s fun to see the records. I’m kind of addicted to this now and I’m going to try and break a couple more!” Stone said. There are two kinds of Minnesota state records: one for catching and keeping the biggest fish of each species based on certified weight; and the other for the length of a caught and released muskellunge, northern pike, lake sturgeon or flathead catfish. The DNR announces new state records in news releases, on social media and on the DNR website. Find current records and guidelines for each type of state record at mndnr.gov/recordfish. Discuss below - to view set the hook here.
    • gimruis
      Sorry I meant to type "when you have your limit" that culling is illegal.
    • Rick
      Commentary by C.B. Bylander,
      DNR information officer The bass fishing catch-and-keep season opens Saturday, May 26, and spring is the time to enjoy it.  Largemouth and smallmouth bass can be easier to catch in spring and early summer when they spend more time in shallow water. Later, as water temperatures rise, bass move to deeper structure in search of sunken points, rocky humps and weed lines that offer both prey and protection. So, why wait? Now is the time to spring into action. The catch-and-release only season opened in most of the state May 12. Statewide, you can start keeping fish on May 26, the start of Memorial Day weekend. The bass season doesn’t close until Feb. 24, 2019. Minnesota’s reputation as an outstanding bass fishing state is clearly on the rise. This is due, in part, to the world-class smallmouth bass fishing at Mille Lacs Lake. Though local and regional anglers have long known about the lake’s great fishing this became national knowledge in 2016 and 2017 when the Toyota Bassmaster Angler of the Year championships happened at Mille Lacs. Simply put, the abundance of big smallmouth bass blew the pros away. In fact, the 2016 fishing was so phenomenal – the winning three-day limit totaled 76 pounds – that the following year Bassmaster ranked Mille Lacs number one on its list of 100 best bass lakes. Though the spotlight has been on Mille Lacs the broader story is that Minnesota is home to some 2,000 largemouth bass lakes, 500 smallmouth bass lakes and tens of thousands of miles of natural streams and rivers that hold bass. That’s a lot of water, and it’s a lot of water that isn’t fished for bass as hard as southern state waters because so many Minnesota anglers prefer to fish for walleye. Never fished bass in Minnesota before? Here are two thoughts. Think small: A lot of great bass fishing exists in lakes less than 1,000 acres in size. So, don’t overlook these smaller opportunities, especially if they are in remote areas and have a lot of shallow water. Go to the DNR’s LakeFinder has helpful information at mndnr.gov/lakefind. But if you like big: Popular destinations include the Twin Cities’ Lake Minnetonka and these regional destinations: the southeast’s Mississippi River, the south-central’s Green Lake, the  west-central’s Alexandria Chain of Lakes, the north-central’s Gull Lake Chain of Lakes and the far north’s Rainy and Vermillion lakes. Limit and special fishing regulation information is available at mndnr.gov/fishmn. Discuss below - to view set the hook here.
    • Getanet
      Well, spent Thursday and Friday on Kab for my first time ever. It's a beautiful lake, the weather on the other hand could have been better for camping. It poured both nights, and during the day it seemed like it was either windy, rainy, or both. Unfortunately we didn't have much luck and didn't boat a walleye. We fished around Bittersweet Island and that general part of the lake, and fished at varying times, depths and presentations. About the only thing we didn't try was fishing around sunrise. Talked to a grizzled vet of the lake at the landing on Saturday. He said sometimes the strange weather patterns turn the fish off up there. I'm going to go with that excuse - we had a great time but was certainly disheartening after hearing how great the fishing was on Opener to have such poor luck.   Will definitely be up there again though. Beautiful area.
    • ducksnbucks
      Thanks guys for the info. Had a great time with the girls yesterday afternoon. We caught bluegills up to 9", crappies to 11", saw a lot of nice bass, and as we wanted, caught some nice cats. All fish were between 19 and 24", extremely fat fish and lots of fun to catch. The girls were thrilled at the action and all fish were released to be caught another day. Bluegills were not creating beds yet but the crappies were starting to. Thanks again and have a good one!